[quote]RoidEnthusiast wrote:
and for anyone who wants to bitch, [/quote]
You seem to be doing enough bitching for everyone…
This following link is an article from T-Nation stating that the lowest total dose for an appreciable amount of gains to come from a cycle is about 2,500mg…ya 250mg a week is worthless here is the link
[quote]bbkhan87 wrote:
This following link is an article from T-Nation stating that the lowest total dose for an appreciable amount of gains to come from a cycle is about 2,500mg…ya 250mg a week is worthless here is the link
[/quote]
2.5g spread out over a number of weeks. That is explicity stated in the following line. WTF it means is another story.
This says nothing to disprove the idea that 250mg/wk is worthless. It also doesn’t support the claim either.
The author of that article even states that he doesn’t agree with that “fact”.
Ya lowest TOTAL dose.
Plus he states that he doesnt COMPLETELY agree yet he is not saying he completely disagrees
For sure as a base it would be benificial but do you honestly think an 8 week cycle with 250mg will do anything for substantial lbm gains
[quote]bbkhan87 wrote:
Ya lowest TOTAL dose.
Plus he states that he doesnt COMPLETELY agree yet he is not saying he completely disagrees
For sure as a base it would be benificial but do you honestly think an 8 week cycle with 250mg will do anything for substantial lbm gains
[/quote]
According to that, one can spread out 2.5g over a year and make gains. Or one can shoot 2.5g at one time and make gains. That ‘fact’ just doesn’t make sense for bodybuilding purposes. It literally does not apply.
Not completely agreeing and not disagreeing means he doesn’t know what he wants to say. He just threw that in there as filler for his article. It was introduced as a “tidbit” of information and shouldn’t be confused for anything else.
You want to know my opinion on 250mg/wk for 8 weeks?
I’d say there will definitely be a performance enhancing effect. Weight gain or fat loss? Who knows? Too many variables. It is impossible to predict lbm gains regardless of dosage. Some people need less and some need more. So it would be silly to say that NO ONE can gain off 250mg/wk.
All it really comes down to is the gains vs. side effect ratio. 500mg/wk is a very friendly dosage for a first timer which is why it is the recommended dose.
oh good point man is aromitization really high with 500mg
Please use punctutation.
Aromatization is proportional to the amount of testosterone used. That’s the only way I know of answering such a question.
bro, easy with the attitude. Just asking questions.
[quote]bbkhan87 wrote:
bro, easy with the attitude. Just asking questions.[/quote]
I don’t have an attitude. You are misinterpreting what you read.
[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
Whoa! wrote:
Bushy, I do see what you mean, and thanks for typing up that response.
However, I’ve always thought (maybe ASSumed…) that Anadrol was progestagenic. The profile at Meso says it is, anyway. I guess I need to learn more.
I haven’t read the meso profile, but my William Lewellyn 2004 AS Reference Manual tells me about the direct stimulation of the E receptor.
Again, it comes down to blending real world results with textbook learning, since no one publication can truly claim to have it 100% correct.
If anadrol were progestergenic, then it would definitely make sense to include an AI if running test with the drol (and why wouldn’t you be running test?). Also, that might better explain the beneficial addition of winstrol to the stack.
Bushy[/quote]
My 2006 reference also confims that Anadrol directly stims the breast tissue.