#1 Seduction Artist in the World 2012 - Arash Dibazar

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Idiocy is not manipulation. In the end, I suppose I was looking for reassurance, which I got once I was able to talk about what happened, so it could perhaps be called a shittest, but coldly calculating? Ha, no. ALL of our fights have been based in being fearful of how much we like each other, and one of us feeling vulnerable as a result. They’ve also all been the lead-in to a conversation that increased intimacy or commitment. [/quote]

First yes, most of the time its instinctive.

The “they act cold, calculating and utterly ruthless” bit is what it looks like fromn the outside, I know it looks different from the inside, however to use a staple “hypergamy does not care”.

Female instincts are utterly ruthless, as they must be for the survival of the species, but at a time where there is no check on them whatsoever you either learn the art of the mindfuck or you can tattoo “yes dear” right on your forehead.

Not only that, they are highly dysfunctional in this day and age because we do not really need to reward athletes, bikers and career criminals because they do not really comntribute to society much.

Joe Beta however does and its really, really, really bad that to work hard, get a decent job, find a nice girl is a script that can lead to financial and emotional ruin.

Finally, I noticed that he did not supplicate, when you pulled back, so did he, I bet when you argued he got loud too.

I hate to say it, but this is textbook game and what you did was a) a social dominance test, and b) an investment test which is interesting because that means that you have accepted him as top dog.

You have found your Alpha, congratulations.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Idiocy is not manipulation. In the end, I suppose I was looking for reassurance, which I got once I was able to talk about what happened, so it could perhaps be called a shittest, but coldly calculating? Ha, no. ALL of our fights have been based in being fearful of how much we like each other, and one of us feeling vulnerable as a result. They’ve also all been the lead-in to a conversation that increased intimacy or commitment. [/quote]

First yes, most of the time its instinctive.

The “they act cold, calculating and utterly ruthless” bit is what it looks like fromn the outside, I know it looks different from the inside, however to use a staple “hypergamy does not care”.

Female instincts are utterly ruthless, as they must be for the survival of the species, but at a time where there is no check on them whatsoever you either learn the art of the mindfuck or you can tattoo “yes dear” right on your forehead.

Not only that, they are highly dysfunctional in this day and age because we do not really need to reward athletes, bikers and career criminals because they do not really comntribute to society much.

Joe Beta however does and its really, really, really bad that to work hard, get a decent job, find a nice girl is a script that can lead to financial and emotional ruin.

Finally, I noticed that he did not supplicate, when you pulled back, so did he, I bet when you argued he got loud too.

I hate to say it, but this is textbook game and what you did was a) a social dominance test, and b) an investment test which is interesting because that means that you have accepted him as top dog.

You have found your Alpha, congratulations. [/quote]

I understand what it looks like to you from the outside; I’m offering you a view to the inside. There is nothing cold or calculating about it, it’s all confusion and worry. In this specific case because I have to decide soon where I’m going to live, in his town or closer to my new work. His town is very much HIS town and if things don’t ultimately work out between us it’s going to be difficult.

He’s not confused as to my motives or internal processes because they always come spilling out eventually. And then we talk about them. So I would say that to him, my behavior reflects what he knows of me (that I’m a dumbass, lol). He doesn’t see it as ruthless.

Some of our ruptures have been about his insecurities, but I can’t speak to those except from my own perspective. They could certainly be called shittests, though, and we’ve run essentially the same playbook, except with me pulling back and waiting, then ultimately addressing the underlying concern.

He has felt in the past that I have more options than I realize (for sex, boyfriends) and that ultimately I will want something different/better. Except I’m not a grass-is-greener kind of person, and I like HIM and have since the very first day. Which I think he believes now…and come to think of it, probably has for a while. So I suppose now my insecurities are dominating. Although I think maybe this week put the last of those to rest. Maybe.

These is no need for a social dominance test; we’re both savvy enough to know where we fall in that, and we’re each very clear that we feel lucky to have the other. We’re a well-matched couple, for all sorts of reasons. Is he my alpha? Maybe. He’s a strong, smart guy. I respect him and he makes me tingle. But I know where his weaknesses are, too, because he’s very free about sharing them.

To me, that’s real confidence, whereas attempting to maintain a facade of alpha invincibility smacks of insecurity. He knows my weaknesses, too, or at least the most significant of them. It’s okay. It’ll either work or it won’t, but if not it won’t be because of deception on either of our parts.

