Damn - Some Hot Teachers

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 4:24pm

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]KBCThird wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]KBCThird wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I think the other big point people are missing is how horribly this violates teacher ethics. Its similar to a boss sleeping with a person whose job they control.

An authority figure like a teacher should never do anything like that, even if you believe a 12 year old can consent.[/quote]

This I do agree with. They are taking advantage of their position, but not the age of the kids[/quote]

Do you really classify a high school or middle school teacher as an “authority figure?” Besides, who really holds the power in the relationship? If they are found out, who stands to lose more?[/quote]

Yes, absolutely. Students, by and large, look up to their teachers. And if they don’t they set about looking for ways to skirt or undermine the teacher’s authority. So absolutely, yes I do.[/quote]

I suppose you and DD are right about that. I’m just having trouble coming up with a scenario where the teacher could use her authority to damage the student without having it completely ruin her own life.[/quote]

psychologically, developmentally, socially, est.

Besides it doesn’t mater if an adult chooses to ruin their own life.

WhiteFlash · July 30, 2010, 4:32pm

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]KBCThird wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]KBCThird wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I think the other big point people are missing is how horribly this violates teacher ethics. Its similar to a boss sleeping with a person whose job they control.

An authority figure like a teacher should never do anything like that, even if you believe a 12 year old can consent.[/quote]

This I do agree with. They are taking advantage of their position, but not the age of the kids[/quote]

Do you really classify a high school or middle school teacher as an “authority figure?” Besides, who really holds the power in the relationship? If they are found out, who stands to lose more?[/quote]

Yes, absolutely. Students, by and large, look up to their teachers. And if they don’t they set about looking for ways to skirt or undermine the teacher’s authority. So absolutely, yes I do.[/quote]

I suppose you and DD are right about that. I’m just having trouble coming up with a scenario where the teacher could use her authority to damage the student without having it completely ruin her own life.[/quote]

There isn’t one. Listen, I don’t think anyone here is arguing that it isn’t wrong and/or really fucking weird that an older woman wants to fuck and apparently sustain a relationship with a 14 year old boy. But, she did not take advantage of him. The kid knew what he was doing, or at least to the extent of knowing he was fucking his sexy teacher. She didn’t hold him down, get him hard and rape him. It was consentual. Does a 14 year old understand the weight of his actions? Probably not. Should the teacher be held in the same regard if the genders were reversed? Probably so. Was it rape? No fucking way.

schultzie · July 30, 2010, 4:33pm

I came in here looking for pics of hot teachers but was incredibly disappointed.

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 4:37pm

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
Should the teacher be held in the same regard if the genders were reversed? Probably so. Was it rape? No fucking way. [/quote]

So and old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl isn’t rape. interesting.

WhiteFlash · July 30, 2010, 4:49pm

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
Should the teacher be held in the same regard if the genders were reversed? Probably so. Was it rape? No fucking way. [/quote]

So and old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl isn’t rape. interesting.[/quote]

Dude, why? That’s not what I said at all. If an old man physically forces himself on a defenseless little girl, that is rape. If a 14 year old boy fucks his 20-something teacher, it is not. At 14 one is definitely not aware enough to understand the consequences of their actions, we get that. But, this kid was aware that he was fucking his teacher. Chances are that was his first. That’s a doozy of a first time. Don’t think any of us here have that cool of a first time story. Also don’t think any of us here would’ve turned her down, or that we’d be crying about how we got raped when we told the story a decade later.

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 4:54pm

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
Should the teacher be held in the same regard if the genders were reversed? Probably so. Was it rape? No fucking way. [/quote]

So and old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl isn’t rape. interesting.[/quote]

Dude, why? That’s not what I said at all. If an old man physically forces himself on a defenseless little girl, that is rape. If a 14 year old boy fucks his 20-something teacher, it is not. At 14 one is definitely not aware enough to understand the consequences of their actions, we get that. But, this kid was aware that he was fucking his teacher. Chances are that was his first. That’s a doozy of a first time. Don’t think any of us here have that cool of a first time story. Also don’t think any of us here would’ve turned her down, or that we’d be crying about how we got raped when we told the story a decade later.[/quote]

Mine was a logical inference, yours was not.

