Yeah I don’t think it’s highly accurate no doubt. But the idea that he has something nefarious to do with the virus is certainly out there.
1 Like
No doubt about that, but why he would need a virus is beyond me as you pointed out. Maybe trying to diversify his holdings? Lol
Who knows. One thing that I do believe is accurate is that Trump voters/Fox news watchers are more likely to believe this stuff. They haven’t trusted science for years.
I just read this
Make of it what you will…
so proud of my school…
3 Likes
The problem is, you are using reason. These conspiracy theories need to be unreasonable and ridiculous because the people they are trying to get to believe them do not use reason and logic when they look at the world. If a theory did not defy logic and common sense, these same people would not believe it. It’s like the whole if it’s too good to be true thing. If people didn’t believe the “unbelievable” then a lot of con men (and politicians and preachers) would be out of work. In short, people believe these theories not in spite of their dubiousness which borders on the ridiculous but because of it. The sad part is that there is very little you can do to change their minds. These same people are probably still waiting for Obama to take their guns and circumcise their daughters.
1 Like
Ahh. So you’re the kind of guy who doesn’t believe ultimate responsibility stops with whomever is in charge. Good to know.
It’s also a complete lack of considering doing your own research. People watch a YouTube video or see something on Facebook and they don’t think about it they just believe it for the most part.
I have tons of posts over the years where I had absolutely no idea if what someone claimed was true, but it seemed like it could be false or it made me interested to learn more. And a lot of times simple searches have lead to me coming back on here and saying yeah that’s actually bullshit. When I hear something that seems unique or hard to believe I look into it as my default mode. I think that’s why not only do I buy into these less, but that I can verify if it has some validity.
But oddly (or not) when we used to have far more posters even that direct evidence didn’t always lead them to change their mind. They just shifted the way they worded it. But entire industries are built on these people. Alex Jones is a millionaire who said Sandy Hook was a false flag and Obama created Superstorm Sandy to beat Romney. When people can say things like that and still have a big following you have no hope. You’re dealing with people so fucking stupid you got no chance.
It’s a weird human phenomenon. It’s like the Bible. What makes what it contains true? The fact it exists. People just have this strange cognitive process that makes them accept as true anything that exists. An entire industry of religious relics was built on that process of credulity. So if someone believed the head they were buying belonged to John the Baptist, that belief made it true.
Spinoza argued that at first, people believe everything they hear. There is a second cognitive step necessary to “un-believe” it. Spinoza believed that in order to comprehend something, even something false, it had to be accepted as true. Afterwards, a person might evaluate the truth of whatever was initially accepted as such. People, according to this theory, are not naturally skeptical. This is the opposite of what Descartes believed. Neurological studies have backed up Spinoza’s conclusions. People really do believe everything they hear (that may actually be the title given to a study) until they don’t. It’s probably related to evolution and survival. Skeptics won’t survive long in the wild if they need to actually see if the sound they heard was made by a sabre-toothed tiger or let a snake bite them to find out if it is venomous.
1 Like
We have here because of public gathering size limits this story out of Western Canada:
Why not sneak through completing the pipeline? there have been First Nations and environmentalists who want to shut this down, and the government is bent on shutting down protest instead.
People can only speculate as to whether there is some sort of deeper hidden agenda, and most of that talk is driven by Gates’ own comments like the time he was talking about using vaccines to reduce the world’s population. But it doesn’t seem far fetched at all that he would be using the virus to his advantage in that if he can get enough people vaccinated he could make billions of dollars. He is mixed up with a bunch of pharmaceutical companies that are trying to make a vaccine and is talking about vaccinating at least 7 billion people, at several dollars per vaccine that is a hell of a lot of money. And this is a virus that causes no symptoms in over 50% of people who get infected, plus 80-90% of those who died from it are over 70 years old.
As for injecting people with microchips, it started with people either misinterpreting or deliberately distorting the facts. There is a company called Apiject, which might have some ties to Gates (I’m not sure about that) and was the one singled out for RFID chip vaccines, that actually does make single-dose syringes with an RFID chip. However, the chip is in the syringe so that the syringe itself can be tracked, not that the chip is injected into a person.