And lastly, we don’t yell. Yet. :slight_smile:

The only thing I’m questioning is the girls talent level.

Hot 18 year old girls don’t need the Internet to meet guys.

Still, even if she’s passable, it goes to show you women give two fucks about age

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WOMEN, FOR THE CLUELESS LADS LOOKING TO GET LAID.

TO THE GUYS THAT POST HERE: You are pathetic. You come here with your tales of wuss-dom and wonder why the girl you have a hard-on for always goes for the prick/jock.

Well here’s what’s it all about coming from the mouth of a jock who at the age of 28 has bagged more girls than some of you chodes will bang in a lifetime, hell 3 lifetimes (I am the guy who was probably fukking the girl you pine over like a wuss-bag in your miserable high school existence.)

Consider this a shining beacon of male-reason to cut through all the bullshyt I read on this forum, that in the end only serves to emasculate you poor, clueless bastards even more.

THE CARDINAL RULES:

  1. 95% OF WOMEN ARE UTTERLY WORTHLESS, (OTHER THAN FOR SEX OF COURSE) AND ULTIMATELY REPLACEABLE.

I could really give a fukk about most of the women I meet, even most of the ones I end up fukking. They are lame, boring, kind of stupid, and usually lacking in any kind of original thought. They are utterly self-important, self centered and basically wait around for the man in their life to give them some kind of purpose outside of school/job/or whatever sport they engage in.

Another thing that annoys me is that a lot of guys fall into the delusion of getting into “platonic relationships” with girls… what a crock of shyt!! Girls really have nothing to contribute to hanging out with the boys other than as a conduit to meeting other, hotter girls… other than that, females are pretty worthless to men. Most men just don’t have the balls to admit it to themselves.

Therefore, gentlemen, simplify your lives thusly. So: regarding Girls: - if you’re not fukkin’ them - drop 'em… unless she has hot friends. Other than that - they are utterly worthless to you.

Once in a blue moon, you’ll actually meet a girl who is actually worth some kind of effort. But this is a very dicy judgment call, and I would assume most of you guys are too inexperienced with women and stlll prone to mushy touchy-feely bullshyt emotions to make this distinction yet. You have to muck through a lot of sluts and ****-teases to find some quality. Quality, of course, is individual criteria you guys will create as you gain experience with women. And even when you find quality, there’s no guarantee it’ll last.

  1. YOU SHOULD NEVER REALLY GIVE A FLYING FUKK WHAT A GIRL THINKS ABOUT YOU ANYWAY. DO WHATEVER THE HELL YOU WANT TO DO AND NEVER TAKE ANY BULLSHYT FROM A WOMAN. REMEMBER, YOU’RE A MAN NOT SOME EMASCULATED PVSSY. IF YOU ARE NOT GETTING WHAT YOU WANT OUT OF A “RELATIONSHIP” YOU WALK WITHOUT HESITATION. PERIOD. AND DON’T LOOK BACK. THERE’S ALWAYS ANOTHER ONE.

ONCE YOU GIVE UP YOUR POWER IN A RELATIONSHIP, YOUR WOMAN WILL LOSE ALL RESPECT FOR YOU, AND IT’S ALL DOWNHILL FROM THERE.

  1. DON’T EVER TAKE ADVICE FROM WOMEN ABOUT WOMEN. THEY ARE UTTERLY CLUELESS. WHY? BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE TOTALLY FULL OF SHYT, AND HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY REALLY WANT. THEY’LL ONLY TELL WHAT YOU THINK YOU WANT TO HEAR, AND USUALLY IT HAS NO FOUNDATION IN REALITY.

IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME: TAKE THEIR ADVICE AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. DON’T SAY YOU WEREN’T WARNED.

  1. THE GUYS THAT SCORE TONS OF PVSSY ARE THE ONES YOU SHOULD BE ASKING FOR ADVICE, BECAUSE THEY SECRETLY KNOW WHAT THEY (WOMEN) REALLY WANT:

CHICKS GET OFF ON POWER. WHY DO YOU THINK THEY GO FOR THE JOCKS AND THE DUDES WITH THE DEFINED PECS AND SIXPACKS, AND NOT SOME FLABBY, TERRIBLE-POETRY-SPOUTING LOSER LIKE YOU? POWER, BABY.

