There aren’t any “fake” peer reviewed RCT’s encompassing vaccines… THAT is some conspiracy level ideology.
1 Like
Why? They alter the flu shot yearly to accommodate for different strains.
Boosters using the current version of the vaccines drastically boost antibody count which can more effectively neutralise covid (even omicron according to data available)
Over the years, variant specific boosters (like the flu shot) will come about. You’ll probably need a shot every twelve months, though I expect the mandate bullshit to be dropped when the situation becomes endemic.
I do not think that is what he said. He is asking is it fake (lie) that the studies require a lot of time.
As to the fake research the doctor gives an example of bad research/study that was published in a medical journal and retracted when it was shown to be BS. The company that did the research disappeared.
Watch the interview.
Link to retracted papers
Strong enough for what? Kids are not at risk.
Quoting sky news is like quoting fox news or msnbc and specifying it is an unbiased source
What are you saying? Do you think Sky News just made up the story? Or are you just trying to sound cool?
What kind of sicko would let their baby be a guinea pig for these vaccines?
Lol… are you kidding? Do you think they are guessing or made up the story? IT IS FROM PFIZER.
Yeah that is what I meant. The doctor on the podcast says that randomized studies take a lot of time and a lot of people. We do not have time for randomized studies is what he says. People are dying and they are not treated. Just let us threat people. Let us prescribe what we think works based on all the studies and our experience on the field. Let us try to safe people. This is the message of the podcast.
Unfortunately, people here refused to watch. Obviously there are people here that prefer people dying so their agenda is dominant.
Oh look, that’s the exact bullshit fake excuse for avoiding RCTs that I’ve explicitly named yesterday without even watching the snake oil peddler. All anti vaxx “arguments” are designed exclusively for illiterate fools, much like Nigerian e-mail scams.
3 Likes
"The conduct of an RCT takes several years until being published; thus, data is restricted from the medical community for long years and may be of less relevance at time of publication.[97]
It is costly to maintain RCTs for the years or decades that would be ideal for evaluating some interventions.[76][95]"
Literally from wikipedia, dummy.
Educate yourself or listen to the podcast. You have no authority here if you do not know what you are even talking about. You are repeating some corporate media talking points, that their main sponsors Pfizer are repeating on the news cycle.
Loppar talking points, brought to you baaaaiii Pfizer
Bratko, I know what RCTs are. I appreciate your last ditch effort to frantically learn something, but that’s not how it goes.
We already have RCTs on Ivermectin for example (you know, the RCTs for which we allegedly “didn’t have the time and that required too many people”) and they show no positive effect on treating Covid. We did have some fraudulent studies (copy/pasted exact same numbers for all patients, nonexisting hospitals…) that touted benefits of the “miracle drug” but they were publicly debunked. Kory and co were conspicuously silent on the scandal, except occasionally handwaving it away as “there’s fake studies everywhere” (in that is partially correct - it was recently discovered that dr. Raoult from Marseille of HCQ fame outright faked his 2020 study about the previous “miracle drug”).
That’s why the snake oil peddlers do not want to do the RCTs because they know they’ll be exposed, so they stay in the podcast bubble and feed the lies about “being prevented from saving lives” to outraged idiots.
Oh, and did you know that dr. Malone himself is vaccinated? He subjected himself to “an experimental medical procedure” to “be able to travel more easily”. Pretty strange motivation for an allegedly lethal RNA changing concoction?
Did you know that there’s a vaccine mandate in Fox and that Tucker, Hannity and others are all vaccinated, while at the same time are telling the sheeple “to make an informed personal choice” nudge nudge wink wink.
This POS - who’s financing McCullough - has been peddling lies for decades to prevent children from getting vaccinated yet only socializes with spike protein shedders.
They’re vaccinated, you’re not. You’re the idiot that’s been taken for a ride and they’re laughing all the way to the bank.
4 Likes
The more anti-vaxxers there are, the less anti-vaxxers there are.
You’re not an idiot for being anti-mandate. You’re an idiot if the reason for not being vaxxed is a vax mandate.
1 Like
Which of the controlled studies you are talking about?
Stop trying to falsify information and stop repeating corporate media talking points. There are plenty of RCTs on ivermektin. A lot of them in preprint. The general consensus of these studies is that ivermektin helps and it is not a horse dewormer.
I do not care who is vaccinated. People can vaccinate as much as they want. If they are okay to use something with severe side effects, that does not protect infection, does not help stopping the spread, and barely affects hospitalization and death, then I have nothing to tell them. Their body, their choice.
You are linking me to The Guardian the left wing propaganda newspaper, who are citing Politico, proven liers, regarding some propaganda you would like me to read? What are you tryin to prove here? I know you are a dummy and cant debate anything.
Watch the podcast, dummy. Educate yourself. Stop coming to me with some corporate media bullshit and talking points.
Do you remember the other corporate media talking point?
Yada, yada snake oil I guess.
Joe Rogan drinks liquid used as an engine cooler, I guess.
It seems the trend is the opposite. Vaccinated people are duying in significantly larger numbers nowadays. With a higher death rate as well, although slightly higher, but “not from covid”. Or at least not where they test vaccinated hospitalized patients like Switzerland for example. In UK they die from something else 
Hcq actually was disproven… don’t parrot this bs please
Meta analysis was indicative HCQ actually increased the risk of serious complications for those with severe covid
I’ll just leave this here. Another expert who does not appear to agree with McCullough much.
Did you watch the podcast?
What podcast? You keep mentioning a podcast and I have no idea what you’re talking about.
Joe Rogan with Peter McCullough. It is exactly what he said. The drug has no use at late stage and is dangerous. But if used early with a mix of other drugs it prevents death and hospitalization in high rate.