You Guys Ready for Sarah Palin Yet?

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Haven’t you had enough of these Harvard lawyers (Obama, Romney), Yale business grads (Bush), and scummy Rhodes Scholars (Clinton)?

Can we PLEASE get a decent and moral person like Palin in there, clean it all out? Let’s set term limits for the rats and enact a balanced budget amendment; it would be like a good healthy dose of Ex-Lax for the country.

Palin can be the ‘rock’ upon which we can re-establish this great nation.[/quote]

http://www.politicususa.com/tea-party-darling-sarah-palin-disarmed-alaska-state-defense-force-militia.html
[/quote]

I don’t even understand the point of your article from ‘Politics USA: Real Liberal Politics - No Corporate Money - No Masters.’ Liberals like gun control. What’s their problem here? Well, they are trying to make Sarah Palin look like a hypocrite but they fail utterly. For one thing, everyone(including the NRA) knows that she has done more than anyone else in the state, and probably as much as anyone else in the country, to protect and preserve 2nd Amendment rights. All whilst facing fierce opposition from the Democrats of course.

So they look through their archives for a story back in 2008 about the Alaska State Defense Force. They pick their little cherry then try to weave some ridiculous narrative through it. It’s pure fantasy. Here’s some of the stuff that didn’t fit their thinly veiled agenda:

Tne commander(Brig. Gen. Thomas Westall) of the Alaska State Defense Force was under investigation into complaints about his conduct. An invetigation was launched and the recommendation was that they remove the brigade’s military policing powers. Westall had already stepped down from his position as commander.

“It’s just an opportunity for me to retire. Can’t I do that gracefully?” he said, laughing.

'Brig. Gen Thomas Westall’s departure from the defense force marks the third time he’s left a post amid complaints he abused the power of the position…

One of those people was air taxi operator Dave Glenn, ticketed by Westall for violating airport rules about dogs.

Things went downhill between the two after that, Glenn said.

“He showed up in a quasi-military civilian uniform with a flak vest and an automatic pistol hanging on his hip,” he said. "This made me highly nervous…

Glenn, who served with the 101st Airborne Division during the Vietnam War, decided to start carrying his gun…

Controversy also surrounded Westall in 1989, when he was a top enforcement official for the Federal Aviation Administration in Alaska who shut down eight air carriers in 18 months.

The commission never took official action, he said. He believes Westall stepped down after word got out about the commission wanting him to resign.

“I think the reorganization is going to be just great. I just think it’s time for me to move on” he said.

Source: http://www.adn.com/2008/10/28/570836/westall-has-been-accused-of-abuse.html#storylink=cpy

This article from the Anchorage Daily News was a big more flattering of Brig. Gen. Westall:

'The report critiqued the brigade’s lack of specific policies, especially regarding termination of soldiers, said Campbell, adjutant general for the Alaska National Guard.

It also found that administering a part-time civilian force brings a high liability risk to the state, he said.

[The state’s Military and Veterans Affairs Commissioner Craig Campbell:

“The report does not say Westall was a bad commander,” Campbell said. “The report says the state defense force, it’s a voluntary organization, it’s part time, it’s dedicated volunteers serving their state, but they don’t have the intensity of training, the skill sets the National Guard has.”

In a still-evolving mission shift, most force members will instead serve civil roles in support of the Alaska National Guard, Campbell said. The Guard is taking on MP duties under a new national mission, another major factor in the decision to disarm the brigade.


EDIT: If Palin had not taken the advice to partially disarm this brigade the same leftist media would’ve blasted her for keeping an inefficiently run armed militia with an unstable commander on the state payroll. They probably would’ve called it her own ‘private army’ and suggested she intended to use it to start an insurrection. Doesn’t matter what you do. The leftist media will invent their own narrative to suit their ideology.[/quote]

the point was she is not this beacon of so called (CONSERVATIVE) values

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

the point was she is not this beacon of so called (CONSERVATIVE) values
[/quote]

Any my point is that a leftist, liberal writer like that should think that’s a good thing. My point was also that they completely distorted events and created their own phoney narrative as I have demonstrably shown above.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

the point was she is not this beacon of so called (CONSERVATIVE) values
[/quote]

Any my point is that a leftist, liberal writer like that should think that’s a good thing. My point was also that they completely distorted events and created their own phoney narrative as I have demonstrably shown above.[/quote]

The problem with your form of calculation is there is both a so called liberal and a so called conservative , you can not write off 50% and not give it credence

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

the point was she is not this beacon of so called (CONSERVATIVE) values
[/quote]

Any my point is that a leftist, liberal writer like that should think that’s a good thing. My point was also that they completely distorted events and created their own phoney narrative as I have demonstrably shown above.[/quote]

The problem with your form of calculation is there is both a so called liberal and a so called conservative , you can not write off 50% and not give it credence [/quote]

Once again, I have no idea what you are talking about in relation to anything that has been posted. Writing off 50%? A so called liberal and so called conservative? I have absolutely no clue as to what you’re talking about.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

the point was she is not this beacon of so called (CONSERVATIVE) values
[/quote]

Any my point is that a leftist, liberal writer like that should think that’s a good thing. My point was also that they completely distorted events and created their own phoney narrative as I have demonstrably shown above.[/quote]

The problem with your form of calculation is there is both a so called liberal and a so called conservative , you can not write off 50% and not give it credence [/quote]

Once again, I have no idea what you are talking about in relation to anything that has been posted. Writing off 50%? A so called liberal and so called conservative? I have absolutely no clue as to what you’re talking about.[/quote]

Neither does he.

Pittifull, you so funny.

[quote]JEATON wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

the point was she is not this beacon of so called (CONSERVATIVE) values
[/quote]

Any my point is that a leftist, liberal writer like that should think that’s a good thing. My point was also that they completely distorted events and created their own phoney narrative as I have demonstrably shown above.[/quote]

The problem with your form of calculation is there is both a so called liberal and a so called conservative , you can not write off 50% and not give it credence [/quote]

Once again, I have no idea what you are talking about in relation to anything that has been posted. Writing off 50%? A so called liberal and so called conservative? I have absolutely no clue as to what you’re talking about.[/quote]

Neither does he.

Pittifull, you so funny. [/quote]

What’s up with you Jeaton , I did not crawl up your ass today :slight_smile:

Palin: “Weâ??re not going to be able to advance the cause of limited constitutional government unless we deal with these big government enablers on our side,” Palin forcefully said. “And this all ties into the problem of crony capitalism and the permanent political class in the Beltway. We need to consistently take them on election after election â?? ever vigilant.”

She is the heart and soul of a great nation! Let us hope that she is not too late.