SO CALL A GIRL OUT WHEN SHE SAYS SOME STUPID SHYT OR TRIES TO PULL SOME CRAP ON YOU, HAVE SOME BALLS AND TAKE HER OFF THAT DAMN PEDESTAL. CHANCES ARE SHE’S NOT EVEN THAT HOT, DUMBA$$.

IT’S THE WHOLE Alpha Male THING, ADAPTED TO HUMANS. ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT. NOTHING GETS A GIRL OFF LIKE POWER. (like a guy who isn’t afraid to tell a girl - overtly or covertly - that he wants to get into her pants)… THIS POWER… JERKS LIKE ME HAVE IT. “NICE GUY” PUSSIES LIKE YOU DON’T. THAT’S WHY YOU JERK YOURSELF OFF TO SLEEP EVERY NIGHT.

WHAT THEY REALLY WANT IS TO BE TREATED LIKE DIRT. THAT MEANS FUKK THE LIVING SHYT OUT OF THEM, MULTIPLE TIMES IN ONE NIGHT TO MIND BLOWING ORGASMS, AND THEN DISAPPEAR FOR AWHILE. YOU’LL SEE HOW THEY ALWAYS COME BACK FOR MORE. TO THIS EXTENT, YOU SHOULD ALWAYS HAVE MORE THAN ONE GIRL. THIS KEEPS STUPID HEAD-TRIP PLAYING BYTCHES IN CHECK. AND OF COURSE, VARIETY IS THE SPICE OF LIFE (to borrow the lame cliche…hey it’s true !! )

  1. HAVE SOME BALLS AND BE A MAN. ACTION, ATTITUDE AND NOT OVERANALYSIS IS THE KEY TO GETTING LAID TO THAT EFFECT, IF YOU LOOK LIKE A WUSSY, YOU’LL BE TREATED LIKE A WUSSY. GET OFF YOUR FAT, LAZY ASS AND GET IN THE GYM. BEAT THE JOCKS AT THEIR OWN GAME. STOP LAMENTING THE UNFAIRNESS OF IT ALL. GET OVER THAT SHYT. LIFE ISN’T FAIR. YOU WANT TO START FUKKIN HOT BYTCHES? GET OFF YOUR ASS AND MAKE IT HAPPEN.

  2. IF YOU HATE YOURSELF OR THE WAY YOU LOOK NONE OF WHAT I SAID IN POSTS 1-5 WILL MAKE A BIT OF DIFFERENCE. YOU HAVE TO REMAKE YOURSELF INTO A PIMP. THIS IS WHERE BECOMING FRIENDS WITH A CERTIFIED MACK WORKS WONDERS. IF YOUR CURRENT INCARNATION IS NOT GETTING YOU LAID , WISHING THAT GIRLS SEE YOU FOR “WHO YOU REALLY ARE” IS NOTHING BUT A FUKKIN SELF DELUSION. GET OFF THAT FUKKIN CLOUD, AND START DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

  3. DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GET OFF THIS SITE. THIS SITE WILL NOT GET YOU LAID. IT WILL TURN YOU INTO AN EMASCULATED SHE-MALE.

  4. ONLY UGLY, SEXUALLY FRUSTRATED, PLAIN JANE, AND/OR FAT CHICKS, POST ON THESE FORUMS (and the Internet in general). THE TRULY INSANE POPULAR, HOT BYTCHES YOU WANT TO BE FUKKIN ARE OUT GETTING RAILED BY THEIR A$$HOLE BOYFRIENDS AT THIS VERY MINUTE OR CRUISING FOR DYCK AT THE HOT NIGHTSPOT AS WE SPEAK. THEY DON’T SIT AT HOME AND CRUISE THE NET.

  5. LADIES, I COULD GIVE A FLYING FUKK ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS TO THIS POST. WHY? BECAUSE AS MUCH AS YOU HATE GUYS LIKE ME ON PAPER, WHEN YOU MEET US OUT IN THE REAL WORLD, WE MAKE YOUR PUZZIES WET.

