Brokeback Propaganda

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Can one or two people get it wrong, on either side? Sure. But over all I know what I read and I know what is right and I know what is wrong.[/quote]

May I suggest that the reason you claim to “know” what is right flows from your religious convictions?

Your beliefs on homosexuality are directly contradicted by every major medical and mental health organization. These organizations have reviewed the entire body of scientific research, and their conclusions are based on that research rather than on religious beliefs.

I’m curious. Among those of you telling gays they need to change, is there even ONE that isn’t a fundamentalist Christian with strong religious convictions?

[quote]By they way, we just broke the record for the longest most nauseating thread on homosexuality that this board has ever seen!

And we did it together. :slight_smile:
[/quote]

Woohoo! :wink:

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Can one or two people get it wrong, on either side? Sure. But over all I know what I read and I know what is right and I know what is wrong.

May I suggest that the reason you claim to “know” what is right flows from your religious convictions?[/quote]

It might flow from my religious convictions. Then again, it might flow from the volumes of data that I have uncovered over the past year or so.

May I suggest that your beliefs flow from the fact that you have a same sex attraction? Can your views be tainted because you want to see what you want to see?

I don’t think there is all that much research behind what they purport to believe. I think it is a political correct stance begun by the APA.

And again I ask you, if it is impossible to change then how come so many have changed?

They are not all living a lie. Maybe some are…but not most.

I suggest that you try to get around that one. Just as we are supposed to get around the fact that you are gay and probably looking for information to back up your own personal decision.

Not one organization on the face of this earth has ever reported that being gay and living the gay lifestyle (primary gay sex act etc.) is a healthy one!

[quote]By they way, we just broke the record for the longest most nauseating thread on homosexuality that this board has ever seen!

And we did it together. :slight_smile:

Woohoo! :wink:
[/quote]

Come on now I would expect that you would be happier than that about it.

I think we can go on to 100 pages! In fact, that is my new goal (always have to have a goal).

100 PAGES!

[quote]forlife wrote:

They will tell gays that they SHOULD change, and that they CAN change, despite the conclusions and recommendations of every major medical and mental health organization in the world. They will harm people in the process, and they directly bear the responsibility for doing so.[/quote]

Thousands have changed and you cannot deny it. That you have not changed is a decsion that you made when you gave up.

What you are currently doing is far more dangerous than attempting to change once again.

Would you dare call all of these people liars?

"Changing Sexual Orientation or Behavior

(May 9, 2001). Press Release, National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, Prominent Psychiatrist Announces New Study Results: “Some Gays can Change.” Available at http://www.narth.com/docs/spitzerrelease.html (last updated May 8, 2001.)

“Like most psychiatrists,” says Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, “I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that’s untrue–some people can and do change.”

Acosta, F., (1975) Etiology and treatment of homosexuality: review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 4:9-29.
??better prospects for intervention in homosexual life and in its prevention through the early identification and treatment of the potential homosexual child.? (p. 9)

Aries, P. and A. Bejin, ed., Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Bieber, I., et al. (1962) Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. NY: Basic Books.

?The therapeutic results of our study provide reason for an optimistic outlook. Many homosexuals became exclusively heterosexual in psychoanalytic treatment. Although this change may be more easily accomplished by some than by others, in our judgment a heterosexual shift is a possibility for all homosexuals who are strongly motivated to change.? (p. 319)

Bieber, I., Bieber, T. (1979) Male homosexuality. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 24, 5:409-421.
?We have followed some patients for as long as 20 years who have remained exclusively heterosexual. Reversal estimates now range from 30% to an optimistic 50%.? (p.416)
Cappon, D., (1965) Toward an Understanding of Homosexuality. Englewoord Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Of patients with bisexual problems 90% were cured (i.e., no reversions to homosexual behavior, no consciousness of homosexual desire and fantasy) in males who terminated treatment by common consent. Male homosexual patients: 80% showed marked improvement (i.e., occasional relapses, release of aggression, increasingly dominant heterosexuality)? 50% changed.? (p. 265-268)

Clippinger, J., (1974) Homosexuality can be cured. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy. 21, 2:15-28.
?Of 785 patients treated, 307, or approximately 38%, were cured. Adding the percentage figures of the two other studies, we can say that at least 40% of the homosexuals were cured, and an additional 10 to 30% of the homosexuals were improved, depending on the particular study for which statistics were available.? (p. 22)

Fine, R., (1987) Psychoanalytic theory. (in Diamant L. Male and Female Homosexuality: Psychological Approaches. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.) 81-95.
??a considerable percentage of overt homosexuals became heterosexual? If patients were motivated, whatever procedure is adopted a large percentage will give up their homosexuality? The misinformation that homosexuality is untreatable by psychotherapy does incalculable harm to thousands of men and women?? (p. 85-86)

Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.

