ADEX's Rep Gets Better & Better

Hey gang,

Have you all read Cy Willson’s article on Anastozole?

I’ve been getting more and more interested in adex since KsMan first brought it to my and a lot of other guys attention as a “must” for cycles of any worthy doseage.
Now this article has really got me thinking about it in an even more positive light.

Cy is talking here of regular Joe’s using it off cycle as a potential test booster, and estro killer. And it looks good.
He talks about using it in this manner at 1mg a day too.

Can you believe that?
Wow.

Anyway, I thought you guys would be interested in checking it out if you hadn’t seen it. Here’s a link to the article. Or actually the main part pertaining to what we’re after…

http://www.T-Nation.com/article/features/the_war_on_estrogen

Enjoy, oh, and go take some adex after you read it.

Good read though I thought.

ToneBone

I noted in particular that he lists letrozole as being equivalent in vitro estro killing as adex.

That seemed incorrect, but I’m no expert.
The last AI listed looks insane though in it’s strength.
WOW!!

Maybe this dood wasn’t as far off as everybody thought he was…

http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=2129155

Thanks for the read Tone…I always like to learn about stuff like this. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Gerdy

[quote]Dirty Gerdy wrote:
Maybe this dood wasn’t as far off as everybody thought he was…

http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=2129155

Thanks for the read Tone…I always like to learn about stuff like this. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Gerdy[/quote]

Hey thanks Gerdy.

Well, I read that one, and he is a little off the mark I think. Now according to Cy, clomid and adex is a different beast. I personally if doing something like that, would run similar to what Cy said, adex and Alpha Male, or another otc LH stim, whatever floats the boat, be it tribulus or whatever.

It’s interesting though, and I admit a bit surprising to see the recommendation of using 1mg per day.

I saw that and said wow.

[quote]InTheZone wrote:
Dirty Gerdy wrote:
Maybe this dood wasn’t as far off as everybody thought he was…

http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=2129155

Thanks for the read Tone…I always like to learn about stuff like this. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Gerdy

Hey thanks Gerdy.

Well, I read that one, and he is a little off the mark I think. Now according to Cy, clomid and adex is a different beast. I personally if doing something like that, would run similar to what Cy said, adex and Alpha Male, or another otc LH stim, whatever floats the boat, be it tribulus or whatever.

It’s interesting though, and I admit a bit surprising to see the recommendation of using 1mg per day.

I saw that and said wow.
[/quote]

Ya I know the guy was waaay off on the drugs but the theory was there. lol

I also thought it was interesting how he related letro and adex. I mean they are both AI’s but I know several people who have taken both and they always took more precaution when using letro. Saying “don’t take too much or you will mess yourself up”. Lowering estro levels too low for too long and your damaging yourself, I also remember reading that letro messes with cholesterol levels, but I might have mixed things up.

Cy had said that 1mg .vs. 10mg of adex was the same, that the 10mg had no more benefit than the 1mg. I wonder about sides with a higher dose, or length on? Also does that mean that somebody can take letro more freely and not monitor the dose as much?

I have never used any of this stuff but I must admit I’ve done quite a bit of research on it just because…well…it’s really interesting. :stuck_out_tongue: And I plan on using aas sometime in my future with the whole bodybuilding bit. lol

Gerdy

It’s incredibly easy to lower estrogen too far when you’re not on aromatizable AAS.

I tried a relatively low dose of extemestane for a while just for fun, and within about 3 days I absolutely could not get an erection. It was pretty scary haha.

[quote]Thomas Gabriel wrote:
It’s incredibly easy to lower estrogen too far when you’re not on aromatizable AAS.

I tried a relatively low dose of extemestane for a while just for fun, and within about 3 days I absolutely could not get an erection. It was pretty scary haha. [/quote]

I’m about ready to commit to a “study” on myself in the next week or 2 if the delt comes around. Then I’ll run adex solo at .25 ed for a couple days, .5mg/day for a few days, and evaluate at that point, if good, I’ll even try 1.0/day for a few more days…

All while AAS free, and if anything a HOT-ROX or two here and there.

What do you guys think?