  6. IF YOU ARE A GUY READING THIS AND THINK I’M A PRICK, CONGRATULATIONS, GIVE YOURSELF A PAT ON THE BACK.

BUT THEN AGAIN, IN ONE HOUR ONE OF MY FB (**** buddy) WILL BE GETTING OFF WORK AND I WILL FUKK HER TIL 5AM. WHAT ABOUT YOU? THIS ISN’T TO BE AN ******* (even though I am) , IT’S THE RAW, UNADULTERATED TRUTH.

IF YOU CAN’T STOMACH THIS, AND THIS KIND OF BRUTAL TALK STILL HASN’T INSPIRED YOU INTO ACTION… LOOK BETWEEN YOUR LEGS AND CHECK IF YOU STILL HAVE A PAIR DOWN THERE.

  1. RELATIONSHIPS ARE HIGHLY OVERRATED. LOOK AT GEORGE CLOONEY, HE’S GOT THE RIGHT IDEA. When you get married you might as well hand your testicles over to your wife. So I’ll go kicking and screaming til the bitter end.

  2. REAL MEN EAT MEAT. GIRLS SECRETLY THINK THAT VEGETARIANS ARE PVSSIES. MANY OF MY ATTRACTIVE LADY FRIENDS (i.e. FBs) HAVE TOLD ME THIS IN CONFIDENCE. I JUST HAD TO THROW THAT IN THERE. SOMEHOW I WOULDN’T BE SURPRISED TO FIND A LOT OF VEGETARIANS ON THIS SITE.

HAVE A NICE DAY,
Awesome post I stole from elsewhere…

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
I dont know how to put this, but, HOW COME THAT SHIT WORKS?
[/quote]

Because many people have problems / issues.

Question: Do you think you leave women better for having known you?
[/quote]

They can be.

I can led the horse to water, but I cannot make it drink. [/quote]

It really depends on the horse. If all you care about is getting laid, clearly you’ve got things figured out. I have no reason to believe that besides some embellishing, that your stories aren’t true.

But the girls who really just care about getting laid, the girls who are easily susceptible to this charm – in my experience – are already on the wrong path. That’s not to say that sex isn’t important to her, but to a “normal” girl, it’s not THAT important to forego the drawn out “is he relationship material? is he a provider?” assessment. Many of those girls are on a path where they genuinely get drunk with the power and, while they seem to be craving some sort of emotional attachment, just end up empty and alone when all is said and done.

I don’t think those girls can be saved, at least not in any polite or respectable way. You can help them hit rock bottom sooner, but that’s about it.

Now, if you’re objectively looking for just sex, and don’t actually care about her beyond that… that’s fine. If you’re in the moment and don’t care about how many guys she’s playing, and who she was with before she came over to your place, and who she’s with when she leaves your place, then you’re all good.

But if you do care about those things, these are the wrong girls.

I’m actually curious if you have what it takes to find a somewhat more quality girl. It sounds like you’ve mastered the skill of picking up an emotionally vapid/damaged girl. Not knocking that. But the game does change a bit with higher-class (?) girls. It’s still there, it’s just… different; more subtle, more drawn-out.

I’m not going to say I’m any good at it. Just that it’s different. E.g., issues of trust and respect don’t usually enter into relationships with girls who aren’t trustworthy or respectable.

Pretty sure that 18 year old virgin girl was a 300lb sweaty white dude.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
But is my life not better than that of those who have fallen for her sweet smile and grazy hot sex?
[/quote]
Maybe.

But it would be even better yet if you’d seen this all coming, walked away, and spent your time, energy and intellect on something more productive.

[quote]orion wrote:
Should I not know how bad it really is?
[/quote]
Do you purposefully hit your own hand with a hammer so as to know just how bad it really hurts? Purposefully enrage a feral dog, just to see how ferociously it attacks?

You are smart enough and “naturally” experienced enough to know “how bad it really is” without going in search of unnecessary exposure to ugliness and pain.

[quote]orion wrote:
If you constantly avoid pain and unpleasantness, how do you grow?
[/quote]
It is impossible to “constantly avoid pain and unpleasantness.” Life does not allow it. In fact, “natural” experiences of that pain and unpleasantness will show you exactly where you need to grow, and help you to realize that growth.

I hate to say it, O, but I’m getting the sense that you have taken this “Let’s experiment!” “It’s all a game!” “It’s a learning experience!” approach because that allows you to keep it from being truly “real.” It puts a protective, intellectualized wall between your “relationships” and you.

