Why are men sexually attracted to a young women say 15,16 or 17 automatically branded as “pedophiles” when girls that age are sexually and biologically mature? And don’t say they are “mentally immature” without 1. defining what that means and 2. providing scientific evidence for it to say they are “mentally immature” to consent to sex or know what sex is. All evidence points to the brain not being fully mature until 25. Therefore, if mental, instead of biological maturity should be used as a yardstick for sexual relations, any man attracted to any woman under 25 ought to be considered a pervert, pedophile, creep etc. Pedophilia is sexual attraction to PRE-PUBESCENT CHILDREN, not a biologically mature 15-17 y/o with full hips and breasts who bleeds every month.
Furthermore, though it is politically incorrect to state, men are attracted to the physical. I would rather be with a 16 year old girl who looks like she could be Playboy’s playmate of the year, but talks alot of bullshit than a 30 year old “career woman” who can have “meaningful conversations about politics”, but is ugly or could stand to lose 50 or 100 pounds. And most men who aren’t politically correct or been castrated through sensitivity training would agree.
Why are men sexually attracted to a young women say 15,16 or 17 automatically branded as “pedophiles” when girls that age are sexually and biologically mature? And don’t say they are “mentally immature” without 1. defining what that means and 2. providing scientific evidence for it to say they are “mentally immature” to consent to sex or know what sex is. All evidence points to the brain not being fully mature until 25. Therefore, if mental, instead of biological maturity should be used as a yardstick for sexual relations, any man attracted to any woman under 25 ought to be considered a pervert, pedophile, creep etc. Pedophilia is sexual attraction to PRE-PUBESCENT CHILDREN, not a biologically mature 15-17 y/o with full hips and breasts who bleeds every month.
Furthermore, though it is politically incorrect to state, men are attracted to the physical. I would rather be with a 16 year old girl who looks like she could be Playboy’s playmate of the year, but talks alot of bullshit than a 30 year old “career woman” who can have “meaningful conversations about politics”, but is ugly or could stand to lose 50 or 100 pounds. And most men who aren’t politically correct or been castrated through sensitivity training would agree.[/quote]
Why are you trying to valdidate you lust for Freshman girls? No matter what we say youre gonna get get what youve already said you want…
GTFO and if i see you IRL ever i will rip your chest open rip your heart out and shit in its place.
[/quote]
Because you don’t have a logical response to what I say you have to resort to nonsensical threats of violence against a person whom you wouldn’t know if I walked on the sidewalk in front of your house.
Also, instead of giving me an emotional response, why don’t you point on where and how I am wrong using reason and logic.
Why are you trying to valdidate you lust for Freshman girls? No matter what we say youre gonna get get what youve already said you want…
GTFO and if i see you IRL ever i will rip your chest open rip your heart out and shit in its place.
[/quote]
And quit being so castrated and get some nuts. Instead of being soooo offended, that you’re threatning violence to a mystery man in cyberspace who may be thousands of miles away from you, why don’t you give a logical response and show me how and where I’m wrong.
Sorry, but I’ve meet plenty of career women that are hot and love to fuck. Have you ever listened to a teenage girl talk? It’s all mind numbing bullshit because their immature, they don’t know what life is all about, their concern is where are we gonna party and shop. Ya no thanks
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
I’m still in high school. I deal with the stupid shit that teenage girls say every day. Trust me, you don’t want to date a 16 year old.
Why are you trying to valdidate you lust for Freshman girls? No matter what we say youre gonna get get what youve already said you want…
GTFO and if i see you IRL ever i will rip your chest open rip your heart out and shit in its place.
[/quote]
And quit being so castrated and get some nuts. Instead of being soooo offended, that you’re threatning violence to a mystery man in cyberspace who may be thousands of miles away from you, why don’t you give a logical response and show me how and where I’m wrong.[/quote]
Why are men sexually attracted to a young women say 15,16 or 17 automatically branded as “pedophiles” when girls that age are sexually and biologically mature? And don’t say they are “mentally immature” without 1. defining what that means and 2. providing scientific evidence for it to say they are “mentally immature” to consent to sex or know what sex is.
All evidence points to the brain not being fully mature until 25. Therefore, if mental, instead of biological maturity should be used as a yardstick for sexual relations, any man attracted to any woman under 25 ought to be considered a pervert, pedophile, creep etc. Pedophilia is sexual attraction to PRE-PUBESCENT CHILDREN, not a biologically mature 15-17 y/o with full hips and breasts who bleeds every month.
Furthermore, though it is politically incorrect to state, men are attracted to the physical. I would rather be with a 16 year old girl who looks like she could be Playboy’s playmate of the year, but talks alot of bullshit than a 30 year old “career woman” who can have “meaningful conversations about politics”, but is ugly or could stand to lose 50 or 100 pounds.
And most men who aren’t politically correct or been castrated through sensitivity training would agree.[/quote]
Most men, if they would be completely honest, are attracted to 15-17 year old young women, provided these young women are attractive. It’s just that because of todays pedo-hysteria, most men would never admit it, at least publically. In nature, there is really no such thing as “adolescence” thats a man made construct.
Also, in western society, childhood is arbitrarily extended. So much so that even after physical maturity, people are still considered “children”. If you think objectively about it, you have to admit that it’s absurd to equate a 17 year old to a 7 year old.
i agree with op. guys need to just be honest about what gives them boners. this 16 year old age of consent stuff wasnt around a century or two ago. i’m not saying to bang teens. mental maturity matters way more(especialy in our overprotective society where we have the oldest children in history). but just admit that you want to bang them.
[quote]eremesu wrote:
i agree with op. guys need to just be honest about what gives them boners. this 16 year old age of consent stuff wasnt around a century or two ago. i’m not saying to bang teens. mental maturity matters way more(especialy in our overprotective society where we have the oldest children in history). but just admit that you want to bang them. [/quote]
Of course it is true.
Why make a thread asking about it? Whats next? Men like hot tea?
i’m not talking about girls gone wild age here. i am talking the old old days. when a famous romance story involved a 13 year old girl and sixteen year old boy.
