Brokeback Propaganda

[quote]ZEB wrote:
It’s the CDC! [/quote]

Again, you haven’t answered my question.

Why does the CDC get carte blanche, when all the major medical and mental health organizations I listed (American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, World Healh Organization, American Association of Social Workers) do not?

Aren’t you applying a double standard here? Why do you continue to ignore the conclusions of all these organizations?

Not that it’s relevant to the discussion, but I’m 40. If I were 20 instead, would all the references I’ve provided somehow be invalidated?

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
LOL…we should all just stop having sexual relationships. That should really help the human race.[/quote]

Ridiculous, isn’t it? So why would you buy into the flawed logic that Zeb is trying to pass under the radar?

Let me spell it out for you, once again.

Zeb is claiming that homosexuality is wrong BECAUSE there is a higher incidence of HIV among homosexuals in the United States.

By that IDENTICAL logic, heterosexuality is wrong BECAUSE there is a higher incidence of HIV among heterosexuals outside of the United States.

Do you now understand how ridiculous that sounds?

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
There is no greater way to distance yourself from God than to use your body in such a way.[/quote]

You’re welcome to your subjective religious beliefs. But don’t expect me to accept them just because you say they are true. You have no objective scientific evidence for your claims.

Hey Zeb, I have a question for you. I know how fond you are of just skipping points that don’t agree with your soap bubble world, but let’s see if you can actually address the question the time.

Are you opposed to lesbian relationships? Why or why not?

[quote]waterskiin wrote:
Zeb,

I know you are trying to take the moral high road here, but think about what you are asking. You have conceded that some gays cannot change thier orientation.[/quote]

It’s actually far to early to decide who can change their same sex attraction and who cannot.

If the incredible lies from the politically correct had not be spread we might have an answer as to why people are homosexual to begin with.

From the various statistics that I have read it seems that there is almost always a “nuture” part that plays a very large role.

Byne, W., Parsons, B. (1993, March). Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised. Archives of General Psychiatry. 50: 228-39 (228).

“While all behavior must have an ultimate biologic substrate, the appeal of current biologic explanations for sexual orientation may derive more from a dissatisfaction with the current status of psychosocial explanations than from a substantiating body of experimental data. Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking. In an alternative model, temperamental and personality traits interact with the familial and social milieus and the individual’s sexuality emerges.”

Chapman, B., Brannock, J. (1987) Proposed model of lesbian identity development. An empirical examination. Journal of Homosexuality. 14:69-80.

“63% of lesbians surveyed stated that they had chosen to be lesbians, 28% felt they had no choice, and 11% did not know why they were lesbians.”

Elliott, D.M., Brier, J. (1992, February). The Sexually Abused Boy: Problems in Manhood. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 26 (2): 68-71.

“Boys who were sexually molested have subsequently a higher incidence of homosexuality.”

Friedman, Richard, Downey, Jennifer. (1993) Neurobiology and Sexual Orientation: Current Relationships, 5. J. Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 131, 139.

“Some typical childhood factors related to homosexuality are: feeling of being different (for whatever reason) from other children; parent, sibling, peer relationships; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved, unapproving; perception of parental perfection required; perception of mother as being too close, too involved; premature introduction to sexuality (such as child abuse or incest); gender confusion; defensive detachment, reparative drive, same-sex ambivalence; unmet affection needs; diminished/distorted masculinity, femininity.”

I wonder if we somehow removed the following how many would claim a same sex attraction?

-Molested as a child
-One or both parents distant.
-Other abnormal childhood influence

Yes, indeed the reasons that some have a same sex attraction are varied. However there is still no conclusive proof that it is solely genetic.

If it were proven to be solely genetic then I would reconsider my current opinion on the subject.

Now how many politically correct would say the opposite?

That is an understatemnt.

There is no “lifestyle” that even comes close to approaching the dangers of the homosexual lifestyle.

That there are more not speaking out regarding the truth has more to do with political correctness than reality.

Statistically you have a far better chance of living a long and healthy life if you smoked than if you are gay!

I would have to say that you are looking for goodness in a fairly dark area. Your eagerness to put a happy face on what is happening with in the gay community borders on silly.

You are simply “trading pain.”

Have you ever seen anyone die of AIDS in front of you? It’s not a very pretty picture.

I am simply countering the incredible amount of propaganda that has been spread by the politically correct regarding homosexuality. Those who have a same sex attraction can indeed try to get therapy. It has worked for thousands of those who had same sex attraction.

And because one therapy fails does not mean that others will not succeed.

We all serve God in one way or the other. Why do you think you are still here?

I never stated that heterosexuals do not get HIV. However, if you look at the statistics, the overwhelming majority of new HIV cases are homosexual men. And they comprise only about 1.5% of the population.

Statistically, I’m not even sure if there is a higher correlation between smokers and cancer as there are to homosexuals and the HIV virus.

