10 Reason Why Islam Isn't a Religion of Peace

[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Interesting site.

If we say someone should deport the bastard, they’ll say we are anti-Muslim.

Ironic, no?[/quote]

The New York Times did a piece on him: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/us/15net.html?ref=world

The fact that he remains in this country free to continue his internet jihad for Al-Qaeda, (because he’s part of their web operations), has me strongly suspecting our government has been bought off by certain Arab interests. Khan has called for the deaths of Americans several times on his site. Perhaps they’re building a case against him, but I think not.

I imagine lixy would say he’s a renegade nutjob - unfortunately, the internet gives this guy a platform for his hate & ignorance.

What gets me about this is - presumably there are many muslim who have the amount of time & resources that this guy has: why aren’t they posting in an effort to educate the world about the true nature of Islam? Where are the Martin Luther Kings of Islam?

If Islam is NOT a religion of peace, then it must be a religion of war.

If Islam is a religion of war, then it must be the work of the Devil.

Therefore, by transitivity, it must follow that if it can be proved that Islam is not a religion of peace, then it must be the work of the Devil.

Perfectly logical.

The turning point came on 9-11. You attacked an enemy with the ability to respond and the nerve to do so. Even your idol Osamma has realized how big a mistake that was.

If Lixy is the best PR man (or woman) that Islam has to offer then yes it does have a PR problem. I would venture that Lixy, personally, has turned many against his religion and even pushed some moderate thinking people to the fringe. Good work Lixy. Nobody else to blame.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
Interesting site.

If we say someone should deport the bastard, they’ll say we are anti-Muslim.

Ironic, no?

The New York Times did a piece on him: An Internet Jihad Aims at U.S. Viewers - The New York Times

The fact that he remains in this country free to continue his internet jihad for Al-Qaeda, (because he’s part of their web operations), has me strongly suspecting our government has been bought off by certain Arab interests. Khan has called for the deaths of Americans several times on his site. Perhaps they’re building a case against him, but I think not. [/quote]

I;m sure it has nothing to do with that whole “Freedom of speech” nonsense he hates so very badly.

[quote]lixy wrote:
katzenjammer wrote:
Okay, I’ve been following some of these posts for some time and I’d like to jump in here.

I’m an anglo-catholic and admittedly I don’t know all that much about Islam. From my point of view, I encounter so many misunderstandings about the Catholic Church - and I know from personal experience that it is extremely difficult to educate someone about the Church outside the the faith - that I know I must, in all fairness, approach Islam with a huge amount of humility.

My girlfriend of many years grew up Muslim. I have watched her struggle with Islam; I have watched the dynamics of her Muslim family. This did not give me a very favorable impression of Islam, to be honest. And, recently, during Easter service here in Boston, she was baptized into the Anglo-catholic tradition. She is, I should add, terrified to tell her parents or family. In short, I do have impressions of Islam from a personal perspective - though they may be misinformed, incorrect, or not applicable to Islam more generally.

In trying to educate myself about Islam, I have found that materials fall into two general sources. 1. academic sources that - to me, at least - seem to reek of PC bullshit, not to put too fine a point on it. 2. sources from the likes of people like Spencer - his books and videos such as, for example, “Islam: What the West Needs to Know” (can be found on Youtube.)

Spencer’s presentation of Islam seems unassailable, though I’m perfectly aware that it may well be a one-sided presentation of the facts. I am eager, in fact, to find a reputable discussion of those facts from another perspective, especially one that pointedly refutes his analysis. Indeed, I would love to see someone debate Spencer.

If anyone would point me in the right direction here, I’d appreciate it. Cheers to all, ~katz

Let’s get one thing straight: Islam’s PR is just horrible. Besides Wahabism and its variations, there’s neither money nor efforts put into educating people about the faith or its essence. In fact, along with a poor (or even non-existing) command of the Arabic language, this lack of religious education becomes a valuable asset in Ben-Laden’s bag.

Most self-proclaimed Muslims learn about Islam by observation. There’s little analysis or theology involved in the process as should be made obvious by the profusion of bida’at (sing. bid’ah) throughout the Islamic world.

Anyone who’s seen the pathetic responses to Wilders’ video would tell you the same thing: Islam’s PR sucks!

And I’m sure you have noticed by now, the attacks on the religion, its messenger and the Ummah in general are relentless and virulent in their nature.

