[quote]Nards wrote:
Maybe those pictures of Terry looked really weird to me Professor X, because I would’ve bet every last dollar I had that you’d be going up one side and down the other of Terry Crews for those legs.[/quote]
Why? The man is doubtully much over 200lbs. He is not that big and his leg development falls in line with the rest of him. You are looking at one set of doctored photos and acting like your mind can’t let it go.
Crews is in great shape, but why the hell do you or anyone else see him as being so much bigger than he is?
He isn’t a bodybuilder. He’s an actor and ex-football player.
[quote]roybot wrote:
The stills of Terry Crew’s lower body have been tampered with. In the fourth frame down, his legs have been stretched to hell, and in the sixth frame he must have been carrying that bar of soap around for a long time, because it has made his forearm triple the size of the other one.
[/quote]
Yep.
Like I had mentioned above, the photos were stretched.[/quote]
yea look at his right hand, it suddenly gets very long in those frames.
Also, wasn’t this topic about guys with HUGE upper body and legs that look UNTRAINED? Terry Crews’ legs do not in any way look UNTRAINED. They look like they should look on most football players of that size. They aren’t built up like a bodybuilder, but where the fuck are some of you seeing small untrained legs that don’t match the rest of him?
X I think this was a veiled attempt at attacking young guys working out in the gym and doing only bench and curls. Just a variation of Squat rack curls. And then it just go derailed.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
X I think this was a veiled attempt at attacking young guys working out in the gym and doing only bench and curls. Just a variation of Squat rack curls. And then it just go derailed. [/quote]
I know, but I posted in the past about Nards and his 25" quads because I said they looked small and I would hope most bodybuilders build legs bigger than that. I think they now wait for every opportunity available to act as if his legs weren’t that small.
If these guys are running around calling guys like Terry Crews out for not training legs, something is wrong and their perception is a tad skewed. Crews is well known and his history goes back farther than ‘White Chicks’ which is why I wrote about Battle Dome…his first gig that really put him on the map.
[quote]RSGZ wrote:
The first set of stills aren’t tampered with. They’re in the wrong aspect ratio, ID’s one’s are stretched to the correct 16:9 ratio.[/quote]
None of the upper body shots were stretched, so somebody did that deliberately.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
X I think this was a veiled attempt at attacking young guys working out in the gym and doing only bench and curls. Just a variation of Squat rack curls. And then it just go derailed. [/quote]
I know, but I posted in the past about Nards and his 25" quads because I said they looked small and I would hope most bodybuilders build legs bigger than that. I think they now wait for every opportunity available to act as if his legs weren’t that small.
If these guys are running around calling guys like Terry Crews out for not training legs, something is wrong and their perception is a tad skewed. Crews is well known and his history goes back farther than ‘White Chicks’ which is why I wrote about Battle Dome…his first gig that really put him on the map.[/quote]
Personally I dont think you should call out Crazywood actors, these guys are making a living, not competing. Their body is their brand to a certain extent, Crews has obviously shown he can manipulate his body to suit the part. Also an underated actor and I love the fact he breaks the stereotype of muscle head action actor only. The guy cracks me up.
Pic taken around the filming of the Expendables.[/quote]
I don’t really care what position he played in football or how tall he is…my eyes see a guy with a very well developed upper body (I’m not talking bodybuilders even though this is a bodybuilding forum…we’re in GAL) and very thin legs. Basically as thin as mine.
Therefore without all the analyzing… he looks funny!
Pic taken around the filming of the Expendables.[/quote]
I don’t really care what position he played in football or how tall he is…my eyes see a guy with a very well developed upper body (I’m not talking bodybuilders even though this is a bodybuilding forum…we’re in GAL) and very thin legs. Basically as thin as mine.
Therefore without all the analyzing… he looks funny!
[/quote]
So Nards you dont think those photos were shopped? The ones X posted later on with him running to me you can see some quad and in those shopped ones there is no quad, just asking.
Pic taken around the filming of the Expendables.[/quote]
I don’t really care what position he played in football or how tall he is…my eyes see a guy with a very well developed upper body (I’m not talking bodybuilders even though this is a bodybuilding forum…we’re in GAL) and very thin legs. Basically as thin as mine.
Therefore without all the analyzing… he looks funny!
[/quote]
Pic taken around the filming of the Expendables.[/quote]
I don’t really care what position he played in football or how tall he is…my eyes see a guy with a very well developed upper body (I’m not talking bodybuilders even though this is a bodybuilding forum…we’re in GAL) and very thin legs. Basically as thin as mine.
Therefore without all the analyzing… he looks funny!
[/quote]
Whatever helps you sleep at night. One of you looks like you lift weights regularly.
I know he’s bigger and more developed than me, I’m just saying he’s well…ugh, I’m not writing all that stuff again.
Just so long as we don’t think I’m sitting here laughing saying “Oh SNAP!” as I look at pictures of Terry Crews’ legs. There’s really, honestly,no gloating, just a nodding assent that yes, his legs are small for his upper body.