I mean, none of this really means anything to you, right?

You’re safe.
[/quote]

This hit home for me.

I find it hard to believe most anything unless I see it myself, or prove it myself; turn them into an “experiment”, as it were.

I dated a married woman, despite “knowing better”. I needed to understand why that was a societal taboo. And now I do. I have the experience to tell someone not to get involved in an affair, and exactly why not.

I dated a stripper, despite “knowing better”. She had just started, so I thought maybe this was an exception to the rule. It wasn’t. But I had to know.

I got involved with a coworker, a team member. We both kept our jobs, even if we weren’t on speaking terms (escaped that relatively unscathed). But again, I had to see it for myself.

In other arenas, I managed to drive a sports-car in the middle of a field, while experientially trying to understand vehicle dynamics. I experimented with waterboarding (myself) for the sake of understanding that experience. 1 second of that was enough to understand the concept. I shot myself at point blank range with a high-powered airsoft pistol to get an idea of how much damage it can or can’t do. Etc. etc.

But even so, most of the ‘experiments’ were still low-risk, in situations that were as controlled as they could be. A bit of extrapolation gave me a much more visceral understanding of the ‘real-world’ consequences.

Does that make me better, because I have actual experience to back things up? Maybe. Sometimes it makes me come across as arrogant.

But with respect to ‘intellectualization’. Apparently I do that all the time.

Which is [one of] my dilemma[s]. There’s really no substitute for first-hand knowledge, but is the pursuit of first-hand knowledge causing more problems than it’s solving?

I like Lorez, Chushin and Orion’s perspectives. They all make sense.

That would really depends on what’s your intention with your first hand knowledge. It seems to me that you are doing it so you can warn your peers about girls/relationships. Those technical stuff, we all do it. :slight_smile: It’s fun and usually no one get hurt. Usually…

But like Orion said, you can lead the horse to water, but you cannot make it drink it.

We all try to make our horses drink water, but usually it doesn’t happen. That’s where Chushin’s enlightenment comes in:

As much as we do not like seeing our love ones/friends walking into a Lion’s Den and either barely escape or get mauled, there is nothing we can do about it. How else they will grow on their own? What are you going to do if they won’t grow? We need to handle our inner-self first and then either walk away from them or offer support to them when they need it.

Shit ain’t easy, but if it was - everyone would do it.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Some of our ruptures have been about his insecurities, but I can’t speak to those except from my own perspective. They could certainly be called shittests, though, and we’ve run essentially the same playbook, except with me pulling back and waiting, then ultimately addressing the underlying concern.
[/quote]

Men dont shittest, men are either neurotic or insecure.

No worries, we all are to some degree.

The reason why its not a shittest is because he has neither the instinctive need to throw them out there, he has no strong emotional reaction to it and you can actually win by playing the game.

A shittest is a shitty test because all possible answers are wrong.

Having said that, you might want to lead him there for he is right, you do have more options than you realize and you are a the grass is greener person you cannot not be if you are halfway female.

http://marriedmansexlife.com/take-the-red-pill/

[quote]therajraj wrote:
The only thing I’m questioning is the girls talent level.

Hot 18 year old girls don’t need the Internet to meet guys.

Still, even if she’s passable, it goes to show you women give two fucks about age[/quote]

Passable.

Nice ass too.

WHat it also shows that you can have a profile that would be considered suicide and it really is not.

I only messaged the hottest of the hot and I got a reply every single time.

Ands its not magic either, it is something from her profile and a mild neg, sometimes a not so mild one.

Like this:

Hi there.

As I wander through the valley of misogyny, I want you to know that a love for Bill Murray is almost, almost, a redeeming feature.

Well done, kind Lady, well done.

While you still have lady parts that indeed do drive you insane, I am relieved that you at least have the spark of a soul.

And taste, let us not forget good taste, it is, after all, important.

Keep up the good work of liking Bill Murray.

An image of null
Jan 27, 2013 â?? 10:18pm
Wouldn’t be to sure about me having a soul… My taste on the other hand is nothing but impeccable- only the best and Hendrick’s gin :slight_smile:


Don’t worry, Orion -

they doubted Einstein also.

you are just ahead of your time.

to look at the naked truth is difficult for some, like looking into the sun.

keep speaking the truth, for the truth shall set you free~

[quote]jasmincar wrote:
Why is a grown men doing all that crap and posting it on a forum? I am half your age and I think you are pathetic and childish. I feel ashamed just reading this through my computer. You are in personnal bankrupt. [/quote]

I am a pathetic excuse for a real man.

