Best Way to Build Upper Pec Region

No one is arguing that you can specialize in either strength or size. No SHIT the pro bodybuilder will have a bigger chest, thats a fucking retarded comparison. One guy lifts to pick up things that are heavy, the other one lifts to be big. Where you’re retarded is completely disregarding that heavy weights can make you big. Is the guy who picks up heavy things big? Yes. Is the guy who picks up slightly less heavy things still strong? Yes. The two are not completely separate from each other, and to claim that is down right retarded. No one is arguing that bodybuilders are stronger than powerlifters and powerlifters are bigger than bodybuilders, I don’t see your point.

Does that guy look like the every day joe? Have you seen any powerliters at heavier weight classes? Under their fat they are still pretty fucking big.

Your comments that there are no situations in life that you can benefit from being strong in was so stupid it doesn’t even need a counter argument.

I think its interesting that people who haven’t actually accomplished anything always try to undermine how difficult the goal is to achieve. That guy has a bigger chest than you by “only” 5 inches. Like X said 5 inches doesn’t just fall on you after a few weeks of training. It will take you years to get his chest size, if you ever achieve it. You try to understate goals because you haven’t accomplished them, and it is insulting to those who have.

This example says nothing about benching for chest hypertrophy. He was training to get a big bench, not a big chest. Theres a huge difference, and you should know you can do things the other way around. It is nonsensical to use someone who wasn’t focused on chest hypertrophy to make your point about benching sucking at making your chest grow. Training for a strong bench may not may your chest grow, but that does not mean you cant use the bench press as a tool to do so.

CT wrote a long half a page post in Bartl’s thread about working the chest and how to isoliate the chest and how to stop other muscles from taking over when your chest can’t handle it.

If I remember correctly, he said he did decline Bench to tacle his problem. I don’t know how to link to a specific post so I just coppied and pasted it for you;

I hope I’m allowed to steal this from Bartl’s thread.

CT Wrote;

For a lot of peoples stimulating the chest is very hard to do because they are either shoulders or triceps dominant. This means that in most pectoral exercises one of these muscles will take over the bulk of the work and the pecs will be left relatively understimulated. To correct the situation it is important to:

a) at first select exercises where the dominant muscle is put in a mechanically weak position so that the body is forced to rely on the chest to do the work. This may require dropping most ‘traditional’ chest movements for a while.

b) learn to activate the chest during movements where your dominant muscle normally takes over, this is the second step of the process.

If you look at my training for today you’ll notice that I start my workout with an incline press. A year ago there is no way that I would have been able to effectively use this movement to stimulate the pecs. Why? Because my shoulders were dominant and with every type of incline and even flat press I would rely more on the delts than on the chest.

Now I do get a lot out of the incline press simply because my chest has caught up with my shoulders. How did I accomplish this? It was a three steps process. It needs some patience, because it has to be done gradually. Don’t forget: it took you years to build the erroneous motor pattern of relying on the delts to do the job, you cannot reverse that pattern in a few days!

STEP 1 - STIMULATE THE CHEST WHILE BREAKING THE BAD MOTOR PATTERNS
The first thing to do was to stop performing every exercise where my shoulder tended to take over my chest. This means no flat bench press, flat DB press, incline bench press, incline DB press, flat DB flies or incline DB flies.

In the past I tried to include ‘chest-specific’ exercise to correct my weak point but still kept the above exercises (especially the bench press) in my routine. This did not allow me to learn to use the pecs while performing the bench press.

Don’t let anybody tell you otherwise: the big basic movements (bench press, incline press, decline press, dips) are the exercises that are the most effective at building the chest. Well, they are in theory. If you cannot use your chest properly in these movements they will lose their effectiveness. So to benefit from them you have to breakdown the old motor habits, and that means stopping the use of these movements until the chest is strong enough to take over the exercise.

So what are good chest exercises that take away the shoulder from the movement?

Decline bench press, Decline DB press (pronated grip), Decline DB press (anatomically correct rotating grip), Lying cross-over (far away cable flies), Decline DB flies (anatomically correct rotating grip), Squeeze press (got to press inward hard every inch of every rep)

STEP 2 - LEARN TO USE THE CHEST IN THE BIG BASIC MOVEMENTS
Once that the chest is strengthened and that you are able to feel it work properly in exercises where it is in a mechanically advantaged position the next thing to do is to learn how to use the chest in big compound movements where this muscle group is normally taking a back seat to the shoulders or triceps.

To do this I recommend the pre-exhaustion (pre-fatigue) technique. This is not normally a method I recommend as it forces you to use less weight in the money exercises (big compound movements). But this is one of the few situations where it is the way to go.

