Damn - Some Hot Teachers

[Schwarzfahrer]

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Hey you are the one that brought up abortion, and I’ll pose the question. Is pregnancy worse than the clap?[/quote]

yawn, I’m not gonna rehash everything. Look at the last posts responding to young DDeuce for details.
The important part - we, ie humans, treat and protect young girls differently then young boys for lots of reasons, and the main one is: she can get pregnant.

Furthermore, it is, historically speaking- rather new that we give a crap about STDs.

[Heracles_rocks]

Geeez you guys are doing it wrong!

[Heracles_rocks]

!

[Heracles_rocks]

[Brother_Chris]

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Hey you are the one that brought up abortion, and I’ll pose the question. Is pregnancy worse than the clap?[/quote]

yawn, I’m not gonna rehash everything. Look at the last posts responding to young DDeuce for details.
The important part - we, ie humans, treat and protect young girls differently then young boys for lots of reasons, and the main one is: she can get pregnant.

Furthermore, it is, historically speaking- rather new that we give a crap about STDs.[/quote]

More like they are seen as more delicate. From a little baby to my grandma, I do not cuss, spit, or do any kind of vulgar stuff. Why? I’m not worried about my grandma getting pregnant, and I’m not worried about the other women getting pregnant, it’s chivalry.

[belligerent]

A female teacher at my high school was correctly accused of having sex with a student (who was of age), but resigned before an investigation took place. Seven years later she is now teaching there again. She is NOT attractive and I never would have fucked her or wanted a reputation for fucking her.

[PonceDeLeon]

What I don’t understand is the discrepancy in punishment for female vs. male teachers.

If the teacher was male and had slept with a 12 year old girl, we’d see his ass in prison for at least 5 years, his face on a Megan’s Law hologram collector’s edition trading card, and a made-for-TV movie aired on Lifetime for a week straight, right after a Grey’s anatomy season finale.

And debraD has a great point about the female teacher having your child when you’re 12. That would make me sick as a parent.

[Hyena]

That’s exactly what I was gonna point out ponce. Why is it, when an attractive female takes advantage of an underage male, she gets a slap on the wrist (45 days in jail and probation? give me a fucking break). But if the roles were reversed, and a dude had sex with an underage female, they’re getting locked up for AT LEAST 5 years of hard time. That is some sexist, double standard bullshit.

Its like the whole thing with older women going fucking nuts for Twilight. If there were a cult following of 30-40 year old men, for somebody like, say, hannah montana, then they would all be perverts, and pedophiles, but when women do it, its ok.

…buncha bullshit.

[debraD]

Is that actually true, that women get off lighter? What are the actual numbers for comparison?

You mean there isn’t a bunch of 30-40 year old men hot after teenage girls? I call bullshit on that one!

[PonceDeLeon]

[quote]debraD wrote:
Is that actually true, that women get off lighter? What are the actual numbers for comparison?

[/quote]

Is that a serious question?

I’m willing to dig up numbers for you after I’m done with finals next week.

[DJHT]

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

[quote]DJHT wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

[quote]DJHT wrote:
20 years in medicine. The cultural issues that are happening in America cannot be analyzed by someone who gets their information from CNN in Germany. [/quote]

What do you mean by “cultural isues”? That your society is more porno and repressed at the same time?
That you have more weirdos like pervy TILFs? That’s a very strange claim!

If you make sweeping generalizations (90%) if would be easy to back them up and enlighten me. [/quote]

Okay it was not a generalization I went to school, Hanz. I have a masters with a minor in Pysch. Pedophilia this is what this is, do you not understand that, it does not matter the gender, you have an adult sleeping with a child. The adults in this case 90% of the time were raped/molested at the age of the child they are attracted to. Is that clear enough. My comment is your “culture” has different parameters for what is a child than America’s. Anything else? [/quote]

Again, you just throw out numbers and make wild claims about pedophiles(!), which clearly isn’t what this is about here. Or are willing male teenagers, some of them 16 or 17, prey for pedophiles?

How about you reread the article?
Also, if it’s about culture defining age of consent, it can be hardly pedophilia.

p.s. It’s Hans, Mr. Pysch minor.[/quote]

Man I bet you hate it when people misspell your name. I guess German education is far superior to US education. Or you cannot read. Sorry Hanz when an adult sleeps with a child willing or not it is pedophilia. And this is what is at the root of the problem. Since you are such the scholar what qualifications do you have to expond on this topic. Personal? Did you have some experience you would like to share?

[DoubleDuce]

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

You are dumb. I can’t even argue with you if you can’t understand logic. What is the difference between the risk of pregnancy and the risk of an STD? Why do you make that distention? I’ve pointed out over and over and over how your point is retarded and you continue to ignor it. [/quote]

I assume you are very young and still in school, so here’s some more detail:
People have sexual urges because they have to procreate. Some people are born witout the urge, and they don’t care for sex at all. Needless to say that’s not how a species can survive.