From all this demonization of Islam, there is one obvious victor in the radical Islamists who can now point fingers at some of the gratuitous provocations or heinous acts and say “I told you so”.

So that now, not only are they promising to “liberate” the people from the tyranny of the dictators ruling them, but they have an even more palpable and tangible cause to fight: the occupation of majority-Muslim lands by imperialist powers (think Iraq).

It is often asked why Muslims aren’t doing more to better the image of their faith, and the stone cold truth is that most are still struggling with survival. There’s also a striking difference between the attitude of the Anglo-saxon world and the rest, but that’s another topic.

It’s a sad state of affairs when Islam’s most far-reaching voice is Wahabism. I am personally very pessimistic vis-a-vis the future of this issue. I think that the point of no return was reached after the invasion of Iraq. Now, ignorance is taking over and there are serious barriers to overcome just to iniate a debate.

Prejudice on both sides is growing at lightning speed and there’s hardly anything anyone can do about it. Honestly, I don’t give a damn what Wilders, Coulter, Pat or that PRCalDude thinks of my religion. They’re free to say anything they want and from my perspective, they’re just making themselves look like idiots.

However, what I find troublesome is the ammo they’re laying right in the hands of radicals Islamists. A sort of vicious circle if you will.

Any questions you may have I’ll be happy to answer. There’s plenty to be said on the matter, so please formulate specific and concise questions.

Cheers,

/lixy

P.S; I am a man! Not that I grant much importance to pronouns, but it’s worth noting in case you want to respond to my post.[/quote]

This post right here exemplified exactly what the problems are. First, Islam doesn’t need PR, muslims need to behave better, period. If muslims behaved like peace-loving individuals, no “PR machine” would be necessary.
Second, placing the blame on others. Calling, (monotonously so) out the U.S. for the invasion of Iraq as death nail in ismalic - ‘rest of the world’ relations. That of course is bullshit. While the Iraq war was a titanic mistake in its inception and execution, it had little impact on the world’s view of islam. If anything islamic relations should have improved with much of the world since most of the world is against the war.

I would say violent acts and idiotic protests by muslims have given the world this bad impression. You cannot spin pure unadulterated stupidity as displayed with things such as the cartoon protests or the “Teddy bear” teachers. This is not the fault of wahabism or anything else, this is purely the fault of muslims themselves.

Muslims need to put down the bullshit radicalism and start acting like decent people. Yes, there are plenty of good hearted muslims, but there is a cancer at it’s heart and that needs to be erraticated by muslims; nobody else can do it. But you have to own up the problems first…Islam needs a good 'ol 12 step program…1)Admit the problem first. If you deny there is one, then problems will most assuredly continue.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
katzenjammer wrote:
pat wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
katzenjammer wrote:
Okay, I’ve been following some of these posts for some time and I’d like to jump in here.

I’m an anglo-catholic and admittedly I don’t know all that much about Islam. From my point of view, I encounter so many misunderstandings about the Catholic Church - and I know from personal experience that it is extremely difficult to educate someone about the Church outside the the faith - that I know I must, in all fairness, approach Islam with a huge amount of humility.

My girlfriend of many years grew up Muslim. I have watched her struggle with Islam; I have watched the dynamics of her Muslim family. This did not give me a very favorable impression of Islam, to be honest. And, recently, during Easter service here in Boston, she was baptized into the Anglo-catholic tradition. She is, I should add, terrified to tell her parents or family. In short, I do have impressions of Islam from a personal perspective - though they may be misinformed, incorrect, or not applicable to Islam more generally.

In trying to educate myself about Islam, I have found that materials fall into two general sources. 1. academic sources that - to me, at least - seem to reek of PC bullshit, not to put too fine a point on it. 2. sources from the likes of people like Spencer - his books and videos such as, for example, “Islam: What the West Needs to Know” (can be found on Youtube.)

Spencer’s presentation of Islam seems unassailable, though I’m perfectly aware that it may well be a one-sided presentation of the facts. I am eager, in fact, to find a reputable discussion of those facts from another perspective, especially one that pointedly refutes his analysis. Indeed, I would love to see someone debate Spencer.

If anyone would point me in the right direction here, I’d appreciate it. Cheers to all, ~katz

Please don’t hold your breath for a reasoned rebuttal of Spencer. I’ve looked for several myself. Every “rebuttal” consists of ad hominem against Spencer, tu-quoque about Christianity, and taqiyya and kitman about the Muslim understanding of the Qur’an. Go read some of the reviews of his books by Muslims on Amazon - you’ll get the general drift.

