Brokeback Propaganda

Respond to this forlife,

Read the truth about the APA and draw your own conclusions.

In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed homosexuality as a mental disorder from the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM-II).

This decision was a significant victory for homosexual activists, and they have continued to claim that the APA based their decision on new scientific discoveries that proved that homosexual behavior is normal and should be affirmed in our culture.

This is false and part of numerous homosexual urban legends that have infiltrated every aspect of our culture. The removal of homosexuality as a mental disorder has given homosexual activists credibility in the culture, and they have demanded that their sexual behavior be affirmed in society.

What Really Happened?
Numerous psychiatrists over the past decades have described what forces were really at work both inside and outside of the American Psychiatric Association-and what led to the removal of homosexuality as a mental disorder.

[b]Dr. Ronald Bayer explains how homosexual activists captured the APA for political gain.
Dr. Ronald Bayer, a pro-homosexual psychiatrist has described what actually occurred in his book, Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis. (1981)

In Chapter 4, “Diagnostic Politics: Homosexuality and the American Psychiatric Association,” Dr. Bayer says that the first attack by homosexual activists against the APA began in 1970 when this organization held its convention in San Francisco. Homosexual activists decided to disrupt the conference by interrupting speakers and shouting down and ridiculing psychiatrists who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1971, homosexual activist Frank Kameny worked with the Gay Liberation Front collective to demonstrate against the APA’s convention. At the 1971 conference, Kameny grabbed the microphone and yelled, “Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you.”

Homosexuals forged APA credentials and gained access to exhibit areas in the conference. They threatened anyone who claimed that homosexuals needed to be cured.[/b]

(Now we all know that miltiant homosexuals would never act in this way don’t we forlife.)

Kameny had found an ally inside of the APA named Kent Robinson who helped the homosexual activist present his demand that homosexuality be removed from the DSM. At the 1972 convention, homosexual activists were permitted to set up a display booth, entitled “Gay, Proud and Healthy.”

Kameny was then permitted to be part of a panel of psychiatrists who were to discuss homosexuality. The effort to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from the DSM was the result of power politics, threats, and intimidation, not scientific discoveries.

Prior to the APA’s 1973 convention, several psychiatrists attempted to organize opposition to the efforts of homosexuals to remove homosexual behavior from the DSM. Organizing this effort were Drs. Irving Bieber and Charles Socarides who formed the Ad Hoc Committee Against the Deletion of Homosexuality from DSM-II.

The DSM-II listed homosexuality as an abnormal behavior under section “302. Sexual Deviations.” It was the first deviation listed.

After much political pressure, a committee of the APA met behind closed doors in 1973 and voted to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from the DSM-II. Opponents of this effort were given 15 minutes to protest this change, according to Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, in Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Satinover writes that after this vote was taken, the decision was to be voted on by the entire APA membership. The National Gay Task Force purchased the APA’s mailing list and sent out a letter to the APA members urging them to vote to remove homosexuality as a disorder. No APA member was informed that the mailing had been funded by this homosexual activist group.

According to Satinover, “How much the 1973 APA decision was motivated by politics is only becoming clear even now. While attending a conference in England in 1994, I met a man who told me an account that he had told no one else. He had been in the gay life for years but had left the lifestyle. He recounted how after the 1973 APA decision, he and his lover, along with a certain very highly placed officer of the APA Board of Trustees and his lover, all sat around the officer’s apartment celebrating their victory. For among the gay activists placed high in the APA who maneuvered to ensure a victory was this man-suborning from the top what was presented to both the membership and the public as a disinterested search for truth.”

Dr. Socarides Speaks Out

Dr. Satinover shows how APA’s policies were influcenced by closeted homosexual APA leaders.
Dr. Charles Socarides has set the record straight on how homosexuals inside and outside of the APA forced this organization to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder. This was done without any valid scientific evidence to prove that homosexuality is not a disordered behavior.

Dr. Socarides, writing in Sexual Politics and Scientific Logic: The Issue of Homosexuality writes: “To declare a condition a ‘non-condition,’ a group of practitioners had removed it from our list of serious psychosexual disorders. The action was all the more remarkable when one considers that it involved an out-of-hand and peremptory disregard and dismissal not only of hundreds of psychiatric and psychoanalytic research papers and reports, but also a number of other serious studies by groups of psychiatrists, psychologists, and educators over the past seventy years?”

Socarides continued: "For the next 18 years, the APA decision served as a Trojan horse, opening the gates to widespread psychological and social change in sexual customs and mores. The decision was to be used on numerous occasions for numerous purposes with the goal of normalizing homosexuality and elevating it to an esteemed status.

“To some American psychiatrists, this action remains a chilling reminder that if scientific principles are not fought for, they can be lost-a disillusioning warning that unless we make no exceptions to science, we are subject to the snares of political factionalism and the propagation of untruths to an unsuspecting and uninformed public, to the rest of the medical profession, and to the behavioral sciences.” Dr. Socarides’ report is available from the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality: www.narth.com.

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DSM
The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) is the most widely used diagnostic reference book utilized by mental health professionals in the United States.

It’s a manual by which all diagnostic codes are derived for diagnosis and treatment - every single physician (an estimated 850,000*) in the United States refers to this book in order to code for a diagnosis. In plain English, what does this mean? It means that for over 30 years physicians have been prevented from properly diagnosing homosexuality as an aberrant behavior and thus, cannot, recommend a course of treatment for these individuals.

Prior to that time, homosexuality had been treated as a mental disorder under section “302. Sexual Deviations” in the DSM-II. Section 302 said, in part: “This category is for individuals whose sexual interests are directed primarily toward objects other than people of the opposite sex, toward sexual acts ? performed under bizarre circumstances. ? Even though many find their practices distasteful, they remain unable to substitute normal sexual behavior for them.” Homosexuality was listed as the first sexual deviation under 302. Once that diagnostic code for homosexuality was removed, physicians, including psychiatrists, have been prevented from diagnosing homosexuality as a mental disorder for more than three decades.

*American Medical Association statistic, 2002.

[quote]Gleemonex wrote:
Proviso: I generally don’t like making long posts – they’re empty of pathos and impact, and are utterly boring most of the time.[/quote]

Sorry Glee, I hate reading long posts. And when I read your opening…well I just couldn’t continue as I knew what was coming.

Could you give it to me in perhaps 50 words or less? As I feel the time to read 50 words is really all I want to dedicate to anything you might have to say on this topic.

Not that your not interesting and all. But we all know where you’re coming from (and everyone knows my position too) and well…

(This was under 100 words-But I am now probably over that limit)

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Sorry Glee, I hate reading long posts. And when I read your opening…well I just couldn’t continue as I knew what was coming.