Wrong. People have sexual urges for a number of reasons. Only one of them is procreation. Sex helps to maintain monogamy, it relieves tension, est est est.
Humans are one of the few species that will have sex any time in the womanâ??s cycle, INCLUDING all the time she cannot even get pregnant.

For your information breasts are the same way. They do feed children after birth, BUT human females maintain fatty tissue there all the time regardless of children. This fatty tissue has nothing to do with kids, they are literally made to have fun with.

So donâ??t bring this BS schooling crap in here, child.

The implications of these urges are gigantic and influence everything in our life. Culture, social behaviour, individual behaviour etc.
Men can try to copulate with lots of women, and can theoretically father thousands of children. Some even managed to do just that!
Woman can only give birth to a few babies, they have to choose their mate carefully, are very inconvenient for months, often need assistance for daily activities in the last trimester and are often left alone with raising the child.

YAY. None of that is universal and all of it is preempted by the option of birth control for some hundred years now.

Under these circumstances, it’s imperative for a woman to choose the mate carefully - frequently, the clan/family will take complete care of that, especially if the woman is young.

For those that live in the stone ages. Legal consequences and things like stds make it imperative for everyone. BUT apparently you teach your son itâ??s not important for him?

Why is pregnancy something to be concerned about and STDs not? Why is a condom your answer to the risk of STDs and you ignore it in your assessment of pregnancy?
“Psychological implications follow closely: Men generally don’t bond to a sexmate like a woman, especially a young one, does. Also, concepts like condoms or AIDS don’t exist in our psyche.” this is made up BS. And worse than that its BS about averages, not individuals making it irrelevant and made up.
STDs are entirely pertenant. You brought up risks for girls to have sex. STDs are in that category. Why do you ignore the risk of STDs?

I don’t really understand your obsession with STDs here. All things being equal (that is how you debate btw), the woman is worse off.
That means: a boy who sleeps with his teach has nothing to worry, a girl can get pregnant. Both can get STDs.

â??: a boy who sleeps with his teach has nothing to worryâ?? â??Both can get STDsâ??

Just wanted to reiterate your idiocy.

“I condemn him because in our societies, we want to shelter our girls for a long time. We want them to make well-thought out plans when it comes to offspring.”

Now your true colors come out. You feel the need to shelter girls, but not boys. well thought out plans about offspring? So, teach her to practice safe sex. Why once again do you harp on the risk of pregnancy for some special reason when your own argument of protection is every bit as valid for a rebuttal of it?

It’s not about my colours, I simply tell you why practically all societies shelter girls more.
Protection is good, but not foolproof.

And I told you: in a rational world, your argument would be solid gold.
But we aren’t rational.
A woman that gets raped even by a safer-sex practising assailant can be heavily traumatized. But the really interesting part is that her relationship can also get heavily damaged, and trust can be lost. This is because we’re hardwired to suspect she might bear the rapists offspring.
It’s why in parts of the islamic world woman are told to wear carpets and not lose their “honour” (having sex with someone the clan does not approve).
It’s not rationality at all.

So now your stance is that societyâ??s irrationality should dictate morality and legality?

Besides, your â??we see girls as needing protectionâ?? isnâ??t universal either. Not all societies behave this way. This completely invalidates you using society in as a universal argument.

“Why are you insisting of bringing in AIDS, 12-year olds, as well as gay and lesbian strawmen?”
No they are not straw men. if a 12 year old boy is of the age of consent, you need to explain why he can’t consent to have sex with a man. PLUS it is an entirely relevant line of questioning in regard to you harping on pregnancy risk as the big difference maker. Now answer the relevant argument or accept that your argument is flawed.

Strawman all along. IMHO, the average 12 year old, boy or girl, can consent to shit.
But gay sexuality, as someone already posted (I think?), needs even longer to evolve in a person, simply because it’s not the norm. You might have noticed by now that even in this openminded forum some people literally wish them to burn.
On the other hand, I know some straight guys who had weren’t getting laid until their 20s and siffered from it. Doing it is considered ACROSS ALL CULTURES as a rite of passage to manhood.

Utter BS. Completely made up. â??But gay sexuality, as someone already posted (I think?), needs even longer to evolve in a person, simply because it’s not the normâ??. Where do you get this shit? Homosexuality, INCLUDING among children has probably been the norm in more societies throughout history that not. Take your ridiculous made up crap somewhere else.

“Men and women are hardwired to fornicate with vastly different motives and the list of implications is gigantic.”
Once again entirely made up, untrue, and irrelevant …

-it’s okay, you can wipe your tears-

…because individual circumstance disproves it as a general statement. All men and all women have different reasons. Trying to make a moral argument out of made up entirely untrue stereotypes is pretty low on the “logical thought” totem pole.

