Bad Ideas

For LondonBoxer:

Robert,

"Thank you. I have applied to do something that requires me to have developed vetting done ((on me?) I would be grateful for any input on how to structure that statement more elegantly). You hear all sorts of stories about how far the powers that be might dig, and although I’m not becoming a spook, I would not like for any online activity to provide grounds for failing me. There may be some here (Idaho?) who can clear up just how worried I ought to be (Brazzers membership and gold level Vaseline loyalty scheme aside), and it may be that I’m being over cautious, but until I’m cleared, I’m trying to maintain a fairly mundane internet profile, particularly when the sum of my contributions tends to be, ‘smack that muthafucka when he be talking shit’.

LB,
Really good timing on your inquiry, since, I am up for renewal on my security clearance. I am not familar with the British system, but, from working with a few of your units, they are probably about the same. I just completed my online portion yesterday and will face my interview in December. Since I was up for renewal, they only are going back 10 years in the investigation. Since, you said you were not going into spook work, I would imagine about the same time period. When I first went through the process, they went back to the night I was conceived:))

What will fail you in the United States ( I must qualify something here, your background check is only as good as the person doing it)

  • A felony conviction of a violent crime or treason

  • Membership in violent ot radical organizations

  • Dishonorable discharge from the military

  • Domestic violence conviction

  • History of drunk driving , drug use or gambling

  • And the biggest reason of all: FINANCIALS: Bankruptcy will get you denied faster than buying a Russian sex worker, large credit card debt, outstanding tax bills to the government, failed house or car loans, etc.

Social Media:

Brother, there are some the “unwritten” rules out there, that will get you denied . The USG will mine Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkLin, etc for anything they can find on you, I know , because last week, I had my intelligence analyst run an “open source search” on a potential suspect we are attempting to locate. You would be amazed at the information the badguys will post about themselves. That is why, I DO NOT have any social accounts. It is simply not good operational security for anyone, why anyone would post about their lives, post pictures of their family, their residence, etc…is beyond my understanding.

What do they look for? from what I have told, if you have not posted drunken nude shots, ranted about killing various groups of cultures, looked at child porn, not spent countess hours on porn sites or POSTING links to porn sites, visted terrorist websites, sex worker websites, or bomb making websites, you should be ok. I only post on two websites, T-Nation and one Archery site. Thats it.

You dont come across as a person with severed heads or pictures of porn on your instragram, so, unless you have some really damning photos on Facebook , been caught on that massive surveillance system you have in London with your dick hanging out, or threatened to assassinate the Queen, you should be fine.

Let us know how this turns out and like Robert said, this forum is stronger with you on board. Good Luck

[quote]idaho wrote:
For LondonBoxer:

Robert,

"Thank you. I have applied to do something that requires me to have developed vetting done ((on me?) I would be grateful for any input on how to structure that statement more elegantly). You hear all sorts of stories about how far the powers that be might dig, and although I’m not becoming a spook, I would not like for any online activity to provide grounds for failing me. There may be some here (Idaho?) who can clear up just how worried I ought to be (Brazzers membership and gold level Vaseline loyalty scheme aside), and it may be that I’m being over cautious, but until I’m cleared, I’m trying to maintain a fairly mundane internet profile, particularly when the sum of my contributions tends to be, ‘smack that muthafucka when he be talking shit’.

LB,
Really good timing on your inquiry, since, I am up for renewal on my security clearance. I am not familar with the British system, but, from working with a few of your units, they are probably about the same. I just completed my online portion yesterday and will face my interview in December. Since I was up for renewal, they only are going back 10 years in the investigation. Since, you said you were not going into spook work, I would imagine about the same time period. When I first went through the process, they went back to the night I was conceived:))

What will fail you in the United States ( I must qualify something here, your background check is only as good as the person doing it)

  • A felony conviction of a violent crime or treason

  • Membership in violent ot radical organizations

  • Dishonorable discharge from the military

  • Domestic violence conviction

  • History of drunk driving , drug use or gambling

  • And the biggest reason of all: FINANCIALS: Bankruptcy will get you denied faster than buying a Russian sex worker, large credit card debt, outstanding tax bills to the government, failed house or car loans, etc.

