Age Old Question: Size First or Cut First?

[quote]forbes wrote:
TNT diet is a diet similar to the Anabolic Diet, but there are different plans. if you go on mens health website and type in TNT diet, it will send you there and tell you EVERYTHING about it (science, eating plans etc).

thanks for not calling fat rsg. i can see my abs fine when i suck in and flex my stomach, but when i relax my belly, my gut sticks out. thats what got me thinking on what i should do. i eventually want to see my abs without having to flex.

thanks.[/quote]

By the way…no T-Man should EVER go to the Men’s Health website. I admit…that’s where I started too. I read the ABS Diet book and it got me started but seriously…those guys just don’t get it. When you see posts there saying stuff like “Help…Thanksgiving is tomorrow and I don’t want to over eat” you know it’s pretty sad. I finally found T-Nation and saw the light.

[quote]rsg wrote:
Professor X wrote:
FightingScott wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Worst logic ever.

Everyone, ignore what I’ve written. It’s wrong.

forbes, I don’t know what you should do.
I have no idea. Not in the slightest.

Apparently you don’t since you are just copying and pasting. Please explain to me why you shouldn’t do isolation exercises “because you can’t flex bone”, but those compound exercises DON’T require muscle to begin using them?

They are ALL used to build sizer and strength. Poor logic would be the assumption that they should be avoided because you lack muscle mass…WHEN THAT IS WHY YOU LIFT WEIGHTS.

When will this become common knowledge?

While Mr Tate may have his motives for avoiding isolation exercises (apart from being a powerlifter and ones mentioned in the previous posts), it’s retarded to believe that avoiding isolation exercises on body parts will make them grow better.

Lets all just believe everything we read without actually trying it out, and seeing what works better.[/quote]

That isnt what ANYONE is saying. It isnt that avoiding isolation exercise will; make him grow better!!wtf?

It is simply as a beginner, he may as well focus on the exercises that use the most muscle as possible, read my post again, 80% compound/money exercises. To create more hormone response, to use the time effectively, to lift more weight to use more muscles - these things build raw strength and size… then he can concentrate on concentration curls and db scott curls to accentuate his peaks!

See what i mean? It isnt avoid all isolation… Bodybuilding isnt about avoiding 1 single thing. it is about NOT avoiding anything to build the most muscle and have it as perfectly formed as possible.
Not 100% compound. Not 100% machines… but as a beginner, the majority, heavy, compound, bilateral, often barbell movements.

You cannot disagree with this in all reason.

JJ

[quote]davidtower wrote:
forbes wrote:
TNT diet is a diet similar to the Anabolic Diet, but there are different plans. if you go on mens health website and type in TNT diet, it will send you there and tell you EVERYTHING about it (science, eating plans etc).

thanks for not calling fat rsg. i can see my abs fine when i suck in and flex my stomach, but when i relax my belly, my gut sticks out. thats what got me thinking on what i should do. i eventually want to see my abs without having to flex.

thanks.

By the way…no T-Man should EVER go to the Men’s Health website. I admit…that’s where I started too. I read the ABS Diet book and it got me started but seriously…those guys just don’t get it. When you see posts there saying stuff like “Help…Thanksgiving is tomorrow and I don’t want to over eat” you know it’s pretty sad. I finally found T-Nation and saw the light. [/quote]

LMAO! Yea, those guys are anti-men, they are like the neurotic, female mindset about exercise and fat. Not bodybuilding, not sport, not health… but scared about how they look to others, insecurity and eating disorders!

THEY need some testosterone in a couple of different modes.

[quote] JJ wrote:
rsg wrote:
Professor X wrote:
FightingScott wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Worst logic ever.

Everyone, ignore what I’ve written. It’s wrong.

forbes, I don’t know what you should do.
I have no idea. Not in the slightest.

Apparently you don’t since you are just copying and pasting. Please explain to me why you shouldn’t do isolation exercises “because you can’t flex bone”, but those compound exercises DON’T require muscle to begin using them?

They are ALL used to build sizer and strength. Poor logic would be the assumption that they should be avoided because you lack muscle mass…WHEN THAT IS WHY YOU LIFT WEIGHTS.

When will this become common knowledge?

