If the elections were rigged in favor of the Republicans why did they lose in 2006?
Same reason, they didn’t lose or win. It is controlled by the same party. It is called the ruling elite. The Right & the Left is just scenery for the public to play with, both hands feed the same mouth.
There are no winners or losers in a controlled election. There is a reason the same two families have been in the White House for the last 28 years. Think about it. Its not hard to understand how.
merlin
[/quote]
Why didn’t Clinton let Bush 41 have his 2 terms and then start his in 1996?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Limbic wrote:
rainjack wrote:
The photos are hilarious.
But honestly - do you think they make a point?
If that is the extent of your ability to think, I can only hope you are somewhere else on election day besides at the polls.
Your buddy Headhunter says Hillary has more baggage than a cargo plane. This is while the opium crop in Afghanistan is booming? How do they move that stuff?
You guys should get your heads together, synchronize your efforts.
What does opium crops in th eME have to do with posting pictures?
Are you afraid your posts ill be ignored without illustrations?
You are like those homos that include a picture of a fucking cat every time they post. Not that you are a homo, and not that there is anything wrong with that if you are.
I’m just saying. Unless they are of boobs, or chicks making out - pictures really don’t do much for me. [/quote]
How could the pictures not make a fucking point? wtf?
Monorail cats are on a level all their own. I’m a man, my son, I’m not into destroying my raphe nucleus.
None of these politicians are free of baggage.
And why would chicks making out with other chicks excite you? All they’re doing is fucking with your head and lying about their relation to the world.
[quote]merlin wrote:
I don’t give a fuck about who won or lost(that was your conformist assumption). What I am concearned with, is the PEOPLE not having a say no matter who gets “elected”.[/quote]
You should have stopped with the last post. You were the one that has posted at least twice about how Bush was not elected - but you don’t care who won?
Lucy - Joo have some splainin’ to do.
[quote]It don’t matter who gets “elected” … that is controlled by the ruling elite. What matters is the PEOPLE have no power in the decision process, although they at least think they did. Some of them anyway.
merlin
[/quote]
When was the last time your tin foil hat was checked for leaks? I think your brains has done dripped down into your ass - either that, or you voluntarily shoved your head up there for some reason.
If the elections were rigged in favor of the Republicans why did they lose in 2006?
Same reason, they didn’t lose or win. It is controlled by the same party. It is called the ruling elite. The Right & the Left is just scenery for the public to play with, both hands feed the same mouth.
There are no winners or losers in a controlled election. There is a reason the same two families have been in the White House for the last 28 years. Think about it. Its not hard to understand how.
merlin
Why didn’t Clinton let Bush 41 have his 2 terms and then start his in 1996? [/quote]
Good question! Ya know Bill aint waiting around though. If Hil aint gonna be on time to do the job, her replacement is in the oval office.
I gotta admit …I liked Bill alot better than George(I think they’re both scumbags)…Bill was always in trouble every time I turned on the news. George just constantly kept proving he’s dumber than a 5th grader …ITS GETTING OLD.
I’M READY for what… gonna be 32 years now of the same two families in the White House. I can’t wait til someone on the rag has an episode, especially with Billy Boy back in business …this is gonna be a real hoot!
[quote]rainjack wrote: merlin wrote:
I don’t give a fuck about who won or lost(that was your conformist assumption). What I am concearned with, is the PEOPLE not having a say no matter who gets “elected”.
You should have stopped with the last post. You were the one that has posted at least twice about how Bush was not elected - but you don’t care who won?
Lucy - Joo have some splainin’ to do.
It don’t matter who gets “elected” … that is controlled by the ruling elite. What matters is the PEOPLE have no power in the decision process, although they at least think they did. Some of them anyway.
merlin
When was the last time your tin foil hat was checked for leaks? I think your brains has done dripped down into your ass - either that, or you voluntarily shoved your head up there for some reason. [/quote]
Ahhh no rainjack …I’ve seen the disrespect you get on these forums on a daily basis. considering these comments are comming from you, they’re pretty much tossed over the shoulder.
I have no explaining to do. If you can’t figure out that I am not some sleasebag conformist like yourself and don’t care for Republican or Democratic supporters …than that’s on you. I don’t care to argue self-serving semantics about some numskull president because he has a share in the same political idealology that I do. Instead of stating the truth, you’ll lower yourself and defend pluralism to its finest. You are the scum of what makes this country unique.