Social Media:

Brother, there are some the “unwritten” rules out there, that will get you denied . The USG will mine Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkLin, etc for anything they can find on you, I know , because last week, I had my intelligence analyst run an “open source search” on a potential suspect we are attempting to locate. You would be amazed at the information the badguys will post about themselves. That is why, I DO NOT have any social accounts. It is simply not good operational security for anyone, why anyone would post about their lives, post pictures of their family, their residence, etc…is beyond my understanding.

What do they look for? from what I have told, if you have not posted drunken nude shots, ranted about killing various groups of cultures, looked at child porn, not spent countess hours on porn sites or POSTING links to porn sites, visted terrorist websites, sex worker websites, or bomb making websites, you should be ok. I only post on two websites, T-Nation and one Archery site. Thats it.

You dont come across as a person with severed heads or pictures of porn on your instragram, so, unless you have some really damning photos on Facebook , been caught on that massive surveillance system you have in London with your dick hanging out, or threatened to assassinate the Queen, you should be fine.

Let us know how this turns out and like Robert said, this forum is stronger with you on board. Good Luck

[/quote]

Idaho,

Thank you very much for taking the time to explain all of that. It’s quite reassuring.

I guess as a young bloke of the social media generation, my web profile is probably, inevitably, more extensive than your own - particularly as I’m sat for much of my time at a computer. Compared to my peers though, it’s practically non-existent, quite literally only two or three innocuous instances of social media activity in the past year, no compromising photos of me, indeed only one new photo of me in the past 3 years at all. No twitter, no instagram.

Otherwise I suspect my web-history is no worse than a typical guy in his mid-twenties, and I don’t think there is anything that can’t be easily explained - eg, I do make a point of watching the IS videos on Liveleak, because I think it is important to be aware of the evil that is being committed, and not to shy away from things that make you ask uncomfortable questions. I’m sure the whole process will be just a matter of formality though. Other than the countless hours on porn sites searching for new and exciting niche fetishes. Gotta get me my dopamine fix somehow.

LB- I think the fact that you do have online presence is in your favor as long as it paints the right picture as to what you do with your free time. I have not had a clearance required job in 10 years. I have been detained for questioning by Army CID due to a case of mistaken identity while purchasing a pistol.

They seemed to review every part of my timeline (and obviously had the complete backround file on me) and where particularly interested in undocumented or unverifiable time ( if you didn’t have a job what the heck where you doing). Here in the US, the Social Security office plays a big role in painting your timeline with verifiable sources that they can talk to.

[quote]Dude623 wrote:
LB- I think the fact that you do have online presence is in your favor as long as it paints the right picture as to what you do with your free time. I have not had a clearance required job in 10 years. I have been detained for questioning by Army CID due to a case of mistaken identity while purchasing a pistol.

They seemed to review every part of my timeline (and obviously had the complete backround file on me) and where particularly interested in undocumented or unverifiable time ( if you didn’t have a job what the heck where you doing). Here in the US, the Social Security office plays a big role in painting your timeline with verifiable sources that they can talk to.[/quote]

Thanks mate. I’m actually intrigued to see how deep they dig and what sort of stuff they bring up. I’m extremely interested to know what can be gathered and what degree of granularity it can be analysed to. Should be interesting.

[quote]LondonBoxer123 wrote:

[quote]Dude623 wrote:
LB- I think the fact that you do have online presence is in your favor as long as it paints the right picture as to what you do with your free time. I have not had a clearance required job in 10 years. I have been detained for questioning by Army CID due to a case of mistaken identity while purchasing a pistol.

They seemed to review every part of my timeline (and obviously had the complete backround file on me) and where particularly interested in undocumented or unverifiable time ( if you didn’t have a job what the heck where you doing). Here in the US, the Social Security office plays a big role in painting your timeline with verifiable sources that they can talk to.[/quote]

Thanks mate. I’m actually intrigued to see how deep they dig and what sort of stuff they bring up. I’m extremely interested to know what can be gathered and what degree of granularity it can be analysed to. Should be interesting.[/quote]

I am a huge luddite so I have close to zero personal social media presence. I also have zero .gov experience. I do know many private sector screenings involve looking at “friends”/contacts in social media so if somehow you are e-connected to your cousin’s idiot kid who posts pictures with drugs it may be time to “unfriend”. Folks with four figures of contacts don’t seem to have the same concerns because the answer “If they ask, I friend them. You want to be my friend?” suffices for some. On the other hand if you have 10 contacts and two are “aspiring rappers” then it gets sporty.

Also, clean your car. I have heard of people bombing their interviews because during the session they had someone go check out the vehicle and it either looked like they lived out of it or it had “wrong” bumper stickers. So, if applicable, it may be time to scrape the anarchy and/or punk/ska bumper stickers of the car.

Just a few things based on “burn ins” I am aware of.

Regards,

Robert A

[quote]Robert A wrote:

[quote]LondonBoxer123 wrote:

[quote]Dude623 wrote:
LB- I think the fact that you do have online presence is in your favor as long as it paints the right picture as to what you do with your free time. I have not had a clearance required job in 10 years. I have been detained for questioning by Army CID due to a case of mistaken identity while purchasing a pistol.

They seemed to review every part of my timeline (and obviously had the complete backround file on me) and where particularly interested in undocumented or unverifiable time ( if you didn’t have a job what the heck where you doing). Here in the US, the Social Security office plays a big role in painting your timeline with verifiable sources that they can talk to.[/quote]

Thanks mate. I’m actually intrigued to see how deep they dig and what sort of stuff they bring up. I’m extremely interested to know what can be gathered and what degree of granularity it can be analysed to. Should be interesting.[/quote]

I am a huge luddite so I have close to zero personal social media presence. I also have zero .gov experience. I do know many private sector screenings involve looking at “friends”/contacts in social media so if somehow you are e-connected to your cousin’s idiot kid who posts pictures with drugs it may be time to “unfriend”. Folks with four figures of contacts don’t seem to have the same concerns because the answer “If they ask, I friend them. You want to be my friend?” suffices for some. On the other hand if you have 10 contacts and two are “aspiring rappers” then it gets sporty.

Also, clean your car. I have heard of people bombing their interviews because during the session they had someone go check out the vehicle and it either looked like they lived out of it or it had “wrong” bumper stickers. So, if applicable, it may be time to scrape the anarchy and/or punk/ska bumper stickers of the car.

Just a few things based on “burn ins” I am aware of.

Regards,

Robert A[/quote]

Your post thoroughly depressed me. I have no such friends, and have never had a rebellious bumper sticker, even on my first car (which was improved aesthetically with the addition of every bug that obscured the original bodywork). It’s like there’s a whole part of my life that’s missing.

Edit: Cleaning it is an excellent point, and something I would probably have done (the role is within the military, so I will be fully squared away at my various interviews).

Robert- good point about the car! I missed it entirely.
LB- I guess the same is true about your current residence with regards to them sending someone to evaluate. Good luck, with the process. Keep in mind that they have a list and if you fill all the check boxes, without any flags your in. With government jobs the evaluation is seldom affected by emotions, this is the opposite of civilian sector jobs where someone’s like or dislike of you plays a big part.


Robert,
My movement got cancelled today because of a “high potential for threats” LOL. So, I was thinking with a little imagination, we could visualize southern Afghanistan as Arrakis.


Arrakis:


Souk Market:


Souk Market 2:


Ornithopters on patrol:


Arrakeen within the “bowl” of the Shield Wall.

or we could just be members of Roy Chapman Andrews expedition to the Gobi Desert. ok, enough frivloity, back to work. Stay Safe.

Idaho -Was that spice mélange on the back shelf in the tall containers behind the coke products. Great pics. Makes you thirsty just looking at them.

[quote]idaho wrote:
Robert,
My movement got cancelled today because of a “high potential for threats” LOL. So, I was thinking with a little imagination, we could visualize southern Afghanistan as Arrakis. [/quote]

High potential.

As opposed to all those other “safe as churches” days?

The pictures of the landscape are beutiful. I think Afghanistan would be an amazing place to visit, if not for everything that makes it Afghanistan.

The sand and sky are as striking as that old National Geographic cover of the Afghan woman with the hauntingly beautiful eyes, back when the Mujahideen were the “good guys”.

Regards,

Robert A

[quote]idaho wrote:
ok, enough frivloity, back to work. Stay Safe.[/quote]

Well noted.

In that case here is a mea culpa. I don’t have a lot that could be all that useful to the LEO’s here, because I have never done that job. The following is enough in my wheelhouse that one of the lurkers may find some value. I suspect it is all old news to you, mapwhap, ect.

Earlier in this thread, or a different one I can’t remember, you mentioned being waved off from teaching using a pistol mag as an improvised weapon against someone’s throat. At the time I thought it was a simple, brutal, and effective thing. I am ashamed to say I missed perhaps the best part.

I have written before that I support having a “Fuck off” tool accessible to either hand, for when you find yourself tangled assholes to elbows with someone trying to do you harm. I did and still do support a small fixed blade for this, however training to use the pistol mag has huge benefit.

Most of us carry our pistol magazines where they are easily accessible to the weak/support side hand for speed/robustness when reloading. We also practice “finding” them a whole bunch. In a weapons retention or other situation where the strong side is occupied the support hand already has a shit ton of motor learning at finding the reload. Turning the reload into a yawara could be gold. This is especially true if regulation or available space preclude a dedicated offside weapon, blade, or centerline carry of same.

An additional benefit of the mag as weapon is it is less likely to be a retention hazard. I am thinking of the 2010 incident where Maurice Pierce stabbed an Auston officer with the officer’s own K-bar here. The TDI and LDK are marketed as retention tools for officers, but a good many of them carry the blades in friction sheaths on their off hips. So essentially either hip has something that has to be defended. I am sure the LEO’s here have developed a huge amount of strongside “hip awareness” because of living with a side arm, I suspect the offside isn’t as reflexively guarded.

I don’t know the specific technique idaho was demo’ing, but I have probably done something similar over the years.

In case anyone has only a passing familiarity with yawara techniques I offer the following. It is probably old news. I am not Takayuki Kubota or a teacher of yawara-jutsu.

3 Basic ways of using a yawara/kubaton or improvised yawara that you likely already know how to do.

I am going to recommend just making a fist around the stick or magazine and if you only have enough material to have it poke out on one side of your fist you make it poke out the bottom/pinky side. You can “cap” the other end with your thumb or not depending on preference/shape.

1.) As an aid to gouging - Grind, lever, or press the hard surface of the object into a part of their body that hurts. This is the most publicized way, thanks to the “no permanent injury” marketing for the Kubaton in specific and a lot of martial arts in general. It is also the least likely to be useful if we are down to using our reloads as an improvised weapon.

Not all “pressure” points are created equal and the mechanics of gouging and ripping mean it works way, WAY better when you are in balance and/or in a dominant position. If that is the case you probably aren’t needing to improvise. On the other hand if you are fighting for your life and grabbing around for weapons with your off hand…

There are entire systems based upon Dim Mak or Kyoshu points and how to fuck with them. Most of the training/exposure to this material hasn’t blown my skirt up.

