No freaking way!!! Bush will destroy the working class. He hates labor and will do everything in his power and then some to destroy them.
YES.
absolutely. YES
YES
Yes I will vote for Bush. Bush is a man of character and is interested in doing the right thing instead of the popular thing. Most women voted no because Bush is a hawkish and forcefully strong president who is definitely not intouch with his feminine side. Most women are opposed to things like war (which has been the route Bush has taken) because they are fundamentally different than men. Not less than equal in worth or importance but different hormonally which has been shown to affect behavior and though process. God bless women, I love them, (especially my wife) but they are not suited to run the country.
Bush an a New Vice ? Hell we just need a bunch of people that can come up with some kind of plan for our dam economy. As far as all the dam political crap , NO COMMENT I’ll take the 5th. You can go around an around an around an around an around … Shit I’m frigin dizzy now.
You betcha…there are no good Stupidcrats to vote for…or republicans for that matter. The economy was slipping at the end of Bill Clinton and algore…so ya can’t lay that one on Dubya…
OF COURSE!!
Bostonbarrier
You and Anderson make it seem like its a bad thing that Clinton reduced the miltary. Which I don’t thing is bad. I beleived that Regan and bush senor had miltary spending way to high. I don’t beleive that are current miltary is hampered by Clinton’s lower budget. The only thing I can think of that you may argue is that of homeland security and on that concept I agree with you.
Concearing the tax cut on dividends id love that. To bad they aren’t on the corporate level. Ill research it and see what I can find about the tax cut. The problem though is bush is already in a deficit and you cut taxes his funding will even be less. How are we going to pay for his expanded miltary?
Fuck Yeah
People who vote for and will vote for George W. Bush are good. The rest of you are bad.
The world is far too dangerous to elect a candidate who only cares about what feels good (typical democrat). George W. Bush’s foreign policy team is the most experienced team I have ever seen.
SO I GIVE AN EMPHATIC YES TO YOUR QUESTION.
The problem with Bush regime is that it creates large scale instability in the world economy. Who can big multinationals plan they future investments, if it is impossible to plan the future.
Yes. I shudder to think what Gore would have done if he’d been in office during 9/11 and all that has followed. Herc
Unfortunately, the most qualified people I know who I would vote for in less than a second are not politicians, and wouldn’t waste their time running for election. But as a second choice, I would indeed vote for Bush again.