While Mr Tate may have his motives for avoiding isolation exercises (apart from being a powerlifter and ones mentioned in the previous posts), it’s retarded to believe that avoiding isolation exercises on body parts will make them grow better.

Lets all just believe everything we read without actually trying it out, and seeing what works better.

That isnt what ANYONE is saying. It isnt that avoiding isolation exercise will; make him grow better!!wtf?

It is simply as a beginner, he may as well focus on the exercises that use the most muscle as possible, read my post again, 80% compound/money exercises. To create more hormone response, to use the time effectively, to lift more weight to use more muscles - these things build raw strength and size… then he can concentrate on concentration curls and db scott curls to accentuate his peaks!

See what i mean? It isnt avoid all isolation… Bodybuilding isnt about avoiding 1 single thing. it is about NOT avoiding anything to build the most muscle and have it as perfectly formed as possible.
Not 100% compound. Not 100% machines… but as a beginner, the majority, heavy, compound, bilateral, often barbell movements.

You cannot disagree with this in all reason.

JJ[/quote]

This thinking hasn’t done much but make this very confusing. Bodybuilding is NOT confusing. If you want big legs, you do squats, leg presses, leg curls, and deadlifts. No one needs to worry about whether it is “80% compound”. It is common knowledge in bodybuilding that you do a “mass builder” before you do any smaller exercises. That means BENCH PRESS and not pec deck first.

This “anti-isolation” movement is retarded and, if you haven’t noticed, that is exactly what some are recommending.

There is no reason at all for someone to avoid biceps curls. Why the fuck would someone avoid this exercise?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
JJ wrote:
rsg wrote:
Professor X wrote:
FightingScott wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Worst logic ever.

Everyone, ignore what I’ve written. It’s wrong.

forbes, I don’t know what you should do.
I have no idea. Not in the slightest.

Apparently you don’t since you are just copying and pasting. Please explain to me why you shouldn’t do isolation exercises “because you can’t flex bone”, but those compound exercises DON’T require muscle to begin using them?

They are ALL used to build sizer and strength. Poor logic would be the assumption that they should be avoided because you lack muscle mass…WHEN THAT IS WHY YOU LIFT WEIGHTS.

When will this become common knowledge?

While Mr Tate may have his motives for avoiding isolation exercises (apart from being a powerlifter and ones mentioned in the previous posts), it’s retarded to believe that avoiding isolation exercises on body parts will make them grow better.

Lets all just believe everything we read without actually trying it out, and seeing what works better.

That isnt what ANYONE is saying. It isnt that avoiding isolation exercise will; make him grow better!!wtf?

It is simply as a beginner, he may as well focus on the exercises that use the most muscle as possible, read my post again, 80% compound/money exercises. To create more hormone response, to use the time effectively, to lift more weight to use more muscles - these things build raw strength and size… then he can concentrate on concentration curls and db scott curls to accentuate his peaks!

See what i mean? It isnt avoid all isolation… Bodybuilding isnt about avoiding 1 single thing. it is about NOT avoiding anything to build the most muscle and have it as perfectly formed as possible.
Not 100% compound. Not 100% machines… but as a beginner, the majority, heavy, compound, bilateral, often barbell movements.

You cannot disagree with this in all reason.

JJ

This thinking hasn’t done much but make this very confusing. Bodybuilding is NOT confusing. If you want big legs, you do squats, leg presses, leg curls, and deadlifts. No one needs to worry about whether it is “80% compound”. It is common knowledge in bodybuilding that you do a “mass builder” before you do any smaller exercises. That means BENCH PRESS and not pec deck first.

This “anti-isolation” movement is retarded and, if you haven’t noticed, that is exactly what some are recommending.

There is no reason at all for someone to avoid biceps curls. Why the fuck would someone avoid this exercise?[/quote]

I hadnt noticed actually. and i do agree with you.

However, my “80%” honestly isnt meant to be 80%!! it was a rough estimate for the OP who is a beginner to see that the VAST MAJORITY of exercises in his workouts are going to be of a certain kind (which included curls by the way! :wink: )
Now it has turned into some large debate about something else, please dont bring up a quote of mine that is taken out of context into a more advanced situation where i would never have used it. It was intended primarily to simplify something for a beginner, and did just that. At that time. That time is past, and my point is made. Leave that quote where it belongs, in the context it was meant, thanks!

