Abortion Kills Mostly Blacks

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
181

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.

They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.

Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.

Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting.

Perhaps I’m right. Perhaps there is no way in hell you will ever admit it.[/quote]

Right. It’s just like other people telling you you experience no discrimination. No matter how much you protest to the opposite, there’s really nothing you can do to convince people otherwise. Same thing with us and you. You show up on these threads when you feel your race has been insulted to brand everyone with the scarlet letter ‘R’ no matter how much we protest to the contrary.

Everyone falls all over themselves to apologize and tell you that they’re not, in fact, racist, but that doesn’t seem to matter to you. You’re the Judge, and they are Guilty. Meanwhile, the thing you fail to understand is that blacks, like Obama, are allowed any measure of racial collectivism they desire, yet are never called on it and get to keep calling other people racist. You, yourself, are a prime example of this collectivism. You have no interest in PWI aside from whether or not it has something to do with your race. The double standard is truly a wonder to behold. Special racial rules for whites, racialism for blacks.

Meanwhile, the data continues to show that blacks are in a nearly identical situation (if not worse, in some cases) to what they were 40 years ago during the writing of Moynihan report, despite a myriad of new anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action. The harder we try, the behinder we get, it appears.

182

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.

They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.

Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.

Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting.

Perhaps I’m right. Perhaps there is no way in hell you will ever admit it.

Right. It’s just like other people telling you you experience no discrimination. No matter how much you protest to the opposite, there’s really nothing you can do to convince people otherwise. Same thing with us and you. You show up on these threads when you feel your race has been insulted to brand everyone with the scarlet letter ‘R’ no matter how much we protest to the contrary. Everyone falls all over themselves to apologize and tell you that they’re not, in fact, racist, but that doesn’t seem to matter to you. You’re the Judge, and they are Guilty. Meanwhile, the thing you fail to understand is that blacks, like Obama, are allowed any measure of racial collectivism they desire, yet are never called on it and get to keep calling other people racist. You, yourself, are a prime example of this collectivism. You have no interest in PWI aside from whether or not it has something to do with your race. The double standard is truly a wonder to behold. Special racial rules for whites, racialism for blacks.

Meanwhile, the data continues to show that blacks are in a nearly identical situation (if not worse, in some cases) to what they were 40 years ago during the writing of Moynihan report, despite a myriad of new anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action. The harder we try, the behinder we get, it appears.
[/quote]

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.

183

[quote]Professor X wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:

I didn’t ask whether you disliked Kerry. I stated there have never been this many threads showing all out hatred for a candidate as there have been with Obama. Have you looked at this board over the last few months? How many McCain threads have there been total compared to “Obama will kill the US” threads?
[/quote]

Has nothing to do with his skin color, but with his choices, and his history in chicago. It has to do with who he is as a person, not what tone his pigment is.

If McCain had the same associations but in reverse, he would be in jail not president elect.

184

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.

They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.

Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.

Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting.

Perhaps I’m right. Perhaps there is no way in hell you will ever admit it.

Right. It’s just like other people telling you you experience no discrimination. No matter how much you protest to the opposite, there’s really nothing you can do to convince people otherwise. Same thing with us and you. You show up on these threads when you feel your race has been insulted to brand everyone with the scarlet letter ‘R’ no matter how much we protest to the contrary. Everyone falls all over themselves to apologize and tell you that they’re not, in fact, racist, but that doesn’t seem to matter to you. You’re the Judge, and they are Guilty. Meanwhile, the thing you fail to understand is that blacks, like Obama, are allowed any measure of racial collectivism they desire, yet are never called on it and get to keep calling other people racist. You, yourself, are a prime example of this collectivism. You have no interest in PWI aside from whether or not it has something to do with your race. The double standard is truly a wonder to behold. Special racial rules for whites, racialism for blacks.

Meanwhile, the data continues to show that blacks are in a nearly identical situation (if not worse, in some cases) to what they were 40 years ago during the writing of Moynihan report, despite a myriad of new anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action. The harder we try, the behinder we get, it appears.

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.[/quote]

Ignorrance is bliss isn’t it,

reporting facts is not racism no matter how much it hurts your feelings or ego.

Not getting a job when you are the more qualified candidate but the other candidate will fill their minority quota as a federal employer that is institutionalized racism thanks to the idiotic ACLU and overbearing (special)equal opportunity laws.

185

[quote]apbt55 wrote:

Ignorrance is bliss isn’t it,

[/quote]

Coming from you, this made my day.

Thanks for the laugh!!

186

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
belligerent wrote:
Nothing against the thread starter but this just looks bad in conjunction with all the other race threads and the Obama threads… shit is getting out of control.

They don’t see that. There were nowhere near this many threads showing pure hatred for Kerry or any other candidate for the last 8 years I’ve been on this forum.

Then again, they have the benefit of doing things like that and then claiming there is no racial bias at all.

Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting.

Perhaps I’m right. Perhaps there is no way in hell you will ever admit it.