“Should the teacher be held in the same regard if the genders were reversed? Probably so. Was it rape? No fucking way.”

No one was discussing forced sex forced sex isn’t the issue.

“So and old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl isn’t rape. interesting.” ← this assumes the sex isn’t forced.

WhiteFlash · July 30, 2010, 5:06pm

^^^ Dude, I get what you’re saying. I have the whole time. Is consentual sex with someone who’s not old enough to understand what they’re doing rape? In the true definition of the word, yes. But, I honestly believe that gender plays a role here, and everything is circumstantial.

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 5:08pm

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
^^^ Dude, I get what you’re saying. I have the whole time. Is consentual sex with someone who’s not old enough to understand what they’re doing rape? In the true definition of the word, yes. But, I honestly believe that gender plays a role here, and everything is circumstantial.[/quote]

So answer the question,
Is an old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl rape?

You seem to now be withdrawing your assertion that the reverse should be treated equally.

WhiteFlash · July 30, 2010, 5:33pm

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
^^^ Dude, I get what you’re saying. I have the whole time. Is consentual sex with someone who’s not old enough to understand what they’re doing rape? In the true definition of the word, yes. But, I honestly believe that gender plays a role here, and everything is circumstantial.[/quote]

So answer the question,
Is an old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl rape?

You seem to now be withdrawing your assertion that the reverse should be treated equally.[/quote]

Dude you sure like to argue. Yes, it is rape. Thought my answer could be inferred from my previous post.

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 5:35pm

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
^^^ Dude, I get what you’re saying. I have the whole time. Is consentual sex with someone who’s not old enough to understand what they’re doing rape? In the true definition of the word, yes. But, I honestly believe that gender plays a role here, and everything is circumstantial.[/quote]

So answer the question,
Is an old sceezy man sleeping with a little girl rape?

You seem to now be withdrawing your assertion that the reverse should be treated equally.[/quote]

Dude you sure like to argue. Yes, it is rape. Thought my answer could be inferred from my previous post.[/quote]

So, now I’m confused:

“Should the teacher be held in the same regard if the genders were reversed? Probably so. Was it rape? No fucking way.”

Which part of that statement are you retracting?

WhiteFlash · July 30, 2010, 5:37pm

I mant same regard in the eyes of the law. My personal judgemet is “Way to go, kid.”

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 5:38pm

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
I mant same regard in the eyes of the law. My personal judgemet is “Way to go, kid.”[/quote]

Honest question.

So your view is that it should be rape in the eyes of the law for these teachers, but it isn’t bad for the kids?

Schwarzfahrer · July 30, 2010, 5:49pm

It [i]IS[/i] really very simple, kinda like our-societies-run-for- millenia-like-that simple:

Girls need extra protection cause they can get pregnant.
If somebody impregnates her, the clan suffers in so far that her uterus has made a big, important decision or rather, an investment. And her family’s life is influenced strongly by it.
The passing male stranger, however, invested only some time for his own private pleasure.

If today, a teacher knocked up my little girl (assuming it’s not rape), our family’s life would change completely and utterly.
Since we believe in equality under the law, gender equality etc (which are good and noble in their own right) we can’t just settle for fifty goats here. This sucks especially since I can’t bash his teeth in and he might also vanish in some prison cell. So we could really be stuck with a baby.

My son banging his hot teach would be quite a thing, but nothing would come out of it that isn’t in the hand of that pervy TILF. If she wants to get pregnant, it’s her whacky decision.

It is fitting to stress at this point how ridiculous our time is in so far that the options can be VERY limited and you may be FORCED to pay for DECADES for some unwanted grandchild.

In every old culture, you would have demanded ample compensation if your status permitted it and abortion/infanticide would be still on the table.

Today, a broke guy simply goes to jail while anti abortionists can literally force a girl to conceive.
Madness.

-edited once because of stupid mistakes and for clarity

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 5:50pm

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
It [i]IS[/i] really very simple, kinda like our-societies-run-for- millenia-like-that simple:

Girls need extra protection cause they can get pregnant.
If somebody impregnates her, the clan suffers in so far that she her uterus has made a big, important decision or rather, an investment. And everybody’s life is influenced by it.
The passing male stranger, however, invested only some time for his own private pleasure.