Could you give it to me in perhaps 50 words or less? As I feel the time to read 50 words is really all I want to dedicate to anything you might have to say on this topic.

Not that your not interesting and all. But we all know where you’re coming from (and everyone knows my position too) and well…
[/quote]

Ditto. If you would like to condense your bathos into a cogent point, I will respond. You get extra credit if you actually respond to the points I’ve made instead of ignoring, misquoting, and redirecting the conversation.

forlife,

This little tid bit won’t take you long at all to read:

ZEB wrote:
Respond to this forlife:

HOW TRUSTWORTHY IS THE APA?

Read this and draw your own conclusions:

"…a June 11, 2003 article from CNSNews.com said “Psychiatric Association Debates Lifting Pedophilia Taboo”. In a step critics charged could result in decriminalizing sexual contact between adults and children, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recently sponsored a symposium in which participants discussed the removal of pedophilia from an upcoming edition of the psychiatric manual of mental disorders.

Homosexuality was once considered a crime but later declared by the APA to be a treatable “mental illness” is now considering pedophilia as natural. I wrote in my June 18, 2003 article Seek For Sex Education And You Shall Find “There you have it, folks, government supported sexual child abuse.”

As I charged in prior posts the APA is a very liberal organization. What other wacky things are to come from this organization only time will tell.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Betty/Freauf31.htm

Here’s what NARTH doesn’t tell you. The APA has stated unequivocally:

The so-called “removal” of pedophilia from the DSM-IV was actually a question of defining pedophilia, and was ultimately REJECTED by the APA:

[quote]In DSM-III-R, the criteria sets for the Paraphilias included a clinical significance criterion (i.e., “the person has acted on these urges, or is markedly distressed by them”) in recognition of the fact that the mere presence of paraphilic sexual urges or fantasies do not necessarily warrant a diagnosis of a paraphilia in an individual. During the preparation of DSM-IV, the wording of this criterion was adjusted (i.e.,?the fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning") as part of the effort to adopt uniform wording for the clinical significance criterion across the disorders.

An unforeseen side effect of this rewording was that it led to confusion regarding the DSM-IV definition of Pedophilia. Specifically, the replacement of the DSM-III-R phrase ?acts on these urges? with the phrase ?causes clinically significant?impairment? was misconstrued to represent a fundamental change in the definition of Pedophilia. Some readers misunderstood this new wording as greatly restricting the number of individuals who would be diagnosed with Pedophilia by requiring that they be distressed by their behavior in order to qualify for the diagnosis.

This was clearly never intended, since it is well recognized that many (if not most) individuals with Pedophilia are not distressed by their pedophilic urges, fantasies, and behaviors. In fact, rather than restricting the diagnosis of Pedophilia to fewer individuals, the original purpose of the change was to potentially broaden the diagnosis to include individuals whose pedophilic urges interfered with functioning in a variety of ways (e.g., causing impairment in occupational functioning because of a preoccupation with pedophilic thoughts and images at work). There was never any intention to no longer include individuals who acted on their urges.

To remove any possible ambiguity regarding whether acting out pedophilic urges with others is sufficient for a diagnosis of Pedophilia, the original DSM-III-R wording has been reinstated. Furthermore, the original DSM-III-R wording has been reinstated for other paraphilias that inevitably harm their victims (i.e., voyeurism, exhibitionism, and frotteurism).[/quote]

Amazing what you learn when step away from the NARTH propaganda and actually consider the facts.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
However, if you used good logic you could also think that just because it is on the NARTH web site (I just checked it) does not mean that it is not a statistic from the US Department of Justice![/quote]

You presented it as a QUOTE from the US Department of Justice, which is misleading to say the least. You know that whole bearing false witness thing? If you have an actual statistic from the USDJ (with a reference that I can check), please share.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

  1. The APA sold their soul to the homosexual agenda. Not even bringing up for a vote (which they usually do) homosexuality being a mental disorder.[/quote]

I could challenge you on this point,but it’s not necessary to waste my breath because EVERY MAJOR MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION has reached the same conclusions regarding homosexuality. You love to harp on the APA, but they are only one organization.

Another “fact” pulled out of your library of NARTH falsehoods? Each of the medical and mental health organizations I mentioned REVIEWED THE CURRENT BODY OF LITERATURE ON HOMOSEXUALITY, AND ARRIVED AT CONCLUSIONS WHICH DIRECTLY OPPOSE YOURS.

You are claiming that these organizations all forsook their professional responsibilities and training, and decided to walk lockstep with the APA. Of course, you don’t have an iota of evidence to back up your claims.

If you actually take the time to look at the policy statements I provided earlier, you will see that each was arrived at by an independent scientific review of the literature.

For example, here is a policy statement provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics:

The American Academy of Pediatrics independently cites 33 references in their policy statement. Hardly a mindless rubber stamp of the APA, as you like to claim:

  1. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WE, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ Fertility, family planning and women’s health: new data from the 1995 National Survey on Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 1997; 23:1-114

  2. Amini SB, Catalano PM, Dierker LJ, Mann LI Births to teenagers: trends and obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:668-674 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Curtin SC Declines in teenage birth rates, 1991-97: national and state patterns. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1998; 47:1-17 [Medline]

  4. Spitz AM, Ventura SJ, Koonin LM, Surveillance for pregnancy and birth rates among teenagers, by state United States, 1980 and 1990. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1993; 42:1-27 [Medline]

  5. Cooper LG, Leland NL, Alexander G Effect of maternal age on birth outcomes among young adolescents. Soc Biol 1995; 42:22-35 [Medline]

  6. Kann L, Kinchen SA, Williams BI, Youth Risk Surveillance United States, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1998; 47:1-89 [Medline]

  7. Donovan P. The Politics of Blame: Family Planning, Abortion, and the Poor. New York, NY: Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1995

  8. Alan Guttmacher Institute. Sex and America’s Teenagers. New York, NY: Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1994

  9. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Homosexuality and adolescence. Pediatrics 1993; 92:631-634 [Medline]

  10. Kapphahn CJ, Wilson KM, Klein JD Adolescent girls’ and boys’ preferences for provider gender and confidentiality in their health care. J Adolesc Health 1999; 25:131-142 [CrossRef][Medline]

  11. Millstein SG, Igra V, Gans J Deliver of STD/HIV preventive services to adolescents by primary care physicians. J Adolesc Health 1996; 19:249-257 [CrossRef][Medline]

  12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Guidelines for Health Supervision III. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997

