[quote]lixy wrote:
He’s quite the educator, that Bush.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
He almost gets the idea of “tax breaks”…just doesn’t understand the other piece of the puzzle involves less spending.
He started out right going after al Qaeda in Afghanistan but, like every ADD infected child, lost interest, got distracted and took a wrong turn.
Really though, he’s the worst president in history–EVER.
I cannot think of one thing in which he started out with good intentions that didn’t end up a clusterfuck. If he worked for me his ass would have been gone a long time ago.[/quote]
Yet he was re-elected which means what?
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
rainjack wrote:
You will watch another Republican be sworn into the Oval Office come January '09.
Especially if the Dems are dumb enough to nominate Hillary. She’s got more baggage than an overloaded cargo plane.
[/quote]
more baggage than Aaliyah’s plane?
[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
rainjack wrote:
You will watch another Republican be sworn into the Oval Office come January '09.
Especially if the Dems are dumb enough to nominate Hillary. She’s got more baggage than an overloaded cargo plane.
more baggage than Aaliyah’s plane?[/quote]
Yup. And Edwards takes better care of his hair.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
rainjack wrote:
She’s got more baggage than an overloaded cargo plane.
[/quote]
from?
[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
Yet he was re-elected which means what?[/quote]
In order to be “re-elected”, you have to be ELECTED in the first place. Unless you consider Diebold an election process …then O.K. For the rest of the us who know how the system works …we’ll just guess who the system will ELECT this time.
merlin
malevolent?
the “New” Republicans
body-double?
ever wonder why the prez acts so goofy?
[quote]merlin wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
Yet he was re-elected which means what?
In order to be “re-elected”, you have to be ELECTED in the first place. Unless you consider Diebold an election process …then O.K. For the rest of the us who know how the system works …we’ll just guess who the system will ELECT this time.
merlin
[/quote]
Biggest load of shit on this thread yet. He was elected, and he was re-elected.
No amount of whining about a non-issue will change that fact.
The photos are hilarious.
But honestly - do you think they make a point?
If that is the extent of your ability to think, I can only hope you are somewhere else on election day besides at the polls.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
He was elected, and he was re-elected.
[/quote]
Not only are you a fool(conformist) …but you are an ignorant fool. Ignoring the popular vote and accepting the DIEBOLD election systems tally is just plain ignorance. Not only that, are you that ignorant to think that you are actually voting in an uncontrolled election process.
Nobody gets elected without a paper trail and 100% of the votes counted. I guess you’re not a “thinking person” there rainjack …you outta try it out sometime. It just might open up the eyes of a blind man or an ignorant man.
merlin
[quote]merlin wrote:
rainjack wrote:
He was elected, and he was re-elected.
Not only are you a fool(conformist) …but you are an ignorant fool. Ignoring the popular vote and accepting the DIEBOLD election systems tally is just plain ignorance. Not only that, are you that ignorant to think that you are actually voting in an uncontrolled election process.
Nobody gets elected without a paper trail and 100% of the votes counted. I guess you’re not a “thinking person” there rainjack …you outta try it out sometime. It just might open up the eyes of a blind man or an ignorant man.
merlin
[/quote]
If the elections were rigged in favor of the Republicans why did they lose in 2006?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
The photos are hilarious.
But honestly - do you think they make a point?
If that is the extent of your ability to think, I can only hope you are somewhere else on election day besides at the polls. [/quote]
Your buddy Headhunter says Hillary has more baggage than a cargo plane. This is while the opium crop in Afghanistan is booming? How do they move that stuff?
You guys should get your heads together, synchronize your efforts.
So anyone critical of Bush is a loon then???
[quote]Limbic wrote:
rainjack wrote:
The photos are hilarious.
But honestly - do you think they make a point?
If that is the extent of your ability to think, I can only hope you are somewhere else on election day besides at the polls.
Your buddy Headhunter says Hillary has more baggage than a cargo plane. This is while the opium crop in Afghanistan is booming? How do they move that stuff?
You guys should get your heads together, synchronize your efforts.[/quote]
What does opium crops in th eME have to do with posting pictures?
Are you afraid your posts ill be ignored without illustrations?
You are like those homos that include a picture of a fucking cat every time they post. Not that you are a homo, and not that there is anything wrong with that if you are.
I’m just saying. Unless they are of boobs, or chicks making out - pictures really don’t do much for me.
[quote]merlin wrote:
rainjack wrote:
He was elected, and he was re-elected.
Not only are you a fool(conformist) …but you are an ignorant fool. Ignoring the popular vote and accepting the DIEBOLD election systems tally is just plain ignorance. Not only that, are you that ignorant to think that you are actually voting in an uncontrolled election process.
Nobody gets elected without a paper trail and 100% of the votes counted. I guess you’re not a “thinking person” there rainjack …you outta try it out sometime. It just might open up the eyes of a blind man or an ignorant man.
merlin
[/quote]
The reality is - Bush won. He won in 2000, and again in 2004.
You call me a fool, ignorant, and a conformist.
What do you call someone who is still crying about not getting his way 7 years ago?
A baby?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
merlin wrote:
rainjack wrote:
He was elected, and he was re-elected.
Not only are you a fool(conformist) …but you are an ignorant fool. Ignoring the popular vote and accepting the DIEBOLD election systems tally is just plain ignorance. Not only that, are you that ignorant to think that you are actually voting in an uncontrolled election process.
Nobody gets elected without a paper trail and 100% of the votes counted. I guess you’re not a “thinking person” there rainjack …you outta try it out sometime. It just might open up the eyes of a blind man or an ignorant man.
merlin
The reality is - Bush won. He won in 2000, and again in 2004.
You call me a fool, ignorant, and a conformist.
What do you call someone who is still crying about not getting his way 7 years ago?
A baby? [/quote]
Wrong!
I wouldn’t lower myself to be associated with either of those two candidates that were nominated, or the party they represent.
I don’t give a fuck about who won or lost(that was your conformist assumption). What I am concearned with, is the PEOPLE not having a say no matter who gets “elected”.
It don’t matter who gets “elected” … that is controlled by the ruling elite. What matters is the PEOPLE have no power in the decision process, although they at least think they did. Some of them anyway.
merlin
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
If the elections were rigged in favor of the Republicans why did they lose in 2006?[/quote]
Same reason, they didn’t lose or win. It is controlled by the same party. It is called the ruling elite. The Right & the Left is just scenery for the public to play with, both hands feed the same mouth.
There are no winners or losers in a controlled election. There is a reason the same two families have been in the White House for the last 28 years. Think about it. Its not hard to understand how.
merlin