Yet no woman can give birth to dozens of children. And men can’t get pregnant.

You were talking about motives for individuals. Your statement doesnâ??t address the issue being discussed. Even remotely. Try again.

“Why do men rape and women practically don’t? Do they do it 50/50 in your bizarro world?”
Why does it matter who does it more? It makes no difference. If in the history of the world only 1 woman had ever raped a man, it would still be rape. “Women don’t normally do it” is once again a stupid and entirely logically flawed argument.

Awesome logic discounting powerful probabilities like that.
Why not try to understand why men are rapists (>99,9%) and women usually the victim?
Is it that hard?

Try explaining why it because of an average, how a woman raping someone isnâ??t really rape. You fail at logic.

[doogie]

Hospital Sex With Student Sinks Teacher

[Vash]

[quote]doogie wrote:

Documents | The Smoking Gun

16? 16?!With a 25 year old? Fuck that bullshit.

Give the kid a high five, and the chick a finger wag. The dude isn’t scarred, he won’t have flashbacks, suicidal thoughts, or eating disorders. He’s going to remember that time he turned off the pipeline for easily-accessible, not-bad-lookin’ ass.

I hope his friends kick his ass for spoiling it for the other poor, defenseless sophomores who might have gotten some.

[Rational_Gaze]

A 16 year-old banging a 25 year-old would be completely legal in the UK, and he would get a high-five from me.

[doogie]

In Texas it is illegal for teachers to bang their students even if the kid is 18. It’s a 20 year sentence, I believe.

[DJHT]

I like some of the reponses below:

This gives a whole new meaning to President George W Bush’s "No Child Left Behind,"educational initiative.

Years ago, my dad told me if something like that were to happen to me, “KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT!”

A case could be made that she sped up his recovery. A strong case, I think.

[kman3b18]

I have my own opinion on the 12yo boy vs. 12yo girl arguement that took place once upon a time in here, but I’d be curious to see how many of the ‘pro double standards’ camp are in line with modern feminism ideals…

[heavythrower]

[quote]debraD wrote:
Not sure sure you guys would think it would be great to bang a teacher as 12 year old when she gets pregnant and has your kid. Maybe you wouldn’t care but maybe you would and maybe you’re just not old enough to get sucked into that just yet.

Just sayin.[/quote]

serious double standard when it comes to a male teacher porking one of his female students vs the other way around…that is just the way it is.

give you another example.

I am a ED nurse, at a busy regional trauma center. we got this 17 year old kid, quad riding accident, he had a head injury and was unconscious. well part of trauma protocol is we strip all clothing off to fully expose his body, and so happens this was a pretty good looking fit kid, and he was WELL endowed. sort of ridiculous actually, even to me and I have watched my share of porn, lol

Well word got around and all the lady nurses just had to go in multiple times, sometimes in groups, and take a peek. it was shameless. everybody thought it was funny, including me, to be honest.

now reverse that situation. It is an attractive teenage girl patient, and all the male medical and nursing staff are going in and taking a look, and openly talk about it and joke.

there would be fines, terminations, suspensions, law suits, criminal charges…etc.

not fair, but the world is not fair.

[debraD]

[quote]heavythrower wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:
Not sure sure you guys would think it would be great to bang a teacher as 12 year old when she gets pregnant and has your kid. Maybe you wouldn’t care but maybe you would and maybe you’re just not old enough to get sucked into that just yet.

Just sayin.[/quote]

serious double standard when it comes to a male teacher porking one of his female students vs the other way around…that is just the way it is.

give you another example.

I am a ED nurse, at a busy regional trauma center. we got this 17 year old kid, quad riding accident, he had a head injury and was unconscious. well part of trauma protocol is we strip all clothing off to fully expose his body, and so happens this was a pretty good looking fit kid, and he was WELL endowed. sort of ridiculous actually, even to me and I have watched my share of porn, lol

Well word got around and all the lady nurses just had to go in multiple times, sometimes in groups, and take a peek. it was shameless. everybody thought it was funny, including me, to be honest.

now reverse that situation. It is an attractive teenage girl patient, and all the male medical and nursing staff are going in and taking a look, and openly talk about it and joke.

there would be fines, terminations, suspensions, law suits, criminal charges…etc.

not fair, but the world is not fair. [/quote]

That scenario you describe is more than not fair, it’s criminal. Completely unethical and cannot be justified as harmless. Everyone who participated in that should be disciplined/terminated etc.

Just because people stand around and do nothing while something that is clearly wrong is going on, doesn’t mean that life is just unfair. It means people are apathetic and lazy when it comes to their ethics. Why didn’t you speak up?