wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart
[quote]jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart[/quote]
Jasmincar, please go kill yourself. You give Canadians a bad name.
[quote]B.L.U. Ninja wrote:
Fuck that shit. Mofos over there who post comments are just plain childish and fuckin ignorant.
“That’s what you get for fucking with the west” WTF? You kidding me? Now that crazy little midget up in North Korea is gonna fucking blow us all up cuz of this shit.[/quote]
must people don’t understand what nuclear war really is. Mankind will learn only after the fact
nuclear weapons at the time where deployed, to bring a fanatical enemy to their knees, they gave us no other option
[quote]jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart[/quote]
You can blame the Japanese government for Hiroshima…
[quote]jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart[/quote]
feelings mutual leftist tool!!!
[quote]jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart[/quote]
Japan started the war. Therefore japan is responsible for any and all deaths resulting from that war. As to “civilian” - what does that mean? The Japanese culture of the day was a warrior culture. Where do you think soldiers come from? Civilians. Where does the food, clothing, weapons and other implements of war come from? Civilians.
That’s right - civilians are an important part of any war making machine so to say it is unethical to target them is both illogical and foolish. The war would have never ended had we only targeted military targets; especially against a warrior culture like the Japanese.
Plus - had we not used the bomb more people would have died on BOTH sides than died in the bomb in the invasion of mainland Japan. In addition to that, atomic bombs are no more gruesome in their affects to the human body than any other type of bomb; do think the casualties from the Tokyo firebombing fared any better than those in Nagasaki and Hiroshima…get educated you fool.
It was pretty jacked up to target the civilians with the a-bomb, then we dropped two! Couldn’t we just have dropped one on a non heavily populated mil base? That would have showed our capability without killing 100K+ civilians.
[quote]adamhum wrote:
It was pretty jacked up to target the civilians with the a-bomb, then we dropped two! Couldn’t we just have dropped one on a non heavily populated mil base? That would have showed our capability without killing 100K+ civilians.[/quote]
They did not surrender, so why not?
[quote]mmllcc wrote:
jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart
Japan started the war. Therefore japan is responsible for any and all deaths resulting from that war. As to “civilian” - what does that mean? The Japanese culture of the day was a warrior culture. Where do you think soldiers come from? Civilians. Where does the food, clothing, weapons and other implements of war come from? Civilians. That’s right - civilians are an important part of any war making machine so to say it is unethical to target them is both illogical and foolish. The war would have never ended had we only targeted military targets; especially against a warrior culture like the Japanese.
Plus - had we not used the bomb more people would have died on BOTH sides than died in the bomb in the invasion of mainland Japan. In addition to that, atomic bombs are no more gruesome in their affects to the human body than any other type of bomb; do think the casualties from the Tokyo firebombing fared any better than those in Nagasaki and Hiroshima…get educated you fool.[/quote]
Yep, exactly.
[quote]jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart[/quote]
You’re a pussy. Must be the French that got into you. II hate pussies with all my heart especially French pussies. Again , lives of my coutnrymen >>>>>>> than any amount of lives of the enemy who started a war.
[quote]G87 wrote:
PimpBot5000 wrote:
Its hard to tell. It seems to be from a human interest TV show. The captions don’t really say anything useful, just stuff like “I’m fortunate to have relatives in my hometown” and that sort of thing.
The Hiroshima bomb museum has a bunch of photos and sculptures of victims, and he does look pretty much in check with some of them. However, most Hiroshima victims who were THAT badly disfigured later succumbed to cancer.
Poor guy though…damn.
I cried a little when I was in the Hiroshima museum. Call me a pussy or whatever else you want to call me, but the human capacity to hurt each other makes me sick to my stomach.[/quote]
They have a section on the Japanese atrocities? Or the Pearl Harbor bombings? I seriously doubt it. Again, they started this and we finished it. If that’s to much USA, USA, whatever.
They could have not bombed Pearl Harbor. They could have surrendered.
Some of you guys really need to brush up on your history…
The Japanese tried to surrender for months, but on condition that the Emperor stay in power, The USA weren’t down with that. The fucked up thing is that after dropping the bombs, they decide he should stay in power anyway…
The bomb didn’t even have anything to do with defeating the Japs, they had already had their ass handed to them in China by the Russians. The USA just wanted to show the Russians how big their balls were so they knew not to fuck with them after the war, and also deter them from taking over a ravaged Europe.