ToneBone

[quote]Thomas Gabriel wrote:
It’s incredibly easy to lower estrogen too far when you’re not on aromatizable AAS.

I tried a relatively low dose of extemestane for a while just for fun, and within about 3 days I absolutely could not get an erection. It was pretty scary haha. [/quote]

You know thet theory behind using an AI or even a SERM as a stand alone product to raise T levels is cute. I’ll never be caught doing it though.

[quote]sapasion wrote:
Thomas Gabriel wrote:
It’s incredibly easy to lower estrogen too far when you’re not on aromatizable AAS.

I tried a relatively low dose of extemestane for a while just for fun, and within about 3 days I absolutely could not get an erection. It was pretty scary haha.

You know thet theory behind using an AI or even a SERM as a stand alone product to raise T levels is cute. I’ll never be caught doing it though.[/quote]

lmao

I’ve used lerto by itself, and it fuckin sucked. Besides not having any sex drive, I became very moody and actually depressed. But I am interested in giving adex a go by itself, or maybe I’m just itching to start my cycle early.

-M

[quote]mbaina wrote:
I’ve used lerto by itself, and it fuckin sucked. Besides not having any sex drive, I became very moody and actually depressed. But I am interested in giving adex a go by itself, or maybe I’m just itching to start my cycle early.

-M[/quote]

Ha, haaa, yeah that’s where I’m at with this too.

I used 1mg/day of arimidex when it first came around, in 1999. I was getting ready for the USA and my trainer sent me a bottle of arimidex, which I had never heard of at the time, and told me to stop the noveldex and start taking 1 pill(1mg) of arimidex a day.

Looking back now that was probably too much but for that contest I came in super dry and no gyno what so ever. He also had me stay on test and anadrol closer to the contest then I had in the past. The arimidex seems to eliminate water retention from these drugs.

[quote]joeblow wrote:
I used 1mg/day of arimidex when it first came around, in 1999. I was getting ready for the USA and my trainer sent me a bottle of arimidex, which I had never heard of at the time, and told me to stop the noveldex and start taking 1 pill(1mg) of arimidex a day.

Looking back now that was probably too much but for that contest I came in super dry and no gyno what so ever. He also had me stay on test and anadrol closer to the contest then I had in the past. The arimidex seems to eliminate water retention from these drugs.[/quote]

Pretty good story Joe.

Yeah, I put the article up not only for what he conveys about it’s use as a stand alone with something otc like alphamale, but also to bring a little more attention to something that KsMans’s been talking about for a long time.
Which is, that it shouldn’t be thought of as something to run AFTER you get symptoms of high estro, but rather run it from the beginning of cycles to not only prevent gyno and other high estro yukky stuff, but as he’s been pointing out, to ENHANCE the cycle with regards to gains.

This is somewhat one recent camp of thought led by KsMan, and it’s in contrast to what some of our more experienced guys in the forum say. Which is, to wait until you get symptoms of high estro.

I am not saying any one side is wrong, but for me, I’m going to use it from the get go, since I am estro sensitive, with more confidence in the future, and not worry if I’m up to .5mg a day, or even 1mg if need be.

So, I would like to see some of that discussed if you guys want, on this thread also. I think it’s interesting and maybe we’ve been a little too skeptical of how much adex really does bring to the table.

Thanks for your thoughts Joe.

ToneBone

I would kinda favourise letro over arimidex especialy for cycles including progesterone like stuff… since letro is good to lower both estrogen and pregesterone, i’ve also read somewhere that letro increases testosterone a lil more than adex, as stand alone compound of course…

regarding its potency, I think people tend to run it too high sence it is dosed at 2.5mg… I personaly intend to give it a run at 0.10mg eod

[quote]InTheZone wrote:
joeblow wrote:
I used 1mg/day of arimidex when it first came around, in 1999. I was getting ready for the USA and my trainer sent me a bottle of arimidex, which I had never heard of at the time, and told me to stop the noveldex and start taking 1 pill(1mg) of arimidex a day.

