2015 NFL Off Season

The Doplhins are more of a feeling call, admittedly. But, they have a very favorable strength of schedule. They added Suh, who makes their d-line immediately better. And, allows their outside rushers more room to work with less chance of double teams. They will do much, much better on D this year.

Tannehill is looking good and Jarvis Landry has the potential to be a top tier reciever, imo. Losing Clay at TE and adding Cameron doesn’t hurt them. Cameron can do what is needed by the TE moving down the field, and in the red zone Cameron and Landry would be working the same part of the field and Tannehill will go to Landry anyways, even if Clay was still there. So they shouldn’t be losing any points by their change at the TE position. I really like Clay as a TE btw. I have him on my fantasy team.

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
I just found it odd you called out my top four…

And your SB matchup is Dallas (who is worse on paper this season and replaces Murray with 4 RB’s no one else less wants) and the Dolphins (who don’t even have a division title to their name this decade).

By all means, make bold predictions, but at least have some reasoning behind them…[/quote]

The Cowboys have gotten worse on paper? DeMo had a good year last year, but lets not get carried away here. There are multiple RBs in the league that could have put up his numbers in Dallas last year and some could have put up bigger numbers. That is why every RB in free agency that was not getting a lot of attention was asking Dallas to holler at them.

Defense. We get Sean Lee back. Demarco Lawrence is healthy. We sign Greg Hardy. We draft an edge pass rush specialist, that looks like will be making an immediate impact on passing downs.

Speaking of Gregory. We get three 1st round talent draft picks out of this years draft.

Romo is coming into the season healthy for the first time in 3 years.

Dez Bryant is signed and is focused on one thing. Winning the Super Bowl.

Jason Garret has firmly placed his stamp and style on this team. His players are believing in what he is trying to do, and the entire team is on the same page.

I don’t know what paper you are looking at that has Dallas getting worse? I do know where you could find that paper though… The fiction section.[/quote]

DM didn’t have a good year, he had a tremendous year. Obviously the offensive line played a huge role in that, but no one on the Cowboy’s roster right now could reproduce those numbers or come even close. That offense is at its best when it has a great rushing attack, and the new RB by committee approach won’t bring that same success.

Romo is underrated, I’ll give you that. I am not sure why there seems to be so much annual heat on him. I understand there are some questionable 4th quarter interceptions, but most of the ones I saw were because of extremely bad play calling (continuing to call medium to deep passes in the 4th quarter when you are leading by 2+ TD’s?). However, he’s going to be asked to do a lot more this season than last. Yes, QB’s have a much longer lifespan in the NFL, but he is still 35, will have less of a running game this year to keep defenses honest, and will be asked to throw probably 75-100+ more attempts this season.

Dez Bryant is a top 3 WR, but after him the drop off in receiving talent is huge. Witten is always reliable, but he is 33 and already declining.

Defensively, they are tremendously better at DE while DT might experience a small drop off. Lee is back at OLB, but the rest of their LB starters and depth are just JAG’s. Their secondary is nothing special and has underachieved year in and out. Last season they were quite plainly a middle of the road defense, nothing more. Adding talented pass rushers will help, but won’t make that defense worlds better.

[quote]mbdix wrote:
The Doplhins are more of a feeling call, admittedly. But, they have a very favorable strength of schedule. They added Suh, who makes their d-line immediately better. And, allows their outside rushers more room to work with less chance of double teams. They will do much, much better on D this year.

Tannehill is looking good and Jarvis Landry has the potential to be a top tier reciever, imo. Losing Clay at TE and adding Cameron doesn’t hurt them. Cameron can do what is needed by the TE moving down the field, and in the red zone Cameron and Landry would be working the same part of the field and Tannehill will go to Landry anyways, even if Clay was still there. So they shouldn’t be losing any points by their change at the TE position. I really like Clay as a TE btw. I have him on my fantasy team. [/quote]

Landry might have #1 receiver talent, but he isn’t one yet. Stills is a great addition, but Jennings is not an upgrade over the poorly used Mike Wallace. I think Jordan Cameron is an upgrade. He played well with poor quarterbacks. Tannehill improved last season, let’s see if he continues to do so. Lamar Miller has talent.