Also, the Nagasaki bombing was one of history’s saddest ironies. Originally Kyoto had been earmarked for the bomb, but the head of allied bombing command had visited it and thought it should be preserved, so crossed it off the list and put Nagasaki on instead. Nagasaki had, for 400 years or so, been the only open port in Japan, so was home to the only Christian community in the country and mostly opposed to the war. On the day of the bombing, cloud cover obscured the original target and the plane turned back for home. It flew over Nagasaki, there was a gap in the clouds and they dropped the bomb, right on top of the biggest cathedral in Asia, completely wiping out the Christian part of the city.
damn I just registered for that site…now im fucked
[quote]jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart[/quote]
Can I be on that list without stating my feelings on Hiroshima?
I thought you weren’t gonna post here anymore…
When unconditional surrender is required, you gotta do what you gotta do. You should be glad we dropped the bomb, or else the great sport of baseball wouldn’t be so popular in Japan.
[quote]tom63 wrote:
mmllcc wrote:
jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart
Japan started the war. Therefore japan is responsible for any and all deaths resulting from that war. As to “civilian” - what does that mean? The Japanese culture of the day was a warrior culture. Where do you think soldiers come from? Civilians. Where does the food, clothing, weapons and other implements of war come from? Civilians. That’s right - civilians are an important part of any war making machine so to say it is unethical to target them is both illogical and foolish. The war would have never ended had we only targeted military targets; especially against a warrior culture like the Japanese.
Plus - had we not used the bomb more people would have died on BOTH sides than died in the bomb in the invasion of mainland Japan. In addition to that, atomic bombs are no more gruesome in their affects to the human body than any other type of bomb; do think the casualties from the Tokyo firebombing fared any better than those in Nagasaki and Hiroshima…get educated you fool.
Yep, exactly.[/quote]
So, if thats your way of justifying Hiroshima, then 9/11 is also justifiable since the US has been butting their noses into Middle Eastern affairs for ages.
[quote]Therizza wrote:
jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart
Jasmincar, please go kill yourself. You give Canadians a bad name.[/quote]
You, shut the fuck up.
I suggest you go read a real history book before you talk out of your ass.
I also have to say we warned them for weeks dropping letters out of plains to let the people know what was going to happen if they did not surrender.
My grandfather used to drive boats filled with infantry men and drop them off on islands in the pacific so they could fight the Japanese and he said there were many times where all the soldiers he dropped off never came back when it was time for him to pick them up. It wouldve been much worse for our soldiers if we took the approach of sending them into battle on japans mainland rather than dropping the bomb. We saved many thousands of American lives.
[quote]Comrade wrote:
Some of you guys really need to brush up on your history…
The Japanese tried to surrender for months, but on condition that the Emperor stay in power, The USA weren’t down with that. The fucked up thing is that after dropping the bombs, they decide he should stay in power anyway…
The bomb didn’t even have anything to do with defeating the Japs, they had already had their ass handed to them in China by the Russians. The USA just wanted to show the Russians how big their balls were so they knew not to fuck with them after the war, and also deter them from taking over a ravaged Europe.
Also, the Nagasaki bombing was one of history’s saddest ironies. Originally Kyoto had been earmarked for the bomb, but the head of allied bombing command had visited it and thought it should be preserved, so crossed it off the list and put Nagasaki on instead. Nagasaki had, for 400 years or so, been the only open port in Japan, so was home to the only Christian community in the country and mostly opposed to the war. On the day of the bombing, cloud cover obscured the original target and the plane turned back for home. It flew over Nagasaki, there was a gap in the clouds and they dropped the bomb, right on top of the biggest cathedral in Asia, completely wiping out the Christian part of the city.
[/quote]
but they surrendered. so who cares. and what does being christian have to do with anything? jesus aint gonna save you from nukes nugga.
[quote]mmllcc wrote:
jasmincar wrote:
wow at the comments…
If someone here thinks hiroshima is justified I hate you with all my heart
Japan started the war. Therefore japan is responsible for any and all deaths resulting from that war. As to “civilian” - what does that mean? The Japanese culture of the day was a warrior culture. Where do you think soldiers come from? Civilians. Where does the food, clothing, weapons and other implements of war come from? Civilians.
That’s right - civilians are an important part of any war making machine so to say it is unethical to target them is both illogical and foolish. The war would have never ended had we only targeted military targets; especially against a warrior culture like the Japanese.
Plus - had we not used the bomb more people would have died on BOTH sides than died in the bomb in the invasion of mainland Japan. In addition to that, atomic bombs are no more gruesome in their affects to the human body than any other type of bomb; do think the casualties from the Tokyo firebombing fared any better than those in Nagasaki and Hiroshima…get educated you fool.[/quote]
One of the most retarded posts ive read in a while.