[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]honest_lifter wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]mse2us wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
Guys, I thought I would look up how many verses you have used to co through to prove your point. I would say 8-10. Not many. Every verse I use, your only 3 comebacks are you are “Blinded by Satan,” “the people must have been confused, and there are other versions of the Bible that say what our translation says.” I can use those to. The two translations other than your own have no significance. I have never heard of the KIV, and the New American Bible. What denomination uses those? Are they new translations of your Bible used by Jehovah’s Witnesses. If we look at the two verses that seem to have you guys in a tiffy, John 1:1 and John 10:33 every single translation on bible.cc shows that both verses claim that Jesus is God. Why should we all go by your Bible while all the Bibles used by Christians have been said “the Word was God,” and “claim to be God?” Are you saying that you guys know more about greek than the apostles?
Lets throw a new verse in there. John 20:28 where Thomas exclaimed, “My Lord, and My God!” You are going to come back with something whitty so lets hear it. Is it going to be that He talked to Jesus first then turned his head to Heaven and said the second, or is it going to be Thomas was so surprised that he stated something like OMG?
I have now proved that Jesus claimed to be God. The people, Jews, beleived it, and the apostles beleived it. Jesus is not second, but is God. I will wish you 2 well. Peace be to you, in my God and Savior, Jesus Christ. [/quote]
I never said you were blinded.
I have used at least fifteen scriptures in my post that SPECIFICALLY distinguish between God and Jesus. You keep using the same scriptures and NONE of them SPECIFICALLY DISTINGUISH between God and Jesus. John 10:33. Come on man! I haven’t called you blind but if you can’t understand this explanation then you truly are blind. Willingly blind as Cueball said. I’ll explain it one more time. Jesus said I and the father are ONE at John 10:30. When Jesus said that, the Jews did not understand what he meant so they charged him with claiming to be God. I’m not sure if you know this but Jesus was innocent of all the charges the Jews leveled at him. If Jesus claimed to be God then the Jews would have had a case against Jesus. But Jesus did not mean that he was the person he referred to as “MY Father.” Again, John 17:20-23 explains what Jesus meant by being ONE with his Father. The New American Bible which is the official Bible of the Catholic Church states:
“20 I pray not only for them, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, 21 so that they may all be ONE, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be in us, that the world may believe that you sent me. 22 And I have given them the glory you gave me, so that they may be ONE, as we are ONE. 23 I in them and you in me, that they may be brought to perfection as ONE, that the world may know that you sent me, and that you loved them even as you loved me. 24 Father, they are your gift to me. I wish that where I am they also may be with me, that they may see my glory that you gave me, because you loved me before the foundation of the world.”
Can you SEE that Jesus clearly explains what ONE means? He wanted his disciples to be UNITED IN MIND AND THOUGHT LIKE JESUS AND HIS FATHER ARE UNITED IN MIND AND THOUGHT. I’ve explained this so many times that I sound like a broken record. Again, the Jews were clearly mistaken when they heard Jesus make that statement. And why you can’t see that I don’t understand. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, maybe you just didn’t read the several post where I explained John 10:33 instead of reading them and willingly ignoring them. Can you see?
I stated that Thomas called Jesus my God in my earlier post. Here’s what you don’t get. John 20:28 does not specifically distinguish between God and Jesus like the MANY verses I quoted do. Now this verse does require further investigation to see why Thomas would call Jesus his god. But the Bible is clear when it states at 1 Corinthians 11:3 that God is the head of Christ and when the Bible states at 1 Corinthians 15:28 that Jesus will submit himself to God. So unless Paul while under God’s inspiration is lying, Thomas calling Jesus “My God” does not mean he is God Almighty. Like I stated before one being called a god does not mean God Almighty. Again, Satan is called a God at 2 Corinthians 4:4 and Judges are called gods at Psalms 82:1,2,6,7. The term god in the Bible can refer to anyone with power especially spirit beings. Isaiah 9:6,7 prophecied that Jesus would be called a god among other names. Isaiah 9:6,7 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the PRINCELY rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, Eternal Father, PRINCE OF PEACE. 7 To the abundance of the PRINCELY RULE and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”
Can you see that this is a prophecy about Jesus? And do you notice he is called Mighty god and PRINCE of peace who will have a PRINCELY rule. So Thomas calling Jesus god is inline with this prophecy and the prophecy is clearly referring to Jesus.
I don’t have to come back with something witty to show from the Bible that the Trinity doctrine is not a Bible teaching. All I do is use reason from the scriptures.
So no you have not proved that Jesus claimed to be God because he didn’t. The Jews believing Jesus called himself God at John 10:33 does not mean Jesus is God. And no the apostles did not believe Jesus was God. This is what the apostle John believed which is stated at John 20:31 which states:
“But these have been written down that YOU may believe that Jesus is the Christ the SON OF GOD, and that, because of believing, YOU may have life by means of his name.”[/quote]
I love how you use certain translations of the Bible that fit your doctine. If you are going to use a translation of the Bible you have to use the entire Translation of the Bible. All Christian Bibles, including Catholic, and Protestant Bibles say in John 1:1 that the Word was God. You do not deny that the Word is Jesus. You have gone along with that one from the very begining. I find it amazing how the Jehovah’s Witnesses know more about the Bible, written in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic, than the people that actually knew those languages, and understood them more than you or I could ever imagine. You keep bringing up all these different parts of the Bible to say what you want it to say. But when you see that Jesus is God in human flesh all your questions are answered, and your eyes will be opened.
You are not going to convince me otherwise, and I am not going to convince you either. We are going to have to wait, and then stand before God and see what he says.
Friends, or can you actually befriend a non-Jehovah’s Witness? Peace to you friend.[/quote]
It doesn’t answer all your questions if Jesus is God. In fact, it makes reconciling the scriptures that mse2us put up impossible.
Also, you would be hard pressed to reconcile the following scripture either:
John 1:18
“No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god who is in the bosom position with the Father is the one that has explained him.”
[/quote]
What? Your translation is a little out there. Seems like you have multiple gods. You may not worship them, but you have multiple gods.
John 1:18
"No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.
Jesus is the one who has made him known. Jesus has seen God because he has always been. The Word was with God, and the Word is God, as stated in John 1:1. Seems to reconcile to me.
I am trying to offer a peace offering, to stop this debate that neither of us will be able to win. If you continue on in this manner I will have to assume that Jehovah’s Witnesses do not care about peace. Which is in stark contrast to
Matt 5:9
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called sons of God.
[/quote]
And this is the problem with the scripture only approach. Same words interpreted differently to mean different things. Further, because there are contradictions and paradoxes, one is often force to choose one nugget of scripture over another, but which is right?
This is why I say the evangelical and the apostolic traditions have a lot to gain by joining together and learning from each other.
As for the less traditional sects, the differences are to fundamental to reconcile, but the numbers are so few it may not matter. I do have a problem with the revisionist history that some have participated in. Revisionist history is lying, know your roots, there is no need to make it different than it actually was. If you have to change history to validate your faith, I question it’s validity. This is about seeking truth not making lies to suit ourselves, that’s pointless.
Why don’t we agree we all love God and we can move on. Scripture wars are going no where…