2 Random Strength ?'s

[quote]dankid wrote:
Im not really sure about the whole weak point theory. I mean in my mind, it makes sense that the reason I am weak at the top of pullups is that I have strong lats but weak biceps. Ive done a lot of deadlifting and rack pulls, so my lats are strong. And ive done very little curling. If I look at others in the gym, they have done exactly the opposite as me, and happen to be in the opposite situation (cant pull up from a hang).

So it makes sense that my training led to this aparent weakness.

Ive also contemplated that maybe you dont need to get your chin above the bar when going heavy. Maybe doing a lot of weight and a decent amount of ROM is enough. Lighter sets can then focus on ROM and top end strength.

***One other thing I though of doing is this.

  1. Focus on strength with heavier weights, and accept not going quite all the way up. (but focus on getting to a max 3-5 weight)

  2. End with a weighted isometric hold at the top. (Hold the top position until you cant hold anymore and then lower as slow as possible)

Im not sure if this would work, but it would seem to allow me to keep hitting them heavy, while also adressing my weakness.[/quote]

The very top is usually the hardest part of the range of motion. If you are doing pullups and not chinups and you feel your arms are the weakness, it would be the brachialis and not the biceps.

I would highly recommend isometric holds at the top like described here:

Make sure you really squeeze your shoulder blades down and back all the way during the holds.

Also, from CT’s column:

Those who have problems with chins should start with a similar but easier exercise. A lot of people use either assisted reps or cheated reps in the chin-up itself, but this is wrong IMHO because the individual doesn’t learn to execute the exercise properly and starts to rely on faulty motor patterns.

I like the inverted row progression. I have attached a picture of the inverted row with elevated feet but this is the fourth progression step.

  1. perform the inverted row with the feet on the floor and the knees bent at 90 degrees.

  2. perform the inverted row with the feet on the floor and the legs straight

  3. perform the inverted row with the feet on a low elevated surface (12 inch stack of plates for example) and the legs straight

  4. perform the inverted row with the feet on an elevated surface (a small swiss ball, a training bench) and the legs straight

  5. Perform the inverted row with the feet on a high elevated surface (big swiss ball, training bench + a stack of plates) and the legs straight.

  • It’s important that in all variations you keep the hips in-line with the knees and with the torso/shoulders.

Before moving on to the next step you should be able to perform multiple sets of 12-15 reps.

Once you complete step 5 you can move on to chin-ups.

The limiting factor in chinups/pullups can vary from one individual to the next. I’d say that the biggest problems are either due to a lack of scapula stabilization/fixation and a weak biceps (if chins are proportionally weaker) or brachialis (if pullups are proportionally weaker).

TIME2BGAY is so fucking annoying with his oly lifter superiority bullshit.

Are the GHRs on the ground or on a GHR bench?

The bench is easier than the floor. I would start w/ the negatives and then push your self back up. When you can, you should add isoholds here also.

[quote]Ryan71 wrote:
Are the GHRs on the ground or on a GHR bench?

The bench is easier than the floor. I would start w/ the negatives and then push your self back up. When you can, you should add isoholds here also.[/quote]

Thanks for the advice Ryan. Ive done some research and have decided to not try and strengthen my biceps through isolation exercises. I know the BB’ers on the site will preach taht you NEED to do curls, but I have seen enough PL’ers claiming to NEVER do any isolation work for biceps. So instead, im taking the more functional approach, by working my weaknesses on pullups/chinups. Im doing something similar to Cressey’s strength protocol.

Basically I warm-up to a 1rm, and then shoot for a total of 4 x 1 that is greater than or equal to 90% of 1rm, then i’ll decrease the weight by 10% and perform 3-4 sets of 4.

At the end of my workokut, i perform a static hold at the top of a pullup, and as I fatigue, lower myself as slow as possible. Just one rep, one set.

And as for GHR. Im performing them on the floor. Im still not sure about these. The reason I want to be able to do them so bad, is because they are so hard. I figure if my hamstrings are that weak, then strengthening them will help a lot with my squats and deadlifts. But then on the other hand, like I mentioned above, strengthening my hamstrings with SLDL’s and RDL’s seems much more functional than GHR’s. Which led me to question if there is really any need to develop Knee flexion for non-runners? And I have seen some on the site that have claimed to never have hamstring issues until they started working their hamstrings with GHR’s and leg curls. So Im still not too sure on this one.

Thx again.

[quote]Weighty1 wrote:
You’ve seen what they want you to see. Chances are they all probably used to bench, row, shoulder presss and a whole other host of exercises, but because they are not the bread and butter of their routine they probably didn’t bother to record it, as it was not a major factor for them.
[/quote]

There are absolutely some mind games going on some times. I’ve read something completely stupid and noticed that some people believe the crap…