None of Muslims here correct my understanding of their doctrine. When I bring in examples from the Hadith or Qur’an or Qur’anic commentary (Tafsir), they call me a bigot, ridicule me, or say that I’m being unchristian (tu-quoque), like on the other thread.

The fact that your g/f is terrified of telling her family about her baptism means that she’s afraid of ending up an honor killing statistic. As Mohammed said, “If anyone leaves their religion (meaning Islam), kill them.”
You can read the Sunni understanding of apostasy right out of their own mouths:

Thus, according to the Qur’an, as a result of the advent of the Messenger of God in the Banu Ishmael, those who rejected faith from amongst the polytheists were subject to the death penalty, under the provisions of the Divine Law relating to the advent of God’s messengers. If any of these polytheists had accepted Islam at the hands of the Messenger and later decides to return to his previous beliefs, then he too should be grouped with those who had rejected the call of the messenger and, thus, also be subjected to the same punishment. If seen in this perspective, the narrative under consideration actually means that those people who were to be punished, according to the law of God, had they not accepted Islam, would face the same punishment, if at any time during their lives they leave the folds of Islam and return to their previous beliefs.

But what do I know? I’m just a bigot - just the infidel version of lixy on this forum.

In other words, she should be afraid and probably would be best to not tell them. That, or tell them over the phone from a far away location.

She’s from a prominent (Bangladeshi) family of poets, judges, & journalists. Some of them live here in the US. I don’t think she’s going to tell them anything. If we were to get married, I’m not sure what we’d do.

So, you’re meaning to tell me that no one has responded to Spencer et al with reasoned, point-for-point rebuttals??

That says something none-too-positive about Islam & Muslims. It’s pathetic, actually. Why don’t the reasonable, peace-loving Muslims stand up and proffer a substantive, reasoned alternative? Perhaps these are the same Muslims who continually fail to speak out against the “Islamo-fascists.” They’d rather sit quietly and say nothing - and implicitly condone it. I know what I’m talking about because I’ve sat among them in living rooms and at dining tables for years, while recent world events transpired. Even after 9/11, they either said nothing - or they remarked casually that americans deserved it. And these are seemingly normal, highly educated (MIT, Wharton, etc.) people otherwise enjoying the liberty, security, & high standard of living here in America.

Nor does any of this bode well for the future of Christian-Islamic relations. Frightening.

At issue is the truth claims of the religion itself. What is the orthodox understanding of various Islamic doctrines? Well, I quoted Muslims themselves in their understanding of how to treat apostates above. Now we’re talking about how Islam needs better PR. What about my post above? Are these Muslims wrong in what they were saying, and I’ve read the wrong site, or not? No one cares to address that question, and that’s the exact thing Muslims do with Spencer, or they’ll quote a minority, unorthodox opinion in Islam and pass it off as orthodox, as Ali Eteraz likes to do. They trail off into various non sequiturs in an effort to redirect the conversation and not answer the original question.

Sounds like your g/f hopefully isn’t in as much danger of an honor killing as those poor girls in Texas recently, but it’s definitely good to be aware of their doctrine regarding the matter. It always helps to keep your eyes peeled.

Here’s one review I pulled off of Amazon, which is somewhat representative:
May this author burn in Hell; he’s the real intolerant person!!! Muhammmad (peace and blessings of Almighty God be upon him) was Ar-Rahmat ul-'Aalameen), a mercy to mankind. Go and read the Qur’aan to find about it. See what Muslims have to say. The Holy Qur’an says that when an evil doer comes to you with new, confirm it. My advice is to confirm the real truth, as only the truth can set you free from lies like that which the author so falsely describes as “truth.”

Great rebuttal there.