Technique is to just use the damn thing like the worlds strongest/pointiest thumb or finger and poke, gauge, and rip with it. Targets that seem to be the most robust are the eyes, throat/trachea and associated cartilage, ears, behind or under the jaw, and testicles. Sometimes ripping the hard object, as a surrogate for a knuckle, back and forth over ribs or the back of a hand can “Jones” someone into doing something stupid but the kind of person this works on really isn’t the kind of person you should need a weapon in your hand for.

I wouldn’t plan on getting more than a wiggle or shift as a result when dealing with someone intent on making you dead and/or pregnant. Depending on your abilities that shift may be all you need though. Also, if it is all you have room or structure for than fight your fight until you get something better.

2.) As a hand load - The magazine probably adds more weight to your fist than most real yawara so it is not just “hard”/pointy but also a bit of a “loading” for your fist(like a sap glove you hold).

Technique is whatever strike you would be throwing anyway. If you want to hit with the yawara/magazine that is great, if you don’t that is fine too. The only draw back here is that you need the balance/structure to generate a good strike in the first place. IF you are ass over tea kettle that may not be happening.

I suspect idaho’s throat technique was in this category.

3.) As a hard/pointy surface - Pick some sensitive skin and run the mag/yawara into it. I actually think this is the most useful of the above. Option one works best when clinched/grappling and I don’t like to give up one of my “grabbers” unless it is for a piece of steel that can put holes in someone (Another plug for short blades and firearms). Option two may be redundant for folks in good shape who train a lot. This is something else.

The “strike” is almost a pecking motion. It can be more of a jab/snap if at range, but it works just fine as an “arm punch”. If anyone remembers how “wrong” Brock Lesner’s hammer fists were they get the idea. What you are doing is using the rigidity of the weapon, applied to a sensitive area, to give a response. Suggested targets are the eyes or ears. The goal is most certainly not to “end the fight” but to make the person move their head rather than focus on killing you for just a moment.

The protective reflex to pull the head away from a scratch or impact to the eyes is present in almost everyone that is alive. The ears seem to provoke a reaction even in most aggressive and adrenalized folks. In almost every case the person moves their head away from the painful stimulus initially. Use that moment to improve your position and/or bring the actual hurt.

This is basically a glorified metsubishi/distraction strike. It also works just as well with a pen, box cutter, actual knife, or any hard object. Getting their head to move away from you may seem small, but if you are nipple to nipple with someone intent on harm it can be the first step to taking their balance, or it could be kazushi in and of itself. After that it is the same rules as last year. First you take his balance, then you take the rest of him.

I don’t think any of the above requires anything apart from a little work and the type of training most everyone on this board already does. The key is to work it a few times, with some degree of frequency so if things do get that bad it registers as a “potential solution” in your mind/subconscious. The fact idaho had his people reaching for something they were already training to reach for means a good portion of this is a “sunk cost”. And if you already bought that park pass than you might as well go on every fucking ride there.

Train hard.

Please stay safe.

Regards,

Robert A

[quote]Robert A wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:
ok, enough frivloity, back to work. Stay Safe.[/quote]

Well noted.

In that case here is a mea culpa. I don’t have a lot that could be all that useful to the LEO’s here, because I have never done that job. The following is enough in my wheelhouse that one of the lurkers may find some value. I suspect it is all old news to you, mapwhap, ect.

Earlier in this thread, or a different one I can’t remember, you mentioned being waved off from teaching using a pistol mag as an improvised weapon against someone’s throat. At the time I thought it was a simple, brutal, and effective thing. I am ashamed to say I missed perhaps the best part.

I have written before that I support having a “Fuck off” tool accessible to either hand, for when you find yourself tangled assholes to elbows with someone trying to do you harm. I did and still do support a small fixed blade for this, however training to use the pistol mag has huge benefit.