  13. Green M, ed. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 1994

  14. Elster AB, Kuznets NJ, eds. AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1994

  15. Klein JD, Wilson KM, McNulty M, Kapphahn C, Collins KS Access to medical care for adolescents: results from the 1997 Commonwealth Fund Survey of the Health of Adolescent Girls. J Adolesc Health 1999; 25:120-130 [CrossRef][Medline]

  16. Ford CA, Bearman PS, Moody J Foregone health care among adolescents. JAMA 1999; 282:2227-2234 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Frost JJ, Forrest JD Understanding the impact of effective teenage pregnancy prevention programs. Fam Plann Perspect 1995; 27:188-195 [Medline]

  18. Zabin LS, Hirsch MB, Streett R, The Baltimore pregnancy prevention program for urban teenagers. I. How did it work? Fam Plann Perspect 1988; 20:182-187 [Medline]

  19. Zabin LS, Hirsch MB, Smith EA, The Baltimore pregnancy prevention program for urban teenagers. II. What did it cost? Fam Plann Perspect 1988; 20:188-192 [Medline]

  20. Vincent ML, Clearie AF, Schluchter MD Reducing adolescent pregnancy through school and community-based education. JAMA 1987; 257:3382-3386 [Abstract]

  21. Landry DJ, Kaeser L, Richards CL Abstinence promotion and the provision of information about contraception in public school district sexuality education policies. Fam Plann Perspect 1999; 31:280-286 [Medline]

  22. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Contraception and adolescents. Pediatrics 1999; 104:1161-1166 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues: 1998. Pediatrics. 1999; 103:516-520 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Counseling, the adolescent about pregnancy options. Pediatrics 1998; 101:938-940 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Ruusuvaara L Adolescent sexuality: an educational and counseling challenge. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997; 816:411-413 [Abstract]

  26. Peckham S Preventing unintended teenage pregnancies. Public Health 1993; 107:125-133 [Medline]

  27. Card JJ, Niego S, Mallari A, Farrell WS The program archive on sexuality, health & adolescence: promising “prevention programs in a box.” Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28:210-220 [Medline]

  28. Darrow WW Condom use and use-effectiveness in high-risk populations. Sex Transm Dis 1989; 16:157-168 [Medline]

  29. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Pediatric AIDS and Committee on Adolescence Adolescents and human immunodeficiency virus infection: the role of the pediatrician in prevention and intervention. Pediatrics 2001; 107:188-190 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Harrison AE Primary care of lesbian and gay patients: educating ourselves and our students. Fam Med 1996; 28:10-23 [Medline]

  31. Ryan C, Futterman D. Lesbian and Gay Youth: Care and Counseling. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2000

  32. Suris JC, Resnick MD, Cassuto N, Blum RW Sexual behavior of adolescents with chronic disease and disability. J Adolesc Health 1996; 19:124-131 [CrossRef][Medline]

  33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Adolescent Sexuality Kit: Guides for Professional Involvement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1992

forlife:

But you missed the point entirely!

That they were actually trying to “redefine” at what age a child should have sex is the shocking part.

When they heard the halabaloo from the public they quickly changed their tune.

Why do you always miss the important points ole’ buddy?

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
However, if you used good logic you could also think that just because it is on the NARTH web site (I just checked it) does not mean that it is not a statistic from the US Department of Justice!

You presented it as a QUOTE from the US Department of Justice, which is misleading to say the least. You know that whole bearing false witness thing? If you have an actual statistic from the USDJ (with a reference that I can check), please share.

[/quote]

Here is what I stated:

"US Justice Department 2000:

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children."

And it is a fact and I stand by it.

Now if you would like to explain why so many homosexual men are molesting children I would be glad to read it.

Here is what you could say:

  1. There are more heterosexual people molesting children how come your not worried about them.

To which I would reply: Only 1% to 3% of the population is gay and to have almost 33% of all molestation cases perpetrated by homosexual men is a staggering statistic.

You could then say:

  1. As if the Justice Department is going to tell the truth, look who the President is.

To which I would reply: Those statistics have been pretty steady for the last several years, even during the Clinton White House. There has never been a President who was more sympathetic to the gay cause.

Or you could say

  1. All you do is suck up bad information from web sites that don’t like gays. To which I would reply: Just because one particular site may not agree with your agenda does not mean that all of the information that comes from that site is wrong. Besides, any site that puts out accurate information that holds homosexuals in a negative light would be a bad site in your opinion.

Okay which one of the three will you use? Or, will you add another dodge other than the three above?

Hmmm…maybe I don’t need you around to debate with as I can usually hit your answers about 9 out of 10 times anyway.

Speaking of debating, we are only a dozen or so pages away from beating the old gay thread record so please keep them coming. Without you my friend there is no more debate. (Then again I did pretty good above without you).

Don’t let me down forlife.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
That they were actually trying to “redefine” at what age a child should have sex is the shocking part.
[/quote]

Another blatant misquote (i.e., lie). Did you even bother to read the APA statement?

The goal was to adopt uniform wording for clinical significance across various disorders, including pedophilia. However, to avoid any potential misunderstanding of the definition, the APA went with the ORIGINAL definition. The APA has always considered pedophilia to be a “criminal and immoral act”, and suggesting otherwise is an outright falsehood.

Thou shalt not bear false witness.

"US Justice Department 2000:

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children."

Give me a link to the above policy statement from the US Justice Department (rather than from a NARTH article).

As for your question, I already addressed it. As usual, you blatantly ignored the points I made. So here they are again (excluding the one I just reiterated):

  1. It is a common trick to use the “up to” language as a way to make a statistic seem more extreme than it really is. For example, an ad might say that you can “earn up to $60,000 per year by using our new eBay selling strategies!” Of course, the average salary per year may be much, much lower. See “How to Lie With Statistics” by Darrell Huff.

  2. Homosexuality is not pedophilia. NARTH likes to claim homosexuals prey on children, by highlighting cases of pedophilia happening between men and boys. What they don’t tell you is that those men are interested in children (pedophiles), and are NOT interested in other men (homosexuals).

Research study:

Another research study:

Yet another:

See this research as well:

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:

  1. The APA sold their soul to the homosexual agenda. Not even bringing up for a vote (which they usually do) homosexuality being a mental disorder.

I could challenge you on this point,but it’s not necessary to waste my breath because EVERY MAJOR MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION has reached the same conclusions regarding homosexuality.[/quote]

Oh darn you’re wrong again! They never reached any conclusion on their own. They simply followed in lock step with the APA’s decsion.

And the only reason you are not challenging me on that is because you can’t bring anything of substance to the table.

The APA was hijacked and I posted how and when.

