[quote]mse2us wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]mse2us wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]mse2us wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
Lets bring up another one, and this time Jesus says he is Jehovah. You are going to like this one.
John 12:39-41
39For this reason they could not believe, because, as Isaiah says elsewhere:
40"He has blinded their eyes
and deadened their hearts,
so they can neither see with their eyes,
nor understand with their hearts,
nor turnÃ???Ã???Ã???Ã???Ã???Ã??Ã?¢??and I would heal them."[a] 41Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus’ glory and spoke about him.
This one refers to Isaiah 6:10 - For those that do not know this is the part where Isaiah sees the Lord sitting on the throne.
10 Make the heart of this people calloused;
make their ears dull
and close their eyes. [a]
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts,
and turn and be healed."
Hebrews 1:10-12
10He also says,
“In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.”[a]
This goes back to Psalm 102:25-27
25 In the beginning you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
26 They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
Like clothing you will change them
and they will be discarded.
27 But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.
[/quote]
Nice try D. At John 12:41 John is talking about Isaiah seeing Gods glory not Jesus’. For starters, that is not Jesus talking it is John narrating. John points out that the Jews not believing Jesus was prophesied in Isaiah. John then goes onto quote Isaiah. Let see how the New King James Translation renders John 12:38-41:
"38 that the word of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spoke:
Lord, who has believed our report? And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?
39 Therefore they could not believe, because Isaiah said again:
40 “He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, Lest they should see with their eyes,
Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I should heal them.”
41 These things Isaiah said when he saw HIS glory and spoke of Him.
Can you see the difference D? The above translation states that Isaiah saw HIS glory. Who’s glory? Verse 38 show the verses that follow are talking about the Lord’s glory. My Bible uses God’s name Jehovah instead of the title Lord. I went to Bible.com and out of the 15 translations that I looked up 12 said that Isaiah saw HIS glory meaning Jehovah’s glory; not Jesus’ glory. So MOST translation state HIS glory instead of Jesus’ glory. Unfortunately, this does cause confusion because we are now debating over words that translations use. Not all Bible translations are equal and due to beliefs such as the Trinity many Bible translators let that influence their translations. So the above verses Dmaddox used is weak scriptual evidence to explain the Trinity. How so? When God inspired John to write those verses the point of those verses was to show that the Jews did not believe Jesus because it was prophysied by Isaiah that God would blind their hearts and mind. It was not to show God’s and Jesus’ relationship and who had more authority. On the other hand 1 Corinthians 11:3 directly and clearly addressed the headship or pecking order of woman vs man, man vs Jesus and Jesus vs God. The verse even starts of by stating: “But I want you to know.” So when God inpired Paul to write
1 Corinthians 11:3 he wants readers to know that in marriage the man is the head of the household, in the Christian congregation Jesus is the head of man and when it comes to authority God is the head of or over Jesus. This harmonizes with what Jesus said at John 14:28 when he said “the father is greater than I am.”
1 Corinthians 15:24-28 is another passage that clearly and directly address God’s and Jesus relationship by mentioning both God and Jesus and directly stating who has more authority. So again when God inspired Paul to write 1 Corinthians 15:27,28 that all things are subject to Jesus with the exception of God and that in the future Jesus will subject all the things to God, God wants the readers to know that Jesus is made subject to him.
I keep hammering this point and Trinitarians don’t seem to get it. YOU WILL NOT FIND A SCRIPTURE IN THE BIBLE THAT WAS WRITTEN SPECIFICALLY TO ADDRESS GOD’S AND JESUS’ RELATIONSHIP THAT STATE GOD AND JESUS ARE THE SAME BEINGS OR EQUAL IN AUTHORITY. THAT’S BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE IN THE BIBLE. On the other hand there are MANY scriptures that SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS God’s and Jesus’ relationship and directly state that God has more authority than Jesus. So no matter how many scriptures you use and try to “twist” Dmaddox none will be greater, clearer and more direct than the two (out of many) I listed above in regards to showing that God and Jesus are not the same or equal.
By the way the scriptures you quoted from Hebrews, are you going to explain those scriptures/ Because I can’t see how you could even use those to show that Jesus is God.[/quote]
First of all why are you yelling? There is not need for this. You are as frustrated with me as I am with you and Honest.
Nice try m, but did you read the first part? So that the words of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled. Jesus came to fulfill the Law and not abolish it. They are talking about Jesus. He is the fulfillment of the prophets prophicy. So when it is using the word HIS, that would mean Jesus. I am no english scholar, but I can even come to that conclusion.
Until we get this taken care of you might want to hold off on other verses, or the same verses you continue to post.
I will say I am showing you plenty of verses in the Bible that prove Jesus and God are the same. You just are not willing to see it. I see your points, and how you come to those conclusions, but since you do not understand the duality of Jesus being fully man and fully God, you will not be able to see our point. Once you do then you will be able to see what the Bible is truely trying to tell us.
