Was going to post something in disagreement, but i think I’ll just see my way out from this part of the forums. It’s like credentialed bro science over here.
![]()
Same.
I can’t even figure out how to start though. It’s like trying to debate a flat-earther.
High intensity exercise, such as weight training, utilizes glucose primarily stored as glycogen in the liver and muscles that comes from carbohydrates.
Strange replies (yours and the previous one) for such a simple discussion about carbohydrates and muscle growth.
Do you think different perspectives are always strange? Or just when it pertains to carbs and muscle building?
I found this video to be super motivating while I was doing Deep Water! That diet and training plan broke me through a plateau I’d reached that got me from 184 to 192 in 8 weeks. Funny, going from high carb and low volume training to low carb and high volume training busted me through a major plateau.
So awesome to hear dude! Marty Gallagher talks about the need for those extremes for balance
I think the whole experience taught me a very valuable lesson in periodization and the awesome effect it has on preventing stagnation. I believe this follows Jim Wendler’s Leaders and Anchors concept as well.
No, I think comparing this discussion to that of debating a flat earther to be a strange reply along with calling this forum like credentialed bro science.
I find it strange that you, in all your prowess, think you know what Frank Zane needed to do better in his bodybuilding career.
I think it’s a great analogy. Flat-earthers have conviction in their very narrow worldview despite centuries of scientific expertise saying otherwise. Likewise, you are making a claim through a very pigeon-holed ideology of bodybuilding, namely high carb dieting + HIT, despite decades of so many of the greats experiencing unprecedented success in their time using a multitude of very different approaches.
Well, it seems to me the anti-carb group have become the new cult,
![]()
I don’t think any of us are really stymied by the recommended approach (HIT/ high-carb), but the analysis that got some of the posters there is confusing. “Frank Zane was 3x the best bodybuilder on the planet during the golden age of bodybuilding; he missed his potential by not eating and training this way.” Do you see why that reads a little strange?
Same here … when I finally let go of my one way of training / eating of very low volume / higher carb, I was able to start making gains again after being stuck for years … I was so fucking bull headed. Never saw this Deep Water guy before but thanks to T3hPwnisher for posting it.
I have to check out more of his stuff.
I’m not faulting HIT / high carbs for my plateau I got stuck at for so many years , it was because of MY unwillingness to try something different. Being so stubborn and set is NOT the way to go about anything.
I’m still getting a kick out of Zane fucking up his career because he didn’t eat enough spaghetti and pancakes. I guess he could have had two at least more Olympias if he did ![]()
I was the opposite…for many years i was high protein and/or high fat with little to no carbs
I followed the low carb hype and cult
I was fat, blood numbers were terrible, had digestive issues and energy sucked
When i went to 50/25/25 (carbs/fat/protein), lost weight (not where i want to be yet, but am getting there), blood numbers are good, no more digestive issues and am full of energy
to each their own i guess
As for Zane…he won 3x Mr. Olympia…not gonna question his methods of getting there
Uhh…
That tricep is sticking out the back like an additional appendage.
Thats not pushing or angling. That is just massive tricep.
I think you gents are nailing it: when something isn’t working, try another thing!
Stop worshipping these bodybuilders. They are not as smart as you think. Most of them have great results because of great genetics…and drugs.
I don’t. You should stop worshipping a book written 35 years ago
![]()