[quote]forlife wrote:

Homosexuality is not pedophilia.[/quote]

The old “homosexuality is not pedophilia” defense.

Talk about playing with words!

Right you are!

Being a homosexual does not mean that you are a pedophile. I think we all agree on that I’m happy to say. However, many pedophiles happen to be homosexuals.

In fact, they are over reprsented in the pedophile population. (Almost 33% of all child molestation is from a pedophile who happens to he a homosexual.

Now why do you suppose that is? I’m asking because I don’t know.

If you are done playing word games answer that question for me.

And I thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

Zeb

[quote]forlife wrote:
Thou shalt not bear false witness.[/quote]

Let’s see that’s about the 7th time that you have accused me unjustly of “bearing false witness.” I wonder what the punishment should be for one so low and vile?

I got it, since you are quoting the scriptures and have repeatedly, I think I’ll do the same.

Try to remember who brought this debate to the Bible.

Fair enough?

"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders.

Oops.

[quote]bigflamer wrote:
stellar_horizon wrote:

Listen dude. I have a strong faith in god and his works. Religion is where I develop a problem. Do you think that people are gay against God’s will, and that there’s nothing he could do about it? Think about it. All things happen for a reason and all things exist because God allows them to. Period.

If:

-God has a plan for us all and we all interweave together in that plan

-God has a reason for everything

-God doesn’t make mistakes

Then:

-God’s plan includes the homosexuals

-There’s a reason he allowed homosexuals to come into this world

-God doesn’t make mistakes. Period.

To think that anyone, including the homosexuals, could do anything but god’s will is vain indeed.[/quote]

By this same awesome train of logic, God allows murders, rapes, torturing of children. Ergo, you worship someone whose plan includes torturing children.

Not a Christian, but people who worship a God who they then try to force into logical corners are very silly people.

this thread is still going? brokeback for sure.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Oh darn you’re wrong again! They never reached any conclusion on their own. They simply followed in lock step with the APA’s decsion.
[/quote]

You really should have that amnesia checked, Zeb:

Each of the medical and mental health organizations I mentioned REVIEWED THE CURRENT BODY OF LITERATURE ON HOMOSEXUALITY, AND ARRIVED AT CONCLUSIONS WHICH DIRECTLY OPPOSE YOURS.

You are claiming that these organizations all forsook their professional responsibilities and training, and decided to walk lockstep with the APA. Of course, you don’t have an iota of evidence to back up your claims.

If you actually take the time to look at the policy statements I provided earlier, you will see that each was arrived at by an independent scientific review of the literature.

For example, here is a policy statement provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics:

The American Academy of Pediatrics independently cites 33 references in their policy statement. Hardly a mindless rubber stamp of the APA, as you like to claim:

  1. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WE, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ Fertility, family planning and women’s health: new data from the 1995 National Survey on Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 1997; 23:1-114

  2. Amini SB, Catalano PM, Dierker LJ, Mann LI Births to teenagers: trends and obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87:668-674 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Curtin SC Declines in teenage birth rates, 1991-97: national and state patterns. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1998; 47:1-17 [Medline]

  4. Spitz AM, Ventura SJ, Koonin LM, Surveillance for pregnancy and birth rates among teenagers, by state United States, 1980 and 1990. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1993; 42:1-27 [Medline]

  5. Cooper LG, Leland NL, Alexander G Effect of maternal age on birth outcomes among young adolescents. Soc Biol 1995; 42:22-35 [Medline]

  6. Kann L, Kinchen SA, Williams BI, Youth Risk Surveillance United States, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1998; 47:1-89 [Medline]

  7. Donovan P. The Politics of Blame: Family Planning, Abortion, and the Poor. New York, NY: Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1995

  8. Alan Guttmacher Institute. Sex and America’s Teenagers. New York, NY: Alan Guttmacher Institute; 1994

  9. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Homosexuality and adolescence. Pediatrics 1993; 92:631-634 [Medline]

  10. Kapphahn CJ, Wilson KM, Klein JD Adolescent girls’ and boys’ preferences for provider gender and confidentiality in their health care. J Adolesc Health 1999; 25:131-142 [CrossRef][Medline]

  11. Millstein SG, Igra V, Gans J Deliver of STD/HIV preventive services to adolescents by primary care physicians. J Adolesc Health 1996; 19:249-257 [CrossRef][Medline]

  12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Guidelines for Health Supervision III. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997

  13. Green M, ed. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 1994

  14. Elster AB, Kuznets NJ, eds. AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1994

  15. Klein JD, Wilson KM, McNulty M, Kapphahn C, Collins KS Access to medical care for adolescents: results from the 1997 Commonwealth Fund Survey of the Health of Adolescent Girls. J Adolesc Health 1999; 25:120-130 [CrossRef][Medline]

  16. Ford CA, Bearman PS, Moody J Foregone health care among adolescents. JAMA 1999; 282:2227-2234 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Frost JJ, Forrest JD Understanding the impact of effective teenage pregnancy prevention programs. Fam Plann Perspect 1995; 27:188-195 [Medline]

  18. Zabin LS, Hirsch MB, Streett R, The Baltimore pregnancy prevention program for urban teenagers. I. How did it work? Fam Plann Perspect 1988; 20:182-187 [Medline]

  19. Zabin LS, Hirsch MB, Smith EA, The Baltimore pregnancy prevention program for urban teenagers. II. What did it cost? Fam Plann Perspect 1988; 20:188-192 [Medline]

  20. Vincent ML, Clearie AF, Schluchter MD Reducing adolescent pregnancy through school and community-based education. JAMA 1987; 257:3382-3386 [Abstract]

  21. Landry DJ, Kaeser L, Richards CL Abstinence promotion and the provision of information about contraception in public school district sexuality education policies. Fam Plann Perspect 1999; 31:280-286 [Medline]

  22. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Contraception and adolescents. Pediatrics 1999; 104:1161-1166 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues: 1998. Pediatrics. 1999; 103:516-520 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence Counseling, the adolescent about pregnancy options. Pediatrics 1998; 101:938-940 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Ruusuvaara L Adolescent sexuality: an educational and counseling challenge. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997; 816:411-413 [Abstract]

  26. Peckham S Preventing unintended teenage pregnancies. Public Health 1993; 107:125-133 [Medline]

  27. Card JJ, Niego S, Mallari A, Farrell WS The program archive on sexuality, health & adolescence: promising “prevention programs in a box.” Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28:210-220 [Medline]

  28. Darrow WW Condom use and use-effectiveness in high-risk populations. Sex Transm Dis 1989; 16:157-168 [Medline]

  29. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Pediatric AIDS and Committee on Adolescence Adolescents and human immunodeficiency virus infection: the role of the pediatrician in prevention and intervention. Pediatrics 2001; 107:188-190 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Harrison AE Primary care of lesbian and gay patients: educating ourselves and our students. Fam Med 1996; 28:10-23 [Medline]

  31. Ryan C, Futterman D. Lesbian and Gay Youth: Care and Counseling. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2000

  32. Suris JC, Resnick MD, Cassuto N, Blum RW Sexual behavior of adolescents with chronic disease and disability. J Adolesc Health 1996; 19:124-131 [CrossRef][Medline]

  33. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Adolescent Sexuality Kit: Guides for Professional Involvement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1992

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Now why do you suppose that is? I’m asking because I don’t know.
[/quote]

Read the four studies I provided you earlier, and get back to me.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Let’s see that’s about the 7th time that you have accused me unjustly of “bearing false witness.” [/quote]

You have deliberately misconstrued, misquoted, and outright lied multiple times in this thread. I’m just calling you on it (and will continue to do so).

