Interesting…thank you. Having worked neck deep in the ghetttoooo for 15 years I’ve seen it firsthand. These brain dead yt slime are a detriment to everything
3 Likes
Feminism definitely changed the status quo over a prior order, but it’s hard to pin black American culture on feminism as an example of female failure.
There are a lot of factors at play, from socioeconomic disadvantages (which are very real without wholesale buying CRT bullshit) to selective breeding and behavioral training leading to low IQs and a lack of self-preservation and whatever else.
Maybe not the most politically correct line of conversation but at the end of the day we are all animals, and selective breeding ultimately can shape entire breed strains in both physical and mental traits. The Bell Curve is a largely shunned, but legitimate Harvard level study on factors leading to what you’re describing for reference.
In contrast, Nordic countries always had a strong female presence, back to the Viking age. They were arguably as successful as any other European society, and had they chosen to settle and colonize vs raid and go home we would likely be living a very Nordic existence today. They did ultimately influence British imperialism and guided it early on, created the strongest French kingdom and still exist as a productive, prosperous culture.
Women were not subjugating men, which I believe is the primary contention with feminism, but they lived equally. There were female farmers, property owners, proprietors, warriors and clan leaders.
I think this is how the vast majority of women would like to live. The 90’s affirmative action movement wasn’t without cause, but it has gone too far.
Selfish use of propagation is a personal point of greed though, not an ideal.
2 Likes
Viking influence on early British imperialism. Interesting.
Welcome. I grew up and lived in the suburbs of Queens, but did not confine myself my activities to those towns. I worked in Jamaica, Bushwick, Manhattan, and the Bronx for almost fifteen years. My father owned two stores on Jamaica Avenue, the avenue in the song “The Avenue” by Run DMC. I had Run’s autograph as kid because he shopped at one of the stores. 
My uncle and granddad worked in the South Bronx in the late 70’s and early 80’s and then had a store on Queens Boulevard. I spent much of my recreational time in Astoria and Manhattan. I’ve seen quite the variation of life across socieoeconomic strata and have come across what seems like nearly every ethnicity under the sun.
And they founded the city of Dublin.
2 Likes
Blacks in America did better during segregation than post segregation, especially with regard to family structure and education, and feminism emerged soon after desegregation.
1 Like
You are correct. It is not the full picture, but what I meant was that the black and other low-income communities served as the first testing grounds for feminist/sexual revolution.
That’s correct, and I appreciate the political incorrectness.
You are correct again here. Nordic people held women in high esteem, and your accurate description of them shows that the notion that women the world over were being mistreated and had no influence or important positions is complete bullshit!
Northern Europeans/Nordics/Germanics were the most monogamous people in history and even some of the top guys in their societies were monogamous, unlike the harems and concubinage of other parts of the world where the people were not nearly as chivalrous. But to my knowledge of them, if I have it correct, despite their high regard for women, they were not letting their young women run amok and screw whoever they wanted to and there were brutal punishments for adulterous women and male home wreckers.
I do not have a problem of this so long as I do not live in a matriarchy in which women despise men and men relinquish their role in upholding civilization and primarily think with their schlongs.
Tis my natural habitat. I don’t need no vampires throwing their big noisy blood partys.
Nordic people went to and left their mark on a lot of places, including Asia and the Middle East, which you might know already.
1 Like
That seems likely, since the women were typically marrying between 12 and 15 years old(a society full of pedophiles, according to what people claimed to believe about Roy Moore a few years back).
1 Like
I did not know the ages for this. But aside from that, these people weren’t sexually decadent or polygamous generally, from what I’ve been informed.
1 Like
Was Roy Moore taken through the ringer for hitting on teenaged women? I don’t know details on him. I’m not fond of this subject in written form as there are people who have no shame in throwing around the very fucking serious label of pedophile for those attracted to fully sexually developed females, which would make some of them pedophiles by their inaccurate definitions considering they masturbate to such women in porn and publications like Sports Illustrated and have also had sex with them at certain ages of their lives.
With that said, we do need statutory rape law, I believe.
1 Like
I think marrying young and sexual propriety go hand-in-hand. People are expected to develop their abilities as worker bees, nowadays, and marry at 30 or older. It’s unrealistic to expect people to commonly refrain from having sex(and, really, sex with multiple people) for that long.
2 Likes
Yep.
There’s a huge misunderstanding of the term. You seem to grasp its meaning.
2 Likes
I don’t know about xennial style casual sex, but it’s my understanding Vikings were polygenic and had entirely different views of sex in general than the rest of Christian Europe, prior to their own conversion. The deceit of infidelity was the crime, but relationships could be and often were “open”.
And women had significant rights, including an ability to divorce if the husband could not provide orgasms.
Lots of nuances, and many actually did put women in power sexually, or at least on equal footing.
1 Like
I agree.
1 Like
Thanks for that. I will read it.
Fair warning, there’s a decent chance this is a feminist publication. If you ignore the sideline commentary it discusses historical fact in between.
I’m off to do the in-law thing for a few. Happy Thanksgiving.
2 Likes
Got it.
Same here. Happy Thanksgiving to you too.
1 Like
The question is, what came first, the socioeconomic disadvantages or the breakdown of the nuclear family? Clearly, when there was obvious racism and disadvantages for blacks like during Jim Crow, their families were still intact and black women married at higher rates than white women so poor socioeconomic conditions don’t necessarily have an effect on marriage and the nuclear family. Monetizing poverty on the other hand requires the absence of fathers and husbands.
3 Likes