Briffault's Law

Off Topic
1

BRIFFAULT?S LAW:

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

There are a few corollaries I would add:

Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.

Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)

A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).

http://www.stickmanweekly.com/ReadersSubmissions2009/reader5546.htm

If there is one thing that makes me regret the demise of SAMA it is that there is no place anymore for issues like the one above, because having people like AngryChicken and big, strong black BDSM dude whose name I will immediately remember after having hit the “submit” button, no doubt, comment on issues like this is beyond valuable especially for young men who are still looking for their little princess.

Also, yes, I think the site I pulled this from is somehow devoted to bedding SEA women, disregard that please, I was just the most succinct piece I could find.

2

Also, this video and, for once, the discussion below the video is at least semi bearable.

3

Whores.

/thread

4

“No man can ever understand what is going on inside the head of any woman, of any culture, including their own, no matter how much they study. We should not kid ourselves.” – from the link

5

And BigLew or something.

6

oh relationshits.

Seriously though, the guy who wrote the link is jaded. 4th marriage…he can blame women all he wants, but he is probably doing something wrong.

7

[quote]Anonymity wrote:
oh relationshits.

Seriously though, the guy who wrote the link is jaded. 4th marriage…he can blame women all he wants, but he is probably doing something wrong.[/quote]

No shit. Dude is a whiny cuntbag.

“WAAAAAAAAHHHHH wimminz r the awfullest WAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!1”

8

[quote]Anonymity wrote:
oh relationshits.

Seriously though, the guy who wrote the link is jaded. 4th marriage…he can blame women all he wants, but he is probably doing something wrong.[/quote]

Briffault was married 4 times, not the poster of that link and I think after 3 divorces he would know.

Also, his last wife was 1 year older than his oldest child, one would think that he would know one or two things about how the game is played.

9

Well since nobody wants to play, my thoughts on this.

As I may have mentioned once before, I had some serious sleep apnoea issues which lead to all kinds of stuff, which mainly resulted in wild swings as far as my attractiveness, income and future potential was concerned.

When the rollercoaster went up I had more than enough women in my life, when it went down, they left.

All of them, whether we had sex or not.

While I do admit that it is highly insulting and a big narcissistic blow that their main social, sexual and emotional value, at least for men, are determined by quickly deteriorating assets like youth and looks, I do not for believe for one second that women are any better, if anything, they are worse.

If you think about it would you rather be an object that is cherished, displayed and protected and immediately snatched up if your former owner no longer can perform his function or would you rather be an object that is deemed useful because of the things it can do for you, like a washing machine that is repaired at a reasonable cost when it can be and discarded and replaced when it cant.

I do not think that laying blame here brings much to the table though, I think that female psychological adaptations must be way more brutal than mens precisely because she only has a limited amount of time to find as good a partner as possible and if she wastes any time with feelings like loyalty, honor, commitment or whatnot she is immediately at an evolutionary disadvantage.

If that disadvantage on average means only one less child that makes it into adulthood those feelings would be bred out of the population before we even became homo sapiens.

Since a mans contribution to procreation can be as small as 20 seconds of his time it makes sense that his adaptation would be less strict.

Am I claiming that all women are calculating bitches?

No, I am claiming that women feel a certain way if a relationship pays off for her and she suddenly experiences a change of heart when she no longer does, much the same way a man might be attracted to a woman if she is halfway fit and that might change if she gains 40 lbs.

Finally, the way divorce law is at the moment in most Western nation and how it is practiced in reality I would like to point to corollary laws 1 and 2 and invite you to draw your own conclusions.

10

[quote]orion wrote:
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

[/quote]

The human species disproves this all the time. When men become quadriplegics women stand by them all the time. Sometimes women will stand by their men when they’ve been out of work for years. I have a childhood friend whose father lost his job due to California’s Jarvis-Gan initiative. His dad never worked again, he didn’t even try to find a job the mom had to go back to work. The father was a loving father so you might think his wife stayed with him because she got help parenting. Maybe, but when the kids were all out of the house she didn’t leave him. It wasn’t until they were in their 70’s when HE left her.