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Now why do you suppose that is? I’m asking because I don’t know.

Read the four studies I provided you earlier, and get back to me.[/quote]

I know that you are thinking you are really doing something extra special for you and all your gay friends by debating with me on this thread. But in reality all you have done is to not only prove all of my points but also make other points that I was even shocked to see you reveal.

(We will go over all of those later)

For now in case you missed it I want you to read this over carefully:

forlife has laid out a very stranges set of facts in his own life. Facts that would lead one to believe that he is far from “normal.” While I won’t rush to judge him, I suggest that all interested parties simply read over his very bizarre posts. And his sometimes goofy logic: “homosexual men can easily be drawn sexually to a woman.” (yea oooookay…)

However, you (forlife) are confused about many more things in life than you originally suspected!

it’s not me that people should believe it’s the following STUDIES,RECORDS, FACTS, AND PERTiNENT INFORMATION that they should take into consideration!

US Justice Department 2000:

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children."

Okay it’s not a mental disorder…Then what is it?

AND THIS:

Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse
Timothy J. Dailey, Ph.D.
http://www.frc.org/get/is02e3.cfm

Scandals involving the sexual abuse of under-age boys by homosexual priests have rocked the Roman Catholic Church. At the same time, defenders of homosexuality argue that youth organizations such as the Boy Scouts should be forced to include homosexuals among their adult leaders. Similarly, the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a homosexual activist organization that targets schools, has spearheaded the formation of “Gay-Straight Alliances” among students. GLSEN encourages homosexual teachers – even in the youngest grades – to be open about their sexuality, as a way of providing role models to “gay” students. In addition, laws or policies banning employment discrimination based on “sexual orientation” usually make no exception for those who work with children or youth.

Many parents have become concerned that children may be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even “recruited” into adopting a homosexual identity and lifestyle. Gay activists dismiss such concerns – in part, by strenuously insisting that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children.

However, despite efforts by homosexual activists to distance the gay lifestyle from pedophilia, there remains a disturbing connection between the two. This is because, by definition, male homosexuals are sexually attracted to other males. While many homosexuals may not seek young sexual partners, the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners. In this paper we will consider the following evidence linking homosexuality to pedophilia:

Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

Male Homosexuals Commit A Disproportionate Number of Child Sex Abuse Cases
Homosexual apologists admit that some homosexuals sexually molest children, but they deny that homosexuals are more likely to commit such offenses. After all, they argue, the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, this argument ignores the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population.

The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation.

Men Account for Almost All Sexual Abuse of Children Cases
An essay on adult sex offenders in the book Sexual Offending Against Children reported: “It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offences. Indeed, with 3,000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!” 1
Kee MacFarlane, et al., writing in Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Evaluation and Treatment report: “The large majority of sexual perpetrators appear to be males (Herman & Hirschman, 1981; Lindholm & Willey, 1983).” 2

A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: “In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male.” 3
A study in the Journal of Sex Research states that “pedophilia does not exist, or is extremely rare, in women.” 4

A Significant Percentage of Child Sexual Abuse Victims are Boys
According to the Journal of Child Psychiatry: “It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about 9 to 1, but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. . . . The majority of community studies suggest a . . . ratio . . . in the order of 2 to 4 girls to 1 boy.” 5 The study adds that “some authors now believe that boys may be sexually abused as commonly as girls (Groth, 1978; O’Brien, 1980).” 6
A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that “approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males.” 7
Sexual Abuse of Boys is Underreported
The actual percentage of child sexual abuse victims who are boys very likely exceeds the above estimates. Many researchers echo the view of the Journal of Child Psychiatry study, which refers to the “under-reporting of the incidence and prevalence of sexual abuse in boys.” 8

Dr. Robert Johnson, in Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, reports: “The vast majority of cases of male sexual molestation is not reported. As a result, these young men keep both the incidents and their feelings to themselves.” 9

The Department of Justice report on child sexual exploitation explains why the percentage of boy victims is underestimated: “Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. . . . They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behavior and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization. . . . No matter what the investigator does, most adolescent boys will deny they were victims.” 10
The Journal of Child Psychiatry adds: “Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. . . . This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report.” 11
Homosexuals Comprise Less than 3 Percent of the Population
Relying upon three large data sets: the General Social Survey, the National Health and Social Life Survey, and the U.S. census, a recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent, and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent. 12

A study of the sexual behavior of men in the United States based on the National Survey of Men (a nationally representative sample comprised of 3,321 men aged twenty to thirty-nine, published in Family Planning Perspectives), found that "2 percent of sexually active men aged twenty to thirty-nine . . . had had any same-gender sexual activity during the last ten years. Approximately 1 percent of the men (1.3 percent among whites and 0.2 percent among blacks) reported having had exclusively homosexual activity. 13

J. Gordon Muir, writing in The Wall Street Journal, discusses a number of studies that have found that homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population. 14
In a survey of studies on homosexuals in different populations, the Archives of Sexual Behavior reported a random sample of Hawaii State residents interviewed by telephone. The study found “just about 3 percent of males and 1.2 percent of females as having engaged in same-sex or bisexual activity.” 15 However, this relatively higher number is attributed to the fact that the study was not limited to exclusive homosexuals, but included all those

AND THIS:

A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that homosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, “all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories,” which included males as young as age fifteen. 36

Okay enough about gay men molesting children. Let’s talk about the CDC report on homosexual men. But I don’t think you’ll like what they have to say:

An estimated 503,305 MSM (440,887 MSM and 62,418 MSM who inject drugs) had received a diagnosis of AIDS, accounting for 67% of all men and 54% of all people who received a diagnosis of AIDS [1]

It’s such a safe practice according to you but in reality it’s a very unhealthy lifestyle, both physcally and emotionally…as you might already know deep down:

Here you go take a look for yourself:

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/PUBS/Facts/msm.htm

Shall we look at some of the literature as to how people become “homosexual?” Sure why not!