Defensively, I don’t know. Yes, Suh is a huge addition, but Wake is 33 and on the decline. Mitchell isn’t an upgrade over Starks and Odrick. They replaced their underperforming OLB’s with younger, cheaper options. Probably a push there. Starting CB is 32 and on the decline. Delmas is out for the year and his replacement Aikens is just a guy.

But, the bottom line is, I don’t know how they get past NE.

Not trying to pick fights, but more so interested in entertaining debates.

ESPN, just a bunch of haters!

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
ESPN, just a bunch of haters!

http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/13533995/split-nfl-new-england-patriots-apart[/quote]

You’d think over time they would just let go… Nope. Let’s not forget they already embarrassingly retracted the story about the Pat’s and Ram’s SB BS.

[quote]daltron wrote:
Not trying to pick fights, but more so interested in entertaining debates.[/quote]

I might have come across as dick at first? My bad.

You know your football and I respect that.

1st of all Dallas would be worse on paper if they kept Murray. Last year, was his first year to ever play a full season. Possibly including college? I’m not 100% sure about that, but I am 100% sure he had some seasons where he missed some games in college. Murray doesn’t finish seasons unless it’s a contract year.

Murray had at least a handful of fumbles at really bad times last year.

The Cowboys really only need 3 yards and a cloud of dust and to stick with it for their running game to be successful with. Because…

There is a drop off in talent from Dez down the depth chart. But, Dez is a beast.
Beasley gets open and is really hard to cover. Wes Welker type. Terrance Williams is starting to get Romo’s confidence and I think they will both have a really good season. I honestly think Romo is as good as there is at throwing the football in the NFL. He finally got to experience what letting the running game take some pressure off of him is going to do for him and the team.

3 yards and a cloud of dust… we are looking at 3rd and 4. I love the Cowboys chances with 3rd and 4.

[quote]daltron wrote:

Defensively, they are tremendously better at DE while DT might experience a small drop off. [/quote]
Tyrone Crawford is in a contract year. Crawford is a very talented player ( I have been saying this since they drafted him) and I think he will have a pro bowl year.
Hardy will be used at DT some this year also. T. McClain is a solid player.

[quote]
Lee is back at OLB, but the rest of their LB starters and depth are just JAG’s. [/quote]
Lee is at the Will for two reasons. 1. Will backer is a key position in Marinelli’s scheme. 2. McClain showed last year why he was a top ten draft pick. He comes back week 5. I like Hitchens.

I agree here. I also remember having a CB who was an average CB winning the Superbowl MVP for us. The Defensive backs are going to need to shit or get off the pot this year. But, the pressure from the D-line should result in a positive turnover ratio for the Cowboys.

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

I cant think of a more OVERrated player in the league. Tebow maybe? but he’s not really in the league…

If Andy Dalton played in dallas behind that line, with that media hype, he would be the second coming of Roger Staubach.

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

I cant think of a more OVERrated player in the league. Tebow maybe? but he’s not really in the league…

If Andy Dalton played in dallas behind that line, with that media hype, he would be the second coming of Roger Staubach. [/quote]

Pretty much.

[quote]mbdix wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Not trying to pick fights, but more so interested in entertaining debates.[/quote]

I might have come across as dick at first? My bad.

You know your football and I respect that.

1st of all Dallas would be worse on paper if they kept Murray. Last year, was his first year to ever play a full season. Possibly including college? I’m not 100% sure about that, but I am 100% sure he had some seasons where he missed some games in college. Murray doesn’t finish seasons unless it’s a contract year.

Murray had at least a handful of fumbles at really bad times last year.

The Cowboys really only need 3 yards and a cloud of dust and to stick with it for their running game to be successful with. Because…

There is a drop off in talent from Dez down the depth chart. But, Dez is a beast.
Beasley gets open and is really hard to cover. Wes Welker type. Terrance Williams is starting to get Romo’s confidence and I think they will both have a really good season. I honestly think Romo is as good as there is at throwing the football in the NFL. He finally got to experience what letting the running game take some pressure off of him is going to do for him and the team.

3 yards and a cloud of dust… we are looking at 3rd and 4. I love the Cowboys chances with 3rd and 4.