Here’s another:
umm ignorance is bliss. most of the arguments used are nothing new and are but a collection of old european prejudices ranging from brits to the french. well we muslims have seen this through the last 1000 years and there is no reason for us to suppose that its going to stop anytime soon. something akin to the protocols of the elders of zion. or antisemitism. actually most people dont even realise that being anti arab and anti muslim makes u an anti-semite. yes arabs too are semites. and even though there are non arab muslims, its the same as having non semitic jews, jewish tribes from africa, india are hardly considered semitic. so i would argue that mr robert spencer first and foremost is an antisemite and must be branded so.
now the prophet muhammed on whom eternal peace be bestowed upon as we wish for moses and jesus, was a great man, ayesha his supposedly 9 year old wife is controversial since not even she knew her true age when she was married. imagine how important was it keeping up with ur birthdays 1400 years ago, its a subject of considerable debate and the woman ayesha was considerably aware of herself and what was happening to her. if anyone cares to read the memoirs of ayesha, then they will find that she remembered her marriage quite clearly and was able to give consent to her marriage with maturity and clarity. she was also quite anxious for marriage and not a little proud at the thought of marrying the prophet. not exactly the sort of things that go around in a 9 year olds head. there is no doubt that she was young but exaclty how old remains a matter of conjecture. consider that even the prophets birthday is not exactly known and is a matter of debate.t hings in those days were not as precise as living in the modern age. consider this that there is very little physical evidence proving the existence of jesus, but for religous texts including the quran. as for the jewish tribe that was destroyed, please read deeper. they betrayed the prophet and planned his destruction. muhammed asked a jewish tribal leader what was the punishment for their behaviour and what was meted out was standard protocol of the time. muhammad was but a man, above all a human with the same human desires that flow in us, a man with power, a man who had to go through the same ordeals, temptations, greed, avarice that we go through in our daily lives. he was a man who brought the word of god to us but trembled at the thought of judgement day. he feared for his soul till the last day. he was not even certain where his destiny lay in heaven or hell though being a great prophet. certainly he might have made mistakes, errors, for which he was truly apologetic. does that not make him human and a better person. that is the miracle that the tv evangelicals can never fathom that a man like muhammad, a good man but decidedly very human with the self doubts, anxiety that afflicts us all at some stage. how could he have had the power to become the most powerful man on earth in the desert and that the former illiterate goat herder could lay waste to three of the biggest empires of that time, the roman empire, the persian empire, and the byzantine empire. and in its place came islam like a tidal wave of energy, soon omnipresent and still the fastest growing religion on the planet. can islam become the religion of mankind. is that what the fear is, it certainly was when the pope declared the crusades of the 11th century and now the neo crusades launched. the players are different but the game is ancient. muhammed is dead and gone. we are grateful to him for bringing the message but his job is over. for all the islamophobes we say have the courage to deal with us directly and not take cheap pot shots at a dead man. how would you feel if some one slandered your dead fathers life . as a son i would say do u really want a piece of me now. so for all the robert spencers of the world remember truth will prevail and islam will only be stronger. for every crusade there is a Saladin waiting to happen. amen

“Islamophobe”… “fastest growing religion”… “Mohammed made mistakes but was still a good man.”

You get the idea.[/quote]

The first one was funny as hell. Kind of like that quote “Death to those who call islam violent.”

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
lixy wrote:

Let’s get one thing straight: Islam’s PR is just horrible.

Thanks for your response - I’ll formulate some specific questions for you, and I am eager to hear what you have to say.

Meantime, on the above: I’m not sure it’s only about formal PR, though no doubt that’s a problem as well. Surely there are Muslim scholars who have the time & resources to rebut Spencer, right? Do they not think its worth their time? Are they for one reason or another bound from doing so? [/quote]

Conversely, when the Catholic Church is criticized, hundreds of clergy, scholars, apologists, etc., come out of the woodwork to affirm the criticism, or to contextualize it, or to explain it away.

Where are the equivalents in Islam??? And I don’t mean an orchestrated PR campaign, I just mean articles & books and videos produced by individuals, institutions, think tanks, etc.

~katz[/quote]

Like I noted in my earlier post, all the institutions, think tanks and scholars that have the resources to be heard by the regular Bostonian are Wahabis. They are the only ones with the money and drive to spread the word about their cult which some would associate with Islam. You have to understand that people in general naturally reject their Salafist interpretation of the Scriptures, and as a result, they have to work pretty hard to lure new adepts. Me, I don’t feel the need to spread around my personal view of Mohamed’s message. I’ll gladly discuss it if prompted, but proselytism is not something that appeals to me. The Quran might be hard to decipher given its language and style, but its essence is all too obvious - it jumped at me after a couple of readings. Point being that misinterpreting it takes serious dedication and is far from the path of least resistance.

And you have to remember that Islam (at least in its original form) doesn’t use any sort of clergy or institution remotely comparable to the Church. So don’t expect there to be “equivalents” of the Catholic Church in Islam. I’m quite happy with that arrangement and wouldn’t change it for the world. If it gives the bunch passively awaiting to be fed information the wrong idea about my faith, so be it.

