South Florida is the best option I have heard.
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
Are you RETARDED?
If Boise joined the SEC, they would start losing games and suddenly everyone would wonder why anybody gave a crap about them in the first place.
And… USF? Sorry, we already have Vanderbilt AND Kentucky, we really don’t need another joke of a football team.[/quote]
Retarded?
Naw.
You seem a little scared though.
GA was the 4th ranked SEC team going into week one and Boise took 'em to the woodshed. In their own state even. There’s no changing that. Who’s to say the wouldn’t match up with at least Arkansas and the Gamecocks, especially with the way Boise plays defense up front.
And why not USF? Vandy is brains and KY is basketball, they’re tne Northwestern and Indiana of the SEC. USF is all football, and they’re always competitive.
Shit is retarded, we shouldnt be adding to the SEC its already the best conference we don’t need weaklings like Texas A&M. Boise would get the D-stain in the SEC evidence= losing to Nevada -.- Look at Oregon a favorite just to lose again to the SEC. I’d rather drop someone like Vandy than add A&M, when was the last time A&M had a significant season?
BTW Roll Tide and screw the Pac-10 Big-12
And bro really?! USF? come on, they have a random upset every few years, other than that garb. They are not “All football” they are just a randy school people who dont get into UCF go to
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
Are you RETARDED?
If Boise joined the SEC, they would start losing games and suddenly everyone would wonder why anybody gave a crap about them in the first place.
And… USF? Sorry, we already have Vanderbilt AND Kentucky, we really don’t need another joke of a football team.[/quote]
Retarded?
Naw.
You seem a little scared though.
GA was the 4th ranked SEC team going into week one and Boise took 'em to the woodshed. In their own state even. There’s no changing that. Who’s to say the wouldn’t match up with at least Arkansas and the Gamecocks, especially with the way Boise plays defense up front.
And why not USF? Vandy is brains and KY is basketball, they’re tne Northwestern and Indiana of the SEC. USF is all football, and they’re always competitive.
[/quote]
Big fuckin deal. They won a game. I’m not saying they’re a bad team, but they would NOT come in to the SEC and continue to have 0 and 1 loss seasons on a regular basis. Playing 2 significant games a year is not the same as playing 8 or 9 significant games a year. They would not be one of the top teams in the SEC. Neither will Texas A&M, but they bring the Texas market (and Texas recruiting) which is HUGE. I don’t think the SEC is worried about cracking the IDAHO market.
And I’m guessing you either went to USF or are somehow affiliated with them, but that is just laughable. They are NOT a competitive team, and they offer no benefit to the SEC. There would be no new market, no new recruiting territory. I honestly would expect them to win maybe 2 conference games a year if they played in the SEC.
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
Are you RETARDED?
If Boise joined the SEC, they would start losing games and suddenly everyone would wonder why anybody gave a crap about them in the first place.
And… USF? Sorry, we already have Vanderbilt AND Kentucky, we really don’t need another joke of a football team.[/quote]
Retarded?
Naw.
You seem a little scared though.
GA was the 4th ranked SEC team going into week one and Boise took 'em to the woodshed. In their own state even. There’s no changing that. Who’s to say the wouldn’t match up with at least Arkansas and the Gamecocks, especially with the way Boise plays defense up front.
And why not USF? Vandy is brains and KY is basketball, they’re tne Northwestern and Indiana of the SEC. USF is all football, and they’re always competitive.
[/quote]
Big fuckin deal. They won a game. I’m not saying they’re a bad team, but they would NOT come in to the SEC and continue to have 0 and 1 loss seasons on a regular basis. Playing 2 significant games a year is not the same as playing 8 or 9 significant games a year. They would not be one of the top teams in the SEC. Neither will Texas A&M, but they bring the Texas market (and Texas recruiting) which is HUGE. I don’t think the SEC is worried about cracking the IDAHO market.