Dubya! LMAO …I’ll bet you’ve had a hell of a time trying to defend your conformist idealology the past 7 years. Woah! Wouldn’t want to be the one that has that douchebag to defend. Must be a real head-shaker for you every time he speaks, or tries to speak. Conformity will bleed you, keep bleeding.
If the elections were rigged in favor of the Republicans why did they lose in 2006?
Same reason, they didn’t lose or win. It is controlled by the same party. It is called the ruling elite. The Right & the Left is just scenery for the public to play with, both hands feed the same mouth.
There are no winners or losers in a controlled election. There is a reason the same two families have been in the White House for the last 28 years. Think about it. Its not hard to understand how.
merlin
Why didn’t Clinton let Bush 41 have his 2 terms and then start his in 1996?
Good question! Ya know Bill aint waiting around though. If Hil aint gonna be on time to do the job, her replacement is in the oval office.
I gotta admit …I liked Bill alot better than George(I think they’re both scumbags)…Bill was always in trouble every time I turned on the news. George just constantly keepd proving he’s dumber than a 5th grader …ITS GETTING OLD.
I’M READY for what… gonna be 32 years now of the same two families in the White House. I can’t wait til someone on the rag has an episode, especially with Billy Boy back in business …this is gonna be a real hoot!
merlin[/quote]
By the way Bush 41 was only in the WH for 4 years not 12.
They actually give the VP his own house. He doesn’t sleep on a cot in the basement of the WH.
Dubya! LMAO …I’ll bet you’ve had a hell of a time trying to defend your conformist idealology the past 7 years. Woah! Wouldn’t want to be the one that has that douchebag to defend. Must be a real head-shaker for you every time he speaks, or tries to speak. Conformity will bleed you, keep bleeding.
[/quote]
How old are you?
I have 50 bucks that says you weren’t old enough to vote for anyone in Y2K.
You get on your soap box about conformity - yet you are nothing but a conformist yourself.
I have been around to know that rebelling to rebel, or not conforming just to be non-conformist is for the weakest of character and will.
The day I need to get my validation from an anonymous internet forum is the day I slit my wrists.
Internet tough-guys - can’t delete them, and you can’t kill them. They are the cyber cockroaches of our society.
Kudos to you and your fellow e-tough guy/non-conformist conformity.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
not conforming just to be non-conformist is for the weakest of character and will.
[/quote]
Really? So I should be part of the gang and conform to one side or the other when both sides are shit? You make about as much sense as who you support(dubya). If the Bloods or the Crypts are the leading two gangs in my hood, then I should just CONFORM to one of them …God knows, I wouldn’t want to be of the weakest character and will.
I hope your penis is bigger than your intellect. I’d hate for you to have all things small, you’d resemble “W”. Nevermind, maybe that’s why you defend stupidity.
Ahhh no rainjack …I’ve seen the disrespect you get on these forums on a daily basis. considering these comments are comming from you, they’re pretty much tossed over the shoulder.
I have no explaining to do. If you can’t figure out that I am not some sleasebag conformist like yourself and don’t care for Republican or Democratic supporters …than that’s on you. I don’t care to argue self-serving semantics about some numskull president because he has a share in the same political idealogy that I do. Instead of stating the truth, you’ll lower yourself and defend pluralism to its finest. You are the scum of what makes this country unique.
Dubya! LMAO …I’ll bet you’ve had a hell of a time trying to defend your conformist idealology the past 7 years. Woah! Wouldn’t want to be the one that has that douchebag to defend. Must be a real head-shaker for you every time he speaks, or tries to speak. Conformity will bleed you, keep bleeding.
merlin
[/quote]
LMAO
Rainjack’s the junkyard dog, expending himself! LMAO
[quote]rainjack wrote: merlin wrote:
I don’t give a fuck about who won or lost(that was your conformist assumption). What I am concearned with, is the PEOPLE not having a say no matter who gets “elected”.
You should have stopped with the last post. You were the one that has posted at least twice about how Bush was not elected - but you don’t care who won?
Lucy - Joo have some splainin’ to do.