What is pre-fatigue? It is a superset (two exercises performed without rest) for the same muscle group (chest). The first exercise is an isolation movement (for the chest) and its objective is to fatigue the target muscle group while also causing a pump in that muscle group (accumulation of lactate and hydrogen ions). Then you immediately move on to the big basic movement (e.g. Bench press or incline bench press). What does the pre-fatigue technique accomplish?

a) the accumulation of metabolites (lactate and hydrogen) makes it easier to ‘feel’ the chest (because it’s pumped). So when you are performing the bench press (or incline press) you will better be able to establish a good mind-muscle connection with the pecs because of the pump. A better mind-muscle connection will allow you to learn to use the chest more when you bench press.

b) pre-fatiguing the chest ensure that it will be thoroughly fatigued at the conclusion of the compound movement. So even if the delts took over, the chest will still have received an adequate stimulus.

Good pairings include:

A1. Cable cross-over 10-12 reps
no rest
A2. Bench press 8-10 reps
2 min. of rest

and

B1. DB flies 10-12 reps
no rest
B2. Incline press 8-10 reps
2 min. of rest

A second technique is to make a slight modification in pressing technique: when performing the bench press do not only press the bar up: try to squeeze the bar inwards. In other words try to bring both hands toward the inside when you press. Obviously since you are holding on to the bar, the hand wont move. But this simple technique will inhibit the triceps and force the pecs to do the bulk of the work. Obviously since you are taking a very strong muscle out of the exercise you will not be able to use as much weight. But the goal right now is to learn to use the chest, not press big weights.

STEP 3 - INTEGRATE
Once that you are able to really feel a strong contraction in the chest when doing basic pressing movements you can move on to a more ‘normal’ exercise selection. However avoid getting back into your old habits and always try to squeeze the bloody hell out of those pecs when pressing!

I would love to know how math works in Nominal Prospect’s bizarro universe. Somehow he kept adding more agonist muscles to a movement, more weight, and somehow came up with less stimulation on the muscle. That’s either some Nobel prize-winning insight, or it’s about a megaton of hot, stinking bullshit, and we should laugh at him.

[quote]rmccart1 wrote:
I would love to know how math works in Nominal Prospect’s bizarro universe. Somehow he kept adding more agonist muscles to a movement, more weight, and somehow came up with less stimulation on the muscle. That’s either some Nobel prize-winning insight, or it’s about a megaton of hot, stinking bullshit, and we should laugh at him.[/quote]

It stinks and I can’t stop laughing. Sign me up for option B.

I guess I got trapped into actually replying to him. I fail.

You’re wasting your time with this minimal respect guy. For fuck’s sake, read his previous posts and tell me you find anything worth discussing stuff with. He’s just as insufferable as that other kid who suggested you need liposuction.

He has conveniently created his own reality and is happy to live there. No one is in danger of taking advice from him and if they do, thats natural selection of sorts.

[quote]Defekt wrote:
No one is arguing that you can specialize in either strength or size. No SHIT the pro bodybuilder will have a bigger chest, thats a fucking retarded comparison. One guy lifts to pick up things that are heavy, the other one lifts to be big. Where you’re retarded is completely disregarding that heavy weights can make you big. Is the guy who picks up heavy things big? Yes. Is the guy who picks up slightly less heavy things still strong? Yes. The two are not completely separate from each other, and to claim that is down right retarded. No one is arguing that bodybuilders are stronger than powerlifters and powerlifters are bigger than bodybuilders, I don’t see your point.

Does that guy look like the every day joe? Have you seen any powerliters at heavier weight classes? Under their fat they are still pretty fucking big.

Your comments that there are no situations in life that you can benefit from being strong in was so stupid it doesn’t even need a counter argument.

I think its interesting that people who haven’t actually accomplished anything always try to undermine how difficult the goal is to achieve. That guy has a bigger chest than you by “only” 5 inches. Like X said 5 inches doesn’t just fall on you after a few weeks of training. It will take you years to get his chest size, if you ever achieve it. You try to understate goals because you haven’t accomplished them, and it is insulting to those who have.

This example says nothing about benching for chest hypertrophy. He was training to get a big bench, not a big chest. Theres a huge difference, and you should know you can do things the other way around. It is nonsensical to use someone who wasn’t focused on chest hypertrophy to make your point about benching sucking at making your chest grow. Training for a strong bench may not may your chest grow, but that does not mean you cant use the bench press as a tool to do so.[/quote]

That was some epic trolling. Really, if you read it it’s kinda funny how terrible it is.

For any confused beginners, NO, don’t waste your time with flyes. Press heavy. The end.

