[quote]jawara wrote:
I like Savage, Glenn Beck, Dr. Laura, and Sean Hannity once in while.[/quote]
I love how Dr. Laura just cuts threw the BS. She’s strait forward and doesn’t just blow sunshine up the callers asses.
Jim Rome, Mike & Mike in the morning… though now I have to listen on the web. When I’m driving, I listen to the local sports-talk hosts on 950 AM. Good stuff.
Full disclosure: I actually listen to NPR quite a bit.
I have never been into political talk shows.
I listen to sports commentary on the radio when I get the chance.
I used to listen to Rush quite a bit, but not so much any more.
I like Hannity sometimes too…
Both get a little too religious for me.
Neal Boortz is my favorite political commentator on radio, by far.
Clark Howard. Save more, spend less, avoid getting ripped off.
Any sports talk.
LA
[quote]rainjack wrote:
pookie wrote:
That’s why I mentioned youtube, genius. You might have missed it, it was a long sentence.
You seem to have trouble with reading full sentences yourself. I asked you what it was you found so offensive. You told me to listen for myself.
How in the fuck am I supposed to divine what you find offensive?
I would think after two attempts to just get a simple fucking question answered, lazy is no longer an ad hominem attack, huh?
But since you brought it up - how is calling me a yes-man for the right not an ad hominem?
Oh, right, I forgot you don’t need to be acquainted with a topic to discuss it, you can get by just with ad hominem, vocabulary nitpicking and calling people lazy. It’s easy to see, you being you and all, how such crap can be considered worthy of being called “a fight.” Keep swinging, chump.
This is not a fight. This is a canadian fucking titty fit. And a lazy one at that.
[/quote]
I wish Pookie WOULD enlighten us with what exactly he finds bigotted about Prager. If I have to guess, for some reason I always guess wrong. 
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
I wish Pookie WOULD enlighten us with what exactly he finds bigotted about Prager. If I have to guess, for some reason I always guess wrong.
[/quote]
He did. He said he FEELS he is racist. Not that he had any proof or anything, just that he feels it.
Also it must be understood that disagreeing with a liberal automatically means you are a bigot.
Terms like these are used to stifle debate, and to create automatic dislike of a person, coloring all future comments by the person. I believe the technique was invented by Joseph Goebbels.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
I actually listen to NPR quite a bit.
[/quote]
“Talk of the Nation” and “All Things Considered” are my favorites, too. 
I enjoyed The Nearly Famous Barry Young Show on KFYI in Phoenix. Sometimes, he does jump to preposterous conclusions, but it is entertaining.
Rush is boring.
And Hannity? When he did that steroid thing with his blond cohort interviewing Kevin Nash as guest… demonizing steroids like it was the second coming of Satan… all credibility went out the window. When Nash didn’t give him what he wanted, Nash was cut off. It wasn’t an interview, it was a witch hunt. Hannity is not a gentleman.
ESPN Radio. I sure enjoy my baseball.
I had the chance to hear about 15 minutes of Bill OReilly this week. It was unbelieveably bad… laughable. I literally LOL’d at how freaking dumb it was.
First he says that groups like Move On are just like the Ku Klux Klan. And that they are blackmailing the Democrats from appearing on a Fox News debate. Move On are setting the agenda for the entire Democratic party (his comments).
Then he says that the country rejects anyone whose policies are too far to the Right or the Left. McGovern and Goldwater both lost because they were too far from the middle. Okay…
But then he says Hillary is the Democratic front runner and she is trending to the “hard Left”. He says that everyone seems to think Hillary is going to win it all, even some of his conservative friends too.
Then he said that America is on the verge of where Germany was pre-Hitler, because of the resurgence of the Democratic party.
It was really nonsensical and simplistic (Politics for Dummies) with him literally contradicting himself every few seconds, making wild inflammatory claims (Move On runs the Democratic Party? Ask any Liberal if they think that’s anywhere close to being true. Move On is a relatively small group compared to the big picture. Move On is like the Klan? That’s offensive on many levels). No talk about specific bills, legislation, policies. It was really dumbed down and a lot more far out than his TV show.
[quote]Brad61 wrote:
It was really nonsensical and simplistic…No talk about specific bills, legislation, policies. It was really dumbed down and a lot more far out than his TV show.[/quote]
So, then, this makes you the proverbial “Bill O’Reilly” of our very own Politics forum?