A hollow shell.

Fortunately, that makes it nigh impossible to give a fuck so I am afraid your efforts, as minimal as they were, are wasted.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
I dont know how to put this, but, HOW COME THAT SHIT WORKS?
[/quote]

Because many people have problems / issues.

Question: Do you think you leave women better for having known you?
[/quote]

They can be.

I can led the horse to water, but I cannot make it drink. [/quote]

It really depends on the horse. If all you care about is getting laid, clearly you’ve got things figured out. I have no reason to believe that besides some embellishing, that your stories aren’t true.

I’m actually curious if you have what it takes to find a somewhat more quality girl. It sounds like you’ve mastered the skill of picking up an emotionally vapid/damaged girl. Not knocking that. But the game does change a bit with higher-class (?) girls. It’s still there, it’s just… different; more subtle, more drawn-out.
[/quote]

I leave a lot out so it probably evens out.

I dont lie though, I like the “this is bullshit” response.

Shows how clueless some guys really are.

As for women with more class, first, you dont know that until you really know her which takes time. A lot of it, actually.

Then, I do better with more intelligent women, I do not play the retard very well.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
The only thing I’m questioning is the girls talent level.

Hot 18 year old girls don’t need the Internet to meet guys.

Still, even if she’s passable, it goes to show you women give two fucks about age[/quote]

Passable.

Nice ass too.

WHat it also shows that you can have a profile that would be considered suicide and it really is not.

I only messaged the hottest of the hot and I got a reply every single time.

Ands its not magic either, it is something from her profile and a mild neg, sometimes a not so mild one.

Like this:

Hi there.

As I wander through the valley of misogyny, I want you to know that a love for Bill Murray is almost, almost, a redeeming feature.

Well done, kind Lady, well done.

While you still have lady parts that indeed do drive you insane, I am relieved that you at least have the spark of a soul.

And taste, let us not forget good taste, it is, after all, important.

Keep up the good work of liking Bill Murray.

An image of null
Jan 27, 2013 â?? 10:18pm
Wouldn’t be to sure about me having a soul… My taste on the other hand is nothing but impeccable- only the best and Hendrick’s gin :slight_smile: [/quote]

Ha, well done. That approach does work well on okcupid.

[quote]gregron wrote:
Pretty sure that 18 year old virgin girl was a 300lb sweaty white dude.[/quote]

As long as he is sending pics of spankable ass, Otis is cool in my book.

[quote]orion wrote:
As for women with more class, first, you dont know that until you really know her which takes time. A lot of it, actually. [/quote]

Agreed.

But you can tell if she doesn’t have much class pretty quickly.

It should be pretty easy to tell what kind of “issues” a girl has, and how deep they run, at least with as much experience as you’ve had. I think everyone has issues of some sort or another, it’s more a matter of which issues, to what degree, and how they manifest. And, really, whether she has a handle on it or not.

Most of the time I can identify the issues in the first couple conversations. It takes much longer to determine the rest.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Some of our ruptures have been about his insecurities, but I can’t speak to those except from my own perspective. They could certainly be called shittests, though, and we’ve run essentially the same playbook, except with me pulling back and waiting, then ultimately addressing the underlying concern.
[/quote]

Men dont shittest, men are either neurotic or insecure.

No worries, we all are to some degree.

The reason why its not a shittest is because he has neither the instinctive need to throw them out there, he has no strong emotional reaction to it and you can actually win by playing the game.

A shittest is a shitty test because all possible answers are wrong.

Having said that, you might want to lead him there for he is right, you do have more options than you realize and you are a the grass is greener person you cannot not be if you are halfway female.

http://marriedmansexlife.com/take-the-red-pill/[/quote]

I don’t even know where to start. First of all, there WAS a right answer to my this week’s shittest, if we’re calling it a shittest. He and I both won that test, because we came out more certain of where we stand and where we want to stand. Each time we get closer, sex and sleeping together (intimacy) gets that much sweeter, so there was that as well. It all feels like this incredible shared victory, which seems to heighten everything. So out watching a band with friends was better, leaving early to be alone was better, and the night together was better. Sunday’s breakfast out was pretty good, too! It’s a really good pill. You should try it.