Most of us carry our pistol magazines where they are easily accessible to the weak/support side hand for speed/robustness when reloading. We also practice “finding” them a whole bunch. In a weapons retention or other situation where the strong side is occupied the support hand already has a shit ton of motor learning at finding the reload. Turning the reload into a yawara could be gold. This is especially true if regulation or available space preclude a dedicated offside weapon, blade, or centerline carry of same.

An additional benefit of the mag as weapon is it is less likely to be a retention hazard. I am thinking of the 2010 incident where Maurice Pierce stabbed an Auston officer with the officer’s own K-bar here. The TDI and LDK are marketed as retention tools for officers, but a good many of them carry the blades in friction sheaths on their off hips. So essentially either hip has something that has to be defended. I am sure the LEO’s here have developed a huge amount of strongside “hip awareness” because of living with a side arm, I suspect the offside isn’t as reflexively guarded.

I don’t know the specific technique idaho was demo’ing, but I have probably done something similar over the years.

In case anyone has only a passing familiarity with yawara techniques I offer the following. It is probably old news. I am not Takayuki Kubota or a teacher of yawara-jutsu.

3 Basic ways of using a yawara/kubaton or improvised yawara that you likely already know how to do.

I am going to recommend just making a fist around the stick or magazine and if you only have enough material to have it poke out on one side of your fist you make it poke out the bottom/pinky side. You can “cap” the other end with your thumb or not depending on preference/shape.

1.) As an aid to gouging - Grind, lever, or press the hard surface of the object into a part of their body that hurts. This is the most publicized way, thanks to the “no permanent injury” marketing for the Kubaton in specific and a lot of martial arts in general. It is also the least likely to be useful if we are down to using our reloads as an improvised weapon.

Not all “pressure” points are created equal and the mechanics of gouging and ripping mean it works way, WAY better when you are in balance and/or in a dominant position. If that is the case you probably aren’t needing to improvise. On the other hand if you are fighting for your life and grabbing around for weapons with your off hand…

There are entire systems based upon Dim Mak or Kyoshu points and how to fuck with them. Most of the training/exposure to this material hasn’t blown my skirt up.

Technique is to just use the damn thing like the worlds strongest/pointiest thumb or finger and poke, gauge, and rip with it. Targets that seem to be the most robust are the eyes, throat/trachea and associated cartilage, ears, behind or under the jaw, and testicles. Sometimes ripping the hard object, as a surrogate for a knuckle, back and forth over ribs or the back of a hand can “Jones” someone into doing something stupid but the kind of person this works on really isn’t the kind of person you should need a weapon in your hand for.

I wouldn’t plan on getting more than a wiggle or shift as a result when dealing with someone intent on making you dead and/or pregnant. Depending on your abilities that shift may be all you need though. Also, if it is all you have room or structure for than fight your fight until you get something better.

2.) As a hand load - The magazine probably adds more weight to your fist than most real yawara so it is not just “hard”/pointy but also a bit of a “loading” for your fist(like a sap glove you hold).

Technique is whatever strike you would be throwing anyway. If you want to hit with the yawara/magazine that is great, if you don’t that is fine too. The only draw back here is that you need the balance/structure to generate a good strike in the first place. IF you are ass over tea kettle that may not be happening.

I suspect idaho’s throat technique was in this category.

3.) As a hard/pointy surface - Pick some sensitive skin and run the mag/yawara into it. I actually think this is the most useful of the above. Option one works best when clinched/grappling and I don’t like to give up one of my “grabbers” unless it is for a piece of steel that can put holes in someone (Another plug for short blades and firearms). Option two may be redundant for folks in good shape who train a lot. This is something else.

The “strike” is almost a pecking motion. It can be more of a jab/snap if at range, but it works just fine as an “arm punch”. If anyone remembers how “wrong” Brock Lesner’s hammer fists were they get the idea. What you are doing is using the rigidity of the weapon, applied to a sensitive area, to give a response. Suggested targets are the eyes or ears. The goal is most certainly not to “end the fight” but to make the person move their head rather than focus on killing you for just a moment.

