[quote]dl- wrote:
Anyways I never really liked how bodybuilding legs look like, kinda gross. [/quote]
You get no more advice.
Ever.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
dl- wrote:
Anyways I never really liked how bodybuilding legs look like, kinda gross.
You get no more advice.
Ever.
[/quote]
Why because how a bodybuilder’s legs look don’t appeal to me? I like big bulk legs I’m just not into havin them all veiny and stuff. So I get no more advice ever because I just wouldn’t want my legs too look like that? The whole reason behind the post was initially what are big measurements.
I then got curious on how some guys have smaller legs than me but mine measure bigger in inches, but there’s looks bigger than mine. I know your heavy into bodybuilding, but I just have different goals my friend.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
dl- wrote:
Anyways I never really liked how bodybuilding legs look like, kinda gross.
You get no more advice.
Ever.
[/quote]
…
Thats mainly from a REALLY low bf% and being dehydrated.
Of course some arms with a high level of devolpment (big peak, etc)are going to look bigger than some arms that are just big.
Thanks man, yeah I know what you mean about the biceps, I got a good grasp on it all now, thanks for everyone answerin my Q’s.
I think for someone to qualify as “big” on T-Nation they would be turning heads if they walked on the street wearing normal clothes. This is one tough crowd to please.
[quote]KombatAthlete wrote:
I think for someone to qualify as “big” on T-Nation they would be turning heads if they walked on the street wearing normal clothes. This is one tough crowd to please.[/quote]
How else would you define “big” in terms of muscle mass?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
KombatAthlete wrote:
I think for someone to qualify as “big” on T-Nation they would be turning heads if they walked on the street wearing normal clothes. This is one tough crowd to please.
How else would you define “big” in terms of muscle mass? [/quote]
thats how I would define it…
eight inches limp
[quote]tom63 wrote:
I don’t know if you remember Kal Szalack(sp). He had some huge arms but still was probably about 19-20 " at most. Of course he was maybe 235-240 lbs.[/quote]
He had great arms even when they wern’t flexed! Beautiful shape!