I can see how that would be inferred, but was not what I intended.
I think the punishment should be relative to the crime. If murderers walk in less than 10 years, it would have to be a pretty heinous rape (vicious beating, repeat offender, known to have std’s etc) to warrant a decade in prison.
Again, not the intent… but rather to keep things in perspective… many think like this:
I’m sorry, but I’d say murder is more vile…
People get really passionate about rape… I get that, it is disgusting… but people are quick to call for an offender’s head (quite literally)… in this case, the court thought 6 month’s was a just punishment… I don’t know all the facts, but from my very limited/superficial knowledge of the case, it sounds like:
1.) This was a drunk, young, first time offender
I don’t know about you… but in my younger years, I’ve done shit that I wasn’t proud of when extremely intoxicated (beat the shit out of people, damaged property, put others lives in danger by driving etc)… No, I never raped anyone… but I have made bad decisions under the influence of alcohol… decisions I wouldn’t have made sober… decisions that I regret and have taught me to control my alcohol consumption.
2.) She wasn’t badly hurt (abrasions, presumably from positioning her is all I hear)
The lack of injury tells me this was a crime of “passion” rather than “violence”. Again… without all the facts, I can’t tell you how much malice or intent to harm he displayed, but on the surface it doesn’t sound like too much. My understanding is that many rapists, use the act as means of violence, asserting dominance etc… this sounds more like the actions of a drunk/horny college kid.
3.) She wasn’t even conscious to refuse
Again, lack of non-consent does not equal consent… wouldn’t you say the rapist who imposes himself on someone who’s fighting and telling them to stop, is a different type of criminal than the opportunistic fuck going after “ninja sex”? I get that you could argue the latter is just as despicable… but again which is likely more dangerous?
Again, this is all from my very limited and superficial knowledge of the case… (most of which gleamed from here and social media)… it sounds like a drunk kid made the mistake of giving in to his base nature by taking advantage of a pretty girl who passed out. There was no pre-meditation… no roofies… no aggravation/women hating douche baggery (i.e. beating on her etc).
Does that mean he’s not a rapist? Nope… but I would say (at least at this point) he’s in an entirely different category than someone like Jeffery Dahmer.
I’m not a judge… I don’t follow these kind of cases… was his sentence too lenient? It sounds like the overwhelming consensus is yes… but some of the punishments that people call for are utterly ridiculous.