Found this video on the net. I got no intentions to start a debate here. Just a little humor before election time!
Follow the link. You’ll need Quicktime to play it.
(Quicktime can be gotten for free from www.cnet.com).
And the right falls silent…
…this video must have been around the same time that he was at the family compound with his folks and began insulting his mother’s friend, leading to a war of words with with mom and dad and rusulting in George Sr. getting Billy Graham to come speak to Jr. The rest, as they say, is history…it’s the American Dream: a man with no direction, no career prospects, a marriage on the rocks, a drinking problem, but a rich and powerful last name can reverse the aforementioned and result in becoming the president of the US.
We can all relate, no?
I refuse to believe no one else has viewed this clip!
C’mon right and left alike, what do you think?
No biggie? Or, no surprise?
I doubt there are laws against being an obnoxious drunk… 
If I ever end up with money, I’m going to hide that fact from my kids, assuming I have kids, so that they don’t grow up thinking they can be irresponsible idiots.
Looks like you have documentation showing Bush had a few drinks once at a party. I bet he’s the only president to do have done that.
I noticed he wasn’t that drunk- he could still tilt his head back without falling? In fact, I think he’s easier to understand after a few drinks than Kerry is stone sober.
RSU- Was his marriage once on the rocks? They fixed it though I guess. More than we can say for Kerry. Or, that other democrat who humiliated his wife before the whole nation.
What is the right so afraid of that they have to try to malign “all democrats” every chance they get? Wait, don’t answer, that’s obviously a major thread-jack.
The same thing the left is afraid of that they do the exact same thing. It’s not really all that hard to comprehend there vroom, people are afraid of what is unkown or different. Most are anyways. It’s basic human nature. Why is this so hard to grasp. All day long i read attacks by both sides, then crying from both sides stating how they don’t attack but the other side does. Which i and of it’self is an attack because in essence in a third grade kind of way, they are trying to claim, We are better because we don’t make attacks but you do. This of course is false. It’s just jockeying for power. Jockeying to be part of the majority, part of the winning side. If it were really just about what is good for the community, the country, the world. There would be very little of this going on, and more in depth study and discourse of issues, and possible ways to solve those issues. No one ever does that because of human nature. I am guilty of it myself, to say otherwise would be dishonest.
In essence, Vroom buddy, you seem to ask a ton of hypothetical (why is water wet, why does a dog like to hump) questions. I am not sure why you pose so many of these? Do you want to see if anyone else can figure out why these complex things happen? Do you really not know? What are you always trying to get at? You preplex me with vast insight in one sentance then seemingly total lack of insight in the next. Perhaps you do it on purpose for reasons I stated above? Who knows, but in any event you confuse me with at least half of your posts.
Vegita ~ Prince of all Sayajins
that is hilarious…my republican office is cracking up over that…W is funny as hell.
[quote]Vegita wrote:
In essence, Vroom buddy, you seem to ask a ton of hypothetical (why is water wet, why does a dog like to hump) questions. [/quote]
These aren’t hypothetical, they’re rhetorical.