And I’m guessing you either went to USF or are somehow affiliated with them, but that is just laughable. They are NOT a competitive team, and they offer no benefit to the SEC. There would be no new market, no new recruiting territory. I honestly would expect them to win maybe 2 conference games a year if they played in the SEC.[/quote]
Who would Boise lose to from the SEC this year? Bama? Probably. LSU? I’m not so sure. Hawgs? No. War Eagle? No. Rebs? No. Cocks? No. Gators? Push.
USF:
Naw man, I’m not affiliated w/ USF what so ever. Fun team to watch and I’m automatically a fan of any squad that takes down the Irish in their own house. They did me (a Michigan fan) a favor, since we have ND this week.
I like the USF argument mostly because of their success after having only having a program for a dozen years or so. Geographically they’re in a dangerous spot if they ever got contentious on a national scale. We’re all just talkin’ shit, but I dig the discussion.
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
Are you RETARDED?
If Boise joined the SEC, they would start losing games and suddenly everyone would wonder why anybody gave a crap about them in the first place.
And… USF? Sorry, we already have Vanderbilt AND Kentucky, we really don’t need another joke of a football team.[/quote]
Retarded?
Naw.
You seem a little scared though.
GA was the 4th ranked SEC team going into week one and Boise took 'em to the woodshed. In their own state even. There’s no changing that. Who’s to say the wouldn’t match up with at least Arkansas and the Gamecocks, especially with the way Boise plays defense up front.
And why not USF? Vandy is brains and KY is basketball, they’re tne Northwestern and Indiana of the SEC. USF is all football, and they’re always competitive.
[/quote]
Big fuckin deal. They won a game. I’m not saying they’re a bad team, but they would NOT come in to the SEC and continue to have 0 and 1 loss seasons on a regular basis. Playing 2 significant games a year is not the same as playing 8 or 9 significant games a year. They would not be one of the top teams in the SEC. Neither will Texas A&M, but they bring the Texas market (and Texas recruiting) which is HUGE. I don’t think the SEC is worried about cracking the IDAHO market.
And I’m guessing you either went to USF or are somehow affiliated with them, but that is just laughable. They are NOT a competitive team, and they offer no benefit to the SEC. There would be no new market, no new recruiting territory. I honestly would expect them to win maybe 2 conference games a year if they played in the SEC.[/quote]
Who would Boise lose to from the SEC this year? Bama? Probably. LSU? I’m not so sure. Hawgs? No. War Eagle? No. Rebs? No. Cocks? No. Gators? Push.
USF:
Naw man, I’m not affiliated w/ USF what so ever. Fun team to watch and I’m automatically a fan of any squad that takes down the Irish in their own house. They did me (a Michigan fan) a favor, since we have ND this week.
I like the USF argument mostly because of their success after having only having a program for a dozen years or so. Geographically they’re in a dangerous spot if they ever got contentious on a national scale. We’re all just talkin’ shit, but I dig the discussion.[/quote]
How can you say that? They beat one team. ONE TEAM. I don’t care how many seasons in a row they’ve had with one or two good games, THAT’S ALL IT IS. When you see an SEC champion losing to a team like NEVADA, talk to me about how awesome Boise State is. That would be like Florida losing to UAB this Saturday. There are 8 or 9 teams in the SEC who would go undefeated every single year if they played Boise State’s schedule.
I really don’t think beating Notre Dame means anything any more. They’re a joke right now. USF may be competitive one day, but right now they are nowhere close. And I really don’t see that changing any time soon.
SEC, PAC 12, BIG 10, and the ACC will be the super conferences. Teams that aren’t in those should look to join fast.
As a PAC 12 fan, I definitely can’t complain about what I’m hearing. Oklahoma? Texas? Come on over.
^ Push I would never have guessed you being a Nole fan.
PMPM what is your opinion, PAC 12 or SEC for UT and Oklahoma?
lol@bsu in the SEC
that’d be like throwing a rat in to fight with a bunch of alligators, and that’s an insulting comparison to a rat.
