[quote]Makavali wrote:
jawara wrote:
On another note, lets say I was a racist and I wanted to kill black people.
I would keep them poor, uneducated,malnourished,give them drugs, and do whatever I could to kill themselves.
OMG it’s a conspiracy![/quote]
Google Margaret Sanger. Her goal was to lower the birth rate of black people.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
So can anybody else who cares to learn from the past.
Call me crazy, but I don’t think Obama is going to mess up that bad.[/quote]
I’m beginning to think that is what some of these guys are really scared of… that he doesn’t screw up badly.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
jawara wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
jawara wrote:
So can I assume that you’re out there preaching and speaking to youth groups…helping your communities,etc? And if so,is that only reserved for Bible Belt conservatives?
Now your just being silly. I preach to no one, I just do my best to make sure that I can break the cycle of unwanted pregnancy,poverty, crime, drug use, and the entitlement mentality that is destroying the black community.
How is that silly? Its a very valid question. You’re giving us the persona of being so concerned for “your people.” I’m just curious as to what you’re doing to help “your people.” What makes you the “exception?”
So when I offer a solution to the problem, on that would work, BY THE WAY you mock me. My people are my family, people like you that dont want to get down to the root cause of the problem ar only going to make things worse.
Was that an attempt at side stepping what he asked? He wasn’t mocking you. He was questioning how serious you are since you claim you have the answers. If you won’t even help any other people, why do you feel qualified to speak on what the rest of us should be doing?[/quote]
Your accoussing ME of side stepping? Your the one who brought up the subject of social integration. All I’ve done on this thread is bring a simple solution to a far reaching problem.
[quote]jawara wrote:
Professor X wrote:
jawara wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
jawara wrote:
So can I assume that you’re out there preaching and speaking to youth groups…helping your communities,etc? And if so,is that only reserved for Bible Belt conservatives?
Now your just being silly. I preach to no one, I just do my best to make sure that I can break the cycle of unwanted pregnancy,poverty, crime, drug use, and the entitlement mentality that is destroying the black community.
How is that silly? Its a very valid question. You’re giving us the persona of being so concerned for “your people.” I’m just curious as to what you’re doing to help “your people.” What makes you the “exception?”
So when I offer a solution to the problem, on that would work, BY THE WAY you mock me. My people are my family, people like you that dont want to get down to the root cause of the problem ar only going to make things worse.
Was that an attempt at side stepping what he asked? He wasn’t mocking you. He was questioning how serious you are since you claim you have the answers. If you won’t even help any other people, why do you feel qualified to speak on what the rest of us should be doing?
Your accoussing ME of side stepping? Your the one who brought up the subject of social integration. All I’ve done on this thread is bring a simple solution to a far reaching problem. [/quote]
??
[quote]jawara wrote:
Professor X wrote:
jawara wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
jawara wrote:
So can I assume that you’re out there preaching and speaking to youth groups…helping your communities,etc? And if so,is that only reserved for Bible Belt conservatives?
Now your just being silly. I preach to no one, I just do my best to make sure that I can break the cycle of unwanted pregnancy,poverty, crime, drug use, and the entitlement mentality that is destroying the black community.
How is that silly? Its a very valid question. You’re giving us the persona of being so concerned for “your people.” I’m just curious as to what you’re doing to help “your people.” What makes you the “exception?”
So when I offer a solution to the problem, on that would work, BY THE WAY you mock me. My people are my family, people like you that dont want to get down to the root cause of the problem ar only going to make things worse.
Was that an attempt at side stepping what he asked? He wasn’t mocking you. He was questioning how serious you are since you claim you have the answers. If you won’t even help any other people, why do you feel qualified to speak on what the rest of us should be doing?
Your accusing ME of side stepping? Your the one who brought up the subject of social integration. All I’ve done on this thread is bring a simple solution to a far reaching problem. [/quote]
I’m not going to say you’re trying to side step every question I have asked of you…BUT…well…fuck it: YOU ARE SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTIONS.
Before you address that…please tell me where and how I am mocking you? You can’t put a turkey on the table and not expect it to be carved…na’mean? I’m asking valid questions…back up your shit. Na’mean?
[quote]TheBigV wrote:
People see a problem with saying “You’re [insert color, ethnicity, cultural background, religion], and therefore you are [this].”
They do not see a problem with saying “You’re a low income family, and therefore you are [this].”
If I went up to a low income family and told them they had an 80% chance of losing their teeth before the age of 35, they would be pissed because all of their family members have perfect dental health. Meanwhile everyone else in the trailer park is chewing on their gums.
No one wants to be grouped into a category that doesn’t represent them.
Yes, a plurality of abortions may occur with black families, but this does not equal correlation! There can be something else as the driving force behind this, such as economic issues or lack of knowledge about birth control or other ways to prevent pregnancy.
If “black america” were a bunch of rich fat cats, do you think the correlation between blacks and abortions would be the same? No? Well then it’s not a correlation.[/quote]
Hate to interject, does mean correlation, does not mean causation.
sorry to be picky.