If today, a teacher knocked up my little girl (assuming it’s not rape), our family’s life would change completely and utterly.
Since we believe in equality under the law, gender equality etc (which are good and noble in their own right) we can’t just settle for fifty goats here. Especially since I can’t bash his teeth in and he also goes to jail. So we could really be stuck with a baby.

My son banging his hot teach would be quite a thing, but nothing would come out of it that isn’t in the hand of that pervy TILF. If she wants to get pregnant, it’s her whacky decision.

It is fitting to stress at this point how ridiculous our time is in so far that the options can be VERY limited and you may be FORCED to pay for DECADES for some unwanted grandchild.

In every old culture, you would have demanded ample compensation if your status permitted it and abortion/infanticide would be still on the table.

Today, a broke guy simply goes to jail while anti abortionists can literally force a girl to conceive.
Madness.[/quote]

You know there are other risks associated with sex besides pregnancy right? Is pregnancy worse than aids?

WhiteFlash · July 30, 2010, 6:16pm

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
I mant same regard in the eyes of the law. My personal judgemet is “Way to go, kid.”[/quote]

Honest question.

So your view is that it should be rape in the eyes of the law for these teachers, but it isn’t bad for the kids?[/quote]

Honestly man, there are so many variables that come into playe here. Depending on the age of the kid, his [or her] mental make-up, home life, social environment, how well adjusted they are, etc… I do agree that it has the potential to be devastating, but each could would handle something like that differently. Just because it could be devastating doesn’t mean it would be, ya know? I will say that a kid that age would be way more susceptible towards getting attached, while the adult may just be using him/her for their own personal wants. In that instance it could get way out of hand, way fast.

Brother_Chris · July 30, 2010, 6:39pm

[quote]saveski wrote:
http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-5169888.html?tag=galleryBottomArea;galleryMostPop[/quote]

According to court documents, she admitted emailing a 16-year-old student nude pictures of herself under the screen name “Redsox6606whore.”

Redsox6606whore? Hahah

Schwarzfahrer · July 30, 2010, 6:51pm

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
It [i]IS[/i] really very simple, kinda like our-societies-run-for- millenia-like-that simple:

Girls need extra protection cause they can get pregnant.
If somebody impregnates her, the clan suffers in so far that she her uterus has made a big, important decision or rather, an investment. And everybody’s life is influenced by it.
The passing male stranger, however, invested only some time for his own private pleasure.

If today, a teacher knocked up my little girl (assuming it’s not rape), our family’s life would change completely and utterly.
Since we believe in equality under the law, gender equality etc (which are good and noble in their own right) we can’t just settle for fifty goats here. Especially since I can’t bash his teeth in and he also goes to jail. So we could really be stuck with a baby.

My son banging his hot teach would be quite a thing, but nothing would come out of it that isn’t in the hand of that pervy TILF. If she wants to get pregnant, it’s her whacky decision.

It is fitting to stress at this point how ridiculous our time is in so far that the options can be VERY limited and you may be FORCED to pay for DECADES for some unwanted grandchild.

In every old culture, you would have demanded ample compensation if your status permitted it and abortion/infanticide would be still on the table.

Today, a broke guy simply goes to jail while anti abortionists can literally force a girl to conceive.
Madness.[/quote]

You know there are other risks associated with sex besides pregnancy right? Is pregnancy worse than aids?
[/quote]
Nothing that a thin, penis-shaped fabric can’t take care of?

Besides, Tilfs aren’t really a major risk in that department.

p.s. You really want to drag AIDS into the discussion?
Man you guys must have been SOOO glad during the 80s when it started.

Brother_Chris · July 30, 2010, 6:55pm

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I think the other big point people are missing is how horribly this violates teacher ethics. Its similar to a boss sleeping with a person whose job they control.

An authority figure like a teacher should never do anything like that, even if you believe a 12 year old can consent.[/quote]

Whatever dude, I flirted and took (after graduation) teachers out on dates. Yeah, having sex with a 12 year old is a little weird though.

DoubleDuce · July 30, 2010, 6:58pm

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote: