How the fuck does anyone even consider this a CHOICE?
Barbara Bush said Sarah should stay in Alaska. If that wicked old Republican kunt hates Palin, that should be good enough for anyone.
Hillary…probably one of the most evil women to ever trod the planet…seriously? The only thing worse than an old Republican kunt is a wicked old fucking Democratic kunt.
What the hell happened to her ass?
If I were looking to get laid I would take Sara , If I were looking for a female President I would take Hillary
Sarah Palin is a fucking idiot. So is Hillary.
End of discussion for me. Comparing the two is like asking if I’d rather be stung in the dick by a scorpion or by a hornet. How about neither one?
I’d like to see Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann on the same ticket running for slut of the year straight toward my front door.
[quote]H factor wrote:
Sarah Palin is a fucking idiot. So is Hillary.
End of discussion for me. Comparing the two is like asking if I’d rather be stung in the dick by a scorpion or by a hornet. How about neither one?[/quote]
Sarah ran Alaska, ran her hometown, ran a commission, crossed the aisle to root out corruption in Alaskan politics. What did Hillary ever do? Let’s see…carpet bagged her way into the Senate from NY, and then was given a bone from Obama.
Name one accomplishment while doing any of that.
I never understood why Hillary didn’t tell Bill to fuck off when he got caught getting Lewinskied in the Oval Office.
I mean, I understand the whole “he is the president” and all that bullshit, but would America really ding Hillary for leaving him ?
It’s not like she didn’t have good reason to.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I never understood why Hillary didn’t tell Bill to fuck off when he got caught getting Lewinskied in the Oval Office.
I mean, I understand the whole “he is the president” and all that bullshit, but would America really ding Hillary for leaving him ?
It’s not like she didn’t have good reason to.[/quote]
She wanted to save her marriage, obviously.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I never understood why Hillary didn’t tell Bill to fuck off when he got caught getting Lewinskied in the Oval Office.
I mean, I understand the whole “he is the president” and all that bullshit, but would America really ding Hillary for leaving him ?
It’s not like she didn’t have good reason to.[/quote]
She wanted to save her marriage, obviously.
[/quote]
AHAHAAHAAA!!!
I’d bet she’s just more discrete.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I never understood why Hillary didn’t tell Bill to fuck off when he got caught getting Lewinskied in the Oval Office.
I mean, I understand the whole “he is the president” and all that bullshit, but would America really ding Hillary for leaving him ?
It’s not like she didn’t have good reason to.[/quote]
She wanted to save her marriage, obviously.
[/quote]
He didn’t.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
Sarah Palin is a fucking idiot. So is Hillary.
End of discussion for me. Comparing the two is like asking if I’d rather be stung in the dick by a scorpion or by a hornet. How about neither one?[/quote]
Sarah ran Alaska, ran her hometown, ran a commission, crossed the aisle to root out corruption in Alaskan politics. What did Hillary ever do? Let’s see…carpet bagged her way into the Senate from NY, and then was given a bone from Obama.
Name one accomplishment while doing any of that.
[/quote]
You’ve always thought Sarah would be good. I’m not going to be able to convince you otherwise. I’m also not going to defend Hillary to try and prove Palin is a nutjob.
Fortunately, America is not dumb enough to elect Palin who has absolutely no chance of being President ever.
Sadly, Americans may elect Hillary.
[quote]H factor wrote:
How about neither one?[/quote]
This. There are much better candidates out there for all the parties.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
How about neither one?[/quote]
This. There are much better candidates out there for all the parties.[/quote]
Maybe better for the parties but that’s not the same as better for the people.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
How about neither one?[/quote]
This. There are much better candidates out there for all the parties.[/quote]
Maybe better for the parties but that’s not the same as better for the people. [/quote]
Agreed, but that is what I was trying to say really.
I guess I should have typed:
This. There are much better candidates out there.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
How about neither one?[/quote]
This. There are much better candidates out there for all the parties.[/quote]
Maybe better for the parties but that’s not the same as better for the people. [/quote]
You really want Hillary for President? For real?
And I do NOT want Palin FTR.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
How about neither one?[/quote]
This. There are much better candidates out there for all the parties.[/quote]
Maybe better for the parties but that’s not the same as better for the people. [/quote]
You really want Hillary for President? For real?
And I do NOT want Palin FTR.[/quote]
But then this would never come true! lol
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
How about neither one?[/quote]
This. There are much better candidates out there for all the parties.[/quote]
Maybe better for the parties but that’s not the same as better for the people. [/quote]
You really want Hillary for President? For real?
And I do NOT want Palin FTR.[/quote]
Yes. That’s why I wrote that I want her for president…oh wait…I didn’t write that. I would choose Clinton over Palin if that’s what it came down to. I don’t like her but I would pick the smart scumbag over the dumb scumbag.
As long as the parties choose who will run (the Republican party tried to ignore Ron Paul’s existence) these will be the types of choices we have to make. I really think both parties would rather lose with the candidate they want vs winning with one they don’t. They are already preparing to shoot down Christie if he decides to run.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Yes. That’s why I wrote that I want her for president…oh wait…I didn’t write that. I would choose Clinton over Palin if that’s what it came down to. I don’t like her but I would pick the smart scumbag over the dumb scumbag.
As long as the parties choose who will run (the Republican party tried to ignore Ron Paul’s existence) these will be the types of choices we have to make. I really think both parties would rather lose with the candidate they want vs winning with one they don’t. They are already preparing to shoot down Christie if he decides to run. [/quote]
I agree with all of this and I would never vote for Hillary. Sarah Palin is the political equivalent of asking a bad 7th grade basketball player to start for the high school varsity team.
When you get tripped up on “what do you read” you’re holy cow dumb as shit. That isn’t gotcha journalism if you actually read things. If that’s the “liberal media” out to get someone then we may as well stop asking questions in general.
Tripped her up with that old fastball what do you read? That’s only a difficult question if you don’t or can’t read.
Ah, but she “ran Alaska” says HH. Yeah, until she quit on them.
A cunning evil person is far worse than an incompetent person be they evil or good.
But most people confuse communication skills with intelligence.
[quote]H factor wrote:
Ah, but she “ran Alaska” says HH. Yeah, until she quit on them. [/quote]
Not an entirely fair statement as it stands. She, in a lot of respects, made the right choice in stepping down. Not just for herself, but for the state.
Christie would never step down, Bush would never step down, Bam would never step down, Biden would get hammered and fall off, but wouldn’t step down…
I almost, almost, give her credit for checking her ego and doing what she thought was right even though it would destroy her political ambition.