[quote]jawara wrote:
Professor X wrote:
jawara wrote:
I’m blaming the breakdown of black families on “liberal social programs” because we didnt have these problems until “liberal social programs” were started.
Of course. Here:
http://mtsu32.mtsu.edu:11422/315/adultdiv/divfactos.html
Apparently, some people actually consider social integration into society a large factor in the breakdown of families especially among african-americans and especially in the south. Do Liberals get blamed for a nation’s reluctance for decades to integrate an entire race of people?
Who said anything about intregation? I didnt. I did say a few things about people having sex out of wedlock. What does that have to do with intregation?[/quote]
It has NOTHING to do with ANYTHING. Promiscuity and unsafe sex is not the platform of any party.
[quote]apbt55 wrote:
Hate to interject, does mean correlation, does not mean causation.
sorry to be picky.
[/quote]
yah I did edit the post afterwards, when I remembered “Correlation does not mean causation”, but it never went through.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
So can anybody else who cares to learn from the past.
Call me crazy, but I don’t think Obama is going to mess up that bad.[/quote]
I have never once stated that Obama can end this country or knock the Earth out of orbit in one term. What he can do with the gleeful alliance of other America hating leftists in the congress is destroy what’s left of the economy by mass unconstitutional federalization, neuter our national security, stifle constitutional liberties like the right to bear arms and freedom of speech and a list of other anti American nanny state policy moves in the short term.
In the long term he can saddle us with bleeding heart “empathetic” SC justices who have no more regard with our rule of law than he does not to mention plastering the who bureaucracy with abominable lower court judges.
The damage can be undone, but the fact of someone like him winning a presidential election in the first place does not instill confidence in the discernment of the populous.
This guy does not believe in the way of life bequeathed to us by our founders and does in fact embrace the ideology of those we have called enemies. Here comes the BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH, but that’s how it is. There is a line somewhere between more liberal American politics and those of our enemies. He and some others have crossed it. Biden a long long time ago.
[quote]Christine wrote:
I’m beginning to think that is what some of these guys are really scared of… that he doesn’t screw up badly.[/quote]
I’ve always thought this.
I was reading through the Moynihan report on black families from 1965 today. It reads exactly like the situation today in almost all of the categories he discusses.
Oh well. Maybe in another 40 years or so things will be different.
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.
[quote]TheBigV wrote:
apbt55 wrote:
Hate to interject, does mean correlation, does not mean causation.
sorry to be picky.
yah I did edit the post afterwards, when I remembered “Correlation does not mean causation”, but it never went through.[/quote]
Cool, yeah pet peeve,
sorry
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
Professor X wrote:
<<< GUY, we just elected the first black American president in 2008. >>>
Who is also a marxist enemy and about to unleash the single most universally disastrous internal chapter in this nation’s history, blacks included.
You’re right though. That IS progress in the liberal mind.
Does an Armageddon sound track come with that mental state?
Some of you sound flat out delirious.
That I can agree with. Only time will tell what he actually does.[/quote]
Just as delirious as those who think he is going to pay their mortgage, put gas in their car, and pay off their bills.
I wouldn’t say he is an enemy, I would definitely say if he plans on pushing the same agenda he did in chicago he is a bad person, and in no way deserves a second chance.
And yes by bad I do mean morally corrupt.
But we don’t know, maybe he has changed and he thinks hey if I can change so can America.
Trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.
[quote]belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control. [/quote]
They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.
Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.
They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.
Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.[/quote]
I personally dislike Kerry as much as Obama.
With you being an African American talking about Obama, do you think that makes you more, or less biased on the issue?
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.
They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.
Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.
I personally dislike Kerry as much as Obama.
With you being an African American talking about Obama, do you think that makes you more, or less biased on the issue?[/quote]
I didn’t ask whether you disliked Kerry. I stated there have never been this many threads showing all out hatred for a candidate as there have been with Obama. Have you looked at this board over the last few months? How many McCain threads have there been total compared to “Obama will kill the US” threads?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.
They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.
Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.
I personally dislike Kerry as much as Obama.
With you being an African American talking about Obama, do you think that makes you more, or less biased on the issue?
I didn’t ask whether you disliked Kerry. I stated there have never been this many threads showing all out hatred for a candidate as there have been with Obama. Have you looked at this board over the last few months? How many McCain threads have there been total compared to “Obama will kill the US” threads?
[/quote]
I wasn’t here last election, so I don’t know. I think the fact that Obama was an unprecedented candidate on many levels does lend some weight to there being more threads. McCain type attacks would be a lot of rehash, where I think Obama supplied a lot of fresh material. I’m kinda surprised there wasn’t more Kerry hate personally.
I think if you checked the Media though the rolls were reversed from the forum.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.
They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.
Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.[/quote]
Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.
They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.
Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.
Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting. [/quote]
Perhaps I’m right. Perhaps there is no way in hell you will ever admit it.