Right. It’s just like other people telling you you experience no discrimination. No matter how much you protest to the opposite, there’s really nothing you can do to convince people otherwise. Same thing with us and you. You show up on these threads when you feel your race has been insulted to brand everyone with the scarlet letter ‘R’ no matter how much we protest to the contrary. Everyone falls all over themselves to apologize and tell you that they’re not, in fact, racist, but that doesn’t seem to matter to you. You’re the Judge, and they are Guilty. Meanwhile, the thing you fail to understand is that blacks, like Obama, are allowed any measure of racial collectivism they desire, yet are never called on it and get to keep calling other people racist. You, yourself, are a prime example of this collectivism. You have no interest in PWI aside from whether or not it has something to do with your race. The double standard is truly a wonder to behold. Special racial rules for whites, racialism for blacks.

Meanwhile, the data continues to show that blacks are in a nearly identical situation (if not worse, in some cases) to what they were 40 years ago during the writing of Moynihan report, despite a myriad of new anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action. The harder we try, the behinder we get, it appears.

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.[/quote]

I think I get it. AA, sub prime lending, black scholarships, est. Institutional racism, right?

187

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

I think I get it. AA, sub prime lending, black scholarships, est. Institutional racism, right?[/quote]

The events that led to them being created? Flat out racism on many levels. Again, this ‘damned if you do and damned if you don’t’ seems to only apply to minorities. If we fight racism by banning together by race, we then get called racist. That is very convenient, isn’t it?

188

[quote]
Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.[/quote]

The article that started this thread was some liberal reporter piecing through an abortion report to sell a sensational headline for God knows what reason. The actual report was not about race and abortion, but about various demographic data collected by the CDC, which included race. The CDC didn’t collect SES data. Then, you got ticked off because yet another piece of data is showing blacks doing badly in some category, and you feel that yet equal time is not given to whites, except that whites are reported doing worse than Asians in those same categories, and those categories are what everyone primarily cares about.

I’m sure that the researchers would have adjusted for SES if they could have. I’m sure they would have been thrilled to announce blacks doing better than whites in that category, as would the liberal media. The problem is, liberal think tanks show the same data as the conservative ones. The only difference is in the prescriptions that come from them. Liberals want to continue to use the same policies prescribed in the Moynihan report of '65, despite the fact that those policies have not helped. Conservatives want to do something different.

189

[quote]Professor X wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:

I think I get it. AA, sub prime lending, black scholarships, est. Institutional racism, right?

The events that led to them being created? Flat out racism on many levels. Again, this ‘damned if you do and damned if you don’t’ seems to only apply to minorities. If we fight racism by banning together by race, we then get called racist. That is very convenient, isn’t it?[/quote]

What happens to whites that band together to fight for their race?

How com guys like Malcom X get institutionalized as great civil rights leaders, though he espoused segregation and a hatred for all white people for most of his life?

You are correct there is a double standard, but it is the opposite of what you think.

190

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.

The article that started this thread was some liberal reporter piecing through an abortion report to sell a sensational headline for God knows what reason. The actual report was not about race and abortion, but about various demographic data collected by the CDC, which included race. The CDC didn’t collect SES data. Then, you got ticked off because yet another piece of data is showing blacks doing badly in some category, and you feel that yet equal time is not given to whites, except that whites are reported doing worse than Asians in those same categories, and those categories are what everyone primarily cares about. [/quote]

Wait, I got upset because of why? I couldn’t give a flying shit about whites getting equal time. My issue was using race at all to find some connection with behavior. Unless you are about to claim that simply being black makes you act a certain way, race has nothing to do with this.

191

[quote]Professor X wrote:
apbt55 wrote:

Ignorrance is bliss isn’t it,

Coming from you, this made my day.

Thanks for the laugh!![/quote]

You are son one sided in your arguments I m only assuming you understand it from one side.

You know I what I know minorities were and are discriminated against, but laws won’t fix it, a change in societal mindset will.

Laws generally just piss people off.

192

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

What happens to whites that band together to fight for their race?
[/quote]

Why would whites in America need to ban together to fight for their race? When were whites in general oppressed in this country?

[quote]
How com guys like Malcom X get institutionalized as great civil rights leaders, though he espoused segregation and a hatred for all white people for most of his life?

You are correct there is a double standard, but it is the opposite of what you think.[/quote]

It is clear that you think about as deeply as a puddle of water. You may want to fix that.

LOL @ whites in America fighting for their race.

Now, if we were to discuss certain ethnic groups who may also qualify as white who are fighting for actually being oppressed, that is different, but the idea that majority whites in this country need to fight oppression is so comical it needs its own SNL skit.

193

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.

The article that started this thread was some liberal reporter piecing through an abortion report to sell a sensational headline for God knows what reason. The actual report was not about race and abortion, but about various demographic data collected by the CDC, which included race. The CDC didn’t collect SES data. Then, you got ticked off because yet another piece of data is showing blacks doing badly in some category, and you feel that yet equal time is not given to whites, except that whites are reported doing worse than Asians in those same categories, and those categories are what everyone primarily cares about.