Just because a group of fuckers blow up the twin towers means were all bad? This Islam hate is getting worse and worse. Bush is christian. He is the cause of the war in Iraq. Am I writing a longass post saying “10 Reasons Why Christianity Isn’t a Religion of Peace?” You Christians aren’t that peaceful either. Stop acusing all muslims. Present all the facts. Look at the children in USA. Now compare them to the children in Muslim countries. Which are more obedient?

Lets say Christianity was the “true” religion.

You seem like a numbers man. Ill give you numbers.

“Derived from the Latin gluttire, meaning to gulp down or swallow, gluttony is the over-indulgence and over-consumption of food, drink, or intoxicants to the point of waste. In some Christian denominations, it is considered one of the seven deadly sins�??a misplaced desire of food or its withholding from the needy.[1]”

“Currently, about 31%, or about 59 million people, are obese, which is defined as roughly 30 or more pounds over a healthy weight. Almost 65% are either obese or overweight, 10 to 30 pounds over a healthy weight, which increases their chances of developing diabetes, heart disease, some types of cancer and a host of other health problems.”

“Most U.S. adult citizens adhere to Christianity (78.5%[2]).”

“Population: 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.)”

Now. As you can see, gluttony is one of the seven deadly sins. About 65% of usa is overweight or obese. 78.5% of the population is christian in usa. The population is approximately 300 million. Lets mix these up shall we.

First, We’ll take the 300 million. Multiply it by the amount of overweight/obese people in the states. That gives us 195 million. Now, lets multiply it by the amount of christians. That gives us 153 075 000. About 153 million people.

Lets take the origional number of 300 million. Multiply it by the amount of christians in usa. We get 235.5 million people.

Lets divide this by the number we got before of the approximate obese americans. 235.5 / 153 = 0.6496815286624203821656050955414 which we can round to .65. Lets multiply this by 100 to get a percentage shall we. 65%.

That means 65% of christians in usa are breaking atleast one deadly sin.

65% of your people are violating a deadly sin. What do you have to say about that. I doubt theres 153 Million muslims u can say the same about.

Before attacking another religion, get ur facts straight… I’ve read lixy’s posts, and now hes not the only one defending islam on this forum.

[quote]pat wrote:

I would say violent acts and idiotic protests by muslims have given the world this bad impression. You cannot spin pure unadulterated stupidity as displayed with things such as the cartoon protests or the “Teddy bear” teachers. This is not the fault of wahabism or anything else, this is purely the fault of muslims themselves.
[/quote]

Pat, that would seem to be true, but couldn’t this possibly just be a fringe element of Islam that is “tainting” our view of the Qur’an & their faith?

I guess I take your original post as asserting the following: Islam is in its very essentials a violent religion - indeed, it cannot be anything but violent unless it’s being practiced by “Muslims” who are either ignorant of their faith, or in (c)overt apostasy.

The fact of violence committed by some Muslims in the name of Islam, I think you’d have to agree, wouldn’t seem to support this assertion.

[quote]ahzaz wrote:
Just because a group of fuckers blow up the twin towers means were all bad? This Islam hate is getting worse and worse. Bush is christian. He is the cause of the war in Iraq. Am I writing a longass post saying “10 Reasons Why Christianity Isn’t a Religion of Peace?” You Christians aren’t that peaceful either. Stop acusing all muslims. Present all the facts. Look at the children in USA. Now compare them to the children in Muslim countries. Which are more obedient?

Lets say Christianity was the “true” religion.

You seem like a numbers man. Ill give you numbers.

“Derived from the Latin gluttire, meaning to gulp down or swallow, gluttony is the over-indulgence and over-consumption of food, drink, or intoxicants to the point of waste. In some Christian denominations, it is considered one of the seven deadly sins�??a misplaced desire of food or its withholding from the needy.[1]”

“Currently, about 31%, or about 59 million people, are obese, which is defined as roughly 30 or more pounds over a healthy weight. Almost 65% are either obese or overweight, 10 to 30 pounds over a healthy weight, which increases their chances of developing diabetes, heart disease, some types of cancer and a host of other health problems.”

“Most U.S. adult citizens adhere to Christianity (78.5%[2]).”

“Population: 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.)”

Now. As you can see, gluttony is one of the seven deadly sins. About 65% of usa is overweight or obese. 78.5% of the population is christian in usa. The population is approximately 300 million. Lets mix these up shall we.