"The second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)
?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)

Goetze, R. (1997) Homosexuality and the Possibility of Change: A Review of 17 Published Studies. Toronto Canada: New Directions for Life.
44 persons who were exclusively or predominantly homosexual experienced a full shift of sexual orientation.
Hatterer, L., (1970) Changing Homosexuality in the Male. NY: McGraw-Hill.

49 patients changed (20 married, of these 10 remained married, 2 divorced, 18 achieved heterosexual adjustments); 18 partially recovered, remained single; 76 remained homosexual (28 palliated ? 58 unchanged) ?A large undisclosed population has melted into heterosexual society, persons who behaved homosexually in late adolescence and early adulthood, and who, on their own, resolved their conflicts and abandoned such behavior to go on to successful marriages or to bisexual patterns of adoption.? (p. 14)

James, Elizabeth (1978) Treatment of Homosexuality: A Reanalysis and Synthesis of Outcome Studies (unpublished PhD dissertation, Brigham Young University, on file with Brigham Young University Library).

Elizabeth James meta-analyzed over 100 outcome studies published between 1930 and 1976, and concluded that when all the research was combines, 35% of homosexual clients “recovered” and 27% improved.

Kaye, H., Beri, S., Clare, J., Eleston, M., Gershwin, B., Gershwin, P., Kogan, L., Torda, C., Wilber, C. (1967) Homosexuality in Women. Archives of General Psychiatry. 17:626-634.
??optimism in the psychoanalytic treatment of homosexual women. ?at least a 50% probability of significant improvement in women with this syndrome who present themselves for treatment and remain in it.? (p. 634)

Kronemeyer, R. (1980) Overcoming Homosexuality. NY: Macmillian
?For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy it is ?curable?.? (p.7)
MacIntosh, H. (1994) Attitudes and experiences of psychoanalysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 42, 4: 1183-1207.

824 male patients of 213 analysts ? 197 (23.9%) changed to heterosexuality, 703 received significant therapeutic benefit; and of the 391 female patients of 153 analysts ? 79 (20.2%) changed to heterosexuality, 318 received significant therapeutic benefit. (p. 1183)
MacIntosh, H. (1995) Attitudes and Experiences of Psychoanalysts in Analyzing Homosexual Patients. Journal of the American Psychiatric Association 1183.

422 psychiatrists were asked if they had successfully treated homosexuals, and did they agree that a homosexual can be changed to heterosexual. Of the 285 responses, which involved 1,215 homosexuals, the survey stated that 23% changed to heterosexuality. 84% benefited significantly by reducing their attraction to other members of the same gender, with a decrease in homosexual activity.

Marmor, J. (1975) Homosexuality and Sexual Orientation Disturbances. (In Freedman, A., Kaplan, H., Sadock, B. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry: II, Second Edition. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins)

?This conviction of untreatability also serves an ego-defensive purpose for many homosexuals. ?however, there has evolved a greater therapeutic optimism about the possibilities for change? There is little doubt that a genuine shift in preferential sex object choice can and does take place in somewhere between 20 and 50 per cent of patients with homosexual behavior who seek psychotherapy with this end in mind.? (p. 1519)

Newman, L., (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.
?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)
?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J., Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA: NARTH.

Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.

Pattison, E.M., Pattison, M.L. (1980, December) ?Ex-Gays?: Religiously Mediated Change in Homosexuals. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (12): 1553-1562.
Authors evaluated 11 white men who claimed to have changed sexual orientation from exclusive homosexuality to exclusive heterosexuality. Corollary evidence suggests that the phenomenon of substantiated change in sexual orientation without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy may be much more common than previously thought.

Rekers, J. (1988) The formation of homosexual orientation. (In Fagan, P. Hope for Homosexuality. Washington DC: Free Congress Foundation.)

?With major research grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, I have experimentally demonstrated an affective treatment for ‘gender identity disorder of childhood’, which appears to hold potential for preventing homosexual orientation in males.?
Satinover, J., (1996) Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids MI: Baker.

These reports contradict claims that change is impossible. It would be more accurate to say that all the existing evidence suggests strongly that homosexuality is quite changeable.
?Each individual?s homosexuality is the likely result of a complex mixture of genetic, intrauterine, and extrauterine biological factors combined with familial and social factors as well as repeatedly reinforced choices.? (p. 245)

“A study conducted by a homosexual couple found that out of 156 same-sex couples ‘only seven had maintained sexual fidelity; of the hundred couples that had been together for more than five years, none had been able to maintain sexual fidelity. The authors noted that the expectation for outside sexual activity was the rule for male couples and the exception for heterosexuals.’”