The protective reflex to pull the head away from a scratch or impact to the eyes is present in almost everyone that is alive. The ears seem to provoke a reaction even in most aggressive and adrenalized folks. In almost every case the person moves their head away from the painful stimulus initially. Use that moment to improve your position and/or bring the actual hurt.

This is basically a glorified metsubishi/distraction strike. It also works just as well with a pen, box cutter, actual knife, or any hard object. Getting their head to move away from you may seem small, but if you are nipple to nipple with someone intent on harm it can be the first step to taking their balance, or it could be kazushi in and of itself. After that it is the same rules as last year. First you take his balance, then you take the rest of him.

I don’t think any of the above requires anything apart from a little work and the type of training most everyone on this board already does. The key is to work it a few times, with some degree of frequency so if things do get that bad it registers as a “potential solution” in your mind/subconscious. The fact idaho had his people reaching for something they were already training to reach for means a good portion of this is a “sunk cost”. And if you already bought that park pass than you might as well go on every fucking ride there.

Train hard.

Please stay safe.

Regards,

Robert A

[/quote]

Robert,
Thank you. Excellent and insightful analysis and totally agree with you on having a “fuck off tool” always at your hand. I am a huge proponent of taking everyday movements or training movements and using them to defeat your attacker.

Masssive Disclaimer: Using physicl force to ram a pistol magazine into someone’s throat should only be used during a violent, LETHAL FORCE ENCOUNTER. You use this in the United States and it causes death or permanent injury, without the force being justified, you will be criminally charged and civilly sued.

Now thats out of the way, It is a simple transition from drawing a pistol and executing a proper reload, to shooting out the primary hand and grabbing the back of the neck, hair, or clothing, performing a “reload” with the magazine and delivering a strike to the throat, eyes, etc. Any everyday item you carry, you will usually perform the same moves everytime to use and secure that item. Example: On my armor, I carry a “GPS Tracker” on my left shoulder. I have turned that thing on an off a hundred times, each time with the same movement. I could propbably whip that out and slam into someone’s face, faster than I could draw my handgun. Remember the old “muscle memory” slang: 3000 movements for an “average” person, 10,000 for an “expert” . A lot of truth in that.

Since we are on the subject of using everyday items for weapons, I believe one of the most important things you can do to give yourself an edge, is to train everyday to be ambidextrous. (I would like Sento’s thoughts on this also) I know , I have made this a top priority over the last several years. Training in Kali showed some glaring weaknesses in my ability to manipulate weapons in my left hand. Since making this a priority, my overall dexterity has improved. Just some thoughts. Thanks again for a great post.

idaho,

Great post. I hope everyone appreciates you taking the time to weigh in on this material. I sure as hell do.

RE: Ambidextrous

I think it scales a bit.

You need to get something up to competent/useful first THAN ambi training pays off. Being wrong handed I have to be “both handed” for a lot of things because the world is built for everyone else.

Some skills it will pay bigger dividends than others. Knowing how to use a blade with either hand is huge for retention/close range, but perhaps less so with fencing. Shooting a carbine off of either shoulder is big, but perhaps not for precision rifle.

RE: Motor learning

I was just arguing the 10,000 repetition point with a couple of friends who were being highly critical of the methods at teaching hospitals (high on methodology and repetition) vs community health centers (see one, do one, teach one).

I was pointing out that the work, and perhaps path, to training a “teacher” or for you “force multiplier” vs a competent technician may well be different.

Regards,

Robert A

I thought you post on utilizing the spare mag as a “fuck off” tool was excellent, Robert. It has never occurred to me to use that sime device in so many way, and as you say, it’s certainly innocuous enough that a bad guy isn’t going to start grabbing for it off your belt like they might with a knife. Very insightful. I’m going to have to practice those. Thank you.