Not having a go - this is a polite request, i do agree… as bodybuilders we use a massive range of exercises in the hope of a wide development, proportions and symmetry.

Who said “NO TO ISOLATION?” It wasnt Scott was it? I thought his was the brunt of mine… do money exercises basically. I see that the argument/debate is not about my post, but someone elses, so i shall quietly step back after making this point.

And thankyou,

JJ

[quote]Professor X wrote:

This “anti-isolation” movement is retarded and, if you haven’t noticed, that is exactly what some are recommending.

There is no reason at all for someone to avoid biceps curls. Why the fuck would someone avoid this exercise?[/quote]

“Hey Mister!! You don’t get biceps like THESE doing biceps curls!!”

hey guys, its me, the ORIGINAL OP. anyways, i apologize for not giving a bit of info about my history.

i’ve been working out consistently for about 3 years, going on 4. believe it or not, i have made some muscle gains. i went from…get ready to laugh…130 lbs to 160, and now im down to 150…

i actually gain weight reletively easily, but i do put on a good amount of fat. however, i suppose (ok, i KNOW) that my training was absolute SHIT when i started, and so was my diet, so thats why i gained a lot of fat in the first place.

before i started working out, i was fat. i started simple and simply increased my daily activity by doing more cardio (cuz i thought that was important) and lifted weights (not knowing what i was working).

after i lost a lot of weight, thats when i started lifting. my workouts consisted of…you guessed it…bench and curls, nothing else.

i then developed a shoulder problem (imbalance) and started wroking my back, then shoulders, eventually tri’s, and then eventually legs. i gained weight, but my diet sucked. i ate what i wanted, when i wanted, i the amounts i wanted cuz i thought “its going towards muscle growth”. thats how i added fat.

ever since then, im scared if putting more fat on my already jiggly belly.

please help Thibs. i want help. can you give me a good training program for me. i WOULD post pics, but dont have a digital cam.

i know you’re the man to turn to for this :slight_smile:

PM him then ungrateful little shit.

[quote]forbes wrote:
please help Thibs. i want help. can you give me a good training program for me. i WOULD post pics, but dont have a digital cam.

i know you’re the man to turn to for this :)[/quote]

Your problem is NOT the training program.

[quote] JJ wrote:
PM him then ungrateful little shit.[/quote]

But, what if he doesn’t want to pay for individualized support from a professional? What if his weekly allowance doesn’t cover the lack of self motivation?

first off JJ, i dont know where ur getting the idea that im ungrateful. if ur thinking that im not gonna follow ur advice, then ur wrong. ur advice was good, especially in regards to training, but to load my diet with carbs is not good. my insulin sensitivity isn’t the best (but not bad however). but carbs at every meal…thats a no-no. i think Poliquin and even Thibs would agree with me on that. i think Lowery’s (if im spelling his name correcly) morning carbs and evening fats would be better.

as for your training, its good, but wouldn’t i lose strength on that? in addition to looking good,i want to be able to lift heavy things.

since you JJ already gave me a tenplate to follow, could possibly Prof X give me one so that i can compare (and try them both) to see what works for me?

BTW Prof X, i think my diet is fine. i eat NO junk food (only on special occasion like weddings or family get togthers)thats it. i eat 5-6 meals a day. im very diciplined when it comes to my diet.

so there, i am grateful.

I just want to state something for the record.

I think JJ and I are on the same page on this point but I want to convince rsg and Professor X that, at least this one time, I’m not full of shit.

I hope my posts haven’t been construed as messages of “absolutely no isolation work, ever.” But there’s a difference between heavy Skull Crushers and Reverse-Grip 1-Arm Triceps Pushdowns.

This kid was planning to do a program where he’d do 2 “shaping” and “peak contraction isolation” exercises for every money lift.
That’s not smart programming.

At this point in the game, he needs to concentrate on exercises that give you the most bang for your buck. Sure, you can argue that all exercises build size and strength but the undeniable truth is that certain exercises are better than others at building size and strength.

The OP will get more out of his training doing mostly Squats, Presses, and Rows than he will doing Extensions and Raises.

Why should someone avoid doing Biceps Curls? Well, if doing that extra set of curls comes at the cost of them skipping the much more important set of Barbell Rows, then they’re fucking up.