Schwartz, M.F., Masters, W.H. (1984, February). The Masters and Johnson treatment program for dissatisfied homosexual men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 141 (2): 173-181.
?Certain individuals who want to change their homosexual preference can be helped by a short-term intensive intervention. The failure rate in helping dissatisfied homosexuals establish heterosexual lifestyles after the intensive phase of the intervention was 20.9%, and after 5 years? follow-up it was 28.4%.

Spitzer, Robert (May 2001) Psychiatry and Homosexuality, Wall St. Journal, A26.
“In the sample he studied, Spitzer concluded that many (homosexuals) made substantial changes (after gender affirmative therapy) in sexual arousal and fantasy–not merely behavior. Even subjects who made less substantial change believed it to be extremely beneficial.”

Throckmorton, W. (1996) Efforts to modify sexual orientation: A review of outcome literature and ethical issues. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling. 20, 4: 283-305.

?I submit that the case against conversion therapy requires opponents to demonstrate that no patients have benefited from such procedures or that any benefits are too costly in some objective way to be pursued even if they work. The available evidence supports the observation of many counselors ? that many individuals with same-gender sexual orientation have been able to change through a variety of counseling approaches.? (p. 287)
West, D. (1977) Homosexuality Re-examined. London Duckworth

Behavioral techniques have the best document success (never less than 30%); psychoanalysis claims a great deal of success (the average rate seemed to be about 5%, but 50% of the bisexuals achieved exclusive heterosexuality.)
Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford. ??we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)

??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic?

All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)"

(Fortunately I have all of this on file . It takes no time at all to continue repeating this information, and volumes of other info as well. And I will do so!)

[quote]ZEB wrote:
May I suggest that your beliefs flow from the fact that you have a same sex attraction? Can your views be tainted because you want to see what you want to see?[/quote]

Absolutely. I’m as subject to the possibility of confirmatory bias as anyone else.

Which is why the only fair standard for objective reality is that used by every major medical and mental health organization on the planet: SCIENCE.

You can quote your NARTH studies ad nauseum, but it will never change the fact that every major medical and mental health organization has reviewed the entire of body of research and concluded that YOU ARE WRONG.

The TRUTH is that you and your cohorts are religious extremists trying to push your idea of morality on the rest of the world. Your agenda has been NOTICED and CONDEMNED by every major medical and mental health organization.

[quote]The reason for publishing this factsheet now is the recent upsurge in aggressive promotion of “reparative therapy” and “transformational ministry.”…

This factsheet provides information from physicians, counselors, social workers, psychologists, legal experts, and educators who are knowledgeable about the development of sexual orientation in youth and the issues raised by “reparative therapy” and “transformational ministry.”…

The most important fact about “reparative therapy,” also sometimes known as “conversion” therapy, is that it is based on an understanding of homosexuality that has been rejected by all the major health and mental health professions. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Counseling Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers, together representing more than 477,000 health and mental health professionals, have all taken the position that homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus there is no need for a “cure.”[/quote]

What you are doing is DAMAGING people, and is specifically NOT RECOMMENDED by the professionals responsible for ensuring the physical and mental health of their patients.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Thousands have changed and you cannot deny it. [/quote]

Your mantra means nothing when you define “changed”. As Spitzer admitted in his research, the so-called “success stories” only changed their behavior; their underlying orientation remained HOMOSEXUAL! The very few who actually found themselves oriented to the opposite sex were likely those that were more moderate in the homosexual <----> heterosexual continuum.

By telling people it is wrong to be gay, and offering a snake oil promise that they can change, you are setting them up for both personal and collateral damage.

I have seen FIRST HAND the outcome of the shit you and your religious buddies are peddling. People should listen to the major medical and mental health organizations rather than to a group of religious zealots.

At least they’ve been warned. If they still choose to listen to you, they deserve what they get.

I hope they don’t listen to you, though. Real happiness, health, and integration are possible for gay men and women…despite the strident threats of people like you.

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
May I suggest that your beliefs flow from the fact that you have a same sex attraction? Can your views be tainted because you want to see what you want to see?

Absolutely. I’m as subject to the possibility of confirmatory bias as anyone else.[/quote]

Then open your eyes and try to take a look at how dangerous your lifestyle is!

Ha ha you like saying NARTH is wrong. They comprise about 3% of the material that I posted. Now tell me what’s wrong with the other credible researchers and authors.

Are they all just homophobic?

Um…we are into the truth thing? Or at least how “truth” is viewed?

Okay, my turn.