[/quote]

Oh nah, you weren’t a dick, I just meant I didn’t want to come off as one.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

He’s been put in many bad situations, especially with play calling. I have no ties to the Cowboys, but Romo gets a bad rap too often. While stats are not the end all, statistically he has been a very good QB year in and out. Obviously the Cowboy’s playoff record since 2006 is… dismal at best, however that’s not all him. As for big games, he has had bad moments like any QB. However, I wouldn’t say he lacks the ability to win big games. Last year’s game vs. Seattle was pretty impressive. While they didn’t pull off the win, their loss to Denver to 2013 showed he can play near perfect in a big game (506 yards, 14.1 YPA, 5 TD’s, 1 Int). While the Cowboys have underachieved, one losing season in nine seasons isn’t nothing to sneeze at.

[quote]daltron wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

He’s been put in many bad situations, especially with play calling. I have no ties to the Cowboys, but Romo gets a bad rap too often. While stats are not the end all, statistically he has been a very good QB year in and out. Obviously the Cowboy’s playoff record since 2006 is… dismal at best, however that’s not all him. As for big games, he has had bad moments like any QB. However, I wouldn’t say he lacks the ability to win big games. Last year’s game vs. Seattle was pretty impressive. While they didn’t pull off the win, their loss to Denver to 2013 showed he can play near perfect in a big game (506 yards, 14.1 YPA, 5 TD’s, 1 Int). While the Cowboys have underachieved, one losing season in nine seasons isn’t nothing to sneeze at.
[/quote]

Ya, he’s fine statistically. I’ve defended him on here before actually. He just doesn’t win like other qbs.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

He’s been put in many bad situations, especially with play calling. I have no ties to the Cowboys, but Romo gets a bad rap too often. While stats are not the end all, statistically he has been a very good QB year in and out. Obviously the Cowboy’s playoff record since 2006 is… dismal at best, however that’s not all him. As for big games, he has had bad moments like any QB. However, I wouldn’t say he lacks the ability to win big games. Last year’s game vs. Seattle was pretty impressive. While they didn’t pull off the win, their loss to Denver to 2013 showed he can play near perfect in a big game (506 yards, 14.1 YPA, 5 TD’s, 1 Int). While the Cowboys have underachieved, one losing season in nine seasons isn’t nothing to sneeze at.
[/quote]

Ya, he’s fine statistically. I’ve defended him on here before actually. He just doesn’t win like other qbs. [/quote]

I’ll give you that, yeah. IMO, elite QB’s should be able to consistently take over games, and I don’t feel he does that. I don’t think Romo is top 5, but I think people slot him significantly lower than he should be.

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

I cant think of a more OVERrated player in the league. Tebow maybe? but he’s not really in the league…

If Andy Dalton played in dallas behind that line, with that media hype, he would be the second coming of Roger Staubach. [/quote]

Andy Dalton couldn’t hit water if he fell out of a boat in the middle of the pacific.

[quote]mbdix wrote:
Andy Dalton couldn’t hit water if he fell out of a boat in the middle of the pacific.
[/quote]

and i’d still take him over romo… romo is average at best. He wont win you any big games, but he’ll find a way to lose them, just like Dalton…

[quote]daltron wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Aggv wrote:

[quote]daltron wrote:
Romo is underrated
[/quote]

Underrated?

[/quote]

Lol, ya, he’s average at best. Good numbers, but lacks the ability to win the big games. He’s a below average version of Brett Favre. [/quote]

He’s been put in many bad situations, especially with play calling. I have no ties to the Cowboys, but Romo gets a bad rap too often. While stats are not the end all, statistically he has been a very good QB year in and out. Obviously the Cowboy’s playoff record since 2006 is… dismal at best, however that’s not all him. As for big games, he has had bad moments like any QB. However, I wouldn’t say he lacks the ability to win big games. Last year’s game vs. Seattle was pretty impressive. While they didn’t pull off the win, their loss to Denver to 2013 showed he can play near perfect in a big game (506 yards, 14.1 YPA, 5 TD’s, 1 Int). While the Cowboys have underachieved, one losing season in nine seasons isn’t nothing to sneeze at.
[/quote]

Ya, he’s fine statistically. I’ve defended him on here before actually. He just doesn’t win like other qbs. [/quote]

I’ll give you that, yeah. IMO, elite QB’s should be able to consistently take over games, and I don’t feel he does that. I don’t think Romo is top 5, but I think people slot him significantly lower than he should be.
[/quote]
Agreed and I am a long, long time Cowboys fan.

Just out of curiosity who is the top 5 currently playing?

I’m just going to leave this here. This is before Romo was playing behind this line.