Coronavirus - What Happened?

Is there any set of conditions where someone can be critical of Democrat policies without being hypocritical?

What does such a person look like to you?

You BET they can…when it is purely a Democratic Position.

Deficit spending is not…I repeat NOT one of them.

This bill, however, is. At least in its present state.

One point I would like to make to and about @anon50325502.

We have posted on this site for quite a while together. We have disagreed on a some things; agreed on others. To me, he is a valued poster.

I would hope that our disagreements are more like two Brothers disagreeing than as some mortal enemies at opposite ends of some bullshit political spectrum.

My apologies, @anon50325502. I was totally pissed at something I had just read (yes, it was political!) just before I read your comment.

1 Like

My promise, @twojarslave:

I’ll try and ease up on things that are legitimate criticisms.

With that said; it will be extremely hard for me not to call bullshit, bullshit when its posted.

1 Like

Wow.

Ho Lee Fuk.

The gay sex and designer drug stuff from the Bible thumpers.

I don’t care if they do any two together, but all three is just fucked up.

Actually, I don’t even care if they do all 3 simultaneously, just don’t get caught.

1 Like

It’s all good, man. I get it. We live in highly politicized and partisan times. It’s easy to read a comment and assume the intent is to criticize a party or ideology. It’s even easier to jump to whutaboutisms and point out hypocrisy between two almost identical parties. I do it all the time.

2 Likes

Not cool Wuhan. Not cool at all.

For real, that is worrisome.

1 Like

I’m not seeing the logic behind this from a macro perspective(maybe it’s true, maybe it isn’t). In this age of globalization, almost every other country in the world is trying to downplay their COVID related death tolls.

1 Like

That’s because you’re doing it wrong. Take the following statement as axiomatic, and everything should flow, magicalogically if you will, from there:

All government is bad.

I’ve only taken 1 macro class, but this stimulus package + low productivity seems to be a textbook recipe for stagflation

Indeed.

And thanks.

It’s a moot point at least in the idea that anyone in power truly cares. Supposedly the party of fiscal conservatism ran someone who talked about defaulting on the debt, and we can’t have an issue because we can print our own money. And then proceeded to secure a massive tax cut without attempting to reduce any spending in the middle of solid economic times. I believe legalsteel said something like we didn’t fix the roof when it wasn’t raining. Well it’s raining now.

I’m sure Republicans will counter with their own giant bill more akin to the stuff they enjoy and then everyone will settle on it. But the national debt isn’t something anyone will truly consider because no one in power cares. I suppose the good news is if Trump is back in office he said he would erase the debt in 8 years.

The people who should care don’t. Instead the people on a bodybuilding forum do.

4 Likes

I agree completely, and my point is not to attack with whataboutism. I’m a fiscal conservative - and my point is fiscal recklessness in the past has opened us up to too much thinking that we can spend any dollar amount on the nation’s credit card without consequences, especially in a national crisis (when we do need to spend something).

In short, I’m against the foolish and unnecessary $2.3 trillion tax cut and against the $3 trillion relief package that is mostly a grab bag of Democratic wish list priorities.

My point is because of the foolish tax cut, ā€œconservativesā€ have lost the argument to say ā€œwe can’t afford thatā€ as a pushback. And it makes no sense to say that we can put 2.5 trillion on the credit card in peacetime when the economy is doing great but not 3 trillion on it when we’re on a ā€œwarā€ footing with a pandemic and flirting with a depression. How does this make sense?

3 Likes

Oh, I am, we’re on the same page as far as that. See my other post to @flappinit. We’re setting ourselves up to ā€œnormalizeā€ this kind of spending because of dumb choices in the past re: tax cuts.

It makes sense when you realize Republicans ran (as far as I know in modern history) the least fiscally conservative candidate in history. Say what you will about Obama’s poor record on it, but he at least talked about cutting things with a scalpel and not an ax (if I remember right). Trump actually said none of the debt even matters. And Republicans came out in droves to support that. I guess defaulting on the debt or unlimited printing of money wasn’t nearly as concerning as someone who could get a crowd to chant lock her up?

A fun thought experiment would be that if a Republican proposed the same bill as Dems just did price wise (maybe add in or subtract the shit they like) would it be unlikely to pass? Assume Democrats don’t matter. I’m thinking the actual dollar amount isn’t what actually keeps Republicans from supporting it and we all know Trump would never veto it because of the debt.

1 Like

Therein lies my problem, @thunderbolt23.

Conservatives are trying to ā€œpush backā€ (albeit to me with Paper-Tiger kind of arguments) by saying ā€œthose damn Democrats, and their out-of-control spending!ā€ like they are some Feudal Lords squeezing the last cent out of the besieged Conservative peasants while they can’t do a damn thing about it.

Sorry. When I see or hear that, I call bullshit.

I’ve said it before. The DEMS need to fire their PR firm and hire the ones the GOP uses. Gain as much if not more benefits from these huge spending Bills while blaming the other party for it.

Pretty sweet deal if you ask me, @thunderbolt23.

If the price tag was the same, but the aid was a relief package to businesses - direct cash infusions to help businesses stay afloat - the GOP would pass it. I don’t say that with snark or criticism - it’s fact, and the price tag wouldn’t be a concern.

The price tag for the Democratic bill is only a concern at the Congressional level because it’s spending on ā€œstuff we don’t likeā€. If it was stuff the GOP liked, the number would be meaningless.

I want to get the thinking back to having a problem with spending too much and it doesnt matter of I like the stuff or not - it’s too damn much.

1 Like

No need to apologize, and keep calling bullshit when you see it. We’re in short supply of people who do.

I look around the GOP and all I see are bunch of wimps with their balls neatly put away in Trump’s jar.