I do see what Briffault is suggesting all the time. Girl splits as soon as she’s not getting what she’s expecting. I’m just saying there are exceptions all over the place.

11

A man’s face is his autobiography. A woman’s face is her work of fiction.

12

Anyone that thinks there is any law or formula or logic to male/female relationships is full of shit and probably trying to sell you something. If there were a law or formula to it, you would have the ability to predict where every relationship would end up. At every point in every person’s life, they’ve been bat shit googly eyed for someone, and at some point down the road things went south and then you spent the rest of your life wondering what the fuck you were thinking wasting your time with that person. If there were laws to this, the end result could be established beforehand. But it can’t so you can’t say there are any universal truths to male/female relationships.

I will also add that most of the guys who write this type of shit have serious self esteem issues. I would also imagine that if you could look into this person’s past, they probably had a shit father, or maybe a slutty mother or something. Or just had a lifetime of being burned by women(probably because they were pussies, which most of these pua types openly admit too yet think it doesn’t jade them in some way). These guys reek of bravado. And the only women that fall for their crap are the ones just as weak and damaged as they are.

Want to have your pick of the litter when it comes to women? Try growing an actual dick and being a god damn man and see what that gets you.

13

What a load of drivel. How the author ever found anyone to marry him the first time around is puzzling. No matter how large the bank account or the penis, it could never be enough to listen to that whining garbage day in and day out. Maybe if he tried working on making himself a better person, a better man, he may attract a higher rank in partner.

I would put money on it if you spoke to any of his ex-wives, they would tell you that they tried to make it work but that he just hates himself and is paranoid and impossible to live with. There is a guy like that in every social circle - the guy who complains about women and what they want and yet, he never has a girlfriend and it’s blatantly obvious that it’s his attitude and not women per say.

In fairness, I’m not placing women above men either but refuting the author’s opinion…which he’s entitled to, even if it’s wrong. Men and women enter relationships because it’s mutually beneficial. Sometimes one or the other leaves for various reasons, sometimes they both stay. To place emphasis on one sex or the other as to fault, based on gender alone, is asinine.

14

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:
What a load of drivel. How the author ever found anyone to marry him the first time around is puzzling. No matter how large the bank account or the penis, it could never be enough to listen to that whining garbage day in and day out. Maybe if he tried working on making himself a better person, a better man, he may attract a higher rank in partner.
[/quote]

What I find utterly hilarious is you think he speaketh garbage and yet go on immediately to hand out advice that makes his point.

15

[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
Anyone that thinks there is any law or formula or logic to male/female relationships is full of shit and probably trying to sell you something. If there were a law or formula to it, you would have the ability to predict where every relationship would end up. At every point in every person’s life, they’ve been bat shit googly eyed for someone, and at some point down the road things went south and then you spent the rest of your life wondering what the fuck you were thinking wasting your time with that person. If there were laws to this, the end result could be established beforehand. But it can’t so you can’t say there are any universal truths to male/female relationships.
[/quote]

Statistically you predict where a relationship is going to end up if certain things occur.

For example, a sudden loss in status (i.e. job) leads to a higher divorce rate.

If the man loses his job.

I can also predict that a man with a lot of money is statistically more likely to find a very attractive woman.

Also, your whole premise of their being no laws when it comes to human relationships does not even make me wonder how we made it out of the rainforest, quite frankly it makes me wonder how we ever made it into the rainforest, us being the only species without any instincts governing mating.

16

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:
What a load of drivel. How the author ever found anyone to marry him the first time around is puzzling. No matter how large the bank account or the penis, it could never be enough to listen to that whining garbage day in and day out. Maybe if he tried working on making himself a better person, a better man, he may attract a higher rank in partner.
[/quote]

What I find utterly hilarious is you think he speaketh garbage and yet go on immediately to hand out advice that makes his point.

