[quote]StormTheBeach wrote:
[quote]ViKtoricus wrote:
[quote]TheDudeAbides wrote:
[quote]StormTheBeach wrote:
…
The entire sport is a fucking joke because of people like you. And the internet. And people who don’t use gear.[/quote]
Not to derail (althought that might be too late), but could you or someone else elaborate on the last point? [/quote]
Don’t bother.
I understand where geared (multi ply) powerlifters are coming from. I would be wise enough to know that if I wanted to train as a geared powerlifter, I am better off asking TECHNIQUE questions to the experienced, geared powerlifters themselves (they suck donkey balls when it comes to making training programs. I don’t know why, but my assumption is that they are pussies who were brainwashed by Louie Simmons).
We are dealing with a douchebag who had his IQ sucked away after putting more weight that his neck can handle when he squats geared. Bloodflow to the brain gets decreased because of that. So let me explain things on HIS behalf. He is personally mocking me. He is mocking me because unlike alot of powerlifters nowadays, I have never used multi-ply gear. He is under the assumption that training for a GEARED powerlifter is different from a raw lifter which is TRUE. But that does not mean it’s COMPLETELY, 100% different! I mean seriously. Let’s hypothesize what a typical, raw powerlifting routine will be ON A REAL TRAINING PROGRAM:
Smolov Cycle:
Raw Squat. No assistance exercises for squat.
:
Raw Squat, Raw Bench Press, Raw Deadlift. Assistance work for whatever. OR NOT, depending on alot of things.
Now check out this training program for a GEARED powerlifter:
:
Geared lifts and assistance work. The End.
But the thing is, people get brainwashed into thinking that 10X6.21 or 5X4.9986789 is a better set and rep scheme for geared lifting than 3x4.5 or 5X1.1111
Wanna know who brainwashes them? Louie Simmons, Dave Tate, Jim Wendler, and a shitload of powerlifters with a 405-pound ATG squat but has a 715 -pound GEARED, SUPER-WIDE STANCE SQUAT WITH THE BAR RESTING ON THEIR SHOULDER BLADES.
Please stop reading anything from the powerlifting section of this website and just switch to Olympic Weightlifting. Those guys can actually give you training programs that work without having to purchase bands and chains or whatever from elitefts.com.[/quote]
Well, I’ve actually never done a multi-ply meet. Being a strong person that actually values strength, I would love to do a couple of multi-ply meets just to see what it is all about. The gear is fucking ridiculous. 1000+ squats with 500lb deadlifts is depressing. That being said, not everyone that puts on a canvas suit can squat 1260. So there has to be some aspect of strength involved outside of technique in the suit. Regardless of what you are saying, technique is an important aspect of raw lifting too. Maybe if you worked on your own technique, your numbers would be a little higher. Instead of just focusing on being as hardcore as you obviously are, you should put some energy into actually getting stronger. If you have any questions on how to do that, I could definitely answer them for you.
By the way, Donnie Thompson has an 870lb raw squat, that he walked out, in 2006.[/quote]
Yep. Don Reinhoudt did about 935 in the early to mid 70s. I’m pretty sure it was raw with maybe ace bandages. Thompson wasn’t to far from that.
Strength hasn’t changed much since the 70s. raw numbers aren’t really much higher. But so what? The gear adds interest and makes a different dimension to the sport. It’s not better or worse, just different. Kind of like car racing and the different restrictions or limits.
Try having a sport where records really don’t change much and see how much general interest there is. Compare viewership to Dancing with the Stars and the Olympic weightlifting championships. Or that goofy obstacle course.
We might love it, but the average viewer and sports fan doesn’t. There is no if we change this or that and do it this way that will increase viewership to any appreciable level.
We do this because we love doing it. And what way you love doing it is not my concern.