You keep denouncing the subject that Jesus willfully humbled himself so that he could become sin for us to bring us back to God. God gave up his throne to become sin. To become sin he had to become human. Why would someone give up their throne? They wanted us to be with him. God had to make a sacrifice so that he can look past our sins and bring us back into fellowship with him. No other being can make that sacrifice other than God. John 15:13 Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. God wants us to be with him so he lays down his life for us. God has called us friends. He has also called us brothers, and his children.
Verse 15 of John 15, I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. All angels are God’s servants. How could Jesus know the master’s business if he is an angel? Jesus knew he was here to die for our sins. How can Jesus know God’s plan if he is not God?
[/quote]
I’m sorry if it appears that I’m yelling. I capitalize for emphasize. I’m not sure how to highlight text by underlining or italicizing with my web browser. If I knew how I would do either or instead of capitalizing.
The prophecy that was fulfilled is the fact that the Jews did not believe Jesus because God blinded their minds and hearts. Isaiah prophesied this and it came true.
I want you to show me a scripture that is as specific as the two that I showed you. I can’t see your points based on the scriptures you use because none of them specifically distinguish between Jesus’ and God’s relationship. Some of the scriptures you used do require further investigation but none of them are as direct and clear as the two I asked you to explain. So I can’t ignore the clear and direct scriptures that specifically address God’s and Jesus’ relationship and change my mind based on the scriptures you used that do not specifically address God’s and Jesus’ relationship.
I know that Jesus had to humble himself and he showed humility all while he was on earth but that does not mean he is God. Exodus 33:20 states that “no man may see God and live.” This is in harmony with the scripture Honest_lifter mentioned at John 1:18 that states no man has seen God. So God could not have come down in human form for humans to see.
Look at what God had Abraham do with his only son Issac. He tested Abraham’s love and obediance by seeing if Abraham would offer his only son. This act foreshadowed what God would do with Abraham’s seed Jesus. God didn’t tell Abraham to offer up himself because it’s a lot more difficult to offer up a beloved child. Many parents would take the bullet or sacrifice themselves for their children. The greatest expression of God’s love was offering not himself but his only begotten son. That’s why John 3:16 states: “16 For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.”
God giving himself for a sacrifice would be great but giving his only-begotten son is even greater.
EDIT: I did not see your last post when I wrote this one. So I apologized for appearing to yell before I saw your post asking for an apology. But I do not apologize for stating that your explanation of the scriptures I asked you to explain as being week. [/quote]
Lets think like a Hebrew/Jew from the time that Jesus was on earth. Really try. What would the Jews had done to Jesus if said, “I am God!” from the very begining? They would have stoned him. Pretty simple Right? If they would have stoned him would he have been able to finish his ministry? No.
Again we are still thinking like a Hebrew/Jew from Jesus’ time, and not as an enlightened American, such as yourself. I have pointed out many times that the night that Jesus was betrayed and stood before the Sanhedrin. Jesus was asked are you the Messiah? Jesus answers, “I AM.” These two small words would tell any Hebrew/Jew that he is claiming to be God. They yell BLASPHAMEY. There is only one thing to a Hebrew/Jew that means Blasphemy, and that is claiming to be Yahweh. Claiming to be a god, would have ment he is crazy and to cast him out of the city. They would not have wanted to kill him.
The laypeople Hebrews/Jews knew what he was saying, the Scholars/Spiritual Leaders knew what he was saying, the apostles knew what he was saying, and even Pilot’s wife knew what he was saying. You might want to look that one up also Matt 27:19. The people of that time knew he was saying; there was no relationship between himself and God. He is God.
While looking up the verse for Pilot’s wife I found this jewel.
Matthew 27:11
11Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the king of the Jews?”
“Yes, it is as you say,” Jesus replied.
Who is the King of the Jews? Who is the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords? You can not get any clearer than this. Open your heart and your mind to the true God.
John 18:36 Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place.”
Being the Arch Angel means you are a leader of the angels. Does not mean you are the master over the angels. I am going to post Hebrews 1:5-14 again for emphasis.
5For to which of the angels did God ever say,
“You are my Son;
today I have become your Father”? Or again,
“I will be his Father,
and he will be my Son”? 6And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says,
“Let all God’s angels worship him.” 7In speaking of the angels he says,
“He makes his angels winds,
his servants flames of fire.”[e] 8But about the Son he says,
“Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”[f] 10He also says,
“In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.”[g] 13To which of the angels did God ever say,
“Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet”[h]? 14Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?
