[quote]GVkid wrote:
Oh hey… looks like I answered my own quote question…
[quote]
Food is manufactured because it’s the only way large food companies can deliver a “safe” product from as few locations as possible. With this food model, people literally have to eat crap. I hope your starting to see why it’s impossible for everyone to make the choices you do, It just can’t work with our current model in my opinion. [/quote]
I disagree, I think food is manufactured to maximize profits. If large companies truly cared about a “safe” product, why put chemicals or sub-par ingredients in their manufactured products? Why use all of the HFCS instead of sugar or xylitol/splenda/xyz sweetener? Yes people literally eat crap, but might it be because of a lack of self control on their behalf instead of some mysterious obstacle that stops “2/3 of all americans” from making healthy dietary decisions?
Correct me if I’m way off base here, but from what I’m seeing, no one here is saying that the current large food companies/ranches are making the healthiest product, but simply that the act of reforming the food industry is not practical or realistic? So not that it shouldn’t be reformed, but there is no good, practical way that results in a “win” from every angle.[/quote]
We agree I think, the quotes indicated sarcasm. The economic reasons for big food companies are obvious, you’re right. But the only way to actually deliver products to the people and make them “safe” or fresh is for food companies to add stuff like antibiotics, preservatives, artificial flavorings, etc.
Your second paragraph also seems to be right. I’ve posted articles that show grain fed beef is 6 times higher in bad fats, contains practically no antioxidants, and has additional health risks associated with antibiotics/hormones. Although push has tried to mitigate the health risks, he’s not denied this. The argument is wether the economics support this. I think they can. Apparently this makes me a retard.