You just want to suck up to some guys hairy ass and you don’t want to feel any guilt about it. Sorry, not on this forum :slight_smile:

See how nasty the “truth game” can be?

No my very confused little friend! What you are doing is damaging people. Every time you stick your penis into another mans rectum you take the chance of tearing the rectal lining which is much thinner than a vaginal lining. In addition to that you also leave both you and your gay partner open for a myriad of disease.

I don’t have anything from NARTH on this. But I do have some very informative statistics for you from reputable sources:

“These findings suggest that the prevalence of anorectal sepsis in homosexual men is high and that symptomatic HIV infection is an important determinant of progress after surgery.”

“CONCLUSION–Unsafe sexual behaviour and HIV transmissions have increased among homosexual men after a period of decline. Recent HIV transmissions may disproportionately affect younger men.”

Here’s a good one (well actually a bad one):

GAY BOWEL SYNDROME (cool you have an entire disease named after your practice…okay not so cool):

“In San Francisco, incidence of the “Gay Bowel Syndrome,” as it was called in medical journals, had increased by 8,000 percent after 1973. Infection with these parasites was a likely effect of anal intercourse, which was apt to put a man in contact with his partner’s fecal matter, and was virtually a certainty through the then-popular practice of rimming, which medical journals politely called oral-anal intercourse.(Shilts p.18)”

http://www.fathersforlife.org/dale/aids2.html

Also, did you know that homosexual men are 30 times more likely to contract anal cancer than hetersexual men?

YIKES!

I could go on…in fact I could post so much material that you wouldn’t read any of it. There are literally thousands of pages of documentation which demonstrates the homosexual act and the lifestyle to be very dangerous.

There might be something to the danger of sticking your penis where it does not belong huh?

Please look this post over and then post back to me about how everyone in the world wants everyone to have homosexual relationships…

I like it when you do that…it’s funny. :slight_smile:

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Thousands have changed and you cannot deny it.

Your mantra means nothing when you define “changed”. As Spitzer admitted in his research, the so-called “success stories” only changed their behavior; their underlying orientation remained HOMOSEXUAL![/quote]

You have repeated this lie several times. Here are the facts, please try to understand them:

66% of all men and 44% of all women dropped their same sex attraction!

After two years he conducted a lengthy telephone interview and it was concluded that the majority of those who changed did not even have so much as a “gay fantasy!”

YOU GOT THAT?

His conclusion:

“Like many psychiatrists,” says Dr. Spitzer, “I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that’s untrue–some people can and do change.”

Or…real change which would improve their lives dramatically.

By lying to them as you are doing they WILL have a lifetime of pain!

That I have proven!

You have “seen shit first hand?” Please stop trying to set me up with more jokes…No really you have to stop that.

LOL…You see when you insult me I’ll just make a joke. :slight_smile:

I’m an easy going guy.

Yes, they deserve a better life and will most likely get it. But even if they fail, it is worth a try. You are still alive and you tried to change.

The only damage done to you is your ability to grasp facts has been taken.

He he don’t look now but other than a couple of folks who are hanging in there, I don’t think all that many people are reading our little debate.

Which is a shame as I have really schooled you.

Wait let me finish…"if they stop sticking their penis in other mens rectums, and other assorted places. :slight_smile:

Glad I could help you out on this final word.

Talk to you soon.

Stay safe…

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Which is a shame as I have really schooled you.
[/quote]

Heh. No, what you’ve done is to continue ignoring the conclusions of every major medical and mental health organization in the world.

These organizations say that attempting to change one’s orientation can be DAMAGING and is NOT RECOMMENDED.

Nothing you say will change that.

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Which is a shame as I have really schooled you.

Heh. No, what you’ve done is to continue ignoring the conclusions of every major medical and mental health organization in the world.

These organizations say that attempting to change one’s orientation can be DAMAGING and is NOT RECOMMENDED.

Nothing you say will change that.

[/quote]

And nothing you say will change the facts either my friend.

And those facts are quite telling.

65% of all new HIV cases are from homosexual men.

In reality we would hardly have an epidemic if it were not for homosexual men.

And not one of your medical institutions claims that homosexuality is a perfectly safe practice. Or that it can ever be made safe!

Does a house have to fall on you?

Everyone wants to add something to society, but of course it should be positive!

Now get busy we have exactly 36 more pages to go before we hit 100!

We can do it! Don’t quit now…oh sorry.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
And not one of your medical institutions claims that homosexuality is a perfectly safe practice. Or that it can ever be made safe!
[/quote]

Every major medical and mental health organization recommends that gays do NOT attempt to change their orientation. All of your hyperventilating about the “dangers of homosexuality” is contradicted by this single fact.