Your contention that men don’t shittest but women do, because there’s no emotional reaction for men, is ridiculous. Men are every bit as insecure and reactive as women and just as given to pushing limits. Look at yourself for a fine example.

Lastly, I work hard NOT to make him feel threatened by other men. I’m not a flirt and I’m not interested in extracurricular ego-boosts, because my ego is already pretty fluffy. I’m good at my job, people usually like me, I’m fit and healthy without being obsessive, and I’m satisfied with my looks. The only real insecurity I ever feel has to do with worrying that maybe I like this guy too much, more than he likes (loves) me. Other than that, I’m pretty secure. As far as the grass on the other side goes, I like his mind, I like his moral code, I like his sense of fun, I like that he has close long term friends and they seem to be very good people. I especially like what he does to my body. And maybe most of all, I like what I can do to HIS body and heart and mind. All of that being the case, he has the power to make my ego purr, and if the grass is plenty green right here why would I care what’s over the fence?

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Some of our ruptures have been about his insecurities, but I can’t speak to those except from my own perspective. They could certainly be called shittests, though, and we’ve run essentially the same playbook, except with me pulling back and waiting, then ultimately addressing the underlying concern.
[/quote]

Men dont shittest, men are either neurotic or insecure.

No worries, we all are to some degree.

The reason why its not a shittest is because he has neither the instinctive need to throw them out there, he has no strong emotional reaction to it and you can actually win by playing the game.

A shittest is a shitty test because all possible answers are wrong.

Having said that, you might want to lead him there for he is right, you do have more options than you realize and you are a the grass is greener person you cannot not be if you are halfway female.

http://marriedmansexlife.com/take-the-red-pill/[/quote]

I don’t even know where to start. First of all, there WAS a right answer to my this week’s shittest, if we’re calling it a shittest. He and I both won that test, because we came out more certain of where we stand and where we want to stand. Each time we get closer, sex and sleeping together (intimacy) gets that much sweeter, so there was that as well. It all feels like this incredible shared victory, which seems to heighten everything. So out watching a band with friends was better, leaving early to be alone was better, and the night together was better. Sunday’s breakfast out was pretty good, too! It’s a really good pill. You should try it.

Your contention that men don’t shittest but women do, because there’s no emotional reaction for men, is ridiculous. Men are every bit as insecure and reactive as women and just as given to pushing limits. Look at yourself for a fine example.

Lastly, I work hard NOT to make him feel threatened by other men. I’m not a flirt and I’m not interested in extracurricular ego-boosts, because my ego is already pretty fluffy. I’m good at my job, people usually like me, I’m fit and healthy without being obsessive, and I’m satisfied with my looks. The only real insecurity I ever feel has to do with worrying that maybe I like this guy too much, more than he likes (loves) me. Other than that, I’m pretty secure. As far as the grass on the other side goes, I like his mind, I like his moral code, I like his sense of fun, I like that he has close long term friends and they seem to be very good people. I especially like what he does to my body. All of that being the case, he has the power to make my ego purr, and if the grass is plenty green right here why would I care what’s over the fence? [/quote]

But you said that it certainly does not feel that way on the inside.

If your hypergamous urges are no longer satisfied your feelings will simply… change.

And if you are what you claim to be and I have no reason to doubt it, you can indeed jump ship in a heartbeat.

And again, men dont shittest.

At least not women.

It would be utterly pointless, since we dont want her to be the dominant one in a relationship and we do not even have the equipment to pick up the results a shittest would provide.

The reason why you cannot win a shittest is that you would accept her frame, whichever answer you choose.

To “win” you have to reject her frame.

However, not every rejection of a frame is a won shittest, you can do that do a man and it will most certainly not do much for him on a sexual level.

The way a succesful trial through shittest looks like is this:

She presents her frame, you look at it quizzically and then throw it out of the window.

Then she gets all butthurt and a few days later it is like nothing has ever happened and she jumps you like a starving beast.

Show me how you do that to a man and I believe you that there are make shittests.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

I don’t even know where to start. [/quote]

Geez Emily, Give poor O a break! All that talk about liking yourself, confidence, and growing in a relationship probably hurts him at least as much as guys who don’t give a crap about his jihad.