Thank you for the link, it was very informative. As it states: “Most gays and lesbians are not parents, and have more disposable income because of this.”

While I would not trade my children for all the money in the world, I know I would have more money in my pocket if I didn’t have to pay for things like braces. Do you know how much they cost? YIKES!

You know, I post on these threads like everyone else. But the difference is I don’t retreat from my point when the militant gays show up and start flinging the “homophobic” word around as if it actually has merit.

The more interesting point would be to ask, why isn’t there more people commenting on this topic?

For example, polls and referendums around the country show a solid majority of people 70% to 75% against gay marriage. So why don’t more folks comment on homosexuality when it comes up?

Most people are cowed into silence by the militant hate speech used by the politically correct who spew out all the buzz words. If you speak out against a certain lifestyle you are certainly not cool. It’s only cool to be accepting of anything and everything that happens our way.

You think homosexuality is wrong? GASP…you must be a “homophobe.”

What a bunch of crap!

Free speech works both ways- Those who don’t like my free speech don’t have to read it!

But I won’t be silenced on a message board, or in my personal life by cowards who hide behind various buzz words and other forms of hate speech, in order to promote their agenda.

Why would you draw such a conclusion?

I think those who have a same sex attrction have demonstrated that they can easily carry on “sexually” with those of the opposite sex. 87% of homosexual men have stated that they have had sex with women.

How can that be? How many “heterosexual men” (not in prision:), are physically capable of having sex with another man?

So how can they be capable of having sex with someone of the opposite sex if they are “born that way?” It seems that it is only their “preference” to have sex with someone of the same sex.

Many men would “prefer” to carry on extramarital affairs if their wives would not mind.

But…

I looked it up as you suggested. It doesn’t fit me at all.

However, the fact that you had to stoop to such an obvious put down might mean that you suffer from being politically correct.

You see the politically correct despise anyone who attacks their standard beliefs. Usually the beliefs that were pounded into their heads from liberal universities. And then perpetuated by the liberal media.

You only thought you were a “free thinker.”

Congrats!

Zeb

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:

Why does the CDC get carte blanche…
[/quote]

These are government statistics. They are attempting to gather accurate information with no agenda.

Also, you have not shown any evidence that they are wrong in their denunciation of the word “safe” when it comes to anal sex.

And before we go to much farther I want you to tell me how YOU, or any of your brethern is able to have sex with someone of the opposite sex if you are truly a homosexual?

I ask you again (other than in prison) how many heterosexual males are even physically capable of having sex with someone of the same sex?

Might just be you have a preference…and that’s it!

[quote]forlife wrote:
Hey Zeb, I have a question for you. I know how fond you are of just skipping points that don’t agree with your soap bubble world, but let’s see if you can actually address the question this time.

Are you opposed to lesbian relationships? Why or why not?[/quote]

[quote]forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
LOL…we should all just stop having sexual relationships. That should really help the human race.

Ridiculous, isn’t it? So why would you buy into the flawed logic that Zeb is trying to pass under the radar?

Let me spell it out for you, once again.

Zeb is claiming that homosexuality is wrong BECAUSE there is a higher incidence of HIV among homosexuals in the United States.
[/quote]

You know, you are really going to actually have to start reading my posts.

On this thread I have primarily stated that the homosexual act(anal sex) and lifestyle (of many) is wrong because it causes disease. And I gave evidence from reputable sources (CDC and others) to back that up.

You foolishly stated that lubrication is the answer…(I’m laughing at that irght now :slight_smile:

I know there is no amount of reasoning that will ever sway you from your position.

You have lived many years as a homosexual and you are not about to renounce your belief that it is a wonderful life.

But, you should give those young guys who are reading this a break.

They don’t have to go down the road of pain that you have chosen.

[quote]forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
There is no greater way to distance yourself from God than to use your body in such a way.

You’re welcome to your subjective religious beliefs. But don’t expect me to accept them just because you say they are true. You have no objective scientific evidence for your claims.[/quote]

Most “religious beliefs” would preclude forlife partaking in homosexual acts. Therefore, he turned his back on God…The flesh is powerful indeed!

[quote]forlife wrote:
Hey Zeb, I have a question for you. I know how fond you are of just skipping points that don’t agree with your soap bubble world, but let’s see if you can actually address the question the time.

Are you opposed to lesbian relationships? Why or why not?[/quote]

I will be glad to answer that question as soon as you answer this question:

How can 87% of alleged homosexuals have had sex with members of the opposite sex?

[quote]forlife wrote:

I’m 40.
[/quote]

Everytime you look at a 13, 15, or 17 year old boy, remember that I told you statistics show homosexual males are attracted to young kids. Then, leave him alone. Don’t press your agenda on him.

And, if you ever look for even younger kids, be even more weary. Our society is becoming less and less tolerant of sexual abuse on our children.