[quote]forlife wrote:
Heh. No, what you’ve done is to continue ignoring the conclusions of every major medical and mental health organization in the world.

These organizations say that attempting to change one’s orientation can be DAMAGING and is NOT RECOMMENDED.
[/quote]
Enough with this ridiculous blanket statement. Studies have proven that thousands of people have changed their same-sex orientations. The fact that the medical community has been erring on the side of caution is understandable, but to continue spouting this concept over and over again in this thread as if to imply that change is impossible and will inevitably cause every homosexual who participates in orientation adjustment therapy some kind of permanent psychological distress is bullsh*t.
You keep insinuating this as if homosexuals who partake in these studies are going to slit their wrists out of self-hatred.

I asked you to provide research to back up this point but the bottom line is that you’ve got nothing but 2 small paragraphs explaining that such therapies MIGHT cause feelings of guilt or anxiety in patients and that some reparative institutions implemented questionable tactics in educating the homosexual population. Gimme a break already…

I already showed how the mental health community uses a moral/cultural bias to categorize what behaviors are healthy versus which ones are not (as in my example of suicide). That’s not pure science. That’s a community of mental health professionals conveying what they feel is appropriate for humanity. For you to sit here and paint the faccad that these organziations are purely basing their findings on empirical science is ridiculous. I thought you were smarter than that.

Meanwhile, you so easily glaze over the HIV stats of homosexuals within the United States as well as the biological trauma which people experience who participate in anal sex and the act of sodomy. Deny it all you want, but that’s pure science.

It bothers me that you’re so easily willing to push an agenda that may potentially harm several other individuals just because you want a guilt-free conscience to stick your penis up other men’s butts, watermelons, animals, children, or whatever else you might secretly be into which your sexual orientation continuum has failed to enlighten people about.

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
Enough with this ridiculous blanket statement. [/quote]

I know you would prefer to spout your lies unopposed, but it’s not going to happen. The major medical and mental health organizations of the world have seen your religious crusade, and have called you on it.

They UNANIMOUSLY and CONCLUSIVELY STATE THAT ATTEMPTING TO CHANGE ONE’S ORIENTATION CAN BE DAMAGING, AND IS NOT RECOMMMENDED.

[quote]The reason for publishing this factsheet now is the recent upsurge in aggressive promotion of “reparative therapy” and “transformational ministry.”…

This factsheet provides information from physicians, counselors, social workers, psychologists, legal experts, and educators who are knowledgeable about the development of sexual orientation in youth and the issues raised by “reparative therapy” and “transformational ministry.” …

The most important fact about “reparative therapy,” also sometimes known as “conversion” therapy, is that it is based on an understanding of homosexuality that has been rejected by all the major health and mental health professions. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Counseling Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers, together representing more than 477,000 health and mental health professionals, have all taken the position that homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus there is no need for a “cure.”[/quote]

The Factsheet goes on to say:

[quote]The American Academy of Pediatrics in its policy statement on Homosexuality and Adolescence states: Confusion about sexual orientation is not unusual during adolescence. Counseling may be helpful for young people who are uncertain about their sexual orientation or for those who are uncertain about how to express their sexuality and might profit from an attempt at clarification through a counseling or psychotherapeutic initiative. Therapy directed specifically at changing sexual orientation is contraindicated, since it can provoke guilt and anxiety while having little or no potential for achieving changes in orientation.6

The American Counseling Association has adopted a resolution that states that it: opposes portrayals of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and adults as mentally ill due to their sexual orientation; and supports the dissemination of accurate information about sexual orientation, mental health, and appropriate interventions in order to counteract bias that is based on ignorance or unfounded beliefs about same-gender sexual orientation.7 Further, at its 1999 World Conference, ACA adopted a position opposing the promotion of “reparative therapy” as a “cure” for individuals who are homosexual.8

The American Psychiatric Association in its position statement on Psychiatric Treatment and Sexual Orientation states: The potential risks of “reparative therapy” are great, including depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior, since therapist alignment with societal prejudices against homosexuality may reinforce self-hatred already experienced by the patient. Many patients who have undergone “reparative therapy” relate that they were inaccurately told that homosexuals are lonely, unhappy individuals who never achieve acceptance or satisfaction. The possibility that the person might achieve happiness and satisfying interpersonal relationships as a gay man or lesbian is not presented, nor are alternative approaches to dealing with the effects of societal stigmatization discussed.9

The American Psychological Association in its Resolution on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation, which is also endorsed by the National Association of School Psychologists, states: That the American Psychological Association opposes portrayals of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and adults as mentally ill due to their sexual orientation and supports the dissemination of accurate information about sexual orientation, and mental health, and appropriate interventions in order to counteract bias that is based in ignorance or unfounded beliefs about sexual orientation.10