Looking back now that was probably too much but for that contest I came in super dry and no gyno what so ever. He also had me stay on test and anadrol closer to the contest then I had in the past. The arimidex seems to eliminate water retention from these drugs.

Pretty good story Joe.

Yeah, I put the article up not only for what he conveys about it’s use as a stand alone with something otc like alphamale, but also to bring a little more attention to something that KsMans’s been talking about for a long time.
Which is, that it shouldn’t be thought of as something to run AFTER you get symptoms of high estro, but rather run it from the beginning of cycles to not only prevent gyno and other high estro yukky stuff, but as he’s been pointing out, to ENHANCE the cycle with regards to gains.

This is somewhat one recent camp of thought led by KsMan, and it’s in contrast to what some of our more experienced guys in the forum say. Which is, to wait until you get symptoms of high estro.

I am not saying any one side is wrong, but for me, I’m going to use it from the get go, since I am estro sensitive, with more confidence in the future, and not worry if I’m up to .5mg a day, or even 1mg if need be.

So, I would like to see some of that discussed if you guys want, on this thread also. I think it’s interesting and maybe we’ve been a little too skeptical of how much adex really does bring to the table.

Thanks for your thoughts Joe.

ToneBone[/quote]

Tone in your case, especially since you know already you’re estrogen sensitive and you know from experience what dosage of gear produces what degree of sides then yes by all means the only way to fly in a case like yours is to use it. Everyone who needs it should use it; I have never waivered from that opinion. Where I and others might differ is does everyone on any supra-physioloigcal dosage need it and if so when. A lot of guys are favoring .25mg E3D of the adex and that’s a pretty reasonable compromise between minimal sides and maximal gains.

To address an issue you brought up about .5mg versus 1mg ED. Everything I have read suggests to me that .5mg ED is equally effective as 1mg in terms of estrogen suppression and reduction. Its hard for me to imagine a scenario where 1mg ED would be required. I’m 90% sure you are not using over 2G of highly aromatizable gear.

Finally, and this point overarches just this thread. I have noticed a tendency here in TNation’s Gear Forum and perhaps this is true elsewhere as well. The tendency is for an idea or concept to be asserted by someone who is respected within the community. Then a whole bunch of fence sitters jump onto that side. Two examples I’d use are World’s doctrine and protocol on higher dosed, shorter duration cycles and this new “fad” with adex. Throughout most of 2007 I was pretty regular here in TNation.

During that time I cannot think of many instances where there was any, let alone widespread dialogue about a first or second cycle being 800mg for 8 weeks. I disappeared for a few months and when I returned the fad was the high dose and short duration protocol. What was ironic too was that people who had never in practice used this method were totally behind it. If there is a slightly disturbing phenomenom here it is the ability of people/members to totally get behind a concept they themselves have little or no experience with.

I’m not saying its required to have tried a higher dose shorter duration cycle, but by the way some members write you’d think they had actually done it, when in reality they have not. Similarly the test taper protocol is now largely accepted much more so than even a year ago. What again is ironic is I know for a fact there are guys out there totally behind this method and endorsing it like gospel truth when in living practice they have not done it. Again, not saying you have to have experienced something to believe in its truth and effectiveness.

But the point remains the same that many relative newbies or maybe people who just want to fit in just kind of go with the flow when it comes to ideas and concepts. This is not necessarily a good thing either.
Now this adex thing is starting to gain swelling popularity. Again I’m not saying you don’t need adex on cycle or don’t use at all. I’m just saying if people are making decision for their bodies and their personal gear usage based solely on the notion that a particular concept is in vogue on an Internet message board, something is missing and lacking.

Not trying to single one or any protocol out but knowledge is power and personal experience knowledge is even greater power. People need to make informed and educated decisions for themselves and not necessarily just get swept up in the current.

Sorry if that seemed like a rant. It was not intended to be. Merely a call for intelligent choices not just monkey see monkey do.

[quote]sapasion wrote:
InTheZone wrote:
joeblow wrote:
I used 1mg/day of arimidex when it first came around, in 1999. I was getting ready for the USA and my trainer sent me a bottle of arimidex, which I had never heard of at the time, and told me to stop the noveldex and start taking 1 pill(1mg) of arimidex a day.

