I found clen worked quite well for me. The only problem was that I started using it and I forgot about taurine.
Never again.
Although, I’ll say this for clen - it ain’t anabolic (for me anyway). Great for burning fat though.
Also, I can’t help but think the heart hypertrophy thing would be from abuse of the compound. But that’s like with any drug, isn’t it?
To answer the OP (again): the Clen I got tasted foul like nothing else I’ve ever tasted before. But that said, mine was made specifically for bodybuilders by a chemist (my source).
[quote]InTheZone wrote:
Makavali wrote:
(shameless attempt to bring thread back on topic)
TWENTY FIVE POUNDS OF PROTEIN?!
My god, I hate you.
Hey big Maka is in the fuckin house!
What’s shakin broham…lol.
Yeah let’s talk protein, what about those 25 lbs?
Let’s get this thing back on topic.
Seriously though, if I’m being honest, I’m wary of clen.
Sure back in the day it was like, “Oh wow, fat burning, and it’s anabolic too!” But then again heart hypertrophy is not all that desireable of an affect mwahahahahaha.
Lates mang.
ToneBone the lying asswiping jackass of the steroid forum who is “destroying it” and all it’s honor.
:)[/quote]
yep 25 lbs of protien aint bad, might last me 2 months. decent amino acid profile. was like 130 bucks and shipping was only 20.
BUT you brought up another question i was thinking about clen, you say its anabolic? i thought it was just anti catabolic? or is that the same thing… was wondering… anticatabolic= anabolic? thought they were different.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
I believe clen has a preference for burning fat over muscle.[/quote]
yes clen is good for retaining muscle, i know this, my question is is there a difference between anabolic and anti-catabolic, if so which is clen? much appreciated.
[quote]Dylanj wrote:
xXDevilDogXx wrote:
Dylanj wrote:
Awsome, thanks for the responses guys.
No problemo.
I’m actually gonna do a 2 week run in about 8 days.
good luck with that, i was blessed with genetics to have abs and not work for them… or that could be becuase im just 19…so ive never tried clen, not going to either, just curious if it was legit more than anything.[/quote]
I’m usually very lean, actually hover around 10% bf. But I wish I had your genes. The clen actually helps me cut a little faster so I don’t have to cut my calories quite as much.
[quote]Dylanj wrote:
and to all of you jacking my thread, lets shine the spotlight back on me… so it was my birthday like a month ago, got a 25lbs vat of protien. i was pumped.[/quote]
Holy crap, 25 lbs! How do you scoop it out? With a shovel? LOL
[quote]Dylanj wrote:
Makavali wrote:
I believe clen has a preference for burning fat over muscle.
yes clen is good for retaining muscle, i know this, my question is is there a difference between anabolic and anti-catabolic, if so which is clen? much appreciated.[/quote]
I said a preference. From what I’ve heard, clen will burn muscle too if your body doesn’t see enough of a reason to keep it. Although it probably varies from person to person.
For me, I lost only fat but for my training partner, he lost muscle mass too.
[quote]xXDevilDogXx wrote:
Dylanj wrote:
xXDevilDogXx wrote:
Dylanj wrote:
Awsome, thanks for the responses guys.
No problemo.
I’m actually gonna do a 2 week run in about 8 days.
good luck with that, i was blessed with genetics to have abs and not work for them… or that could be becuase im just 19…so ive never tried clen, not going to either, just curious if it was legit more than anything.
I’m usually very lean, actually hover around 10% bf. But I wish I had your genes. The clen actually helps me cut a little faster so I don’t have to cut my calories quite as much.
Dylanj wrote:
and to all of you jacking my thread, lets shine the spotlight back on me… so it was my birthday like a month ago, got a 25lbs vat of protien. i was pumped.
Holy crap, 25 lbs! How do you scoop it out? With a shovel? LOL[/quote]
nope, the same tiiiiny little scooper found in all protien containers, sifted around for it with a coat hanger, found it at the bottom.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Dylanj wrote:
Makavali wrote:
I believe clen has a preference for burning fat over muscle.
yes clen is good for retaining muscle, i know this, my question is is there a difference between anabolic and anti-catabolic, if so which is clen? much appreciated.
I said a preference. From what I’ve heard, clen will burn muscle too if your body doesn’t see enough of a reason to keep it. Although it probably varies from person to person.
For me, I lost only fat but for my training partner, he lost muscle mass too.[/quote]
ah, we are on different pages, im asking two questions and getting one answere and trying to answere both questions with your one answere. guess i should just dictionary.com anabolic, and anti-catabolic then… haha XD, thanks again
I said a preference. From what I’ve heard, clen will burn muscle too if your body doesn’t see enough of a reason to keep it. Although it probably varies from person to person.
[/quote]
This is about as accurate a statement as can be made about clen’s catabolic/anti-cataboloic.
There are no studies done on healthy males engaged in weight training.
I said a preference. From what I’ve heard, clen will burn muscle too if your body doesn’t see enough of a reason to keep it. Although it probably varies from person to person.
This is about as accurate a statement as can be made about clen’s catabolic/anti-cataboloic.
There are no studies done on healthy males engaged in weight training. [/quote]
What about T3? I’ve read that it doesn’t really give a flying fuck what it burns. It just grabs whatever and throws it into the mitochondria furnace.
I said a preference. From what I’ve heard, clen will burn muscle too if your body doesn’t see enough of a reason to keep it. Although it probably varies from person to person.
This is about as accurate a statement as can be made about clen’s catabolic/anti-cataboloic.
There are no studies done on healthy males engaged in weight training.
What about T3? I’ve read that it doesn’t really give a flying fuck what it burns. It just grabs whatever and throws it into the mitochondria furnace.[/quote]
Don’t fuck with T3 unless you are on AAS. In fact - I wouldn’t fuck with T3 period.
I said a preference. From what I’ve heard, clen will burn muscle too if your body doesn’t see enough of a reason to keep it. Although it probably varies from person to person.
This is about as accurate a statement as can be made about clen’s catabolic/anti-cataboloic.
There are no studies done on healthy males engaged in weight training.
What about T3? I’ve read that it doesn’t really give a flying fuck what it burns. It just grabs whatever and throws it into the mitochondria furnace.
Don’t fuck with T3 unless you are on AAS. In fact - I wouldn’t fuck with T3 period.
[/quote]
I knew someone who tried to cut directly after an AAS bulking cycle. He waited the day after PCT was done and starting restricting calories and using T3 and Clen at the same time. Within 2 weeks he had lost all his new gains and didn’t look any different than he did prior to the same. Complete waste. I will never touch T3. Clen or Albuterol I would use only along with AAS.
[quote]2thepain wrote:
I knew someone who tried to cut directly after an AAS bulking cycle. He waited the day after PCT was done and starting restricting calories and using T3 and Clen at the same time.
Within 2 weeks he had lost all his new gains and didn’t look any different than he did prior to the same. Complete waste. I will never touch T3. Clen or Albuterol I would use only along with AAS.[/quote]
[quote] Brook wrote:
What does ‘pwned’ mean?[/quote]
I hope you’re kidding. But if you aren’t, it’s internet speak for OWNED. It just started to be said one day and it just stuck. Kind of like the !!!11!! thing.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
There are no studies done on healthy males engaged in weight training. [/quote]
I wish I could say I was surprised… but the Government definition of healthy, and the definition of healthy on this site are likely two VERY different things.
Well, I’m off to kill my kidneys with a protein shake.