The National Association of Social Workers in its Policy Statement on Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Issues: endorses policies in both the public and private sectors that ensure nondiscrimination; that are sensitive to the health and mental health needs of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people; and that promote an understanding of lesbian, gay, and bisexual cultures. Social stigmatization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people is widespread and is a primary motivating factor in leading some people to seek sexual orientation changes.11 Sexual orientation conversion therapies assume that homosexual orientation is both pathological and freely chosen. No data demonstrate that reparative or conversion therapies are effective, and in fact they may be harmful.12 NASW believes social workers have the responsibility to clients to explain the prevailing knowledge concerning sexual orientation and the lack of data reporting positive outcomes with reparative therapy. NASW discourages social workers from providing treatments designed to change sexual orientation or from referring practitioners or programs that claim to do so.13

As these statements make clear, health and mental health professional organizations do not support efforts to change young people’s sexual orientation through “reparative therapy” and have raised serious concerns about its potential to do harm. [/quote]

Garofalo, R, Wolf, R.C., Kessel, S., Palfrey, J., & Du Rant, R.H. (1998). The association between health risk behaviors and sexual orientation among a school-based sample of adolescents. Pediatrics, 101(5), 895-902.
return to text

Resnick, M.D., Bearman, P.S., Blum, R.W., Bauman, K.E., Harris, K.S., Jones, J., Tabor, J., Beuhring, T., Sieving, R.E., Shew, M., Ireland, M., Bearing, L.H., & Udry, J.R., (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(10), 823-832.
return to text

Garofalo, et al. 1998; Remafedi, G., Frendh, S., Story, M., Resnick, M.D., & Blum, R. (1998). The relationship between suicide risk and sexual orientation: Results of a population-based study. American Journal of Public Health, 88 (1), 57-60.
return to text

Garofalo et al. 1998; Resnick et al. 1997.
return to text

Ryan, C., & Futterman, D. (1997). Lesbian and gay youth: Care and counseling. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 8(2). [Also published in 1998 by Columbia University Press.]
return to text

Policy Statement: Homosexuality and Adolescence, American Academy of Pediatrics, 1993.
return to text

Resolution adopted by American Counseling Association Governing Council, March 1998.
return to text

Action by American Counseling Association Governing Council, April 1999.
return to text

Position Statement: Psychiatric Treatment and Sexual Orientation, American Psychiatric Association, 1998.
return to text

Resolution on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation, American Psychological Association, 1997.
return to text

Haldeman, D.C. (1994). The practice and ethics of sexual orientation conversion therapy. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 62(2), 221-227.
return to text

Davison, G.C. (1991). Constructionism and morality in therapy for homosexuality. In J.C. Gonsiorek & J.D. Weinrich, Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; Gonsiorek, J.C., & Weinrich, J.D. (1991). Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; Haldeman, D.C. (1994).
return to text

"Policy Statement: Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Issues. Approved by Delegate Assembly, August 1996. Social Work Speaks, 4th ed., NASW, 1997
return to text

From the website of Exodus International, a “transformational ministry”
return to text

Exodus International
return to text

Romer v. Evans, 116 S. Ct. 1620 (1996)
return to text

Nabozny v. Podlesny, 92 F. 3d 446 (7th Cir. 1996)
return to text

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Everyone wants to add something to society, but of course it should be positive!
[/quote]
Evidently that’s not true. Some industries continue to pollute the oceans, others decimate the amazon, evil men pillage villages, and yet others spread disease. And why? For self-gain and hedonism coupled with a lack of morality and little to no regard for other human life. What God has created, they’re unconcerned about destroying. Just like the Book says of how these individuals perceive their meaning in life, to eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow they die.

I just hope heterosexual men & women remain celibate according to their more disciplined abilities since 87% of homosexual men fornicate with both genders and spread HIV and other diseases, thus also infecting the heterosexual population.

Preach on, brother!

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
And not one of your medical institutions claims that homosexuality is a perfectly safe practice. Or that it can ever be made safe!

Every major medical and mental health organization recommends that gays do NOT attempt to change their orientation. All of your hyperventilating about the “dangers of homosexuality” is contradicted by this single fact.[/quote]

Yet between 30% and 70% of everyone who tries to change succeeds!

Who is the sucker?

OOPS!