Looking back now that was probably too much but for that contest I came in super dry and no gyno what so ever. He also had me stay on test and anadrol closer to the contest then I had in the past. The arimidex seems to eliminate water retention from these drugs.

Pretty good story Joe.

Yeah, I put the article up not only for what he conveys about it’s use as a stand alone with something otc like alphamale, but also to bring a little more attention to something that KsMans’s been talking about for a long time.
Which is, that it shouldn’t be thought of as something to run AFTER you get symptoms of high estro, but rather run it from the beginning of cycles to not only prevent gyno and other high estro yukky stuff, but as he’s been pointing out, to ENHANCE the cycle with regards to gains.

This is somewhat one recent camp of thought led by KsMan, and it’s in contrast to what some of our more experienced guys in the forum say. Which is, to wait until you get symptoms of high estro.

I am not saying any one side is wrong, but for me, I’m going to use it from the get go, since I am estro sensitive, with more confidence in the future, and not worry if I’m up to .5mg a day, or even 1mg if need be.

So, I would like to see some of that discussed if you guys want, on this thread also. I think it’s interesting and maybe we’ve been a little too skeptical of how much adex really does bring to the table.

Thanks for your thoughts Joe.

ToneBone

Tone in your case, especially since you know already you’re estrogen sensitive and you know from experience what dosage of gear produces what degree of sides then yes by all means the only way to fly in a case like yours is to use it. Everyone who needs it should use it; I have never waivered from that opinion. Where I and others might differ is does everyone on any supra-physioloigcal dosage need it and if so when. A lot of guys are favoring .25mg E3D of the adex and that’s a pretty reasonable compromise between minimal sides and maximal gains.
To address an issue you brought up about .5mg versus 1mg ED. Everything I have read suggests to me that .5mg ED is equally effective as 1mg in terms of estrogen suppression and reduction. Its hard for me to imagine a scenario where 1mg ED would be required. I’m 90% sure you are not using over 2G of highly aromatizable gear.

Finally, and this point overarches just this thread. I have noticed a tendency here in TNation’s Gear Forum and perhaps this is true elsewhere as well. The tendency is for an idea or concept to be asserted by someone who is respected within the community. Then a whole bunch of fence sitters jump onto that side. Two examples I’d use are World’s doctrine and protocol on higher dosed, shorter duration cycles and this new “fad” with adex. Throughout most of 2007 I was pretty regular here in TNation. During that time I cannot think of many instances where there was any, let alone widespread dialogue about a first or second cycle being 800mg for 8 weeks. I disappeared for a few months and when I returned the fad was the high dose and short duration protocol. What was ironic too was that people who had never in practice used this method were totally behind it. If there is a slightly disturbing phenomenom here it is the ability of people/members to totally get behind a concept they themselves have little or no experience with. I’m not saying its required to have tried a higher dose shorter duration cycle, but by the way some members write you’d think they had actually done it, when in reality they have not. Similarly the test taper protocol is now largely accepted much more so than even a year ago. What again is ironic is I know for a fact there are guys out there totally behind this method and endorsing it like gospel truth when in living practice they have not done it. Again, not saying you have to have experienced something to believe in its truth and effectiveness. But the point remains the same that many relative newbies or maybe people who just want to fit in just kind of go with the flow when it comes to ideas and concepts. This is not necessarily a good thing either.
Now this adex thing is starting to gain swelling popularity. Again I’m not saying you don’t need adex on cycle or don’t use at all. I’m just saying if people are making decision for their bodies and their personal gear usage based solely on the notion that a particular concept is in vogue on an Internet message board, something is missing and lacking.
Not trying to single one or any protocol out but knowledge is power and personal experience knowledge is even greater power. People need to make informed and educated decisions for themselves and not necessarily just get swept up in the current.
Sorry if that seemed like a rant. It was not intended to be. Merely a call for intelligent choices not just monkey see monkey do.
[/quote]

Saps,

You must remember that Ks has been talking about this for a long, long time now. I don’t think I’m jumpin off the fence or anything, cause I have thought about it for a long time, well, yeah, especially since I attempted a high dose shorty, but after the third shot,(1200mg), I got derailed pretty good, lol.