Wait, I got upset because of why? I couldn’t give a flying shit about whites getting equal time. My issue was using race at all to find some connection with behavior. Unless you are about to claim that simply being black makes you act a certain way, race has nothing to do with this.
[/quote]

Look up the difference beetween correlation and causation then argue.

race correlates very nicely, oh well big deal, that is what statistical analyses of the data presented showed.

I have to look at correlations all the time, then do root cause investigations to hopefully come up with a root cause.

194

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.

The article that started this thread was some liberal reporter piecing through an abortion report to sell a sensational headline for God knows what reason. The actual report was not about race and abortion, but about various demographic data collected by the CDC, which included race. The CDC didn’t collect SES data. Then, you got ticked off because yet another piece of data is showing blacks doing badly in some category, and you feel that yet equal time is not given to whites, except that whites are reported doing worse than Asians in those same categories, and those categories are what everyone primarily cares about.

Wait, I got upset because of why? I couldn’t give a flying shit about whites getting equal time. My issue was using race at all to find some connection with behavior. Unless you are about to claim that simply being black makes you act a certain way, race has nothing to do with this.
[/quote]

No one here argued that being black makes you a certain way. The report didn’t argue that. The data is DESCRIPTIVE, not prescriptive.

What you’re essentially asking for is that demographers keep track of no racial data and that the government do the same. This, of course, will leave no leg for diversicrats and affirmative activists to stand on. The Michelle Obamas of this world will be put out of business. I’m all for that.

195

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Until you understand the concept of “institutionalized racism” and the difference between that and being RACIST, you will never understand. One can partake in one and not the other. The article that started this thread is an example of the former.

The article that started this thread was some liberal reporter piecing through an abortion report to sell a sensational headline for God knows what reason. The actual report was not about race and abortion, but about various demographic data collected by the CDC, which included race. The CDC didn’t collect SES data. Then, you got ticked off because yet another piece of data is showing blacks doing badly in some category, and you feel that yet equal time is not given to whites, except that whites are reported doing worse than Asians in those same categories, and those categories are what everyone primarily cares about.

Wait, I got upset because of why? I couldn’t give a flying shit about whites getting equal time. My issue was using race at all to find some connection with behavior. Unless you are about to claim that simply being black makes you act a certain way, race has nothing to do with this.

No one here argued that being black makes you a certain way. The report didn’t argue that. The data is DESCRIPTIVE, not prescriptive.

What you’re essentially asking for is that demographers keep track of no racial data and that the government do the same. This, of course, will leave no leg for diversicrats and affirmative activists to stand on. The Michelle Obamas of this world will be put out of business. I’m all for that.
[/quote]

Uh, isn’t that what you want?

Well then, you are arguing against me WHY?

(you didn’t think this through, did you?)

196

[quote]Professor X wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:

What happens to whites that band together to fight for their race?

Why would whites in America need to ban together to fight for their race? When were whites in general oppressed in this country?

How com guys like Malcom X get institutionalized as great civil rights leaders, though he espoused segregation and a hatred for all white people for most of his life?

You are correct there is a double standard, but it is the opposite of what you think.

It is clear that you think about as deeply as a puddle of water. You may want to fix that.

LOL @ whites in America fighting for their race.

Now, if we were to discuss certain ethnic groups who may also qualify as white who are fighting for actually being oppressed, that is different, but the idea that majority whites in this country need to fight oppression is so comical it needs its own SNL skit.[/quote]

I can think of one white populatiion that was oppressed when they moved here, the Irish.

Maybe they shold band together to seek special priviliges because they were once oppressed.

Look at reality in this day and age minorities in this country primarily blacks have just as much opportunity in this country if not more.

Because the special interest legislation has pushed things past equal.

197

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting. [/quote]

You forgot that his wife “hates whites,” that he associates with the Muslim president of Kenya, that he was not really born in the US, and–perhaps my favorite that you wrote–that his “purported” daddy doesn’t really look like him.

198

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Interesting moral inversion there. Obama attends a racialist church for 20 years, associates with Weatherman murderers, Chicago mobsters and frothing antisemites, but the deluge of anti-Obama threads is due to OUR ‘racial bias,’ nevermind the fact that Obama is to the left of everyone we’ve ever elected. Perhaps you’re just projecting.

You forgot that his wife “hates whites,” that he associates with the Muslim president of Kenya, that he was not really born in the US, and–perhaps my favorite that you wrote–that his “purported” daddy doesn’t really look like him. [/quote]

Oh, silly…that’s not projection…because they’re white!

199

OK, this is getting boring. Where the hell is Thunderbolt at? At least he’s a challenge to some small almost imperceptible degree.

200

[quote]
Uh, isn’t that what you want?

Well then, you are arguing against me WHY?

(you didn’t think this through, did you?) [/quote]

I said this at the beginning of the thread, and I’ve repeated it (check page 1):

I agree with you. Where the hell is Thunderbolt? Maybe he can make some sense of you.