“Like most psychiatrists,” says Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, “I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that’s untrue–some people can and do change.”
Acosta, F., (1975) Etiology and treatment of homosexuality: review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 4:9-29.
??better prospects for intervention in homosexual life and in its prevention through the early identification and treatment of the potential homosexual child.? (p. 9)
Aries, P. and A. Bejin, ed., Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Bieber, I., et al. (1962) Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. NY: Basic Books.
?The therapeutic results of our study provide reason for an optimistic outlook. Many homosexuals became exclusively heterosexual in psychoanalytic treatment. Although this change may be more easily accomplished by some than by others, in our judgment a heterosexual shift is a possibility for all homosexuals who are strongly motivated to change.? (p. 319)

Bieber, I., Bieber, T. (1979) Male homosexuality. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 24, 5:409-421.
?We have followed some patients for as long as 20 years who have remained exclusively heterosexual. Reversal estimates now range from 30% to an optimistic 50%.? (p.416)
Cappon, D., (1965) Toward an Understanding of Homosexuality. Englewoord Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Of patients with bisexual problems 90% were cured (i.e., no reversions to homosexual behavior, no consciousness of homosexual desire and fantasy) in males who terminated treatment by common consent. Male homosexual patients: 80% showed marked improvement (i.e., occasional relapses, release of aggression, increasingly dominant heterosexuality)? 50% changed.? (p. 265-268)
Clippinger, J., (1974) Homosexuality can be cured. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy. 21, 2:15-28.

?Of 785 patients treated, 307, or approximately 38%, were cured. Adding the percentage figures of the two other studies, we can say that at least 40% of the homosexuals were cured, and an additional 10 to 30% of the homosexuals were improved, depending on the particular study for which statistics were available.? (p. 22)
Fine, R., (1987) Psychoanalytic theory. (in Diamant L. Male and Female Homosexuality: Psychological Approaches. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.) 81-95.

??a considerable percentage of overt homosexuals became heterosexual? If patients were motivated, whatever procedure is adopted a large percentage will give up their homosexuality? The misinformation that homosexuality is untreatable by psychotherapy does incalculable harm to thousands of men and women?? (p. 85-86)
Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.

"The second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)

?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)

Goetze, R. (1997) Homosexuality and the Possibility of Change: A Review of 17 Published Studies. Toronto Canada: New Directions for Life.
44 persons who were exclusively or predominantly homosexual experienced a full shift of sexual orientation.
Hatterer, L., (1970) Changing Homosexuality in the Male. NY: McGraw-Hill.

49 patients changed (20 married, of these 10 remained married, 2 divorced, 18 achieved heterosexual adjustments); 18 partially recovered, remained single; 76 remained homosexual (28 palliated ? 58 unchanged) ?A large undisclosed population has melted into heterosexual society, persons who behaved homosexually in late adolescence and early adulthood, and who, on their own, resolved their conflicts and abandoned such behavior to go on to successful marriages or to bisexual patterns of adoption.? (p. 14)

James, Elizabeth (1978) Treatment of Homosexuality: A Reanalysis and Synthesis of Outcome Studies (unpublished PhD dissertation, Brigham Young University, on file with Brigham Young University Library).

Elizabeth James meta-analyzed over 100 outcome studies published between 1930 and 1976, and concluded that when all the research was combines, 35% of homosexual clients “recovered” and 27% improved.
Kaye, H., Beri, S., Clare, J., Eleston, M., Gershwin, B., Gershwin, P., Kogan, L., Torda, C., Wilber, C. (1967) Homosexuality in Women. Archives of General Psychiatry. 17:626-634.
??optimism in the psychoanalytic treatment of homosexual women. ?at least a 50% probability of significant improvement in women with this syndrome who present themselves for treatment and remain in it.? (p. 634)
Kronemeyer, R. (1980) Overcoming Homosexuality. NY: Macmillian
?For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy it is ?curable?.? (p.7)

MacIntosh, H. (1994) Attitudes and experiences of psychoanalysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 42, 4: 1183-1207.
824 male patients of 213 analysts ? 197 (23.9%) changed to heterosexuality, 703 received significant therapeutic benefit; and of the 391 female patients of 153 analysts ? 79 (20.2%) changed to heterosexuality, 318 received significant therapeutic benefit. (p. 1183)
MacIntosh, H. (1995) Attitudes and Experiences of Psychoanalysts in Analyzing Homosexual Patients. Journal of the American Psychiatric Association 1183.

422 psychiatrists were asked if they had successfully treated homosexuals, and did they agree that a homosexual can be changed to heterosexual. Of the 285 responses, which involved 1,215 homosexuals, the survey stated that 23% changed to heterosexuality. 84% benefited significantly by reducing their attraction to other members of the same gender, with a decrease in homosexual activity.
Marmor, J. (1975) Homosexuality and Sexual Orientation Disturbances. (In Freedman, A., Kaplan, H., Sadock, B. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry: II, Second Edition. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins)

?This conviction of untreatability also serves an ego-defensive purpose for many homosexuals. ?however, there has evolved a greater therapeutic optimism about the possibilities for change? There is little doubt that a genuine shift in preferential sex object choice can and does take place in somewhere between 20 and 50 per cent of patients with homosexual behavior who seek psychotherapy with this end in mind.? (p. 1519)
Newman, L., (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.
?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)

?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J., Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA: NARTH.
Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.
Pattison, E.M., Pattison, M.L. (1980, December) ?Ex-Gays?: Religiously Mediated Change in Homosexuals. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (12): 1553-1562.