I clearly didn’t do the best job of getting my point across, but in trying to say that he should prioritize Compound moves over Isolation moves, I feel like I was jumped on with the message of “NO! We’ve got another anti-isolation dick-wad!”

Is this guys problem his training? Who can say? We don’t know what his training has been. But have a hunch that it’s a lot like everyone else’s regime who weights a 150 after 3 years of training: lots of isolation moves. This isn’t my opinion. This is an undeniable trend you can see in any gym: small people doing a ton of isolation work.

And I stand by my statement that isolation exercises become more benificial as you gain strength and muscle mass. When you’re small and weak you simply aren’t strong enough to use poundages on many isolation exercises that are heavy enough to cause a training effect. If you can only bench 115, then you’re undeniably better off spending your time doing dips and bench than you are doing 35lb SkullCrushers. But once you’re strong enough to do 115 pound SkullCrushers you’re defiantly causing your triceps some overload and you’re training effectively.

[quote]forbes wrote:
first off JJ, i dont know where ur getting the idea that im ungrateful. if ur thinking that im not gonna follow ur advice, then ur wrong. ur advice was good, especially in regards to training, but to load my diet with carbs is not good. my insulin sensitivity isn’t the best (but not bad however). but carbs at every meal…thats a no-no. i think Poliquin and even Thibs would agree with me on that. i think Lowery’s (if im spelling his name correcly) morning carbs and evening fats would be better.

as for your training, its good, but wouldn’t i lose strength on that? in addition to looking good,i want to be able to lift heavy things.

since you JJ already gave me a tenplate to follow, could possibly Prof X give me one so that i can compare (and try them both) to see what works for me?

BTW Prof X, i think my diet is fine. i eat NO junk food (only on special occasion like weddings or family get togthers)thats it. i eat 5-6 meals a day. im very diciplined when it comes to my diet.

so there, i am grateful. [/quote]

Fair play.

I gave you a very basic template with the information at the time which was height, weight and bodyfat!
I think i may just be able to do better :wink:

I would suggest going through a load of artices on the site maybe search under CT or Poliquin in “Authors” even…

I didnt mean my advice as such - more that there were 3 pages of - albeit arguing amongst ourselves - information and advice for you and you only wanted CT! It doesnt matter, your reply was fair, right and courteous. I am a sucker for undeniable reason!

Joe

Maybe I missed this but how old are you?

[quote]forbes wrote:
BTW Prof X, i think my diet is fine. i eat NO junk food (only on special occasion like weddings or family get togthers)thats it. i eat 5-6 meals a day. im very diciplined when it comes to my diet.

[/quote]

This does not mean your diet is “fine” unless you are growing from it, gaining pounds of muscle mass and getting much stronger.

[quote]FightingScott wrote:
I just want to state something for the record.

I think JJ and I are on the same page on this point but I want to convince rsg and Professor X that, at least this one time, I’m not full of shit.

I hope my posts haven’t been construed as messages of “absolutely no isolation work, ever.” But there’s a difference between heavy Skull Crushers and Reverse-Grip 1-Arm Triceps Pushdowns.

This kid was planning to do a program where he’d do 2 “shaping” and “peak contraction isolation” exercises for every money lift.
That’s not smart programming.

At this point in the game, he needs to concentrate on exercises that give you the most bang for your buck. Sure, you can argue that all exercises build size and strength but the undeniable truth is that certain exercises are better than others at building size and strength.

The OP will get more out of his training doing mostly Squats, Presses, and Rows than he will doing Extensions and Raises.

Why should someone avoid doing Biceps Curls? Well, if doing that extra set of curls comes at the cost of them skipping the much more important set of Barbell Rows, then they’re fucking up.

I clearly didn’t do the best job of getting my point across, but in trying to say that he should prioritize Compound moves over Isolation moves, I feel like I was jumped on with the message of “NO! We’ve got another anti-isolation dick-wad!”

Is this guys problem his training? Who can say? We don’t know what his training has been. But have a hunch that it’s a lot like everyone else’s regime who weights a 150 after 3 years of training: lots of isolation moves. This isn’t my opinion. This is an undeniable trend you can see in any gym: small people doing a ton of isolation work.