First, We’ll take the 300 million. Multiply it by the amount of overweight/obese people in the states. That gives us 195 million. Now, lets multiply it by the amount of christians. That gives us 153 075 000. About 153 million people.

Lets take the origional number of 300 million. Multiply it by the amount of christians in usa. We get 235.5 million people.

Lets divide this by the number we got before of the approximate obese americans. 235.5 / 153 = 0.6496815286624203821656050955414 which we can round to .65. Lets multiply this by 100 to get a percentage shall we. 65%.

That means 65% of christians in usa are breaking atleast one deadly sin.

65% of your people are violating a deadly sin. What do you have to say about that. I doubt theres 153 Million muslims u can say the same about.

Before attacking another religion, get ur facts straight… I’ve read lixy’s posts, and now hes not the only one defending islam on this forum.[/quote]

Look up the definition of “Red Herring”…This is a ginormous one. It is also a strawman of vast proportions. Perhaps it is a Straw Red Herring!

[quote]pat wrote:
This post right here exemplified exactly what the problems are. [/quote]

Do tell…

Given that there are organized movements dedicated to demonizing Islam, I’ll say that developing some PR wouldn’t hurt the image of Islam.

That is true. But sitting down and praying that Ben-Laden and his crew will stop butchering people is not going to do much. That is why I believe some semblance of unity and PR skills might actually do some good.

I didn’t place the blame on “others”. I wrote that ignorance is taking the best out of people and the Iraq war made sure the US’ image in Muslims’ eyes is forever associated with hegemony, colonialism, plunder and such horrific images as Abu Ghraib. If there was a chance of dialog prior to 2003, it has been squashed a bit over five years ago.

It never said the war on Iraq had anything to do with “the world’s view of islam” (although, the terrorist-land it’s turned into is not helping). In fact, it has nothing to do with “the world”. The sentiments you and your pals harbor are luckily concentrated in a few parts of the globe. Elsewhere, people know better than to amalgamate the Palestinian resistance or Iraqis shooting at Americans with Islam.

Who spun what?

Violent acts displayed by some people make some idiots think everyone of the same faith must be a nutjob, and by extension, the religion itself must be wicked.

Tell us something we don’t know.

Actually, Wahabism is at the core of the issue. Like it or not, it has caused 9/11, 11/3 and 7/7 which cost the lives of thousands. It has also caused a long and bloody civil war in Algeria, shed much blood in Somalia and all the horrors under the Talibans. Palestinians are influenced to a great extent by Ryad and its obscure and destructive ideology.

So, go ahead and ignore it if you must, but anyone who has ever lived in a majority-Muslim country will tell you how much money is injected by the Al-Sauds to spread their cult.

Read on:

You’re making it very hard for me to keep a cool head. I am a Muslim and I strongly resent your not-so-subtle insinuation that I am somehow at fault for a bunch of kooks getting riled up over drawings.

Get your head out of the gutter if you want this discussion to continue nicely.

You got that right, Cpt. Obvious!

I think that it’s not salvageable at this point. Take Iraqis for example. Between a radical Islamist trying to hunt down Americans and an American trying to hunt down radical Islamists (and let’s not forget Nationalists, which they file under the umbrella term “insurgents”), the Iraqi will 9 times out of 10 side with the Islamist. And there’s absolutely nothing you can do about that. And if I was an Iraqi, you can bet your ass that I would do the same, and so would you in their situation.

Remember what I wrote in an earlier post about point of no return? Most people wouldn’t consider me “ignorant”, yet I would make that choice in an eyeblink. So just imagine what the ignorants would do.

Catch the drift?

I think I’ve used this image before but it’s worth repeating. You’re like the little kid stomping his feet because gravity smashed his ice cream cone on the floor. You bitch about something on which nobody, no institution and no government has any say in. Islam has a problem alright, and that’s its inability to defend itself in the face of such idiotic claims as Wilders’. Luckily, the bulk of Dutch and Europeans know all about that speech and did everything they could to distance themselves from such junk. You, I know your position perfectly well (as I’m sure everyone else) and you can’t be bothered to listen to reason. You cling to Muslim are at fault, ergo, Islam must be the cause. You expect things to change overnight while being aware of the contretemps your taxdollars are creating. And most of all, you lump in 1.3 billion people together and not only lay responsibly for your misconceptions on them, but expect them to act as a monolithic bloc.