And if you notice I have the source of each study listed.

Genetics and Childhood Molestation

(1995) Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us. Child Abuse and Neglect. 19: 582.
59% of male child sex offenders had been ?victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.?
Byne, W., (1994). The Biological Evidence Challenged. Scientific American, 54.
“The incidence of homosexuality in the adopted brothers of homosexuals (11%) was much higher than recent estimates for the rate of homosexuality in the population (1 to 5%).”
“Indeed, perhaps the major finding of these heritability studies is that despite having all of their genes in common and having prenatal and postnatal environments as close to identical as possible, approximately half of the identical twins were nonetheless discordant for orientation. This finding underscores just how little is known about the origins of sexual orientation.”
Byne, W., Parsons, B. (1993, March). Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised. Archives of General Psychiatry. 50: 228-39 (228).
?It is imperative that clinicians and behavioral scientists begin to appreciate the complexities of sexual orientation and resist the urge to search for simplistic explanations, either psychosocial or biologic.?
?Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking.?

“Although identical twins have the same genetic code, non-identical twins and regular siblings share the same proportion of genetic material. Therefore, the genetic theories should show a similar amount of homosexual concordance between non-identical twins and regular siblings.”
“First, they point out the fact that the study rests on the assumption that the relevant environment is the same for identical twins and non-identical twins. Then, the effects of potential bias in the sample is called into question, as Bailey and Pillard recruited their homosexual research subjects by advertising in various homosexually-oriented publications.”
“Third, there was no way to separate the intermingling of environmental and genetic effects, since all sets of twins in the study had been raised together and presumably subject to most, if not all, of the same environmental effects.”

“The most interesting question, however, is that if there is something in the genetic code that makes a person homosexual, why did not all of the identical twins become homosexual, since they have the exact same genetic code?”

“While all behavior must have an ultimate biologic substrate, the appeal of current biologic explanations for sexual orientation may derive more from a dissatisfaction with the current status of psychosocial explanations than from a substantiating body of experimental data. Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking. In an alternative model, temperamental and personality traits interact with the familial and social milieus and the individual’s sexuality emerges.”

Chapman, B., Brannock, J. (1987) Proposed model of lesbian identity development. An empirical examination. Journal of Homosexuality. 14:69-80.
63% of lesbians surveyed stated that they had chosen to be lesbians, 28% felt they had no choice, and 11% did not know why they were lesbians.
Elliott, D.M., Brier, J. (1992, February). The Sexually Abused Boy: Problems in Manhood. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 26 (2): 68-71.
Boys who were sexually molested have subsequently ?a higher incidence of homosexuality.?
Friedman, Richard, Downey, Jennifer. (1993) Neurobiology and Sexual Orientation: Current Relationships, 5. J. Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 131, 139.
“Some typical childhood factors related to homosexuality are: feeling of being different from other children; parent, sibling, peer relationships; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved, unapproving; perception of parental perfection required; perception of mother as being too close, too involved; premature introduction to sexuality (such as child abuse or incest); gender confusion; defensive detachment, reparative drive, same-sex ambivalence; unmet affection needs; diminished/distorted masculinity, femininity.”

“?homosexual men are more likely to become sexually active at much younger ages than heterosexual men. The average age of homosexual males at their first sexual encounter was 12.7, versus 15.7 for heterosexual males.”
“This evidence may suggest that abuse and early sexual experiences can contribute to homosexuality, perhaps because of familiarity with sexual acts, and in some cases because of an initial sexual experience with someone of the same gender.”
Golwyn, D., Sevlie, C. (1993) Adventitious change in homosexual behavior during treatment of social phobia with phenelzine. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 54, 1:39-40.
?We conclude that social phobia may be a hidden contributing factor in some instances of homosexual behavior.? (p. 40)

Harry, J. (1989) Parental physical abuse and sexual orientation in males. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 18, 3:251-261.
?These data suggest that some history of childhood femininity is almost always a precursor of adolescent homosexual behavior.? (p. 259)
Herrell, R., et al. (1999, October). Sexual Orientation and Suicidality: a Co-Twin Control Study in Adult Men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56 (10): 867-874.
This study of male twins who were Vietnam veterans found that male homosexuals were 5.1 times more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors than were their heterosexual twins.

Hockenberry, S., Billingham, R. (1987) Sexual orientation and boyhood gender conformity: Development of the boyhood gender conformity scales (BGCS) Archives of Sexual Behavior. 16, 6:475-492.

??the absence of masculine behaviors and traits appeared to be a more powerful predictor of later homosexual orientation than the traditionally feminine or cross-sexed traits and behaviors.? (p. 475)
Horgan, J., (1995) Gay genes, revisited: Doubts arise over research on the biology of homosexuality. Scientific American. Nov.: 28. Hubbard, Ruth, Wald, Elijah (1993). Exploring the Gene Myth 6.
“The myth of the all-powerful gene is based on flawed science that discounts the environmental context in which we and our genes exist.”
“A gene does not determine a phenotype [noticeable trait] by acting alone; a gene cannot act by itself?Each gene simply specifies one of the proteins involved in the process.”
Jefferson, D.J., (1993, August 12). Studying the Biology of Sexual Orientation Has Political Fallout. Wall Street Journal. 1A.

Lisak, D., Luster, L. Educational, occupational, and relationship histories of men who were sexually and/or physically abused as children. J Trauma Stress. 1994 Oct; 7(4): 507-23.

Nearly one in four young men report sexual abuse as a child resulting in significant life difficulties (as compared to non-abused males).
McGuire, T., (1995) Is homosexuality genetic? A critical review and some suggestions. Journal of Homosexuality. 28, 1/2: 115-145.
?Even if we knew absolutely everything about genes and absolutely everything about environment, we still could not predict the final phenotype of any individual." (p. 142)
Nimmons, David. (March 1994). Sex and the Brain, Discover, 64-71.
“It is important to stress what I didn’t find. I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn’t show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain. INAH 3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than a part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women’s sexual behavior?. Since I looked at adult brains, we don’t know if the differences I found were there at birth, or if they appeared later.”
Pollak, M. Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, ed. P. Aries and A. Bejin, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Tomeo, M.E., et al. (2001, October). Comparative data of childhood and adolescence molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 30 (5): 535-541.
942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation that did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation.
Whitehead, Neil, Whitehead, Brian. (1999) My Genes Made Me Do It! A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation, 158-159.