And I stand by my statement that isolation exercises become more benificial as you gain strength and muscle mass. When you’re small and weak you simply aren’t strong enough to use poundages on many isolation exercises that are heavy enough to cause a training effect. If you can only bench 115, then you’re undeniably better off spending your time doing dips and bench than you are doing 35lb SkullCrushers. But once you’re strong enough to do 115 pound SkullCrushers you’re defiantly causing your triceps some overload and you’re training effectively. [/quote]

Jumping in late here, but I just wanted to say that your point that exercises using heavier loads and greater total muscle mass being a more general muscle builder is well taken. However, the idea that certain isolation exercises, like your example of a one-armed reverse grip triceps pushdown, are inferior ignores specificity.

Some people will say that newbies have no need to work on specifics, but this misses the mark: they are SPECIFICALLY TRYING TO GAIN MUSCLE.

Furthermore, by doing more work (within reason), they increase their work capacity, which increases their ability to generate and sustain power → only positive things.

Anyway, this wasn’t really pointed at you as I think that you do “get it”. And, of course, I’m beating a dead horse and now I will shut up.

[quote]FightingScott wrote:
I just want to state something for the record.

I think JJ and I are on the same page on this point but I want to convince rsg and Professor X that, at least this one time, I’m not full of shit.

I hope my posts haven’t been construed as messages of “absolutely no isolation work, ever.” But there’s a difference between heavy Skull Crushers and Reverse-Grip 1-Arm Triceps Pushdowns.

This kid was planning to do a program where he’d do 2 “shaping” and “peak contraction isolation” exercises for every money lift.
That’s not smart programming.

At this point in the game, he needs to concentrate on exercises that give you the most bang for your buck. Sure, you can argue that all exercises build size and strength but the undeniable truth is that certain exercises are better than others at building size and strength.

The OP will get more out of his training doing mostly Squats, Presses, and Rows than he will doing Extensions and Raises.

Why should someone avoid doing Biceps Curls? Well, if doing that extra set of curls comes at the cost of them skipping the much more important set of Barbell Rows, then they’re fucking up.

I clearly didn’t do the best job of getting my point across, but in trying to say that he should prioritize Compound moves over Isolation moves, I feel like I was jumped on with the message of “NO! We’ve got another anti-isolation dick-wad!”

Is this guys problem his training? Who can say? We don’t know what his training has been. But have a hunch that it’s a lot like everyone else’s regime who weights a 150 after 3 years of training: lots of isolation moves. This isn’t my opinion. This is an undeniable trend you can see in any gym: small people doing a ton of isolation work.

And I stand by my statement that isolation exercises become more benificial as you gain strength and muscle mass. When you’re small and weak you simply aren’t strong enough to use poundages on many isolation exercises that are heavy enough to cause a training effect. If you can only bench 115, then you’re undeniably better off spending your time doing dips and bench than you are doing 35lb SkullCrushers. But once you’re strong enough to do 115 pound SkullCrushers you’re defiantly causing your triceps some overload and you’re training effectively. [/quote]

And really, isolation exercises while they do build size - are more of a refinement of the muscle, the money exercises get you to 250lbs, the isolation exercises make you have the proportions and shape of a bodybuilder… Thats all we (i believe i can speak for scott as he can for me on this) were saying.

Tate - that is where scotts view got misconstrued, as Tate i believe DOES advocate pure Compound - but Tatey is a PL cum BB… so thats that.

I do agree with Scott, and i think we ALL do! Nne of us believe that bodybuilding is 100% of one thing and none of another.

Joe

[quote] JJ wrote:
And really, isolation exercises while they do build size - are more of a refinement of the muscle, the money exercises get you to 250lbs, the isolation exercises make you have the proportions and shape of a bodybuilder… Thats all we (i believe i can speak for scott as he can for me on this) were saying.

Tate - that is where scotts view got misconstrued, as Tate i believe DOES advocate pure Compound - but Tatey is a PL cum BB… so thats that.

I do agree with Scott, and i think we ALL do! Nne of us believe that bodybuilding is 100% of one thing and none of another.

Joe[/quote]

Good post.

[quote]forbes wrote:
please help Thibs. i want help. can you give me a good training program for me. i WOULD post pics, but dont have a digital cam.

i know you’re the man to turn to for this :)[/quote]

My job is to design programs. I have clients who pay me for this. I cannot design programs for free, how fair would it be to my paying clients?