Catholic Teacher Fired

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
181

[quote]WW3General wrote:
I think it is funny you did not get the other one til Raj told you
and brother Chris I am not even gonna try to be cute with you I fucked that 9th grade g/f and your mom.[/quote]

Wow! So this is what you get when you have no evidence, no counter arguments to make your point. If all else fails, insult somebody’s mother!!

I am dying. This is some funny shit.
“Don’t listen to relgious people their just dumb and I fucked their mothers.” LMAO!! This is killing me!

What are you, 12?

“Yo mama like a brick, flat in the front, flat in the back and gets laid by mexicans!” ← If that’s not a proper counter argument to when life begins, nothing is…

182

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]WW3General wrote:
To Brother Chris and Sloth

      Can
    yoU
      Not make a new
      Thread
seriouSly

[/quote]

Cute, I think my girlfriend, back when I was in 9th grade, wrote me a note like this when I broke up with her. But, I think she called me a dick instead. [/quote]

“Oh yeah! I fucked yo mama!” LOL!

183

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]WW3General wrote:
“more likely culprit is non-religious ambivalence”[/quote]

I’m guessing you don’t understand what that statement means.[/quote]

Hide yo mama! he gonna try to fuck’er!
LOL! Sorry I need to stop, I just can’t stop laughing.

184

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Nope. But I have some dear friends, wonderful people, who had a multiple birth due to in-vitro. Finest people on the planet. To then have them called ‘inherently evil’ in what they did…well, the gents who thought that up can kiss off…seriously.
[/quote]

Does not seem like you share in these people’s “fineness.” Though I would like to see where anyone called these people inherently evil.[/quote]

The bishop did exactly that – calling in-vitro ‘inherently evil’. So what’s that make people who go that route?

185

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Organised religions suck. Plain and simple.

The least suck-ish are Hinduism and Judaism.

Condemning people for wanting to have children…Jesus is mighty pissed.[/quote]

Yet, another example of the mighty intellect of HH.

No one is condemning anyone for wanting to have children, you’re arguing against a straw man.[/quote]

She got condemned to the unemployment line because she wanted to have a baby.

Seems to me that the church has a lot more to deal with than a woman who dedicates here career to educating children and wanting to bring life into this miserable world.

186

HeadHunter there is no hope in having a serious talk just talk some shit and have fun like I am. I do actually apologise for the I fucked your momma joke because his momma ain’t got nothing to do with this and she may be a really nice lady like most mothers are. But, I will take her out to a nice steak dinner and never call her back.

187

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

She got condemned to the unemployment line because she wanted to have a baby.

[/quote]

Nope.

188

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Nope. But I have some dear friends, wonderful people, who had a multiple birth due to in-vitro. Finest people on the planet. To then have them called ‘inherently evil’ in what they did…well, the gents who thought that up can kiss off…seriously.
[/quote]

Does not seem like you share in these people’s “fineness.” Though I would like to see where anyone called these people inherently evil.[/quote]

The bishop did exactly that – calling in-vitro ‘inherently evil’. So what’s that make people who go that route?
[/quote]

It is inherently evil.

189

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Nope. But I have some dear friends, wonderful people, who had a multiple birth due to in-vitro. Finest people on the planet. To then have them called ‘inherently evil’ in what they did…well, the gents who thought that up can kiss off…seriously.
[/quote]

Does not seem like you share in these people’s “fineness.” Though I would like to see where anyone called these people inherently evil.[/quote]

The bishop did exactly that – calling in-vitro ‘inherently evil’. So what’s that make people who go that route?
[/quote]

It is inherently evil.
[/quote]

Are the children evil? If an act is evil, then the results must be too.

If that’s the belief of the Catholic church, then I think Jesus would condemn the church.

Maybe the Grand Inquisitor was historical. :frowning:

190

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

She got condemned to the unemployment line because she wanted to have a baby.

[/quote]

Nope.
[/quote]

Okay…

191

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]WW3General wrote:
To Brother Chris and Sloth

      Can
    yoU
      Not make a new
      Thread
seriouSly

[/quote]

Cute, I think my girlfriend, back when I was in 9th grade, wrote me a note like this when I broke up with her. But, I think she called me a dick instead. [/quote]

My advice? Don’t waste your time. He’s either a troll, or about a mature as that 9th grade girlfriend. Though, I suppose both go hand in hand. See his other thread, a couple of responses down.
[/quote]

I put him on the list. So, I’d have to take him off to see what he said.