God is saying in verse 8 about Jesus, your throne, Oh God, will reign for ever and ever. Pretty clear that God is saying that Jesus is God. [/quote]
Again, none of those verses are as clear and direct as 1 Corinthians 15:24-28 or 1 Corinthians 11:3. Unfortunately, bad Bible translation can misconstrue the true meaning of the verses and all this does is cause confusion. Not only that but due to pre-existing beliefs about the Trinity many translations have been influenced to hint that God and Jesus are the same. Two of the examples you gave Dmaddox do just that.
Since there aren’t any scriptures that directly distiguish between God and Jesus and then clearly state who has more authority like the two verses I listed above DO, Trinitarians like to use verses that hint that Jesus is God Almighty. For example, Trinitarians use “I am” to show that Jehovah and Jesus are the same. Many translations render Exodus 3:14(NIV) as:
God said to Moses, “I am who I am . [b] This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’ "
According to this translation God is stating that Moses should tell the Israelites that “I am” has sent you.
Jesus says the words “I am” at John 18:5 when the mob states that they’re looking for Jesus. The NIV renders John 18:5 as:
“Jesus of Nazareth,” they replied. “I am he,” Jesus said. (And Judas the traitor was standing there with them.) 6When Jesus said, “I am he,” they drew back and fell to the ground.”
So Dmaddox is saying that since God said his name is “I am” and Jesus answered “I am he” to the mob when they said they were looking for Jesus this implies that they are the same.
Now here is my point. My Bible which is the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures renders Exodus 3:14 the following way:
"At this God said to Moses: “I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE.” And he added: “This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, ‘I SHALL PROVE TO BE has sent me to YOU.’”
The verse directly above renders “I am” as “I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE.” Which means that God can become whatever is needed to fullfil his purposes. Which translation is more accurate or clearly conveys the meaning of Exodus 3:14? Because “I am who I am” and “I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE,” completely changes the meaning of the verse. Now here is where the pre-existing Trinity belief comes in. If you look at the footnote next to the words “I am” at Exodus 3:14 in the NIV translation it shows that it could also be translated as “I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE,” which is similiar in meaning to “I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE.” But due to the fact that Trinitarians like to link what God said at Exodus 3:14 to what Jesus said at John 18:5 to prove that Jesus is God Almighty, translators let this influence their translations and chose to use “I am” instead of the more accurate “I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE.”
The other example is Hebrews 1:8,9. Verse 8 from the New Revised Standard Version reads:
“But of the Son he says,'Your throne, O God, is* for ever and ever, and the righteous sceptre is the sceptre of your* kingdom.” 9You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness beyond your companions."
The [u]New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures/u renders Hebrews 1:8,9:
"But with reference to the Son: “God is your throne forever and ever, and the scepter of your kingdom is the scepter of uprightness. 9 You loved righteousness, and you hated lawlessness. That is why God, your God, anointed you with the oil of exultation more than your partners.”
Can you see the difference? The former verse states: “But of the Son he says, Your throne, O God, is for ever and ever.” The latter states: “But with reference to the Son: God is your throne forever and ever,”
The way that these two translations renders verse 8 changes the meaning of the verse. Again,
here is were pre-existing Trinity beliefs influences the translation. The New Revised Standard Version has an astriek next to “O God, is*.” at verse 8. When you click on the astriek to look at the footnote it reads: “Or God is your throne” which then completely changes the meaning of the verse and renders it like the NWT. As Dmaddox points out the popular rendering such as the New Revised Standared Version that I used makes it appear that the son is called “O God” but also notes that it could be rendered “God is your throne” meaning that his father is the source of Jesus’ throne.
I know, confusing! My point in of all of this is that some Bible translations such as the King James Translation are bad translations. Because not only are they harder to read and understand but pre-existing beliefs influenced the translations. The different translations do make it confusing but when presented with scriptures that people use to [i[hint[/i] that God and Jesus are the same look at it this way. When God inspired the Bible writers to write the verses above, the intention or point to convey was not to address Jesus’ and God’s relationship and show who has more authority. On the other hand, 1 Corinthians 15:24-28 and 1 Corinthians 11:3 are there to clearly and direclty show that all things will submit to Jesus except God and Jesus will submit to God and that God is the head of Jesus. No scriptures that Trinitarians use will be as clear and direct as those two.
If anyone wants to look up what I stated above go to this link:
http://bibleresources.bible.com/bible_read.php
The NIV is the first Bible in the list called the Amplified Bible and the New Revised Standard Version is toward the botton of the list. You can look up the verses I mentioned above and see how both the NIV and the New Revised Standard Version have footnotes that change the meaning of the verses.[/quote]
I see how you like to include only the Christian translations of the Bible. The same thing can be said, if not more, for your book. I would say your translation was written only to confirm your beleifs. Changed in many ways to refute the Trinity because a man wanted it to be that way.
I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree, but know we will be on the same side versus atheists, but we will be on different sides talking about Heaven and Hell, the Trinity, and Jesus being an Angel. Take it easy, and see you around Friend.