[quote]terribleivan wrote:
forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
High suicide rate.
High depression rate.
High disease spreading rate.
Inability toward being monogamous (in general)
Heterosexuals commit suicide, get depressed, spread disease, and sleep around too. Would you advocate denying them marriage because of this?
Again, you are being totally inconsistent and applying a double standard.
If you really cared about gays spreading disease (as opposed to being a homophobe with a religious agenda), you would ENCOURAGE them to marry, since government sanctioned unions have been shown to DECREASE the incidence of disease among gays:
[b]After Denmark recognized same-sex couples in 1989, the marriage rate increased, the divorce rate fell and the rate of childbirths outside of marriage declined for the first time in decades?
Moreover, allowing same-sex couples to marry has a number of positive benefits. We interviewed a variety of Danish couples who had registered as partners. They told us how their legal unions deepened their commitment to each other, helped legally protect the children they were raising, enriched their relationships with family members and co-workers, and educated the community.
Our book documents the numerous social and community benefits from Scandinavian recognition of lesbian and gay partnerships. Because marriage and partnership serve private social welfare functions, legal recognition stands to save the state money. Recognition helps integrate lesbian and gay families into the larger society and helps attract productive workers to the country.
We also found that partnership recognition contributed to the success of Scandinavian programs to prevent AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases.
The Nordic nations have had marriage-like partnerships for 17 years now, and the sky did not fall.[/b]
I see now you cling to a flawed inconsisency argument. You must be desperite.
Homosexuals have a much higher rate of suicide than heterosexuals.
Homosexuals have a much higher rate of depression than heterosexuals.
Homosexuals have a much higher incident of disease than heterosexuals.
Homosexuals have many, MANY, more sexual partners than heterosexuals (with the exception of Wilt Chamberlin who is right there with the homos)
The funniest part about your argement that homosexuality is normal is that if everyone was a homo 100 years ago, you wouldnt even be here today! Life would have ceased to exist! And now that we have gotten so scientificly advanced, you want to try to justify your nasty little habit by marrying other men. HA, HA, it aint gonna happen in this country - LOL!
Forlife, you are the most selfish person I have ever seen on these threads, and that says alot![/quote]
Great point that I have never heard anyone bring forth. If, 100 years ago, everyone went the ‘other way,’ the population of the planet would be down to near zero. The fact that the human race couldn’t sustain this, proves that this behavior is at least not normal and against the laws of nature. All this even without the Bible! [/b]
Also, when you point out about the suicide rates for homosexuals and the depression rates for this class of people – I find it ironic that they call themselves “gay.” This word, which has totally been coopted by the homosexual “community,” used to mean happy…ironic indeed!