Still think his comments on the judge don’t hurt him?
I’m with Paul Ryan who said it was “the textbook definition of a racist comment”. I know his true believer fans don’t care but he needs to win others over.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/07/politics/donald-trump-hill-republicans/index.html
Regardless a life is a life and snuffing one out because the parents are not well educated or out of convenience seems wrong to me. Life is precious.
Not to turn this into an abortion debate.
So I’m done.
Die hard you are not…
You may very well be a pragmatic libertarian or even a Libertarian, but die hard, no. (This is not a put down in any way, but a statement of fact.)
A die hard wouldn’t accept either option as both will use government force to impose their will, without question, in fact promise it.
Yeah, every time Trump opens his stupid mouth without a script in front of him he is going to be error prone. He’s like that crazy uncle who makes sense some of the time but is basically a big mouth blow hard.
…and he’s still better than Clinton corruption machine.
And if anyone wonders why we have such two lousy candidates one only need look at the current US population.
We get what we deserve!
God you’re so completely deluded by your own magnanimous unfettered world view, you literally can’t fathom a situation that doesn’t fit into your neat little box can you?[quote=“Aero51, post:190, topic:217849”]
A finite amount of profits some in, the upper level people take their slice, money is allocated to run the business, and the rest is distributed to the workers.
[/quote]
There is only about 386 other things involved here too, but no worries, you’ve got this man.
Explain how this is possible, please. How can people be making the same, inflation going up, yet profits are going up too?
Please break down this impossible math, because yes, it is impossible.
Fair enough… fair enough. They both scare me to the point that I’d vote for Sanders (who I completely disagree with) over my convictions (read: Johnson)… because I am such a jaded pragmatist. In that respect, I’m part of the problem.
Well played sir. nods
Are you sure you work in finance? Did you study at McDonalds University?
Now, I bet you wont read this either, but youll still tell me what Im saying doesn’t make sense.
That is not going to help.
Dan Joseph on income inequality and your fixed pie fallacy.
Cant see videos at work 
Fucking place blocks them like the are in kindergarten
You literally have no idea what I do, stop assuming. Second, you didn’t answer my question and neither did your link.
So again:
Please explain the impossible math of
You’ll find the answer blows your entire talking point bundle the fuck out, so you’ll continue to ignore it and just further feed your envy of other people. But… Who knows, you might actually try and answer the question.
This single statement explains absolutely everything about your outlook.
I am an employer, and, having read this, I would never hire you in a million years.
You are a part of the very problem you rail against. Congratulations.
I wonder if CEOs are using work time to proselytize for the left and try and watch videos on paid company time.
You are stealing from your employer.
You are a thief.
And no, you aren’t on break.
Why I love salary and billable time. I don’t bill my fuck around time, lol. Easy peasy.
You are dense. That article explained everything about wage stagnation you need. I knew you’d have some canned response. If you cant understand it then maybe you cant read either. I don’t know what you expect.
When people tell me they are 100% productive at work, work 60hrs/week, never screw aound, etc. They tend to be liars. I don’t know a single person, not even the best, who is the perfect employee.
Actually, I don’t even want to talk to you anymore. Im coming to understand nothing I say you will take as an acceptable answer.
Sure. I haven’t even begun to dig into the information presented in that “article”. But You have now twice ignored my question by ignoring the other 2 factors.
For the sake of seeing if you can do anything other than personally attack me, let’s assume “wage stagnation” is 100% as you see it. Now answer my question.
I never said that.
Translation: “I can’t answer your question.”
Just incase anyone was unclear of the question
I posted something similar above. This guy is exactly the kind of employee I try and avoid hiring…hand out, palm up.
Telling this to the guy who is a partner in a fucking CPA firm…trolololololol.
No, you are just lazy. If you read it, it answers everything you need. Wage stagnation is explained pretty thoroughly in that article. It describes these trends over a period since about 1970. I answered your question in full, you don’t like the answer and don’t want to admit it. There is absolutely nothing impossible about wage stagnation and the other points you made, as was shown in the article you did not read. Now, I can give you a short answer, but you’ll just tell me it is wrong. You wont explain why it is wrong, but you will tell me it is wrong. Im done with this. You can take it as a “victory”, if you want, but you and I both know that isn’t the case.
I wouldn’t trust him to buy Tupperware for me, let alone manage my finances.