Before you say I’m pulling it out of thin air, check your local newspaper. Everywhere we hear about young boys being molested. And it’s not the heterosexuals doing it. It’s the gays.

[quote]forlife wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Since your premises (1) and (2) can be changed in order w/o effecting the transitivity of the argument, you have just proven Zeb’s case.

Lol…you forgot the other half of the argument. By your logic, heterosexuality is equally wrong.
[/quote]

This guy’s a douche. Zeb, give up.

[quote]forlife wrote:
Hey Zeb, I have a question for you. I know how fond you are of just skipping points that don’t agree with your soap bubble world, but let’s see if you can actually address the question the time.

Are you opposed to lesbian relationships? Why or why not?[/quote]

Although you did not address this to me, I’ll answer it.

I am opposed to us doing things that are not natural for our bodies. That includes gay sex, both in men and women.

Could you imagine if everyone decided to be gay? What if it happened 100 years ago? We would never be even having this discussion.

Today, the homosexual community would say that we can invitro to have our kids, but we didn’t have that option 100 years ago. And, if the homosexual community is as monogomous as you suggest (FYI - statistics disagree with you), you wouldn’t find gay men cheating on their husbands with women.

Your whole argument and your whole lifestyle is a sham. I know you don’t want to hear it, but facts are facts. Just because you close your eyes doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.

BTW - how many gay partners have you had? Most homosexuals admit to having many. I often hear 100’s or 1000’s. That is pretty large considering some people are inclined to lie. Are you?

[quote]ZEB wrote:
These are government statistics. They are attempting to gather accurate information with no agenda.
[/quote]

So you accept the CDC, a GOVERNMENT organization as being non-political.

You then dismiss the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychiatric Association, the World Health Organization, the American Association of Social Workers, etc. as worthless because they all have a political agenda?

Being appointed by government officials, the CDC is at least as likely to be politically motivated as the other organizations I listed.

You would have us believe that EVERY MAJOR MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION is politically motivated, and therefore we should just ignore their scientific conclusions regarding homosexuality??

How stupid do you think people are?

Here are some examples of entire societies where male-male relationships were common.

From the Wikipedia entry on homosexuality:

[quote]In North Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia, where gender- and age-structured relationships are the rule, male homosexual practices are reported to be widespread, engaged in by many individuals who do not regard themselves as homosexual. See Homosexuality and Islam

Historically, in areas where same-sex relationships were embedded in the culture, such as Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, parts of Melanesia, Renaissance Italy, and pre-modern Japan, homosexual relationships were engaged in by a majority of the male population.[/quote]

[quote]Shudo is the Japanese tradition of age-structured homosexuality prevalent in samurai society from the medieval period until the end of the 19th century…

The practice was held in high esteem, and was encouraged, especially within the samurai class.[/quote]

More lies from Zeb. You are way off base in your claim that heterosexual males aren’t physically capable of having sex with other men.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
On this thread I have primarily stated that the homosexual act(anal sex) and lifestyle (of many) is wrong because it causes disease. And I gave evidence from reputable sources (CDC and others) to back that up.
[/quote]

By your flawed logic, the heterosexual act is also wrong because it causes disease. Did you not see the references I provided, showing that the large majority of new HIV cases outside of the United States are primarily due to HETEROSEXUAL sex?

Sorry Zeb, but logic doesn’t work that way. In order for something to be logical, it needs to be consistently applied.

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
Before you say I’m pulling it out of thin air, check your local newspaper. Everywhere we hear about young boys being molested. And it’s not the heterosexuals doing it. It’s the gays. [/quote]

Do you even try to educate yourself, or are you perpetually content buying into the stereotypes of the religious right?

Homosexuality is not pedophilia.

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
I am opposed to us doing things that are not natural for our bodies. That includes gay sex, both in men and women.[/quote]

So the reason for you being opposed to lesbian sex is that it is “unnatural”. Again, you’re welcome to your subjective beliefs. But I didn’t see any actual scientific data backing up your claims.

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
Could you imagine if everyone decided to be gay? What if it happened 100 years ago? We would never be even having this discussion.[/quote]

Hate to break it to you bud, but people don’t just decide to be gay. Do you think I would put up with the shit people like you are constantly shoveling if I could just choose to be straight instead?

Homosexuality has always existed, and yet somehow the human race continues to perpetuate. In fact, some have argued that homosexuality is nature’s way of protecting the race from overpopulation.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
This guy’s a douche. Zeb, give up.
[/quote]

Pretty compelling argument you have there. Maybe instead of name calling, you could actually address my point?

Why is homosesexuality wrong because it produces disease, while heterosexuality is not wrong because it also produces disease? The large majority of new HIV cases outside the U.S. are due to HETEROSEXUAL sex.

If you want to use that kind of logic, you have to apply it across the board. Sorry, but selective logic doesn’t fly.

Wouldn’t it make more sense to focus on educating people to have safe sex, rather than attacking sexual orientation?