[quote]Nards wrote:
I know he’s bigger and more developed than me, I’m just saying he’s well…ugh, I’m not writing all that stuff again.[/quote]
You don’t have to. You currently live in a country where they scream, “Godzilla!!” every time you walk outside so I have no doubt you thought you were much bigger than you are when you logged in.
Your legs look completely undeveloped. His do not even though they are not huge. You can see his quads and his legs overall match the rest of him even if they would need more size if he were competing in bodybuilding…but he isn’t a bodybuilder. He’s a football player and his legs are normal size for that line of work, not underdeveloped.
[quote]Nards wrote:
I know he’s bigger and more developed than me, I’m just saying he’s well…ugh, I’m not writing all that stuff again.[/quote]
You don’t have to. You currently live in a country where they scream, “Godzilla!!” every time you walk outside so I have no doubt you thought you were much bigger than you are when you logged in.
Your legs look completely undeveloped. His do not even though they are not huge. You can see his quads and his legs overall match the rest of him even if they would need more size if he were competing in bodybuilding…but he isn’t a bodybuilder. He’s a football player and his legs are normal size for that line of work, not underdeveloped.[/quote]
[quote]Nards wrote:
I know he’s bigger and more developed than me, I’m just saying he’s well…ugh, I’m not writing all that stuff again.[/quote]
You don’t have to. You currently live in a country where they scream, “Godzilla!!” every time you walk outside so I have no doubt you thought you were much bigger than you are when you logged in.
Your legs look completely undeveloped. His do not even though they are not huge. You can see his quads and his legs overall match the rest of him even if they would need more size if he were competing in bodybuilding…but he isn’t a bodybuilder. He’s a football player and his legs are normal size for that line of work, not underdeveloped.[/quote]
Now I’m not joking when I say this…but now you’re just being mean.
I like how an ex-pro football player (whom you don’t even know and who will never read this) gets a pass…but the 37 year-old English teacher who lifts in his free time gets this treatment.
Somebody posted earlier that Arnold had small legs compared to his Upperbody. I didn’t agree at first but then googled and saw this picture. I’m not saying he had SMALL legs or untrained ones, but if we compare it with the tree-trunk legs of most bodybuilders, then yeah, he had small legs.
Also, is it wrong to think that Arnold still looks better than Coleman ?
[quote]Nards wrote:
I know he’s bigger and more developed than me, I’m just saying he’s well…ugh, I’m not writing all that stuff again.[/quote]
You don’t have to. You currently live in a country where they scream, “Godzilla!!” every time you walk outside so I have no doubt you thought you were much bigger than you are when you logged in.
Your legs look completely undeveloped. His do not even though they are not huge. You can see his quads and his legs overall match the rest of him even if they would need more size if he were competing in bodybuilding…but he isn’t a bodybuilder. He’s a football player and his legs are normal size for that line of work, not underdeveloped.[/quote]
No I’m not joking when I say this…but now you’re just being mean.
[/quote]
I’m not. I’m just not sugar coating anything. There’s a difference. You NEED to work on your legs more. You probably need about 2 inches on them so they look like you train them regularly.
Your calves are naturally bigger than average which works for you…but comparing your legs to Terry Crews makes no sense…so why act like your feelings are hurt when someone calls you on it?
[quote]DeltaOne wrote:
Somebody posted earlier that Arnold had small legs compared to his Upperbody. I didn’t agree at first but then googled and saw this picture. I’m not saying he had SMALL legs or untrained ones, but if we compare it with the tree-trunk legs of most bodybuilders, then yeah, he had small legs.
Also, is it wrong to think that Arnold still looks better than Coleman ? [/quote]
Now this is getting lame…because if you don’t understand that standards have changed in bodybuilding over time, you shouldn’t comment on it.
I like how an ex-pro football player (whom you don’t even know and who will never read this) gets a pass…but the 37 year-old English teacher who lifts in his free time gets this treatment.
[/quote]
I see you added this.
What does your age or profession have to do with your development?
[quote]DeltaOne wrote:
Somebody posted earlier that Arnold had small legs compared to his Upperbody. I didn’t agree at first but then googled and saw this picture. I’m not saying he had SMALL legs or untrained ones, but if we compare it with the tree-trunk legs of most bodybuilders, then yeah, he had small legs.
Also, is it wrong to think that Arnold still looks better than Coleman ? [/quote]
Depends on which look you prefer. If you even THINK about trying to turn this into a “golden age vs modern day bodybuilder” thread, I will hunt you down and rip your spine out.
[quote]RSGZ wrote:
The first set of stills aren’t tampered with. They’re in the wrong aspect ratio, ID’s one’s are stretched to the correct 16:9 ratio.[/quote]
None of the upper body shots were stretched, so somebody did that deliberately.[/quote]
[quote]DeltaOne wrote:
Somebody posted earlier that Arnold had small legs compared to his Upperbody. I didn’t agree at first but then googled and saw this picture. I’m not saying he had SMALL legs or untrained ones, but if we compare it with the tree-trunk legs of most bodybuilders, then yeah, he had small legs.
Also, is it wrong to think that Arnold still looks better than Coleman ? [/quote]
As X said, standards have changed. Both men were at the peak of their era’s aesthetics.
But just for fun, I prefer Arnold’s arms, graceful sweeping posing style, and deep muscular separation.
Otherwise, he’d have a hard time winning against Ronnie in Coleman’s era.
[quote]DeltaOne wrote:
Somebody posted earlier that Arnold had small legs compared to his Upperbody. I didn’t agree at first but then googled and saw this picture. I’m not saying he had SMALL legs or untrained ones, but if we compare it with the tree-trunk legs of most bodybuilders, then yeah, he had small legs.
Also, is it wrong to think that Arnold still looks better than Coleman ? [/quote]
Now this is getting lame…because if you don’t understand that standards have changed in bodybuilding over time, you shouldn’t comment on it.[/quote]
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not questioning the new standards, I’m just expressing a personal opnion. From my point of view something about Coleman makes me think he is a bit… weird ?, I don’t know what it is though, perhaps is his gym outfit that reminds me of that guy who fought with Stallone in a movie. I don’t think the same thing of the other bodybuilders, like Cutler or Lee Priest.
[quote]
hungry4more wrote:
Depends on which look you prefer. If you even THINK about trying to turn this into a “golden age vs modern day bodybuilder” thread, I will hunt you down and rip your spine out. [/quote]
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not questioning the new standards, I’m just expressing a personal opnion. From my point of view something about Coleman makes me think he is a bit… weird ?, I don’t know what it is though, perhaps is his gym outfit that reminds me of that guy who fought with Stallone in a movie. I don’t think the same thing of the other bodybuilders, like Cutler or Lee Priest. [/quote]
Carl Weathers in Rocky?
He just played in the latest episode of Psych. He still looks good.
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not questioning the new standards, I’m just expressing a personal opnion. From my point of view something about Coleman makes me think he is a bit… weird ?, I don’t know what it is though, perhaps is his gym outfit that reminds me of that guy who fought with Stallone in a movie. I don’t think the same thing of the other bodybuilders, like Cutler or Lee Priest. [/quote]
Carl Weathers in Rocky?
He just played in the latest episode of Psych. He still looks good.[/quote]
Actually Wesley Snipes in Demolition Man.
I still don’t know why, but everytime I watch that “Yeahh buuddy” video of Coleman I instantly think of Snipes in that movie.
