[quote]furo wrote:
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
Taken as to mean building “useful” muscle to protect against collision/contact-
[/quote]
Yeah that’s pretty much my understanding, though he didn’t clearly define it. I think he also mentioned strengthening connective tissue and he emphasises movements that involve getting off the ground, so I guess it’s a little more than just the muscle. I’m not sure though.
[/quote]
The physical needs of most “agressive” sports are fairly similar, and thinking about this and Collucci’s response (sorry, no idea how to double quote) I’d break the armor building into categories. I also think that one of those categories should be lifts where you both apply and absorb force, like the high catch hang clean, heavy push presses, power cleans… lifts like that.
So, you’d have your general strength- bench, squat (front and back) and weighted pullups
Force- cleans, push presses
Bodyweight- (you can get a lot of mileage out of these from going super high rep, to isometrics, static holds, options are damn near limitless) pushups, pullups, planks, neck bridges
The last category would I guess fall under conditioning, but it’s as much mental callusing as it is physical- heavy farmers walks, sled pushes, pulls and sprints, battle ropes, jump rope rope, sprints…
Add in some body balance work (curls, face pulls, extensions, whatever YOU need) and you’re building a strong, athletic machine.
This is exactly how I’ve been training lately and progress has been awesome. Honestly, if most people trained like this and didn’t eat like morons there’d be a lot more quality physiques.