[quote]byukid wrote:
lol@bsu in the SEC
that’d be like throwing a rat in to fight with a bunch of alligators, and that’s an insulting comparison to a rat.[/quote]
See, now I’m praying, PRAYING that Boise meets up with another SEC team in a bowl game and gives 'em another beating.
Please Lord make this so.
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]byukid wrote:
lol@bsu in the SEC
that’d be like throwing a rat in to fight with a bunch of alligators, and that’s an insulting comparison to a rat.[/quote]
See, now I’m praying, PRAYING that Boise meets up with another SEC team in a bowl game and gives 'em another beating.
Please Lord make this so.
[/quote]
X2
I would like to see this also.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Push I would never have guessed you being a Nole fan.
PMPM what is your opinion, PAC 12 or SEC for UT and Oklahoma?[/quote]
I actually would like to see only OU go to the Pac-12 and Texas stay in the Big 12, and watch them and Dan Bebee go down the drain. Personally I think those two are the biggest reason why schools left and are leaving.
[quote]BradyZ wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Push I would never have guessed you being a Nole fan.
PMPM what is your opinion, PAC 12 or SEC for UT and Oklahoma?[/quote]
I actually would like to see only OU go to the Pac-12 and Texas stay in the Big 12, and watch them and Dan Bebee go down the drain. Personally I think those two are the biggest reason why schools left and are leaving.[/quote]
Probably correct about reasons for departure, however not fair to make fans and alumni suffer for faults of a few. I personally would love to see them in SEC, but this is about money not reason.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]BradyZ wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Push I would never have guessed you being a Nole fan.
PMPM what is your opinion, PAC 12 or SEC for UT and Oklahoma?[/quote]
I actually would like to see only OU go to the Pac-12 and Texas stay in the Big 12, and watch them and Dan Bebee go down the drain. Personally I think those two are the biggest reason why schools left and are leaving.[/quote]
Probably correct about reasons for departure, however not fair to make fans and alumni suffer for faults of a few. I personally would love to see them in SEC, but this is about money not reason. [/quote]
I agree, I just have a lil hatred for Danny B.
I can see Texas going to the SEC, but I think more likely they would do to the PAC-12. I can see the Big Ten, Pac-12, and SRC all become a 16 team conference maybe within the next 5 years.
[quote]BradyZ wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]BradyZ wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Push I would never have guessed you being a Nole fan.
PMPM what is your opinion, PAC 12 or SEC for UT and Oklahoma?[/quote]
I actually would like to see only OU go to the Pac-12 and Texas stay in the Big 12, and watch them and Dan Bebee go down the drain. Personally I think those two are the biggest reason why schools left and are leaving.[/quote]
Probably correct about reasons for departure, however not fair to make fans and alumni suffer for faults of a few. I personally would love to see them in SEC, but this is about money not reason. [/quote]
I agree, I just have a lil hatred for Danny B.
I can see Texas going to the SEC, but I think more likely they would do to the PAC-12. I can see the Big Ten, Pac-12, and SRC all become a 16 team conference maybe within the next 5 years.
[/quote]
I know I just had to put my input.
I dont see the Big Ten rolling into the Pac 12.
I see a 4 super with two divisions and each super with two divisions. I see the Big 10 as North, Pac 12 as West, SEC as South and possible ACC as East (after sucking up others).
So you could model some what off NFL having a “Super Bowl” at the end.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]eeu743 wrote:
…There are 8 or 9 teams in the SEC who would go undefeated every single year if they played Boise State’s schedule…
[/quote]
You may be a Gators fan and thus a deplorable individual but I think you are spot-on right there ^.
[/quote]
We’ll see how the season plays out. Best (and worst) thing about a big rivalry is that it really doesn’t matter how good either team is that year…anything can happen. Although, didn’t you guys just beat us for the first time in like… six or seven years? haha I hate FSU, but that’s the best game of the year, in my opinion.
lol at all the SEC dick sucking going on in here. I might as well watch ESPN and listen to that idiot Mark May talk.