[quote]eyver wrote:
WhiteCaesar wrote:
eyver wrote:
He had abnormal growth for a prepubescent kid.
However, looking at his most recent pictures, I see nothing wrong. I knew kids at 12 that were bigger than he is now. Not many kids, but I knew some.
Good luck to him on the whole movie thing, though. It’s usually pretty hard for people that butt ugly.
I’m not sure I understand your point. Are you saying he looks all right now and not outlandishly developed for his age? If so, I agree. (Apparently he got off the drugs when he was taken away from his father.)
If, however, you’re trying to say that he wasn’t in the past being given some sort of steroid or prohormone then you’re just wrong.
Let me repeat the first sentence in my post:
“He had abnormal growth for a prepubescent kid.”
Therefore, your post is simply a restatement of mine. His growth was abnormal for a prepubescent, but now in puberty, he looks like a normal kid.
Why am I bothering with this? I don’t know.[/quote]
Let’s keep it civil, please. I didn’t mean to be attacking you; I was honestly just looking for clarification. “He had abnormal growth for a prepubescent kid” could mean that you think he’s just genetically gifted.
Actually your second post still doesn’t make your position completely clear to me. I think the problem is that you keep describing his development as “abnormal,” which, while certainly true, leaves a lot of room for interpretation. I’d be more inclined to describe it as “unnatural.”