[/quote]

I find it hilarious that when I say that I look for self esteem and a good attitude and consider that more important than “offerings” that you think I made his point. lol Also, the higher rank in partner is me stating that he focuses too much on how much he thinks women judge him based on HIS rank. If he, himself, attracted a higher caliber (morally) of women, that might not be as much of an issue.

Anyways, my husband knows exactly how to treat a lady and understands that women are malicious but different. I would never leave him because every problem in life has a solution somewhere if both people look for it. All I’m saying is that I go to bed very happy every night and it’s not because of my husbands paycheck or social standing.

17

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
Anyone that thinks there is any law or formula or logic to male/female relationships is full of shit and probably trying to sell you something. If there were a law or formula to it, you would have the ability to predict where every relationship would end up. At every point in every person’s life, they’ve been bat shit googly eyed for someone, and at some point down the road things went south and then you spent the rest of your life wondering what the fuck you were thinking wasting your time with that person. If there were laws to this, the end result could be established beforehand. But it can’t so you can’t say there are any universal truths to male/female relationships.
[/quote]

Statistically you predict where a relationship is going to end up if certain things occur.

For example, a sudden loss in status (i.e. job) leads to a higher divorce rate.

If the man loses his job.

I can also predict that a man with a lot of money is statistically more likely to find a very attractive woman.

Also, your whole premise of their being no laws when it comes to human relationships does not even make me wonder how we made it out of the rainforest, quite frankly it makes me wonder how we ever made it into the rainforest, us being the only species without any instincts governing mating. [/quote]

I don’t doubt that job loss leads to a higher divorce rate. Money is a difficult issue for lots of couples out there. However, that is a variable that cannot be accounted for when men and women begin relationships. No one knows if they will lose their job, so I’d imagine both men and women will just hope for the best. Additionally, if these folks who were masters at pulling women, it only works if they are employed? Oh.

Does someone with a lot of money have a better chance of landing a mate? Probably. Is it a guarantee? Hell no. Countless other variables come into play. He could be disfigured, social inept, have a micro penis, be bat shit crazy, etc.

You miss my points about universal truths in male/female relationships. You are speaking about biology, I’m speaking about psychology. There is a bit of a difference between the two. Dicks fit in vaginas, that’s biology. Men obsess about tits and ass, women obsess about shoes, that’s psychology. We made it in and out of the rainforest because of biology. Psychology will probably take us back to it at some point.

18

[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
We made it in and out of the rainforest because of biology. Psychology will probably take us back to it at some point.
[/quote]

What rainforest? I think I’m missing some reference here.

19

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
We made it in and out of the rainforest because of biology. Psychology will probably take us back to it at some point.
[/quote]

What rainforest? I think I’m missing some reference here.[/quote]

We iz rainforest apes.

Indeed we iz.

20

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:
What a load of drivel. How the author ever found anyone to marry him the first time around is puzzling. No matter how large the bank account or the penis, it could never be enough to listen to that whining garbage day in and day out. Maybe if he tried working on making himself a better person, a better man, he may attract a higher rank in partner.
[/quote]

What I find utterly hilarious is you think he speaketh garbage and yet go on immediately to hand out advice that makes his point.

[/quote]

I find it hilarious that when I say that I look for self esteem and a good attitude and consider that more important than “offerings” that you think I made his point. lol Also, the higher rank in partner is me stating that he focuses too much on how much he thinks women judge him based on HIS rank. If he, himself, attracted a higher caliber (morally) of women, that might not be as much of an issue.

Anyways, my husband knows exactly how to treat a lady and understands that women are malicious but different. I would never leave him because every problem in life has a solution somewhere if both people look for it. All I’m saying is that I go to bed very happy every night and it’s not because of my husbands paycheck or social standing.[/quote]

But then the only source of disagreement is that you define “benefit” rather narrowly.

I dont, if it helps raising the chance of succesful offspring it qualifies no matter what it is.