It don’t matter who gets “elected” … that is controlled by the ruling elite. What matters is the PEOPLE have no power in the decision process, although they at least think they did. Some of them anyway.
merlin
When was the last time your tin foil hat was checked for leaks? I think your brains has done dripped down into your ass - either that, or you voluntarily shoved your head up there for some reason. [/quote]
tin foil hat? Even junkyard dogs have their moment! LMAO
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Limbic wrote:
How could the pictures not make a fucking point? wtf?
Explain to me how they do make a point other than a photographer has a talent for snapping/p-shopping unflattering pictures.
Monorail cats are on a level all their own. I’m a man, my son, I’m not into destroying my raphe nucleus.
No one questioned your sex. But I find your defensiveness of such a bit odd.
None of these politicians are free of baggage.
Who stated otherwise?
And why would chicks making out with other chicks excite you? All they’re doing is fucking with your head and lying about their relation to the world.
I guess that depends on who is taking the pictures, wouldn’t you agree?
[/quote]
“No one questioned your sex. But I find your defensiveness of such a bit odd.” Come on now, bud, how many about-faces are you going to incorporate here? But then again, I’m trying to reason here with somebody who thinks he’s having sex with the minds of photographers of lesbians! LOL Next thing you know you’ll be approving of all the women in your neighborhood who masturbate to the tune of gayboy porn. Because that’s what good republican women do, not have sex with “liberals”. LOL
[quote]merlin wrote:
rainjack wrote:
not conforming just to be non-conformist is for the weakest of character and will.
Really? So I should be part of the gang and conform to one side or the other when both sides are shit? You make about as much sense as who you support(dubya). If the Bloods or the Crypts are the leading two gangs in my hood, then I should just CONFORM to one of them …God knows, I wouldn’t want to be of the weakest character and will.
I hope your penis is bigger than your intellect. I’d hate for you to have all things small, you’d resemble “W”. Nevermind, maybe that’s why you defend stupidity.
[/quote]
You already conform to a side - please read what I wrote if you think otherwise. I find it sadly telling that your soul criteria for conformist/non-conformist is only as large as the political arena.
If you were to actually know me - you would hang your head in shame at just how wrong your bigotry is.
As for the size of my penis/intellect - you can only hope to to be as large when you grow up.
tin foil hat? Even junkyard dogs have their moment! LMAO[/quote]
I have no idea what you are on - but if you would be so kind as to PM me exactly what it is, I am going to Vegas in 3 weeks for the Mr. O, and I would love to be flying at your altitude while I am there.
[quote]Limbic wrote:
“No one questioned your sex. But I find your defensiveness of such a bit odd.” Come on now, bud, how many about-faces are you going to incorporate here? But then again, I’m trying to reason here with somebody who thinks he’s having sex with the minds of photographers of lesbians! LOL Next thing you know you’ll be approving of all the women in your neighborhood who masturbate to the tune of gayboy porn. Because that’s what good republican women do, not have sex with “liberals”. LOL
[/quote]
Who did an about face?
Here’s a hint: read from left to right, top to bottom.
[quote]rainjack wrote: merlin wrote:
rainjack wrote:
not conforming just to be non-conformist is for the weakest of character and will.
Really? So I should be part of the gang and conform to one side or the other when both sides are shit? You make about as much sense as who you support(dubya). If the Bloods or the Crypts are the leading two gangs in my hood, then I should just CONFORM to one of them …God knows, I wouldn’t want to be of the weakest character and will.
I hope your penis is bigger than your intellect. I’d hate for you to have all things small, you’d resemble “W”. Nevermind, maybe that’s why you defend stupidity.
You already conform to a side - please read what I wrote if you think otherwise. I find it sadly telling that your soul criteria for conformist/non-conformist is only as large as the political arena.
If you were to actually know me - you would hang your head in shame at just how wrong your bigotry is.
As for the size of my penis/intellect - you can only hope to to be as large when you grow up.
[/quote]
Forget politics …that’s scenery for the forums and just a good battleground for you. You arn’t wise enough to argue anything you believe as right or true, the weak mind tries to conform to popular opinion. You argue for the sake of arguing with someone, hopfully in a self-serving way you can feed your ego if someone agrees with you that’s watching and comes to your aid. You belong in a gang, you have the intellectual capacity for that. This is why you conform. There are arguments there. You don’t even stand a chance in a real fight. A real fight consists of your own two hands against a gang of idiocy.
You’d rather just join the idiocy and wait for a driveby so you have a reason to fire your pea-shooter.
You’re boring. Color yourself grey and call it a night.