“Neil Whitehead tabulated other twin studies on other topics and those traits’ heritability: lying–43%, anorexia nervosa–44%, fear of the unknown–46%, psychological inpatient care–47%, extroversion–50%, depression–50%, altruism–50%, divorce–52%, racial prejudice, bigotry–70%.
“(Dean) Hamer’s genetic sequences have been calculated to affect about 5% of the homosexual population, so even if he is correct, there must be some other explanation for what causes the vast majority of homosexuality.”
“If a hormonal imbalance was responsible for homosexuality, then perhaps a simple dose of hormones to an adult would cure homosexuality. This is not the case, as has been demonstrated several times.”
Wolf, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life, Spence Publishing Co., Dallas, 1999, p. 70-71.
Homosexually-assaulted males identified themselves as subsequently becoming practicing homosexuals almost 7 times as often as bisexuals and almost 6 times as often as the non-assaulted control group. 58% of adolescents reporting sexual abuse by a man prior to puberty revealed either homosexual or bisexual orientation (control group 90% heterosexual). Age of molestation was 4-14 years. ?Nearly half of men who have reported a childhood experience with an older man were currently involved in homosexual activity.? A disproportionately high number of male homosexuals were incestuously molested by a homosexual parent. Conclusion was that the experience led the boy to perceive himself as homosexual based on his having been found sexually attractive by an older man.”

I don’t see any eveidence that homosexuals are born that way…

Let’s look at some social factors:

Social Factors

Bem, Daryl J. (1986) Exotic Becomes Erotic: A Developmental Theory of Sexual Orientation, 103 Psychol. Rev. 320.
Daryl Bem’s “Exotic Becomes Erotic” theory states that “what is exotic to children becomes erotic to them as adolescents.” For example, “boys who play with girls mostly instead of other boys, and who tend to like the way girls play, become familiar and comfortable with femininity. Male behavior and males become exotic, and thus erotic later in life.”
Burtoft, L. (1994). Behind the Headlines: Setting the Record Straight ? What Research Really Says About the Social Consequences of Homosexuality. Colorado Springs, CO: Focus on the Family.

Fisher, S., Greenberg, R. (1996) Freud Scientifically Reappraisal. NY: Wiley & Sons.
?Fisher analyzed the 58 studies and reported that a large majority supported the notion that homosexual sons perceive their fathers as negative, distant, unfriendly figures.? ?There is not a single even moderately well controlled study that we have been able to locate in which male homosexuals refer to father positively or affectionately.? (p. 136)
Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.
?the second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)
?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)
Friedman, Richard, Downey, Jennifer. (1993) Neurobiology and Sexual Orientation: Current Relationships, 5. J. Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 131, 139.
“Some typical childhood factors related to homosexuality are: feeling of being different from other children; parent, sibling, peer relationships; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved, unapproving; perception of parental perfection required; perception of mother as being too close, too involved; premature introduction to sexuality (such as child abuse or incest); gender confusion; defensive detachment, reparative drive, same-sex ambivalence; unmet affection needs; diminished/distorted masculinity, femininity.”
“?homosexual men are more likely to become sexually active at much younger ages than heterosexual men. The average age of homosexual males at their first sexual encounter was 12.7, versus 15.7 for heterosexual males.”
“This evidence may suggest that abuse and early sexual experiences can contribute to homosexuality, perhaps because of familiarity with sexual acts, and in some cases because of an initial sexual experience with someone of the same gender.”
Newman, L. (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.
?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)
?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J. Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA: NARTH.
Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.
Phillips, G., Over, R. (1992) Adult sexual orientation in relation to memories of childhood gender conforming and gender nonconforming behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 21, 6: 543-558.
?The 16-item discriminate-function ? yielded correct classification of 94.4% of heterosexual men and 91.8% of the homosexual men. These results indicate that heterosexual and homosexual men can be classified with equivalent accuracy on the basis of recalling having had or not having had gender conforming (masculine) experiences in childhood.? (p. 550)
Stephan, W., (1973) Parental relationships and early social experiences of activist male homosexuals and male heterosexuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 82, 3: 506-513.
??homosexuals reported experiencing their first orgasm at a younger age than the heterosexuals.? 24% of homosexuals’ first orgasms occurred during homosexual contacts versus 2% of heterosexuals. (p.511)
Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford.
“?we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)
??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic? All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)”

Let’s look at how many have changed from various therapies:

(May 9, 2001). Press Release, National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, Prominent Psychiatrist Announces New Study Results: “Some Gays can Change.” Available at http://www.narth.com/docs/spitzerrelease.html (last updated May 8, 2001.)
“Like most psychiatrists,” says Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, “I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that’s untrue–some people can and do change.”
Acosta, F., (1975) Etiology and treatment of homosexuality: review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 4:9-29.
??better prospects for intervention in homosexual life and in its prevention through the early identification and treatment of the potential homosexual child.? (p. 9)

Aries, P. and A. Bejin, ed., Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Bieber, I., et al. (1962) Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. NY: Basic Books.
?The therapeutic results of our study provide reason for an optimistic outlook. Many homosexuals became exclusively heterosexual in psychoanalytic treatment. Although this change may be more easily accomplished by some than by others, in our judgment a heterosexual shift is a possibility for all homosexuals who are strongly motivated to change.? (p. 319)

Bieber, I., Bieber, T. (1979) Male homosexuality. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 24, 5:409-421.
?We have followed some patients for as long as 20 years who have remained exclusively heterosexual. Reversal estimates now range from 30% to an optimistic 50%.? (p.416)
Cappon, D., (1965) Toward an Understanding of Homosexuality. Englewoord Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Of patients with bisexual problems 90% were cured (i.e., no reversions to homosexual behavior, no consciousness of homosexual desire and fantasy) in males who terminated treatment by common consent. Male homosexual patients: 80% showed marked improvement (i.e., occasional relapses, release of aggression, increasingly dominant heterosexuality)? 50% changed.? (p. 265-268)
Clippinger, J., (1974) Homosexuality can be cured. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy. 21, 2:15-28.

?Of 785 patients treated, 307, or approximately 38%, were cured. Adding the percentage figures of the two other studies, we can say that at least 40% of the homosexuals were cured, and an additional 10 to 30% of the homosexuals were improved, depending on the particular study for which statistics were available.? (p. 22)

Fine, R., (1987) Psychoanalytic theory. (in Diamant L. Male and Female Homosexuality: Psychological Approaches. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.) 81-95.
??a considerable percentage of overt homosexuals became heterosexual? If patients were motivated, whatever procedure is adopted a large percentage will give up their homosexuality? The misinformation that homosexuality is untreatable by psychotherapy does incalculable harm to thousands of men and women?? (p. 85-86)

Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.
"The second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)
?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)
Goetze, R. (1997) Homosexuality and the Possibility of Change: A Review of 17 Published Studies. Toronto Canada: New Directions for Life.
44 persons who were exclusively or predominantly homosexual experienced a full shift of sexual orientation.
Hatterer, L., (1970) Changing Homosexuality in the Male. NY: McGraw-Hill.