It’s just silly.

[quote]lixy wrote:

Like I noted in my earlier post, all the institutions, think tanks and scholars that have the resources to be heard by the regular Bostonian are Wahabis.

[/quote]

First, is the cost simply to start a blog that prohibitive?

Just on pure numbers basis - how many moderate, non-wahabi muslims do you think there here in the US? Presumably they are fairly well-off, with sufficient time? I know many of them. Why are they silent? Why don’t we hear reasoned rebuttals from Muslim scholars at American universities - who have all the resources they could possibly want?

Out of all those people, no one takes the time to rebut the critics of their faith? Do they not care? When I mentioned the Catholic church, I meant that the faithful - of all stripes, some wackos, but most are reasonable lay-people - do their best to explain their faith to its critics. Why not Muslims also? You have to admit, there is really something wrong here.

Second, to use a link from above…

http://understanding-islam.com/related/text.asp?type=article&aid=241

…how is a non-Muslim respectfully supposed to understand this command? I guess that’s my first specific question.

Yeah the Muslims need a greased up PR machine like the Catholics have to cover up their gross distortions of history, roles of accomplice in murder, and general displays of greed, hatred and avarice that have permeated history since the inception of a papal authority.

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
pat wrote:

I would say violent acts and idiotic protests by muslims have given the world this bad impression. You cannot spin pure unadulterated stupidity as displayed with things such as the cartoon protests or the “Teddy bear” teachers. This is not the fault of wahabism or anything else, this is purely the fault of muslims themselves.

Pat, that would seem to be true, but couldn’t this possibly just be a fringe element of Islam that is “tainting” our view of the Qur’an & their faith?

I guess I take your original post as asserting the following: Islam is in its very essentials a violent religion - indeed, it cannot be anything but violent unless it’s being practiced by “Muslims” who are either ignorant of their faith, or in (c)overt apostasy.

The fact of violence committed by some Muslims in the name of Islam, I think you’d have to agree, wouldn’t seem to support this assertion.[/quote]

The original post was not my words but was interesting nevertheless. The intent was to continue a fresh dialog about it. Many times on a forum that requires being inflammatory which it was and was successful.

I personally do not know enough about islam to speak intelligently about it’s past, tenants, or true belief system. What I see is the behavior of it’s practitioners. You seem to have en masse those who practice and/or preach hate, intolerance, and violence or those who condone this behavior either through their words or their lack of condemnation. I have heard the smatterings of some who wish to change it, but even those considered moderates such as America’s own CIAR, would like to see the U.S. under Sharia Law.

Of the muslims who are neither, I just see a complete ignorance of the problem. That if there is any problem with islam is because of Israel or the actions the U.S. and not with what is being wrought from with in. Which is in itself a problem.

In the end, I do not really know why there are so many muslims who are so violent. If it is really because of their religion then it needs to go. I would consider Atheism a better option. Religion is supposed to make you better, if it makes you worse, then whats the point?

What I would like to believe is that there is good in islam and it has just been perverted and hijacked by a bunch of freaks and it really is a peaceful religion in it’s purest form. I hope that is the case, but the muslims need to start making that happen and stop supporting murderers and thugs and start acting right.

[quote]ahzaz wrote:

That means 65% of christians in usa are breaking atleast one deadly sin.

65% of your people are violating a deadly sin. What do you have to say about that. I doubt theres 153 Million muslims u can say the same about.

Before attacking another religion, get ur facts straight… I’ve read lixy’s posts, and now hes not the only one defending islam on this forum.[/quote]

LMFAO! Well I’m glad you’re here to defend Islam. I wouldn’t want you on “my” side. Carry on.

[quote]hedo wrote:
The turning point came on 9-11. You attacked an enemy with the ability to respond and the nerve to do so. Even your idol Osamma has realized how big a mistake that was.
[/quote]

Are you serious?

You can’t possibly pin the blame on a whole following/nation/population if the perpetrators were a select few.

To then say that they all idolize them is ignorance at its best.

Why not, everyone blames America for every evil in the world, yet it’s just a select few in office who actually have the power to use our armed forces.

If the excuse works for Muslims, why not Americans?

[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Why not, everyone blames America for every evil in the world, yet it’s just a select few in office who actually have the power to use our armed forces.

If the excuse works for Muslims, why not Americans?[/quote]

Er… because that would be incredibly hypocritical A. And B, they don’t blame America, they blame its government.