That would definitely be good and WILL add plenty of size, but adding some “flying” movements as post-exhaust or for other purposes is always a good idea if maximal hypertrophy is a goal. The cable crossover is always good for this. The dumbbell flyes are simply worthless over the ROM that most trainees perform them.
Besides, I believe (and I may be in a minority) that adding isolation movements for the chest can improve performance in the pressing movements and the net result is …well…quite nice.
Of course if you want some more entertainment with pseudo-supremacist overtones (and undertones) read his latest thread on the Get a Life section.

[quote]Dirty_Bulk wrote:
That was some epic trolling. Really, if you read it it’s kinda funny how terrible it is.

For any confused beginners, NO, don’t waste your time with flyes. Press heavy. The end.[/quote]

Good thread guys. Nothing new here but one more personal story.

I’m an intermediate level lifter so take this for what it’s worth. About a month ago I dropped the incline down on my incline BB Presses to below 30% and follow that with DB flat presses and flyes. Stopped doing flat BB for the time being.

I plan on doing this for at least another month or two to see what happens.

It’s a little early to tell but I think it has made a slight difference already. (maybe wishful thinking) I can definitely feel it in my upper chest when I am done and the next day more than Flat BB Benching alone. Plus the amount of weight on the incline is improving at each session.

I work out at home so I’m limited with excercise selection. I really wish I had access to cables, pec deck, and hammer strenght incline machine.

[quote]Dirty_Bulk wrote:
That was some epic trolling. Really, if you read it it’s kinda funny how terrible it is.

For any confused beginners, NO, don’t waste your time with flyes. Press heavy. The end.[/quote]

Most 16 year old High School kids “don’t waste their time with flyes”.

They head straight for the bench press and load it up, with the help of their friends.

These guys must really know what they’re doing, according to you? I mean, you just said it yourself, “Press Heavy”. That’s what all these kids do. And they look exactly the same after 6 months. Hmm.

If you train like a bodybuilder, you can change your appearance in a single workout, due to tissue/fascia expansion and glycogen saturation. I can put half an inch on somebody’s chest in a single session with my way of training.

Good luck doing that with your heavy bench press, lol. Dave Tate doesn’t even have functioning pecs and he presses over 450.

[quote]rmccart1 wrote:
I would love to know how math works in Nominal Prospect’s bizarro universe. Somehow he kept adding more agonist muscles to a movement, more weight, and somehow came up with less stimulation on the muscle. That’s either some Nobel prize-winning insight, or it’s about a megaton of hot, stinking bullshit, and we should laugh at him.[/quote]

Maybe you never got around to learning fractions.
100/1 = 300/3

Does the above surprise you?

The only megaton of stinking BS is the claim that you can load up an exercise with hundreds of pounds and pretend that a significant portion of that stress is going to go on a single muscle group. Yeah, right.

It is hard enough to isolate with 5 lbs. You want to isolate with 500 lbs? Forget about it. True isolation is an ideal which bodybuilders constantly strive for. You can approach it, but never truly obtain it. The heavier you go, the further away you get from true isolation.

Muscular weightlifters are born that way. By and large, they don’t get it from throwing around heavy weights all day. If they started training as bodybuilders, they would immediately get bigger.

Look at lifetime pics of strongman competitors vs. pro bodybuilders and you will notice something:

Many of the BB’ers started out relatively skinny and added huge amounts of mass over the years. This is undeniable.

On the other hand, 95% of the strength guys already looked like tanks by the time they were 15.

It’s a fact.

Sorry to slaughter your sacred calf, guys.

“Strength” is largely a function of skeletal structure and leverage, which you are born with. You don’t work for it, you either have it or you don’t. This is exactly why strength sports appeal to fat, lazy types who don’t want to train to failure or isolate muscles.

I just re-read that and I’m struck by how right I am.

Thanks for the responses guys, sorry i let this thread go w/o responding

for the record i feel that i do my incline presses low enough to not cause my shoulders to jump in too much though, london runner’s post has helped a lot because maybe (like glute activation work) i just need to teach myself to activate that muscle group more.

I can incline press 115lb dumbbells 5x5 so I dont see another reason why i my chest isn’t growing but my shoulders are.

first thing I’m going to do is limit my pressing work and do some ‘activation work’ for my pecs

various flyes and such to get the mind muscle connection going. Maybe 2-3 weeks worth 2-3x a week. enough to let the neural pathways learn to use the upper chest area more. I should probably do this for a longer period of time but i honestly dont think i could stomach doing flyes more than a week or two. Sorry guys my ego can’t do it lol.

then i’ll go back to incline presses but i’m going to start with a higher rep range.

perhaps 3-5 sets of whatever i can get, moving up in weight and beating it every week. I’ll hit chest twice a week.

and MY GOD nominal prospect is a fucking idiot.

[quote]“Strength” is largely a function of skeletal structure and leverage, which you are born with. You don’t work for it, you either have it or you don’t. This is exactly why strength sports appeal to fat, lazy types who don’t want to train to failure or isolate muscles.
[/quote]

Why the fuck do you even come here?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
It shouldn’t even be as high as 45 degrees. [/quote]

i’m just going to put a dime or quarter plate under the flat bench then. i dont think the incline benches at my gym go less than like 60degrees.

[quote]Xen Nova wrote:
Why the fuck do you even come here?[/quote]

Please tell me the title of this forum.

(If you won’t do it, I’ll spell it out for you)

[quote]Nominal Prospect wrote:
Muscular weightlifters are born that way. By and large, they don’t get it from throwing around heavy weights all day. If they started training as bodybuilders, they would immediately get bigger.

[/quote]

Matt K.

Is this you spending too much time trolling, or you justifying why you lift like a girl?

[quote]Nominal Prospect wrote:

If you train like a bodybuilder, you can change your appearance in a single workout, due to tissue/fascia expansion and glycogen saturation. I can put half an inch on somebody’s chest in a single session with my way of training.

Good luck doing that with your heavy bench press, lol. Dave Tate doesn’t even have functioning pecs and he presses over 450.
[/quote]

I am not gonna get into this bulshit argument, i dont really get where it came from… BUT… i think i agreewith this, i look vastly different after a workout due to the pump etc…

But a heavy (for me) bench can do this too…

Joe

[quote]Joe Joseph wrote:
Nominal Prospect wrote:

If you train like a bodybuilder, you can change your appearance in a single workout, due to tissue/fascia expansion and glycogen saturation. I can put half an inch on somebody’s chest in a single session with my way of training.

Good luck doing that with your heavy bench press, lol. Dave Tate doesn’t even have functioning pecs and he presses over 450.

I am not gonna get into this bulshit argument, i dont really get where it came from… BUT… i think i agreewith this, i look vastly different after a workout due to the pump etc…

But a heavy (for me) bench can do this too…

Joe[/quote]

Then why do you agree with it? I train heavy. I also get a pump when training. Who the fuck doesn’t?

EDIT due to reading Nominal prospects posts:

I agreed with the first part of the statement i quoted, but yeah, you are correct, who couldn’t agree with that?! - as a bodybuilder, i will get a pump from a low rep, more strength/Func. HT set of 3-4 reps as i always go to - or beyond, failure.

I didn’t agree with the comment that the bench is useless in pumping a muscle or even giving a functional hypertrophy effect, as it can and does for me. (which is what i only assumed he meant by the comment…) As that is utter BS.

On further reading, i have realised thet the person to whom i was agreeing to a minute part of his post on, is actually a total wnaker with ridiculous points of view, strange and WRONG to say the least.

I shouldn’t have posted anything without reading the former posts. :wink:

Joe

[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
Well I don’t agree with most things that NP writes, but then I also think anyone who says that “All you need is heavy pressing to build your pecs” lives in a very one-dimensional universe. They have never suffered from delt and tricep domanance.

CT said it best. Learn to recruit the pecs in their proper fashion, before using heavy pressing.

For me, pec flyes, done in the bottom 45 degrees of the range, have done this for me. How I can press and activate my pecs, whereas before, I couldn’t. To me that is QED.

Bushy[/quote]

It is absolutely true… i could press all day and only get a response in my tri’s or delts, even traps.
If i reduce the weight that little, retract my scapula, and concentrate on pushing my elbows together and down slightly, instead of just pushing my hands up, then i feel my pecs… The fly is definitely a help to do this at some point in the learning curve. I actually found the hammer strength machines a great one for learning the “feel” of the pecs during a press…

Joe

[quote]Nominal Prospect wrote:
Welcome to the Jungle.

Example of PLer with a huge bench press and relatively small chest, measurements given:

http://www.pacaf.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123035249

He benches 450 lbs. more I do yet his chest is only 5" larger. Less, if you control for the difference in BF%. Also says that he has been training for years to get that big.

He could drop 200 lbs. off his bench and add 4 inches to his chest. Nobody on the street, no woman alive, and at least 70% of the people at any gym don’t give a shit how much you lift.

As Bob Chicerillo says, why lift a lot when you can LOOK like you lift a lot?

There is no situation in life that calls for the strength of a 300+ bench, deadlift, or squat.[/quote]

And you’re a personal trainer? Wow, you’ve just reaffimed all of my suspicions regarding most trainers. Not a clue…