49 patients changed (20 married, of these 10 remained married, 2 divorced, 18 achieved heterosexual adjustments); 18 partially recovered, remained single; 76 remained homosexual (28 palliated ? 58 unchanged) ?A large undisclosed population has melted into heterosexual society, persons who behaved homosexually in late adolescence and early adulthood, and who, on their own, resolved their conflicts and abandoned such behavior to go on to successful marriages or to bisexual patterns of adoption.? (p. 14)
James, Elizabeth (1978) Treatment of Homosexuality: A Reanalysis and Synthesis of Outcome Studies (unpublished PhD dissertation, Brigham Young University, on file with Brigham Young University Library).
Elizabeth James meta-analyzed over 100 outcome studies published between 1930 and 1976, and concluded that when all the research was combines, 35% of homosexual clients “recovered” and 27% improved.
Kaye, H., Beri, S., Clare, J., Eleston, M., Gershwin, B., Gershwin, P., Kogan, L., Torda, C., Wilber, C. (1967) Homosexuality in Women. Archives of General Psychiatry. 17:626-634.

??optimism in the psychoanalytic treatment of homosexual women. ?at least a 50% probability of significant improvement in women with this syndrome who present themselves for treatment and remain in it.? (p. 634)
Kronemeyer, R. (1980) Overcoming Homosexuality. NY: Macmillian
?For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy it is ?curable?.? (p.7)
MacIntosh, H. (1994) Attitudes and experiences of psychoanalysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 42, 4: 1183-1207.
824 male patients of 213 analysts ? 197 (23.9%) changed to heterosexuality, 703 received significant therapeutic benefit; and of the 391 female patients of 153 analysts ? 79 (20.2%) changed to heterosexuality, 318 received significant therapeutic benefit. (p. 1183)

MacIntosh, H. (1995) Attitudes and Experiences of Psychoanalysts in Analyzing Homosexual Patients. Journal of the American Psychiatric Association 1183.
422 psychiatrists were asked if they had successfully treated homosexuals, and did they agree that a homosexual can be changed to heterosexual. Of the 285 responses, which involved 1,215 homosexuals, the survey stated that 23% changed to heterosexuality. 84% benefited significantly by reducing their attraction to other members of the same gender, with a decrease in homosexual activity.
Marmor, J. (1975) Homosexuality and Sexual Orientation Disturbances. (In Freedman, A., Kaplan, H., Sadock, B. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry: II, Second Edition. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins)
?This conviction of untreatability also serves an ego-defensive purpose for many homosexuals. ?however, there has evolved a greater therapeutic optimism about the possibilities for change? There is little doubt that a genuine shift in preferential sex object choice can and does take place in somewhere between 20 and 50 per cent of patients with homosexual behavior who seek psychotherapy with this end in mind.? (p. 1519)
Newman, L., (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.

?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)
?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J., Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA: NARTH.
Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.

Pattison, E.M., Pattison, M.L. (1980, December) ?Ex-Gays?: Religiously Mediated Change in Homosexuals. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (12): 1553-1562.
Authors evaluated 11 white men who claimed to have changed sexual orientation from exclusive homosexuality to exclusive heterosexuality. Corollary evidence suggests that the phenomenon of substantiated change in sexual orientation without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy may be much more common than previously thought.

Rekers, J. (1988) The formation of homosexual orientation. (In Fagan, P. Hope for Homosexuality. Washington DC: Free Congress Foundation.)
?With major research grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, I have experimentally demonstrated an affective treatment for ‘gender identity disorder of childhood’, which appears to hold potential for preventing homosexual orientation in males.?

Satinover, J., (1996) Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids MI: Baker.
These reports contradict claims that change is impossible. It would be more accurate to say that all the existing evidence suggests strongly that homosexuality is quite changeable.
?Each individual?s homosexuality is the likely result of a complex mixture of genetic, intrauterine, and extrauterine biological factors combined with familial and social factors as well as repeatedly reinforced choices.? (p. 245)
“A study conducted by a homosexual couple found that out of 156 same-sex couples ‘only seven had maintained sexual fidelity; of the hundred couples that had been together for more than five years, none had been able to maintain sexual fidelity. The authors noted that the expectation for outside sexual activity was the rule for male couples and the exception for heterosexuals.’”
Schwartz, M.F., Masters, W.H. (1984, February). The Masters and Johnson treatment program for dissatisfied homosexual men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 141 (2): 173-181.
?Certain individuals who want to change their homosexual preference can be helped by a short-term intensive intervention. The failure rate in helping dissatisfied homosexuals establish heterosexual lifestyles after the intensive phase of the intervention was 20.9%, and after 5 years? follow-up it was 28.4%.
Spitzer, Robert (May 2001) Psychiatry and Homosexuality, Wall St. Journal, A26.

“In the sample he studied, Spitzer concluded that many (homosexuals) made substantial changes (after gender affirmative therapy) in sexual arousal and fantasy–not merely behavior. Even subjects who made less substantial change believed it to be extremely beneficial.”
Throckmorton, W. (1996) Efforts to modify sexual orientation: A review of outcome literature and ethical issues. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling. 20, 4: 283-305.
?I submit that the case against conversion therapy requires opponents to demonstrate that no patients have benefited from such procedures or that any benefits are too costly in some objective way to be pursued even if they work. The available evidence supports the observation of many counselors ? that many individuals with same-gender sexual orientation have been able to change through a variety of counseling approaches.? (p. 287)

West, D. (1977) Homosexuality Re-examined. London Duckworth
Behavioral techniques have the best document success (never less than 30%); psychoanalysis claims a great deal of success (the average rate seemed to be about 5%, but 50% of the bisexuals achieved exclusive heterosexuality.)
Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford. ??we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)
??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic? All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)

So please, don’t listen to me, as I’m just a guy behind a computer. But please do listen to the very credible information which has been shown to you in this and my many other posts. In formation which is free of the politically correct. Government statistics: CDC, Justice Department. Independent authors with very serious credentials. In fact, I would dare say that never before has there been so much evidence against a particular behavior. A behavior which has been embraced by the left thinking politically correct.

By all means decide for yourself!

[/quote]