[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]fattymcfatso wrote:
My main argument on this thread the entire time was that I think CrossFit is a sport, and I am impressed with the top CrossFit athletes. I know this may differ from what you guys think, but I am really curious now as to what your definition of a sport is.
Just to be clear on this, I am no longer interested in what you think of CrossFit. I only want to know what your personal definition of sport is. [/quote]
Anything can be considered a sport. Thumb wrestling, marbles, hand clapping, just as anything can be considered art. It’s more about how people view it in relation to other examples of sport (or art). A guy running a 6 minute mile in a sporting event just doesn’t impress as much as a guy going under 4 minutes. A 65 second 400m is significantly slower than the split times for competitive milers. The weightlifting numbers are weak compared to competitive lifters. Even when taken as a whole the numbers are still not impressive. So maybe it can be called a sport but it’s like comparing the WNBA to the NBA. They are both sports. They are both basketball. But if you ignored the fact one is women you wouldn’t be impressed by the WNBA when viewed against the NBA.
So Crossfit games appear to be like a decathlon for people who are not athletic enough to do decathlons. They are like strongman comps for weaklings (relatively speaking). Take the best Crossfit woman and compare her to a gold medalist in the heptathlon and you will see a very wide gap as far as athleticism and the path to winning at Crossfit is far easier than the path to winning a gold medal. The Croosfit “athlete” has to work hard in order to succeed. The Olympic athlete has to work harder and also be blessed with a lot of talent.
And I think that is what the people who put down Crossfit see as one of the reasons: the idea that Crossfitters think of themselves as athletes on the same level as athletes from established sports. That they think the Crossfit games are somehow on the same level as the Olympics or professional sports. It’s like participants in intramural sports at a D1 college comparing themselves to the athletes on the varsity teams. Yeah, flag football can be considered a sport but it is not anything like actual football. [/quote]
Comparing CrossFit to anything besides CrossFit is not valid. There is no other activity that spreads an athlete so thin. One of the events in the 2009 games was a 7k trail run followed by a deadlift ladder. Being able to do a max snatch, followed by walking on your hands, followed by a farmers walk etc. The tests change every year. Being ready for anything (like it or not) is what the sport has become. If you can squat 700 lbs (raw of course) odds are you can’t do 15 muscle ups in a row or run kinda fast for a while. The sport or CrossFit punishes the specialist which is why CrossFit numbers will always be lower than specialists.
Rob Orlando is a perfect example. He is a former competitive strongman, who got into CrossFit. He is known for his strength as a CrossFitter now, but not as a strongman, since it is impossible to maintain both. Anthony Bainbridge went the other way, he started with CrossFit and found out he was very strong and now he competes in Powerlifting and has pulled over 300kg at 165. He is no longer good enough at CrossFit to be competitive in it since now he has chosen to specialize in only one area.
I get it. A 300 lb snatch is not impressive, a 6 minute mile is not impressive. If that was all Aja Barto could do I would not be impressed either.