Authors evaluated 11 white men who claimed to have changed sexual orientation from exclusive homosexuality to exclusive heterosexuality. Corollary evidence suggests that the phenomenon of substantiated change in sexual orientation without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy may be much more common than previously thought.

Rekers, J. (1988) The formation of homosexual orientation. (In Fagan, P. Hope for Homosexuality. Washington DC: Free Congress Foundation.)
?With major research grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, I have experimentally demonstrated an affective treatment for ‘gender identity disorder of childhood’, which appears to hold potential for preventing homosexual orientation in males.?
Satinover, J., (1996) Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids MI: Baker.
These reports contradict claims that change is impossible. It would be more accurate to say that all the existing evidence suggests strongly that homosexuality is quite changeable.

?Each individual?s homosexuality is the likely result of a complex mixture of genetic, intrauterine, and extrauterine biological factors combined with familial and social factors as well as repeatedly reinforced choices.? (p. 245)
“A study conducted by a homosexual couple found that out of 156 same-sex couples ‘only seven had maintained sexual fidelity; of the hundred couples that had been together for more than five years, none had been able to maintain sexual fidelity. The authors noted that the expectation for outside sexual activity was the rule for male couples and the exception for heterosexuals.’”
Schwartz, M.F., Masters, W.H. (1984, February). The Masters and Johnson treatment program for dissatisfied homosexual men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 141 (2): 173-181.
?Certain individuals who want to change their homosexual preference can be helped by a short-term intensive intervention. The failure rate in helping dissatisfied homosexuals establish heterosexual lifestyles after the intensive phase of the intervention was 20.9%, and after 5 years? follow-up it was 28.4%.
Spitzer, Robert (May 2001) Psychiatry and Homosexuality, Wall St. Journal, A26.

“In the sample he studied, Spitzer concluded that many (homosexuals) made substantial changes (after gender affirmative therapy) in sexual arousal and fantasy–not merely behavior. Even subjects who made less substantial change believed it to be extremely beneficial.”
Throckmorton, W. (1996) Efforts to modify sexual orientation: A review of outcome literature and ethical issues. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling. 20, 4: 283-305.

?I submit that the case against conversion therapy requires opponents to demonstrate that no patients have benefited from such procedures or that any benefits are too costly in some objective way to be pursued even if they work. The available evidence supports the observation of many counselors ? that many individuals with same-gender sexual orientation have been able to change through a variety of counseling approaches.? (p. 287)
West, D. (1977) Homosexuality Re-examined. London Duckworth
Behavioral techniques have the best document success (never less than 30%); psychoanalysis claims a great deal of success (the average rate seemed to be about 5%, but 50% of the bisexuals achieved exclusive heterosexuality.)

Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford. ??we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)
??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic? All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)"

OOPS!

The American Academy of Pediatrics:

The National Association of Social Workers:

The American Psychiatric Association:

The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Promote Sexual Health and Responsible Sexual Behavior (2001) asserts that homosexuality is not “a reversible lifestyle choice.”

I would add to this thread, but it seems I don’t need to at this time.

BTW - does anyone here know who the most persecuted groups in history are? It’s debateable, but Christians are definitely at the top of the list (much higher than homosexuals considering how so many societiest that have fallen have embrased homosexuality).

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
I would add to this thread, but it seems I don’t need to at this time.

BTW - does anyone here know who the most persecuted groups in history are? It’s debateable, but Christians are definitely at the top of the list (much higher than homosexuals considering how so many societiest that have fallen have embrased homosexuality).[/quote]

Have you ever read a book besides this bible?
Christians one of the most persecuted?
You wish, preacherboy.

There are countless ethnic minorities, small religions or cultures which had to face so much abuse and violence through the centuries that your claim is laughable.
Most of these unlucky groups were victims of catholicism.
And let’s not forget women, who, even today, have often trouble expressing their most basic rights.

The history of christianity is mostly a success story, on the other hand.
After some turbulent beginning decades, which included a few pogroms it became a state religion in Rome. From that point the church and it’s philosphies were gaining might and influence by the years.
Luckily, it’s terroristic reign is slowly coming to an end!