[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I wasn’t expecting such emotional and irrational reponses. Brickhead, you write like a female lol…nttiawwt
an above poster suggested that I may be making these examples up… sadly, I am not.
I just can’t wrap my head around a man choosing to spend the best years of his life raising another man’s child… it’s just, so irrational. Yes, “real men” face up to their obligations… THEIR obligations… not the obligations of another man lol… if you are trying to convince me, or anyone else, that a REAL man would ‘step up to the plate’, and essentially cuckold himself, its a wasted effort. [/quote]
Because maybe the juice is worth the squeeze?
In other words, if the single mother is that awesome, then a kiddo or two is not a deal-breaker by any means. Yeah, maybe there are better options out there, but you can say that about anyone you decide to settle down and build a family with.
I think the problem here is that you don’t really understand the Alpha/Beta thing very well at all. The man is Alpha if he is the de-facto, unquestioned leader of his family. That means that the kids he is essentially adopting fall under his authority. When Susie and Bobby are at home with Mom and Step-Dad, they toe the line that Step-Dad draws. That is being Alpha. The “you’re not my REAL Dad” bullshit does not fucking apply in this scenario.
Beta in this circumstance would be pushing all of the child-rearing responsibility off to the wife, since they’re not “your” kids.
Alpha = All In (Your frame)
Beta = Just the Tip (Their frame)
The act of dating a single mother in and of itself will require a greater degree of Beta (IE comfort-building) to win the woman over. She needs to feel supported and reassured that you’re not going to pump and dump; all of the Alpha tingles that might have got her panties off prior to kids will still have an effect, but they aren’t going to have as profound of one.
IMO as long as the man ends up happy with what he “won” (IE the single mom) after time has passed, and his needs are being met, then who fucking cares how many kids she had when they met or to whom? Why would you want someone to trade “happy and fulfilled” for anything else?
EDIT - I guess to sum up what I wrote above re: Alpha = All In, etc: It is much more Beta to be on the periphery of the family, therefore NOT effectively raising “another man’s kids,” than it is to OWN IT, lead the family, and raise the kids.