“Whether health officials are running a scheduled vaccination program or an urgent pandemic response campaign, they can make better decisions if they know when and where each injection occurs. With an optional RFID/NFC tag on each BFS prefilled syringe, ApiJect will make this possible. Before giving an injection, the healthcare worker will be able to launch a free mobile app and “tap” the prefilled syringe on their phone, capturing the NFC tag’s unique serial number, GPS location and date/time. The app then uploads the data to a government-selected cloud database. Aggregated injection data provides health administrators an evolving real-time “injection map.”"
Any talk about injecting unsuspecting patients with RFID chips is nonsense, for now at least, but there are reasons to be skeptical of Bill Gates’ motives.
It doesn’t seem far fetched to think that a guy who stepped down from one of the most successful companies in history and has spent billions on philanthropy isn’t up to no good here? So let me get this straight…Gates steps down from Microsoft, pledges to give away almost all his money before and upon death, has essentially dedicated himself to helping people with his money but created or will use the virus for profit?
Wonder why he’s spent what 300 million on this to help people already if it’s all for profit. Guess he’s been playing the long game this whole time. Step down from profitable job, give millions away helping people, all to come back by creating a virus with the help of China or something while they sit back and laugh maniacally as the dough rolls in.
Yeah…no it’s absolutely insane to come to that conclusion. Like beyond insane. I get that you’ve been pushing this Gates nonsense and maybe you’re invested but pretty much everyone has called you out on it. It’s fucking idiotic and it’s ok to let it go.
He spent billions in Africa against AIDS, Zika, etc so they would stay alive long enough to have to buy his coronavirus vaccine. It’s quite obvious when you think about it. Spend money to make money.
He never said that, which is the first problem.
He will lose money in the process of trying to come up with a vaccine.
No, there aren’t. Even if he sees an opportunity to make money (after all, we are not communists) it’s not as if Covid 19 doesn’t exist. The fact is, a lot of different organizations, groups and governments are working towards creating a vaccine. Why should he be singled out as being evil?
3 Likes
Let’s not confuse his discussion about slowing population growth which is what he was actually talking about and lowering child mortality.
Keep your eye on the ball. Gates created coronavirus to kill people and then he will create the vaccine in his secret laboratory of doom to finally achieve what he truly wants. To be super wealthy. He’s always dreamed of being rich and this is how he finally makes it happen. I wouldn’t be surprised if when all this is said and done he has like a billion dollars.
Who’s helping him in the secret laboratory of doom? You guessed it Frank Stallone. And George Soros of course.
2 Likes
This simple distinction is far too nuanced for the people who are afraid of being implanted with chips.
Very good though. Thanks for posting that.
1 Like
It should be obvious that the blood circulatory system is designed for liquids, with blood cells and antibodies as being particles at the microscopic scale. they are also likely flexible.
If a chunk of solid matter went through the heart there could be serious interference with the valves. Also, as soon as the particle reaches an only so wide blood vessel there would be blockage. Imagine that reaching the brain…
He still invest in stocks, despite all his money and whatever his ultimate plans are he still wants more money.
I don’t know what is really going on in his head, but part of the reason that people don’t like him is that he is funds left-wing causes like abortion.
I’m not pushing anything, I’m explaining why people believe certain things about Gates because you seem to think it is all completely baseless. I don’t trust him, but I also don’t claim to know what he is really trying to accomplish because it is all speculation.
Does that look like someone you can trust?
you should use a better picture. I still recognize Gates, but still. Is his funding of abortion a sign that he is claiming the whole world as his?
He did say that, but he also said that people in third world countries have lots of kids because of the high infant mortality rate and that if more kids survived then people would have less kids. People are taking one statement out of context and using it to build a narrative, although it is an odd one. Also in many places people actually want to have a large family, his logic doesn’t add up at all, but that is another story.
Not necessarily, only if he has to put more money into that then he gets out of selling billions of doses of the finished product.
Well, aside from the vaccine business itself he is also one of the main people calling the shots at the WHO. It was him who wanted it declared a pandemic and shutdowns across the world, and next thing you know the WHO was recommending just that. Perhaps at first a shutdown would not have been unreasonable since we weren’t sure what we are dealing with, but as I have been saying for some time there is no reason for the vast majority of people to stay home and all that. Those over 60-65 and/or with health conditions that put them at risk (no, that does not mean 30% of the US) should have been told to stay home because those are the ones dying. Here in Ontario, over 90% of deaths are in those over 60, and 70% are over 80 - there is no sense in locking down the whole country, and to make it worse there was nothing done to prevent outbreaks in nursing homes where most deaths occurred.
This is a good article: