Baseball Sucks

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

Pretty much.

A baseball coach is 2/3 babysitter and 1/3 strategist.

The fact that a football team has a staff of 2 dozen coaches automatically means there is a greater emphasis on strategy from a coaching point of view.

The catcher is the most important person in deciding the strategy of a baseball game. Along with the gameplan the pitching coach helps him develop.

People who dont play the game at a decently high level, let alone at all, cant really comment on strategy. This goes for all sports.

[quote]Kakarat wrote:

[quote]cwill1973 wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I don’t understand what people mean when they talk about baseball “skills”? I mean I guess hitting the ball with a bat is difficult, but other than that…? I mean the only other part to this game is catching the ball, and catching a ball with a big glove isn’t really a skill is it?

[/quote]

Play the game at a high level and then come back here and tell us this.

Fact is, baseball is most likely the hardest of the three major sports to play well at the professional level. Think about it: how old is the typical rookie in the NFL? 22? The NBA? 19? 20? In major league baseball, it’s probably about 23 or 24, and it’s much more rare for a rookie to come in and have an impact than it is in football, maybe about equal in basketball. The point is that it typically takes several years longer to be able to compete at a high level in major league baseball than it does in either the NBA or the NFL. It’s the skill development and refinement that takes longer in baseball, hence the longer wait. In the NBA and the NFL, first round picks may flame out, but they largely make the team their first year. A first round pick in baseball rarely gets an invite to major league camp at Spring Training.[/quote]

^This. I watched Starlin Castro playing for the Tennessee Smokies just several days before the Cubs called him up. All the guys on the field were worlds better than any of my friends who played in high school and Castro was clearly better than anyone else playing that day. I’ve seen guys strike out while playing slow-pitch softball.
[/quote]

The age of the players has absolutely nothing to do with the skill that the sport itself takes. The age is simply a reflection of the longevity the sport allows for the players. The rookies are older in baseball because it’s more reasonable to develop players before bringing them in than it is to develop them by actually playing them. [/quote]

That’s not true at all. Not even close. Baseball typically takes longer to get good at precisely because of the extra time needed to hone baseball skills. If it wasn’t that way, then there wouldn’t be minor leagues.

You said it yourself. They develop players in the minors rather than the majors because it doesn’t make sense to develop them at the major league level. Why? Because draft picks simply are not ready to succeed at the big league level right out of high school or college. It is EXTREMELY rare for a player to get drafted and go straight to the majors without playing a single game in the minors. Pete Incaviglia and Mike Moore are the only two I can think of after watching 31 seasons of baseball.

The longevity that we see in baseball simply means that there are more and more players with finely-honed skills for incoming draft picks to compete for a spot with.

Also, I don’t know if you’ve ever played baseball before, but I have. I played at a nationally-ranked Div. I school with several future major leaguers, including two first round picks and a future All-Star. We played a lot of good shcools: USC, Long Beach and Fullerton State, Rice, Coastal Carolina, SDSU, Stanford, UCLA, and so on. I played and pitched against a lot of guys in or formerly in the majors. And I can tell you that as good as that level of play was, the jump between that level and even high A ball is huge. And the jump between high A and the majors is comparable to the jump from junior high baseball to the PAC-10. So a guy making the big league team in his first Spring Training after getting drafted (which is still after time in the instructional league and then probably the Arizona Fall League) would be like a high schooler making the NFL the summer after graduation.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

What the fuck are you doing in this thread? You’ve never even played competitive baseball before. What do you know about the requisite skill level to play baseball?

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

But the decision made before each pitch is 99% of the strategy in baseball, meaning 7 guys on the pitching team just stand there with their thumbs in their asses (trust me, Im an outfielder; the majority of my time on the field is spent thinking about my next at bat).

Whereas in football you have 11 guys on each side of the ball that have important decisions to make based on the play called.

Obviously all sports have strategy but football is compared to a chess match for a reason, appropriately so IMO.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

But the decision made before each pitch is 99% of the strategy in baseball, meaning 7 guys on the pitching team just stand there with their thumbs in their asses (trust me, Im an outfielder; the majority of my time on the field is spent thinking about my next at bat).

Whereas in football you have 11 guys on each side of the ball that have important decisions to make based on the play called.

Obviously all sports have strategy but football is compared to a chess match for a reason, appropriately so IMO. [/quote]

Rather than thinking about your next at-bat, you should be thinking about where the pitcher is likely to pitch to the batter, what type of swing type he has, how much power, etc. If there are runners on base you should be thinking about their speed, where the cut-off man is likely to be if there’s a ball gap (it just makes it a little easier to wheel and fire quickly with an accurate throw) and what base you should be throwing to. Wind and sun are also factors, but unless it’s partly cloudy or the wind picks up, that should be pretty much covered by the time the game starts.

As far as the rest of the team, the middle infielders are usually watching the signs to position themselves based on pitch location. With runners on base, all the infielders are also thinking about bunt possibilities, holding their ground in the event of a hit-and-run, what base to throw to based on where/how the ball is hit and where they’re supposed to be in the event of a hit into the gap. They largely know this without really even having to think about it. It’s called “baseball instinct”, something that no one who hasn’t played would have ANY concept of whatsoever. But “baseball instinct” is simply the result of experience and a honing of skills. People forget that the mental part of sports, and certainly the mental part of a sport with no clock that is played 6 times a week for 6 months in the sweltering heat, IS a skill in and of itself.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

What the fuck are you doing in this thread? You’ve never even played competitive baseball before. What do you know about the requisite skill level to play baseball?[/quote]

If you hold this position, why the fuck are you even in this thread?

Go PM BONEZ and let those who haven’t played at a “high level” discuss the sport.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

But the decision made before each pitch is 99% of the strategy in baseball, meaning 7 guys on the pitching team just stand there with their thumbs in their asses (trust me, Im an outfielder; the majority of my time on the field is spent thinking about my next at bat).

Whereas in football you have 11 guys on each side of the ball that have important decisions to make based on the play called.

Obviously all sports have strategy but football is compared to a chess match for a reason, appropriately so IMO. [/quote]

Rather than thinking about your next at-bat, you should be thinking about where the pitcher is likely to pitch to the batter, what type of swing type he has, how much power, etc. If there are runners on base you should be thinking about their speed, where the cut-off man is likely to be if there’s a ball gap (it just makes it a little easier to wheel and fire quickly with an accurate throw) and what base you should be throwing to. Wind and sun are also factors, but unless it’s partly cloudy or the wind picks up, that should be pretty much covered by the time the game starts.

As far as the rest of the team, the middle infielders are usually watching the signs to position themselves based on pitch location. With runners on base, all the infielders are also thinking about bunt possibilities, holding their ground in the event of a hit-and-run, what base to throw to based on where/how the ball is hit and where they’re supposed to be in the event of a hit into the gap. They largely know this without really even having to think about it. It’s called “baseball instinct”, something that no one who hasn’t played would have ANY concept of whatsoever. But “baseball instinct” is simply the result of experience and a honing of skills. People forget that the mental part of sports, and certainly the mental part of a sport with no clock that is played 6 times a week for 6 months in the sweltering heat, IS a skill in and of itself.[/quote]

You were a college pitcher. Ive been playing outfield for about 15 years now lol. Im aware of how I should prepare before each pitch. I said the majority of my time, not all. I dont play in the pro’s. We dont have scouting reports on the other team. All of the stuff you mentioned is second nature at this point.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

What the fuck are you doing in this thread? You’ve never even played competitive baseball before. What do you know about the requisite skill level to play baseball?[/quote]

If you hold this position, why the fuck are you even in this thread?

Go PM BONEZ and let those who haven’t played at a “high level” discuss the sport.[/quote]

Relax Raj. I’m just trying to get under your skin. Pitchers and catchers reported a couple days ago so it’s time to start harassing each other again about our baseball knowledge and all that shit.

Bonez and I have already done the PM thing. We had a nice exchange last year when he needed some help with his swing and sent me a couple videos of him at the plate.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

But the decision made before each pitch is 99% of the strategy in baseball, meaning 7 guys on the pitching team just stand there with their thumbs in their asses (trust me, Im an outfielder; the majority of my time on the field is spent thinking about my next at bat).

Whereas in football you have 11 guys on each side of the ball that have important decisions to make based on the play called.

Obviously all sports have strategy but football is compared to a chess match for a reason, appropriately so IMO. [/quote]

Rather than thinking about your next at-bat, you should be thinking about where the pitcher is likely to pitch to the batter, what type of swing type he has, how much power, etc. If there are runners on base you should be thinking about their speed, where the cut-off man is likely to be if there’s a ball gap (it just makes it a little easier to wheel and fire quickly with an accurate throw) and what base you should be throwing to. Wind and sun are also factors, but unless it’s partly cloudy or the wind picks up, that should be pretty much covered by the time the game starts.

As far as the rest of the team, the middle infielders are usually watching the signs to position themselves based on pitch location. With runners on base, all the infielders are also thinking about bunt possibilities, holding their ground in the event of a hit-and-run, what base to throw to based on where/how the ball is hit and where they’re supposed to be in the event of a hit into the gap. They largely know this without really even having to think about it. It’s called “baseball instinct”, something that no one who hasn’t played would have ANY concept of whatsoever. But “baseball instinct” is simply the result of experience and a honing of skills. People forget that the mental part of sports, and certainly the mental part of a sport with no clock that is played 6 times a week for 6 months in the sweltering heat, IS a skill in and of itself.[/quote]

You were a college pitcher. Ive been playing outfield for about 15 years now lol. Im aware of how I should prepare before each pitch. I said the majority of my time, not all. I dont play in the pro’s. We dont have scouting reports on the other team. All of the stuff you mentioned is second nature at this point.

[/quote]

It was kind of tongue-in-cheek. When I played in high school I played outfield when I wasn’t pitching. But I was even worse than you. I wouldn’t even be thinking of my next at-bat; I’d be thinking about my next start on the mound three days away! I wasn’t known for being a real “headsy” outfielder, that’s for sure. Constantly out of position and always disregarding the cut-off man and that sort of thing.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

But the decision made before each pitch is 99% of the strategy in baseball, meaning 7 guys on the pitching team just stand there with their thumbs in their asses (trust me, Im an outfielder; the majority of my time on the field is spent thinking about my next at bat).

Whereas in football you have 11 guys on each side of the ball that have important decisions to make based on the play called.

Obviously all sports have strategy but football is compared to a chess match for a reason, appropriately so IMO. [/quote]

Rather than thinking about your next at-bat, you should be thinking about where the pitcher is likely to pitch to the batter, what type of swing type he has, how much power, etc. If there are runners on base you should be thinking about their speed, where the cut-off man is likely to be if there’s a ball gap (it just makes it a little easier to wheel and fire quickly with an accurate throw) and what base you should be throwing to. Wind and sun are also factors, but unless it’s partly cloudy or the wind picks up, that should be pretty much covered by the time the game starts.

As far as the rest of the team, the middle infielders are usually watching the signs to position themselves based on pitch location. With runners on base, all the infielders are also thinking about bunt possibilities, holding their ground in the event of a hit-and-run, what base to throw to based on where/how the ball is hit and where they’re supposed to be in the event of a hit into the gap. They largely know this without really even having to think about it. It’s called “baseball instinct”, something that no one who hasn’t played would have ANY concept of whatsoever. But “baseball instinct” is simply the result of experience and a honing of skills. People forget that the mental part of sports, and certainly the mental part of a sport with no clock that is played 6 times a week for 6 months in the sweltering heat, IS a skill in and of itself.[/quote]

You were a college pitcher. Ive been playing outfield for about 15 years now lol. Im aware of how I should prepare before each pitch. I said the majority of my time, not all. I dont play in the pro’s. We dont have scouting reports on the other team. All of the stuff you mentioned is second nature at this point.

[/quote]

It was kind of tongue-in-cheek. When I played in high school I played outfield when I wasn’t pitching. But I was even worse than you. I wouldn’t even be thinking of my next at-bat; I’d be thinking about my next start on the mound three days away! I wasn’t known for being a real “headsy” outfielder, that’s for sure. Constantly out of position and always disregarding the cut-off man and that sort of thing.[/quote]

lol @ headsy outfielders haha.

I put my time to good use. Wound up leading the league in OBP to the tune of a .585 clip lol. .350 batting average. Trying to make billy beane proud

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

what funny about this is baseball is arguably the most strategic sport of the big 4 [/quote]

x2[/quote]

As much as I love baseball, and as much as the game is extremely based in strategy, there’s NO way baseball involves more strategy than football. How long do pitchers and catchers spend going over a scouting report compared to how long coaches spend watching game film.

I will say this, though. Baseball strategy is in the hands of the players much more than football players. Coaches in baseball can definitely make a difference, but not anywhere close to the impact a new coach or coordinator can have in football. The 49ers are a perfect example. That’s what I like about baseball; while part of the game unfolds in the dugout with the manager, almost everything important about baseball strategy happens right there on the field, whereas in football it’s more like watching a conductor lead an orchestra through a symphony. I prefer to root for the guys playing the instruments than the one conducting them.[/quote]

What’s the point in differentiating between strategy on vs off the field?

So much of baseball is deliberate. How many pitches are thrown in an average game? 300-400? Before EVERY pitch is thrown, it is talked about (via hand signals), decided upon and then thrown. On top of that, it’s a timeless sport.

[/quote]

But the decision made before each pitch is 99% of the strategy in baseball, meaning 7 guys on the pitching team just stand there with their thumbs in their asses (trust me, Im an outfielder; the majority of my time on the field is spent thinking about my next at bat).

Whereas in football you have 11 guys on each side of the ball that have important decisions to make based on the play called.

Obviously all sports have strategy but football is compared to a chess match for a reason, appropriately so IMO. [/quote]

Rather than thinking about your next at-bat, you should be thinking about where the pitcher is likely to pitch to the batter, what type of swing type he has, how much power, etc. If there are runners on base you should be thinking about their speed, where the cut-off man is likely to be if there’s a ball gap (it just makes it a little easier to wheel and fire quickly with an accurate throw) and what base you should be throwing to. Wind and sun are also factors, but unless it’s partly cloudy or the wind picks up, that should be pretty much covered by the time the game starts.

As far as the rest of the team, the middle infielders are usually watching the signs to position themselves based on pitch location. With runners on base, all the infielders are also thinking about bunt possibilities, holding their ground in the event of a hit-and-run, what base to throw to based on where/how the ball is hit and where they’re supposed to be in the event of a hit into the gap. They largely know this without really even having to think about it. It’s called “baseball instinct”, something that no one who hasn’t played would have ANY concept of whatsoever. But “baseball instinct” is simply the result of experience and a honing of skills. People forget that the mental part of sports, and certainly the mental part of a sport with no clock that is played 6 times a week for 6 months in the sweltering heat, IS a skill in and of itself.[/quote]

You were a college pitcher. Ive been playing outfield for about 15 years now lol. Im aware of how I should prepare before each pitch. I said the majority of my time, not all. I dont play in the pro’s. We dont have scouting reports on the other team. All of the stuff you mentioned is second nature at this point.

[/quote]

It was kind of tongue-in-cheek. When I played in high school I played outfield when I wasn’t pitching. But I was even worse than you. I wouldn’t even be thinking of my next at-bat; I’d be thinking about my next start on the mound three days away! I wasn’t known for being a real “headsy” outfielder, that’s for sure. Constantly out of position and always disregarding the cut-off man and that sort of thing.[/quote]

lol @ headsy outfielders haha.

I put my time to good use. Wound up leading the league in OBP to the tune of a .585 clip lol. .350 batting average. Trying to make billy beane proud [/quote]

How’s your swing, by the way? Did you correct whatever mistake it was you were making? If I remember correctly, you were kind of moving forward toward the ball as you strode, shortening your time to track the pitch. Based on your numbers, it looks like you’ve solved it. I remember from watching that at-bat you sent me that you looked like a patient hitter, so the OBP definitely doesn’t surprise me. It’s tough to be a patient hitter in some of these Sunday leagues where the pitchers only throw in the low 80’s and it looks like a fucking beach ball up there. Well, high 70’s might be more my speed now.

I think I’m going to play this summer. I can’t pitch anymore because I’ve dislocated my shoulder about four times in the last 5 years while mt biking. I’m worried I won’t be able to hit for shit since I haven’t faced live pitching in a couple years and I was never much of a hitter anyways, hence why I started pitching in high school. Figured it was the best way to get more playing time.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

Not everyone possesses the intelligence to understand a simple game, dont be too hard on yourself. Im sure youre useful to the world for some sort of reason though. [/quote]

Connect Four requires more strategy than the game of baseball. You can insult me all you want and say I have many vaginas, its ok, I know you’re just doing it so people on message boards will know how tough and cool you really are. ; )

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

Not everyone possesses the intelligence to understand a simple game, dont be too hard on yourself. Im sure youre useful to the world for some sort of reason though. [/quote]

What a dumb thread. You don’t like it, don’t watch it. Simple as that.[/quote]

So…you’re telling me if I don’t like something ignore it, while you comment about how stupid my thread is.

HELLO MR POT NICE 2 MEET U MY NAME IZ KATTLE

[quote]Mutu wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

Not everyone possesses the intelligence to understand a simple game, dont be too hard on yourself. Im sure youre useful to the world for some sort of reason though. [/quote]

Connect Four requires more strategy than the game of baseball. You can insult me all you want and say I have many vaginas, its ok, I know you’re just doing it so people on message boards will know how tough and cool you really are. ; )[/quote]

More strategy than the game of baseball?! they deal with a lot of shit

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

lol @ headsy outfielders haha.

[/quote]

Speaking of… this fucking guy

<3 Baseball. Been to see games in Boston, NY (Mets), Milwaukee, Chicago (Cubs), San Fran, Toronto, Cleveland and of course the Expos when I was growing up.

Love everything about the game - from the pageantry, the inanity of the mascot sliding on the dug-out roof, singing Take Me Out To The Ball Game (or Sweet Caroline @ Fenway), being outside at the stadium and just doing introspection about life in general during innings, the fat umpires, the characters (Manny being Manny, Pedro Martinez, Milton Bradley), the STRATEGY, the old guy in the stands saying “Good Eye Good Eye”…

Baseball is KING of all sports, it’s a pure game that isn’t based on a war-like premise (entering enemy territory like Football, or bringing an object to a hostile area like b-ball, hockey and soccer).

It’s OK on TV (I usually only watch the World Series these days) but in person, at the Stadium, I friggin’ love it. Seeing how the infield lines up, where the outfield is expecting a ball, seeing the runners tag up at first, seeing the guys in the dug out, seeing the bullpen at all times, seeing the 1st/3rd base coaches… you just get such a great level of detail, it’s truly amazing if you know what to look for.

It’s an acquired taste though, I’ve brought many people from other continents to the game and I have to say it really doesn’t catch on unless you have a good context to appreciate the game.

[quote]Mutu wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

Not everyone possesses the intelligence to understand a simple game, dont be too hard on yourself. Im sure youre useful to the world for some sort of reason though. [/quote]

Connect Four requires more strategy than the game of baseball. You can insult me all you want and say I have many vaginas, its ok, I know you’re just doing it so people on message boards will know how tough and cool you really are. ; )[/quote]

You have many vaginas.

[quote]Samir wrote:

Baseball is KING of all sports, it’s a pure game that isn’t based on a war-like premise (entering enemy territory like Football, or bringing an object to a hostile area like b-ball, hockey and soccer).

[/quote]

How is baseball king of all sports? Not all games are based on ‘war like premises’ such as target sports (curling, bowling), striking/fielding (cricket, rounders), and net/wall (squash, tennis). If anything, cricket should be king of all sports considering its huge fan base.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Mutu wrote:
I tried watching it a few times. I was confused when the commentators started talking about “strategy”. I guess not all teams use the basic “hit the ball when its thrown at you/catch the ball when it comes towards you” strategy. Oh yea, also when you hit the ball run towards the white squares on the ground. [/quote]

Not everyone possesses the intelligence to understand a simple game, dont be too hard on yourself. Im sure youre useful to the world for some sort of reason though. [/quote]

Connect Four requires more strategy than the game of baseball. You can insult me all you want and say I have many vaginas, its ok, I know you’re just doing it so people on message boards will know how tough and cool you really are. ; )[/quote]

You have many vaginas. [/quote]

Well played, Bonez.