[quote]AMIRisSQUAT wrote:
1.What type of progression is best suited for what strength quality improvement or is a combination of various loading patterns going to allow for s synergistic effect? e.g for MS development is adding weight enough? Is adding reps for endurance-strength emphasis enough?
[/quote]
Some rule of the thumb …
a) The more CNS-driven a capacity is, the more frequent variation there must be. In that regard power and strength work needs frequent variation (2-4 weeks mini-cycles), functional hypertrophy and hypertrophy work needs a bit less (4-6 weeks mini-cycles) and strength-endurance work, which is almost all metabolic can be kept the same for up to 12 weeks.
Within these time frames (2-4; 4-6; and up to 12 weeks) you can use only the basic methods of progression which are a) load increase (strength and hypertrophy work) b) volume increase via more reps or increased density (strength-endurance work).
Once pass the limits of the mini-cycle you might need to vary the exercises or used more advanced methods:
-
Limit strength (extended 5s, wave loading, band work, chains work, cluster sets, eccentric overload work)
-
Hypertrophy (post-fatigue, drop sets, antagonist supersets, isometrics, tempo contrast, etc.)
-
Strength-endurance (pre/post fatigue, giant drop sets, complex sets, etc.)
You don’t need to (or should not) use avanced methods for all the exercises, or even for all the sets of one exercise. Start with using as little as needed.
b) Each mini-cycle should end up with an unloading week, which is basically a week where volume is reduced by around 50%, but loading is kept high or even increased.
[quote]AMIRisSQUAT wrote:
2. What type of un-loading is recommended for specific types of focused mesocycles? e.g when a mesocycle is emphasizing MS is the un-loading concept the same as for a hypertrophy emphasis mesocycle?
[/quote]
Yes, unloading refers to a reduction in training volume and/or frequency in the order of 40 to 60%
[quote]AMIRisSQUAT wrote:
3. How does the CNS adapt over-time to high-end intensity of load; can a pattern of progression that gradually emphasizes (over the course of months or a year) higher percentages of training sets being devoted to 85% and/or more intensity ranges allow the CNS to become more resiliant to fatigue accumulation?
[/quote]
I have not seen any data on this, but empirical “field” experience tells me that this is so in some regard: the more advanced lifters have more a efficient CNS. So it becomes more effective at sending the motor command. However as far as being able to handle more stress, I really don’t know. It would seem logical as more advanced lifters use heavier loads yet are still able to recover.
[quote]AMIRisSQUAT wrote:
4. What frames of referance do you coaches use to discern between novices, intermediates and advanced trainees? How many years of hard training before you would call someone an advanced trainee?
[/quote]
It really depends on the athlete, his sport, his body type, his biological age, sport of choice, experience in athletics etc.