But that’s why I realized, wow, I should have run the adex out of the gate, but it was considered unecessary, and I agreed out of ignorance you know?
I’m not saying this thing is something to actually do on a regular basis, I’m intrigued by the article and Ksman’s posts, but basicly I’m tired of not being able to start my next run, and it’s like, it won’t kill me for a week or two to check it out, and then I’d have some of my own real feedback, which others could learn something from yada, yada.

I know and understand what you’re talking about, I know how long you were gone and remember the transition to some of the new guys and the crowds mobilizing on different subjects/ideas. Hell I’m sure I’m one of the crowd even.

I do see what you’re saying and I respect you.

later buddy,

ToneBone

I’ve read a study showing a 1mg ED does will lower a normal young males E2 levels to “zero”. To low or too high E2 levels are both bad. I run it since I normally have high E2 levels and even at .5mg EOD it is too much.

I can only do .25mg EOD and it builds up over time so it doesn’t take much. I personally would never do this as a way to raise T levels by itself unless I know I had a high level to begin with.

[quote]aculpep wrote:
I’ve read a study showing a 1mg ED does will lower a normal young males E2 levels to “zero”. To low or too high E2 levels are both bad. I run it since I normally have high E2 levels and even at .5mg EOD it is too much.

I can only do .25mg EOD and it builds up over time so it doesn’t take much. I personally would never do this as a way to raise T levels by itself unless I know I had a high level to begin with. [/quote]

Important:

Research studies are often an exploration of the mechanism of how a certain drug acts in the body. Large doses are used to create profoundly obvious effects. There is most often no intent to represent that what was does as a dosage recommendation or a recommendation as a medical treatment. You need to have this in mind to avoid getting misled.

In other studies the method of action is under study and a drug is delivered by injection or IV to eliminate the confounding variables of absorption as an oral drug. Some things appear to work great… if they are absorbed. But often absorption through the gut is very poor and getting enough into your system to be effective as an oral is simply not going to work! Some supplement companies will quote the research to sell a product that simply cannot work well. So these research studies can be used to deceive you as well.

My whole point in what I posted earlier is that arimidex allows cometitors to use certain steroids(anadrol, test,d-bol ect) right up to contest day. Until arimidex in the late 90’s this was unheard of. I do not know if there are any competitors here but if you are all using high doses of anabolics I would assume so.

By using these drugs closer, without the water retention, you can come in bigger, fuller, and more conditioned. Or if you are just using for the beach you can look bigger, fuller ect. I know guys who will use 4mgs a day pre-contest so they can stay on 1000mgs of test a week close to the contest. Since this guy is saying 1mg=10mgs in effectivness maybe the extra 3 mgs is a waste of $?

I have no experience in using it by itself but I would always include it in any cycle.
When it comes to steroids I tend to steer clear of scientific studies because too often they have been plain wrong. I much prefer first hand accounts from those who have used the product at said dose.

[quote]joeblow wrote:
My whole point in what I posted earlier is that arimidex allows cometitors to use certain steroids(anadrol, test,d-bol ect) right up to contest day. Until arimidex in the late 90’s this was unheard of. I do not know if there are any competitors here but if you are all using high doses of anabolics I would assume so.

By using these drugs closer, without the water retention, you can come in bigger, fuller, and more conditioned. Or if you are just using for the beach you can look bigger, fuller ect. I know guys who will use 4mgs a day pre-contest so they can stay on 1000mgs of test a week close to the contest. Since this guy is saying 1mg=10mgs in effectivness maybe the extra 3 mgs is a waste of $?

I have no experience in using it by itself but I would always include it in any cycle.
When it comes to steroids I tend to steer clear of scientific studies because too often they have been plain wrong. I much prefer first hand accounts from those who have used the product at said dose.[/quote]

Some research papers do provide some good understanding of things. And some [few at best] are very good with dose recommendations and rational… such as the 2005 paper suggesting 250iu hCG SC EOD. But one needs to read between the lines and not get misled.