192

[quote]therajraj wrote:
If a baseball and bat cost $110, and the bat costs $100 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?[/quote]

Are you saying the cost $110 together?

193

[quote]therajraj wrote:
If a baseball and bat cost $110, and the bat costs $100 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?[/quote]

Straw man!

194

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
If a baseball and bat cost $110, and the bat costs $100 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?[/quote]

Are you saying the cost $110 together?[/quote]

Yep.

195

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
If a baseball and bat cost $110, and the bat costs $100 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?[/quote]

Straw man![/quote]

hah

196

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Nope. But I have some dear friends, wonderful people, who had a multiple birth due to in-vitro. Finest people on the planet. To then have them called ‘inherently evil’ in what they did…well, the gents who thought that up can kiss off…seriously.
[/quote]

Does not seem like you share in these people’s “fineness.” Though I would like to see where anyone called these people inherently evil.[/quote]

The bishop did exactly that – calling in-vitro ‘inherently evil’. So what’s that make people who go that route?
[/quote]

Misguided. Unless they know why it’s inherently evil, and then they are morally culpable. However, it doesn’t sound like this lady knows what the Nicene Creed is, let alone the reasoning behind why IVF is immoral.

I’d hate to go into all what makes something a mortal sin, but one of them is knowledge. Without that, it’s still a terrible thing, but one is not as morally culpable as if they knew the reasoning behind why it is such.

Further, to say that the Church finds the want of children sinful is not-founded. John Paul II expresses in his greatest work, Theology of the Body, that the yearning for children, by human parents, is the shadow of the yearning that God the Father had when he created us to share in his Son’s divine nature.

197

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
She got condemned to the unemployment line because she wanted to have a baby.

Seems to me that the church has a lot more to deal with than a woman who dedicates here career to educating children and wanting to bring life into this miserable world.
[/quote]

You’re trying to say the Church fired her because of the ends she wanted, no they fired her for the means she is using.

This is a non-sequitor, specially false dichotomy, saying that the Church needs to focus on one thing (I have no clue what you’d be referring to anyway since the Church is responsible for a lot of things). But, Church is responsible for both (whatever you are suggesting) and the civility of its members (including those that work for Her).

198

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Are the children evil? If an act is evil, then the results must be too.[/quote]

I’d like to see your proof for this.

But it’s not.

199

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Nope. But I have some dear friends, wonderful people, who had a multiple birth due to in-vitro. Finest people on the planet. To then have them called ‘inherently evil’ in what they did…well, the gents who thought that up can kiss off…seriously.
[/quote]

Does not seem like you share in these people’s “fineness.” Though I would like to see where anyone called these people inherently evil.[/quote]

The bishop did exactly that – calling in-vitro ‘inherently evil’. So what’s that make people who go that route?
[/quote]

Misguided. Unless they know why it’s inherently evil, and then they are morally culpable. However, it doesn’t sound like this lady knows what the Nicene Creed is, let alone the reasoning behind why IVF is immoral.

I’d hate to go into all what makes something a mortal sin, but one of them is knowledge. Without that, it’s still a terrible thing, but one is not as morally culpable as if they knew the reasoning behind why it is such.

Further, to say that the Church finds the want of children sinful is not-founded. John Paul II expresses in his greatest work, Theology of the Body, that the yearning for children, by human parents, is the shadow of the yearning that God the Father had when he created us to share in his Son’s divine nature.[/quote]

Well, my friends with the in-vitro kids…should they not have gotten them baptised? Should she have them leave the Faith? Maybe the priest who baptised them should report himself for punishment?

I think an exorcism would probably fix this, don’t you?

200

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Are the children evil? If an act is evil, then the results must be too.[/quote]

I’d like to see your proof for this.

But it’s not.
[/quote]

(1) Getting in-vitro is evil.
(2) Good cannot come out of evil, especially ‘inherently evil’.
(3) Therefore the kids are a result of an evil act and are evil.

Exorcism recommended.